web analytics


By Pete Moore On May 9th, 2012 at 12:00 pm

The Establishment was in full retreat this morning after nine muslims were convicted on various charges of trafficking and raping underage English girls. All of a sudden, we flip from “It’s racist if the victim believes it to be racist”, to “Racism? What’s that?”  The despicable Keith Vaz was in the vanguard, taking every BBC platform provided. Typically of him, a choice had to be made and he sided with immigration against the English victims and British people, saying: “It’s totally wrong to say that it is, because you open up a Pandora’s box as far as race relations is concerned and I don’t think that’s necessarily what we want.” Vaz thinks that justice can be damned, the important thing is to shore up Left Wing social policy and gloss over the catastrophe of immigration.

The Guardian can do no better than a mealy-mouthed comment piece. Too busy dining out on Murdoch and Levenson to report on an estimated 47 young, English victims of systemic muslim sex attacks comrades? The judge is back now and has handed out sentences of between 4 years and, for the nameless ringleader, 19 years. It goes without saying that they all and their kin ought to be kicked back to whatever craphole they came from to stink up our land. It goes without saying that nothing of the like will happen. Read the rest of this entry »


By Pete Moore On May 8th, 2012 at 5:06 pm

What a catastrophe mass immigration is for the British people.

Nine Muslim men have been found guilty of being part of a child grooming ring that manipulated underage girls into having sex by providing them with alcohol and drugs. The victims were as young as 13 years of age, including one who was made pregnant and forced into having an abortion. Police said one of the girls was raped by 20 men in one night.

The attackers all know each other. All but one are Pakistani, some from the same Paki village and one is Afghan. They’ll be sentenced tomorrow, when no doubt the full force of the law might see them banged up for a couple of years. And we’ll be back here again. Paki men are into grooming and raping little white girls. They’re not the daughters of the type of people who tut at racists and anti-immigrant throwbacks. The victims are from broken homes like in this case, where all the victims were known to the State.

Mohammed Shafiq of the Ramadan Foundation is quoted as saying that on-street grooming ‘is a significant problem for the British Pakistani community’. ‘They think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought – it is this sort of behaviour that is bringing shame on our community.”

But we knew that all along, and it’ll happen again because not only are the comfy classes never affected by the disaster they inflicted on the British working class, they turn their minds against it. They’re comfortable and smug now, but the British people won’t always tolerate it. I sincerely look forward to the day.
UPDATE: Greater Manchester Police Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood says it’s not about race: “It is not a racial issue. This is about adults preying on vulnerable young children. It just happens that in this particular area and time the demographics were that these were Asian men.” And if you believe that, you too are stupid enough to become a senior copper and talk crap.


By David Vance On April 30th, 2012 at 8:59 am

Forget about swimming with the dolphins, it seems that swimming with boys constitutes some difficulty for one religious group.

“A Muslim family in Basel has been fined 1,400 francs ($1,550) for refusing to let its daughters participate in mixed swimming classes. The family had sought to avoid paying the fine on the grounds that the requirement for the girls to join the swimming lesson infringed on their religious freedom, online news website Le Matin reported. The parents argued that, in accordance with the teachings of the Koran, they wanted to instil a sense of shame in their children before they reached puberty. Mixed swimming lessons in primary school, the family claimed, would be incompatible with such an aim. Following the family’s appeal of the original Administrative Court verdict, the Federal Court decided to uphold the fine. The court stated that the obligation to participate in mixed swimming classes did not represent a significant assault on the family’s religious freedom.

Well done Switzerland.


By David Vance On April 16th, 2012 at 8:52 am

Labour Peer Lord Ahmed is quite the card. Do you remember him?

Yes, that’s right …he was sent to prison back in 2009 after he was caught sending and receiving text messages at the wheel, minutes before he was involved in a fatal crash on the M1. Happily for him he was released after serving 16 days when the Court of Appeal decided his prison sentence should be suspended. Naturally.

But he’s back. And he is in trouble….again.

A Labour peer suspended from the party after accusations he called for a £10m bounty for the capture of US Presidents Obama and Bush has denied the claims. Lord Ahmed is reported to have made the call after the US offered a $10m bounty for the conviction of the founder of a Pakistani-based militant group. Lord Ahmed, according to the Express Tribune, said: “If the US can announce a reward of $10m for the captor of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of £10m on President Obama and his predecessor George Bush.” The paper adds that the peer went on to say “he would arrange the bounty at any cost even if he was left with the option of selling all his personal assets, including his house”

Ahmed reckons Bush and Obama should be tried to war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

However this does beg the obvious question; In the war between UK forces and Islamic terrorists, has Ahmed now declared which side he is on? And if that is the case, is the House of Lords an appropriate place for him? Or a prison?


By David Vance On April 4th, 2012 at 1:59 pm

This BBC item has been brought to my attention.

Sessions to encourage men to help stop female genital mutilation (FGM) will be held in Bristol, it is hoped. Campaign group Daughters of Eve has started hosting workshops for men in London after gaining funding from the Staples Trust in December.

Wonder who these “men” might be? Any thoughts? The world class BBC journalists don’t seem to know….

Hat-tip to Petr for the item.


By David Vance On March 24th, 2012 at 11:59 am

Most interesing article here on the views of UK Muslims. Young Muslims in particular – our fastest growing demographic.  Sorry if it offends leftists  and dhimmis  but these things must be spoken about.

