Unbelievable. The Peace bus is coming to a town near you real soon, spreading the word that, yes, Islam IS Peace! Might be a better idea to round up as many Imams as possible and direct that bus towards Pakistan.
Two men in Bristol have been arrested under the Terrorism Act 2006, after the discovery of a suspicious substance in a flat. Officers from Avon and Somerset Police arrested the two men, one of Afghan origin, on Wednesday evening after searching premises in the Easton area of Bristol. Police said that during the search a substance was found that led them to believe there may be a potential link to terrorist activity.
Familiar story so far, right? But guess what? Abdul Malik, Liberal Democrat councillor for Easton, said the news of the arrests had been a shock to the Muslim community in the city. He said:
“At the moment it is very new to us. We were only told about the arrests yesterday. We are not sure if it is associated with any event nationally or internationally.”
He’s shocked to discover that some of his co-religionists may have been involved in potentially plots to kill us? Really? Are you?
What an absolutely superb article. I fully expect Kevin Myers to be the brunt of an onslaught from the PC legions that seem to be as common in the Irish Republic as they are in other European countries. Not for Myers any skirting around the issue; not for him any diplomacy rooted in the quagmire of not wanting to give offence to those immigrants who, by their very presence and way of life, are an offence in themselves. He gives it straight from the fifth floor: Muslims are a menace to Western societies and way of life and why the hell should the Irish welcome them with open arms in the same blind and cavalier fashion that they have been allowed to swarm into other European societies.
‘….we now know the consequences for every single European society which has admitted large numbers of Muslims: social alienation, religious antagonism and outright terrorism.’
Spot on! No ‘ifs’, no ‘buts’, it’s absolutely 150,000% accurate. None of the usual cobblers about ethnic diversity, cultural enrichment, culinary delights, economic health, law-abiding communities who are proud to be part of the national identity of their host nation. It’s all complete and unadulterated rubbish! Muslims cause trouble wherever they live in large numbers. Good heavens, they can’t even get on with each other when left to their own devices – as the turmoil in the Gaza Strip has proved over the last couple of years.
However much I detest the role of the Republic in Ulster’s affairs; however much I lay a lot of the blame for the Troubles at their doorstep, I wouldn’t want to see Ireland go the way of ourselves and many countries on the Continent: a society so guilt-ridden over its Christian identity that it subsumes its values to accommodate a tsunami of Muslim aliens. When you look at what the ‘wonderful Muslims’ have done to Britain, you wouldn’t wish the same on your worst enemy:
‘Islamic norms are now tolerated, and informally enforced, across many British cities, where women routinely wear full face-veils. Of Britain’s two million Muslims, over 300,000 believe suicide attacks in the West are justified, and 500,000 believe the 7/7 attacks in London two years ago were the work of British intelligence.
Some 600,000 do not even regard themselves as British, 37pc want sharia law in Britain, and one-quarter want to live in all-Muslim areas. Meanwhile, MI5 is close to being overwhelmed by the sheer scale of the domestic terrorist insurgency: 100 Islamicist suspects are already awaiting trial, and there are some 200 terrorist networks, with 1,700 members, now operating around the country.’
Myers is right to mention the sheer brainless idiocy of those who clamour to the defence of multi-culturalism – especially when that phenomenon is driven primarily by a blatant refusal of Muslims to integrate into Western societies. They have not been a benefit to Britain, they have been a downright bloody hindrance in a multitude of ways. If saying that makes me ‘Islamophobic’ I’ll proudly take the prize.
‘What rational justification is there for enlarging our Islamic population? What is it? Go on, what is it?’
No justification whatsoever!
I was reading this interesting report on the massive demographic changes taking place in Sweden, home of Abba, but increasingly another staging post for Allah. Get this….
Once a thriving industrial town with full employment, Malmoe has seen many of its plants shut down since the 1990s. That, combined with a never-ending stream of foreigners arriving, has led to rising crime and rampant unemployment. Of the town’s 280,000 inhabitants, a third are foreigners and 60,000 are Muslims.
