from the Express
Climate change PROVED to be ‘nothing but a lie’, claims top meteorologist
THE debate about climate change is finished – because it has been categorically proved NOT to exist, one of the world’s leading meteorologists has claimed.
“The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number.
“Heat waves have actually diminished, not increased. There is not an uptick in the number or strength of storms (in fact storms are diminishing).
“I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid.”
I have studied climate change seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid
“There has been no warming over 18 years.”
President Obama told 120 world leaders at the United Nations climate summit last month that America had done more under his watch in cutting greenhouse gases than any other country.
Despite this, the Energy Information Administration’s Monthly Energy Review showed an increase in the use of energy from coal.
World leaders have pledged to keep the global average temperature from rising two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels to prevent the worst consequences of climate change.
The US, along with the UK and other developed countries, is expected to pledge further actions on climate change early next year.
In 2010 a high-level inquiry by the InterAcademy Council found there was “little evidence” to support the IPCC’s claims about global warming.
It also said the panel had purposely emphasised the negative impacts of climate change and made “substantive findings” based on little proof.
You’ve probably seen the news of multiple shootings in Ottawa. As always, nothing is definite, all is confusion, but Sky News has just reported that one soldier who was shot at the National War Memorial has died. This video was taken inside the parliament, where someone felt the need to let the full magazine go –
Somehow this one evaded newsrooms in London and Washington. Der Spiegel reports:
Germany’s foreign intelligence agency (BND) says its review of the crash of a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 in Ukrainian has concluded it was brought down by a missile fired by pro-Russian separatists near Donetsk [...]
The BND has intelligence indicating that pro-Russian separatists captured a BUK air defense missile system at a Ukrainian military base and fired a missile on July 17 that exploded in direct proximity to the Malaysian aircraft, which had been carrying 298 people.
No doubt it was an exhaustive investigation, but it could have been avoided by a reading of some lunatic on ATW who said the same thing months ago. But what interesting conclusions if true.
The sanctions against Russia were built on “Putin’s missile” bringing down MH17. The Western press demonised Putin and Russia, describing him as a butcher and murderer, for weeks. London and Washington “knew” immediately that Moscow supplied the missile, even while their intelligence agencies steered well away from saying so and the web was clearly showing captured BUK missile batteries in the hands of anti-Kiev forces. And now the Germans are saying it was all a pack of lies. It was yet another fairy tale, in effect, to dupe the masses into booing another concocted, imaginary enemy.
The lesson is always the same but always ignored – whenever the press and politicians order you to hate someone or something, assume that they’re lying to you.
I see that Gough Whitlam, Prime Minister of Australia from 1972 – 75, died earlier this week. He was famously sacked by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr. The official reason was that the House of Representatives in Canberra, which Whitlam’s Labour Party did not control, refused to pass a budget. But like much official history this is probably poppycock.
Whitlam was deposed 24 hours before he was due to reveal in Parliament the existence of an extensive CIA network in Australia, ranging from a powerful listening station to a list of agents right through government. Sir John Kerr was a CIA man and he made sure that Whitlam was ousted. It ain’t just Slavs, Arabs and Central American peasants who will have their leaders chosen for them.
Now don’t get me wrong. Whitlam was a man of the Left. His one good act was to remove Australian troops from Vietnam, but this was more than outweighed by his many other follies, the worst of which being final burial of the White Australia policy. So on balance it was a Good Thing to get rid, but it’s always necessary to get the record straight.
It is a strange but telling tale, and although many of my readers may subscribe deeper motives for my highlighting it, it is pefectly relevant to Britain today.
You live in Rotherham, you want to call a reliable taxi company to order a taxi to take you, well, anywhere; and if you are especially nervous, or wish to avoid any possibility of associating with characters of, shall we say a less than preposessing character; you always demand a ‘local’ driver.
When asked for comment, a council official stated, probably through clenched teeth from sheer frustration, ” However, this appears to be a decision made by the company and there is currently nothing in the conditions of their license which state that they cannot operate such a policy, just as some firms choose to offer customers only female drivers.”
The reason for my posting is, quite simply this: this is where we are today; mainly because of the Social Engineering policies of the bloody Labour Government through the Blair years; and why a national newspaper runs a story where people ask to be provided with White drivers because they are deemed more trustworthy than their Pakistani Muslim colleagues.
I do so wonder why!
New Jersey’s Lard Ass Governor is going to run for President…. This poster child of Walking Pustulence truly is the perfect example of everything that is wrong in the Republican party. If he actually believes anyone outside the Hellhole of NJ is going to do anything other laugh and be repulsed by him, he is in for a fun rude awakening.