 “Some 37% of youngsters aged 16-24 want to adopt Islamic laws in Britain (of course, nobody would renounce their British citizenship) compared to only 17% of respondents aged above 55.

Meanwhile, 37% of young respondents want their children to study in Islamic schools, compared to only 19% of older respondents.

Some 7% of respondents confessed to admiring terror groups like al-Qaeda, including 13% of youngsters and 3% of older respondents. (Notably, the terrorist who blew himself up at Tel Aviv’s Mike’s Place café in 2003 was a Muslim carrying a British passport.)

Finally, 74% of the youngsters prefer their wives to wear a veil, compared to 28% among older respondents.

Now then, the question is WHY are do many young British Muslims hold such radical views? Their parents seem less radical. Is the uncomfortable truth that 9/11 was indeed a defining moment when Islam revolutionised itself with a radical fervour that is now manifest in this young people? And what is the right response to this? To indulge it? To accept it? To encourage it? To oppose it? To close your eyes and hope it goes away?


By David Vance On March 21st, 2012 at 8:47 am

he manhunt for the Toulouse serial killer responsible for The murders of four people outside a Jewish school and three paratroopers in south west France.

Well now, what a turn up. Just when the left wing media and certain others were brimming with confidence that the vicious killer of three young Jewish children and their Rabbi teacher was some sort of Neo-Nazi “far right” extremist….it turns out he is a Muslim called Mohamad who claims to be associated with an Al Queda affiliate. Oh, and he had been to Afghanistan for “training”.

Now WHO would have seen that one coming?

The media reports that two of his brothers have also been arrested. Like EU politico the unelected Baroness Ashton, it seems that Mohammad felt anger at the deaths of children in Gaza, which is why he felt obliged to mow down those little tots. To recap…

Eight-year-old Myriam Monsonego clutched her satchel as the killer chased her through the school gates and into the courtyard. He pulled her towards him by her hair and raised a gun to shoot her. The video footage appears to show that, at that moment, his gun jammed. But determined to carry out his killing spree, he kept hold of the girl, changed weapons from what police identified as a 9-mm pistol to a .45 calibre weapon, and delivered a shot to her temple at point blank range.

I hope that the Police do NOT take him alive. This vile creature should depart this Earth rather than become one more martyr for Islamic Jihad.  I expect we shall hear all Islamic Imams and all Islamic groups come out and damn this monster…

UPDATE; His name is reported to be Mohamed Merah, 24 years old Frenchman of Algerian origin.


By David Vance On March 20th, 2012 at 9:04 am

I spotted this story in the UK press suggesting that it is not JUST Christian Churches that oppose the Government plan to legislate for “gay marriage”. It seems that Sikhs and Muslims also oppose it. However that is not the purpose of this post (Cue – phew, thank goodness, not ANOTHER gay marriage post on ATW). No, it was this statement from the Muslim Council of Britai (MCB) that made me think;

Farooq Murad, Secretary General of the MCB, said: “Whilst we remain opposed to all forms of discrimination, including homophobia, redefining the meaning of marriage is in our opinion unnecessary and unhelpful.”

Now then, this declaration that Muslims oppose homophobia is an interesting one especially when one looks around the world and sees Muslim States HANGING gay people in an outburst of tolerance. There is also the matter of leading Muslim Imams who seem to delight in telling us just how intolerable homosexuality is. So, whilst the MCB declares that it is opposed to homophobia, how exactly does this square with Islam and its very public intolerance of homosexuals?


By David Vance On March 20th, 2012 at 8:53 am

Interesting story here concerning the consequences of indulging Islam in the UK.

A Muslim woman was barred from serving on a jury yesterday because she refused to remove her veilIn an extraordinary ruling, a judge said she could not sit on an attempted murder trial because her full face covering, known as the niqab, concealed her expressions.

The woman was about to take the oath in the case at Blackfriars Crown Court in London when the judge interrupted to ask if she was prepared to remove the garment which covered her whole face, apart from a narrow slit through which her eyes could be seen. Judge Aidan Marron QC, said it was ‘desirable’ that her face was ‘exposed’ during the trial and asked her to remove the veil. She refused.

What sickens me is that although she refused to remove the garb if Islam to conform to OUR standards, the Muslim concerned is now being treated as a victim of great injustice and the Human Rights lobby is on her case, arguing she has been treated abominably. If anything, the Judge was far too polite. In my view her insistence to retain her Niqab was a contempt of court and she should have suffered the direct consequence of this. Instead, she was gently asked to step down from jury service.


By David Vance On March 19th, 2012 at 10:54 am

Interesting insight into the views of young British Muslims

“The majority of young British Muslims support violence against women who ‘dishonour’ their families, a Panorama investigation will claim today. The hard-hitting BBC documentary reveals more than two thirds of Asians between the ages of 16 and 34 say communities should live according to ‘honour’ or ‘izzat’. Research carried out for the show found nearly one in five – 18 per cent – said certain acts thought to shame families were justification for violence.”

Surely not? Is this savagery actually widely supported and if so what does THAT say about the religion of peace? Coming from the BBC – that bastion of dhimmitude – this is all the more damning and it raises the question once more if Islam is compatible with modern western democracy.