It gets worse…
On a recent visit, veiled women walk behind the men, casting quick glances at their husbands before refusing to speak to AFP’s reporter. At the local mall, more Arabic is heard than Swedish and 28 of the 30 shopkeepers are immigrants. The neighbourhood is clean, with plenty of greenery providing a nice backdrop for the modern brick buildings. But sprouting from every balcony or rooftop is a Satellite dish broadcasting programs for faraway countries.
Sweden is really little different from elsewhere in Euroland. There is unprecedented levels of Muslim immigration and a determination from many of the practitioner of the ROP to remain apart from the society which (foolishly) takes them in. One could Sweden is meeting another "Waterloo"…
Can’t say that I am surprised to read that only eight per cent of imams preaching in British mosques were born in the UK, BBC-commissioned research suggests. The research, for BBC News and the BBC Asian Network, also suggests that only 6% of imams in Britain speak English as a first language. And almost 45% of imams have been in the UK for less than five years, the report adds. This is a no-brainer. Time to deport 92% of all Imams, for starters, Then we need to seriously investigate the remaining 8%. We need to tackle Islam head-on, no more pussyfooting about will do in these serious times.
A few days ago some geezers of Middle Eastern appearance drove a Cherokee jeep into one of the terminals at Glasgow Airport, which subsequently caught fire. In the ensuing fracas one of the scumbags managed to be subdued as he lay on the ground in flames. Unfortunately the police were silly enough to extinguish the man and arrest him instead of allowing him to be cremated at the spot, with a touch of accelerant added for good measure. As the scumbag tried to attack the police officer he shouted ‘Allah, Allah!’. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Allah the god worshipped by Muslims? Isn’t shouting ‘Allah’ in that dreadful Middle Eastern twang mildly indicative of the fact that the terror plot was carried out by Islamists in the name of Islam?
However, in the Pollyanna world of EU bureaucracy, linking terrorism with Islam is about as acceptable as eating a bacon sandwich in the grounds of Regents Park mosque. According to the Daily Express, guidelines have been drawn up warning (‘warning’!!) governments not to link Islam and terrorism.
‘EU officials said the “common lexicon’’ aimed to stop the distortion of the Muslim faith and alienation of its followers in Europe. European governments had previously agreed on the need to develop a “non-emotive lexicon’’ for use in discussion to avoid “exacerbating division’’.’
How would it be possible to exacerbate division when division is already so wide as to make the Grand Canyon look like a drainage ditch? There is no distortion of the Muslim faith. Virtually all of today’s terrorists are Muslims who commit terrorism in the name of the Muslim ‘religion’. You don’t get that menace with Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism or Sikhism. Just because our Jaw-dropping Jim and his politically correct Home Secretary don’t link the two in their public speeches and announcements, it doesn’t alter the truth. It’s about as ridiculous as IRA ministers at Stormont refusing to use the term ‘Northern Ireland’. It won’t change the reality.
Our United Kingdom has lost the second highest number of citizens to Islamic terrorism of any European member state. Like several other countries we have the cancer of radicalising Islam in our midst. Our weak government might want to go along with some EU directive rooted in cowardice; I assure you the British people do not and will not!
The words in the title, although not actually present, are believed by many to be taken from one of the most ancient oaths to have survived into modern times, that of the Hippocratic Oath. That just about all doctors take one form or another of this particular undertaking, pledging themselves to the ideals of the ‘Father of Modern Medicine’ is a judgement upon the thoughts and beliefs of centuries of codification, of a dedication to the healing and betterment of the human condition, and of a hope that the newly-empowered doctor will “help, or at least to do no harm."
When I was a youngster, doctors were treated with a certain awe, not the least because they were usually better-off than many others; and this happens because Society placed a greater value on a doctor’s knowledge and practice than say, a postman or a builder. This is not to say that the other two professions are less worthy, or even less respected, it is simply that for the average man or woman, to be able to go and place your absolute trust in another person’s hands and mind is where this extra worth or value comes from. Even in modern times, some people who work in various branches of medical knowledge can attain great wealth simply by plying their trade, because their skill and knowledge has given them this awesome ability to cure and to heal. I do not envy such men, because they carry a great responsibility, and the stress of always having to be ‘right’ all the time can be a great burden; but in the main most doctors, with a few very notable exceptions, have proved worthy of the trust placed in their collective hands.