October 21, 2014 New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie launched a preemptive strike Tuesday against some potential Republican rivals for the White House, saying the “experiment” of promoting a lawmaker to president has failed—and arguing that Republicans must nominate a governor in 2016. as long as it’s not him
Christie, chairman of the Republican Governors Association, began his speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce a group that should be driven from existence in Washington by lauding his counterparts across the country. Then he turned on a dime, pivoting in apparently premeditated fashion from 2014 to 2016. He urged attendees to support GOP governors this fall—not only to help them win reelection, he said, but to build a roster of credible presidential contenders. which the fat man is not one of
“To have any chance of electing a Republican president, there’s a bunch of things we need to do. But the first is to have a good bench of Republican candidates,” Christie said. “And I am convinced that the next president of the United States is going to be a governor—and needs to be.” Governors usually handle the job well, but the first thing is not what you sugest, the first thing is to run fools like you right off the stage
Christie continued: “We have had an experiment of a legislator who has never run anything getting on-the-job training in the White House. It has not been pretty. And so we need to have a big and broad bench of good, experienced Republican governors to select from in 2016.” there are 3, and you aren’t on the list Chris
The remarks may well represent Christie’s most forceful intra-party offensive to date, a preemptive and unprompted attack against unnamed “legislators”—including Sens. Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz—who almost certainly will be competing with him in 2016. all of which he is not worthy of riding in the same parade with, even nutcase jr
WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department has tapped former Democratic presidential candidate Gary Hart to be its newest envoy to Northern Ireland.
STUDENTS: TRANSGENDER MAN/WOMAN CAN’T BE DIVERSITY OFFICER, BECAUSE HE/SHE’S A MAN NOW, OR SOMETHINGBy Pete Moore On October 21st, 2014 at 2:05 pm
You can be anything you want to be in America, except a class diversity officer if you claim to be male, even if you’re female. Confused? I had to read this twice before the penny dropped, but then I’m not insane.
A student who was born female felt perfectly comfortable identifying as a man at Wellesley College — until people said he shouldn’t be class diversity officer because he is now a white male.
Timothy Boatwright was born a girl, and checked off the “female” box when applying to the Massachusetts all-women’s school, according to an article in the New York Times. But when he got there, he introduced himself as a “masculine-of-center genderqueer” person named “Timothy” (the name he picked for himself) and asked them to use male pronouns when referring to him.
And, by all accounts, Boatwright felt welcome on campus — until the day he announced that he wanted to run for the school’s office of multicultural affairs coordinator, whose job is to promote a “culture of diversity” on campus.
But some students thought that allowing Boatwright to have the position would just perpetuate patriarchy. They were so opposed, in fact, that when the other three candidates (all women of color) dropped out, they started an anonymous Facebook campaign encouraging people not to vote at all to keep him from winning the position.
“I thought he’d do a perfectly fine job, but it just felt inappropriate to have a white man there,” the student behind the so-called “Campaign to Abstain” said.
“It’s not just about that position either,” the student added. “Having men in elected leadership positions undermines the idea of this being a place where women are the leaders.”
Boatwright told the Times that his high-school friends knew he was transgender, but he identified himself as female on the application to Wellesley because he didn’t want his mom to know. Of course, Wellesley is also a female school, and “it seemed awkward to write an application essay for a women’s college on why you were not a woman,” he said.
I see that Wellesley College is ranked one of America’s better colleges, which is quite remarkable as it’s clearly full of mental women. Maybe this is how Western Civilisation will die: not with a bang but a row about the diversity status of “masculine-of-center genderqueer” types. Nope, I’ve no idea what that means either.
And thinking about it, maybe Western Civilisation deserves to die if it incubates off the scale nuttyness like this.
The World Series begins tonight in Kansas City, Missouri.
That wasn’t supposed to happen. The NY Yankees, Boston Red Sox and California Angels have all the money. But the Yankees have spent their money unwisely, and the other two fat cat teams fell short. The Kansas City Royals, the team that has not been in the playoffs for 29 years, the team with the 19th highest payroll in MLB, is in the Series, while the fat cats sit home and watch it on TV.
Their opponent is the National League’s San Francisco Giants, one of baseball’s old teams. The Giants were based in New York until the end of the 1957 season, when, along with the Brooklyn Dodgers, they moved to the sunny shores of California. Most New Yorkers renounced their old teams when they moved, but not all. I’ve met old timers who never stopped rooting for the Dodgers. A friend at work is a SF Giants fan, because his dad was a NY Giants fan. Sports is not logical.
So before they throw out the first ball at the House that Balboni Built, all here must pick a side. I, along with the blessed Korean superfan Lee SungWoo as talisman will go with the Royals.
But who are you rooting for?