The notorious Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) group have named Yorkshire towns Bradford and Dewsbury and Tower Hamlets in East London as testbeds for blanket sharia rule. The medieval ‘emirates’ would operate entirely outside British law, according to a document on the MAC website. The MAC group, led by Abu Assadullah, was set up last year and has become notorious because of its violent protests, most provocatively burning poppies during the Remembrance Day silence. Under the heading ‘Muslims should set up Islamic emirates in the UK’, MAC says: ‘We suggest it is time that areas with large Muslim populations declare an emirate delineating that Muslims trying to live within this area are trying to live by the sharia as much as possible with their own courts and community watch and schools and even self sufficient trade.”
Now we could dismiss these guys as lunatic fringe – but perhaps that is too lazy a response. They are anti-British, they show an utter contempt for our laws, and by just ignoring them, they do not go away. What is the right response? Do we ban them? If so, what would that accomplish? The problem with the enemy within is precisely that – it is within. These home bred Jihad fans are a menace but it is so hard to know what to do about them.
One in four men accused of ‘street grooming’ underage girls for sex is Asian, a shocking report reveals. In total, 2,379 offenders are suspected of attempting to lure vulnerable victims, often using drugs and alcohol, over the past three years. And a ‘disproportionate’ 28 per cent of them were found to be Asian, in those cases where ethnicity was recorded. The ethnic group makes up just six per cent of the UK population.
Now, let us be a little more clear. “Asian” is a catch-me-all term but the fact is that these sexual predators who groom underage girls for sex are Muslim, more specifically. Note the frequency of the name “Mohammad” amongst those convicted of such hideous crime. Why is this such a feature of this group? What is it about Islam that creates such perversity? I know that the founder of Islam, Mohammad, married a six year old and consummated the marriage when she was nine years old, but is this reason enough for his latter day followers to engage in this deviancy? It must be very disturbing for moderate Muslims to see that some of their co-religionists are so over=represented in this group of sexual offenders.
I wonder what it is about Jew-hating jihadist Sheikh Qaradawi, “massively influential and probably the number one scholar in the Arab world,” that attracts him to Ireland?
“Top Muslim clerics” will be there as well. One would think that “top Muslim clerics” would shun this hateful inciter of mass murder if what the governments of the West, law enforcement and the mainstream media tell us about Islam were true. But once again, no.
A cartoon of Mickey Mouse with a beard and Minnie Mouse wearing a face veil has angered hard-line Muslims. The pictures were posted online by a Christian businessman to advertise his mobile phone companies. It was accompanied with the comment: ‘Mickey and Minnie after.’ The ultra-conservative Muslims, known as Salafis, called the cartoon posted by Egyptian media mogul and politician Naguib Sawiris ‘a mockery of Islam’. The Salafis launched campaigns on Facebook and Twitter calling on Muslims to boycott Mr Sawiris’s mobile phone company Mobinil. Shares in Mobinil and Orascom Telecom, both companies owned by Mr Sawiris, fell on the Egyptian stock exchange. Sawiris is founder of the liberal Free Egyptians Party which believes in a secular Egypt.
I’m afraid that those seeking a secular Egypt are in for a massive disappointment as it trundles towards being Iran 2.0. This extreme reaction to a silly cartoon (Mmm, now where have I heard that before?) shows the stunning intolerance of Islam and the pernicious threats it then issues.
The truth is that the media is reporting a story and seeking to avoid one central aspect of it lest it cause annoyance to a particular minority grouping. Can you guess which one it is?
A married man sold a 15-year-old girl to restaurant workers for sex so he could buy petrol to get home, a court heard yesterday. Tanveer Ahmed, known as ‘T’ to the young children he groomed, arranged for three men to have sex with the youngster for £100, the court was told. He pocketed the cash to put fuel in his car and pay off gambling debts. The 39-year-old is one of nine Asian men on trial for 55 separate charges – which include trafficking, grooming and rape – against teenage girls aged 13 to 16 between 2007 and 2009.
“Asian” men? Mmm…nice try but would it not be more honest to tell it like it is and say MUSLIM men? The grooming of young girls by predatory Muslim gangs has been documented here and here and here and yet the MSM are coy on the detail as if it has no relevance hence the catch-me -all “Asian” nomenclature. No one is saying that such abominable behaviour of any one group but it seems reasonable to point out that some Muslim men seem to have a real problem in this area and to avoid pointing this out does a grave disservice to their victims.
He was notoriously reluctant to discuss religion while Prime Minister, with his chief spin doctor Alastair Campbell famously commenting: ‘We don’t do God.’ But since leaving Downing Street in 2007, Tony Blair has become increasingly open about the importance of religion. Mr Blair, who converted to Catholicism months after leaving Number 10, has now spoken of how he reads the Koran every day. Reading the Islamic religion’s holy book – considered by Muslims to be the exact words of God – ensured he remained ‘faith-literate’, the former Labour leader said. In an interview with the Observer magazine, published yesterday he said: ‘To be faith-literate is crucial in a globalised world, I believe.