So how can we view the news that the plotters, the fanatics, the hopeful suicide bombers of Glasgow airport and the night-clubbers of London’s Haymarket were all either doctors, trainee doctors or medical workers? Do the calls of this strangely vicious religion which they all seem to profess take precedence over their vows to heal the sick and care for the injured? Do the incessant words of their imams, usually but not always immigrants themselves, funded mainly from the strict Wahabbi sect of Saudi Arabia, diminish or blot out the words by which they learned their healing craft and techniques?
These people are not the ill-educated madrassa-raised suicidal cannon-fodder sent forward into the hell-holes of Baghdad; these are people with medical degrees and years of exposure to Western customs and traditions!
What manner of men are these, and how should we treat with them and their kind?
Why are the various Christian churches always at the forefront of politically correct cowardice? It was the same back in 1939 when we were faced with the provocation of Hitler’s forays into one European country after the next. Religious leaders were at the vanguard of appeals not to go to war against Germany. Just look at what would have happened had we heeded their advice!
Today, on a smaller scale crisis, they are at it again. A publication called Religious Intelligence (can’t see much evidence of it in this piece) quotes senior British church leaders calling for ‘support for the Muslim community in Britain in the wake of the renewed spate of terrorist attacks to hit the UK at the weekend.’ Pray tell, would this be the same Muslim community which harbours a substantial minority of people sympathetic to either the aims, the methods, or both, of Al Queda? The same Muslim community where 80% – according to a recent survey – put fealty to their so-called religion ahead of loyalty to the United Kingdom? The same Muslim community who Islamise and ghettoise every single British urban district they manage to demographically vanquish? The same Muslim community who always manage to find some pathetic excuse to ‘explain’ the actions of Islamic terrorists (thank you BBC for finally having the guts to use the term)? The same Muslim community who, almost uniquely amongst the immigrant communities which live here, shows not the slightest collective intention of ever integrating into our culture and accepting our traditions? The same Muslim community where increasing numbers of females are happy to don the abomination that is the niqab?
When the Pope made a trivial comment about Mohammed under the principle of free speech, which he was perfectly entitled to do, where were the messages of support for Christians from various Muslim bodies as the Islamic lunatics demanded he suffer reparations? Where were the cries of support for the Royal Family when sick Muslims called for our Queen to be killed following her knighting of Sir Salman Rushdie? Conspicuously absent, that’s where!!
Let me make one thing crystal clear to these supine clerics. I don’t want Muslims living in this country; I don’t like Muslims living in this country. However, as they are here, the onus is on them to reach out and integrate into this country of choice for them and their dependants, not on the British people to accommodate them and apply metaphorical soothing sticking plaster every time one of them decides to drive a Cherokee jeep into Glasgow Airport. When they finally learn to apply the same standards of commitment to British values and way of life that most other immigrant groups have done, we then might finally find something in common to actually talk about!
UK institutional submission to Islam draws closer with the news that a magistrate faces legal prosecution after he walked out in protest after a women appeared wearing a Niqab in his court. Magistrate Ian Murray pulled out of the hearing when Zoobia Hussain appeared in a niqab, which covers the head and the face apart from the eyes.
Hussain, 32, believed to be a mother of five, appeared for what was due to be a brief administrative hearing this week before bench chairman Mr Murray and two colleagues at Manchester Magistrates Court. She denies causing £5,000 worth of criminal damage including graffiti to a housing association property from which she had been evicted. Her solicitor, Judith Hawkins, said Hussain wanted to appear in the dock in the niqab because she “observed the Muslim religion and remains covered in public places when men are present”.
Mr Murray then stunned those in court by saying he was withdrawing from the case because she was wearing a niqab, adding: “I do not feel I have to give any reasons. This is my personal view.”
Hussain, from the Crumpsall district of Manchester, told her solicitor his walkout was “scandalous”. She added: “There is a human being under here.”
Yes, I don’t doubt that, and one that stands indicted of serious criminal charges and who must be made to show her face and be stripped off the sickening mask of Islam. This country is not Islamic and should not tolerate this contrived effort by Islamic activists to advance the acceptance of the ROP. The magistrate should not have walked out however, had it been me I would have had Hussein thrown out, fined and forced to return dressed in a manner more appropriate for a British as opposed to a Pakistani Court.