I wonder what “faith literate” MEANS when referring to a faith you do not have? There’s nothing wrong with reading the Koran as such but unless one believes what it professes I don’t see how one becomes “faith literate” simply by reading it. Is Mullah Blair going to explain what THESE quotes mean?
“Slay them wherever you find them…Idolatry is worse than carnage…Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God’s religion reigns supreme.” (Surah 2:190-)
“Fighting is obligatory for you, much as you dislike it.” (Surah 2:216)
“Seek out your enemies relentlessly.” (Surah 4:103-)
“Try as you may, you cannot treat all your wives impartially.” (Surah 4:126-)
“The Jews and Christians say: ‘We are the children of God and His loved ones.’ Say: ‘Why then does He punish you for your sins?” (Surah 5:18)
“Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends.” (Surah 5:51)
Not sure even an hourly reading of the above can help one but conclude that Islam has big problems.
As you know, some of our liberal figureheads believe that Sharia Law is “unavoidable” if not desirable for the UK. This may cause a few fashion problems.
A teenage Muslim girl was stoned to death under ‘Sharia law’ after taking part in a beauty contest in Ukraine. Katya Koren, 19, was found dead in a village in the Crimea region near her home. Friends said she liked wearing fashionable clothes and had come seventh in a beauty contest. Her battered body was buried in a forest and was found a week after she disappeared. Police have opened a murder investigation and are looking into claims that three Muslim youths killed her, claiming her death was justified under Islam. One of the three – named as 16-year-old Bihal Gaziev – is under arrest and told police that Katya had ‘violated the laws of Sharia’. Gaziev has said he has no regrets about her death.
The good thing about the Burqa is that it solves all these problems and whilst Miss World Burqa is unlikely to attract huge audiences it will be at least Sharia compliant and THAT surely is a good thing if one holds the views of the Archbishop of Canterbury, for instance.
“Inbreeding among British Muslims is threatening the health of their children, a leading geneticist warned yesterday. Professor Steve Jones, from University College London, said the common practice in Islamic communities for cousins to marry each other increased the risk of birth defects.
‘There may be some evidence that cousins marrying one another can be harmful,’ he told an audience at the Hay Festival. ‘We should be concerned about that as there can be a lot of hidden genetic damage. Children are much more likely to get two copies of a damaged gene. ‘Bradford is very inbred.
There is a huge amount of cousins marrying each other there.’ Studies have shown that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins – and in Bradford, this rises to 75 per cent
I wonder what the % of Pakistans marrying first cousins in Pakistan is? Could Bradford be more Pakistani than Pakistan?
Naturally, Professor Jones has invoked the wrath of those Muslim spokesmen (who were so mute when Bin Laden was finally brought to justice). They see nothing wrong with first cousins marrying.
“He was an ‘able, enthusiastic and popular’ religious education teacher who loved his job at an inner-city girls’ school. But when a gang of Islamic extremists decided his lessons for Muslim girls were ‘mocking Islam’, they unleashed a sickening attack on Gary Smith, slashing his face and battering him with such force that his own mother didn’t even recognise him.
Akmol Hussain, 26, Sheikh Rashid, 27, Azad Hussein, 26, and Simon Alam, 19, ambushed the 38-year-old as he walked to work because they did not approve of a non-Muslim teacher giving lessons on religion to Hussain’s niece. In a ten-minute attack, the fundamentalist mob smashed him over the head with a concrete block and iron rod and slashed his face from the corner of his mouth to his right ear with a Stanley knife. They punched and kicked him in the stomach, head and face, before driving away ‘praising Allah’ as they left their victim covered in blood and unconscious with a fractured skull and shattered jaw.
The Jihadi fanatics thought they had got away with it. But, following suspicions of a terrorist plot, the security services had planted a bug in their car that recorded them snarling: ‘This is the dog we want to hit, to strike, to kill.’
Here are the four “Cor Blimey” integrated British Muslims behind the attack.
As the story explains, it is pure religious intolerance and hatred that drove these guys to this shocking attack on the RE teacher. I am still waiting on British Imams issuing a categorical condemnation of this attack. This is London – in the 21st century.
Have you see the Mandelathon BBC grief-o-meter? http://t.co/0inhLtmSRP Go on, retweet it if it made you smile!
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM
You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.
Copyright & copy; 2010 A Tangled Web (All rights reserved). Comments on articles here are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of A Tangled Web or David Vance. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise unacceptable may be deleted by the Editor. However the fact a particular comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by David Vance of the views expressed therein.