Liberalism again makes a case for being classified as a mental disorder.

SACRAMENTO (CBS/AP) – Transgender students would have the right to use public school restrooms and participate on sports teams that correspond with their expressed genders under a bill approved Thursday in the California Assembly.

In English, that means if Californian boys want to use the girls’ changing rooms and toilets then they have the right to do so. Citizens are warned that if the randy 14 year old down the road wants to get naked next to your daughter, tough. If you disagree, you’re a bigot.

I say let bigotry reign.

Need I say that parents should do everything possible to keep their children from the nonces, weirdos and perverts who infest government schools?

Just another day in British courts.

Mohammed Sheikh, Hamza Ali and Suran Uddin are jailed for abducting a 13-year old girl, drugging her and repeatedly raping her for four days. Two of them “could face deportation to Somalia, their home country”. None of them are in their home country.

Eleven-strong terrorist cell jailed for a total of nintey years for planning attacks with rucksack bombs and firearms, poisons and running over pedestrians in cars fitted with blades. Another bunch of Abduls.

Well done, each and every one of you immigrationists who inflicted a total catastrophe on our country. Well done.

What a fine job the Cultural Marxists have done in sickening society.

I see that two women are suing the Pentagon because the U.S. military’s restrictions on women in combat exclude them from assignments “solely because they are women”. No, it’s not about patriotism and Old Glory. They claim: “This limitation on plaintiffs’ careers restricts their current and future earnings, their potential for promotion and advancement, and their future retirement benefits.” So it’s about the money.

Ladies, give it up. Do what comes naturally instead. Take off your uniform, stay home, marry a man and have a family.

The 14th year of New Labour tyranny marks a desperate new low for a once-free Britons. The Lib-Dem led government has announced it will stand before foreign judges in a foreign court and plead that we have no right to wear a cross around our own necks at work. Clearly the State has had its boot on them for so long it now thinks what we put around them is the State’s business.

I do wonder for how much longer a people can be so deliberately and egregiously insulted. The sooner we turn our minds to sociopaths, traitors and hemp necklaces, the better.

Good.

(h/t drudge)

Sexist remarks and wolf-whistles could become criminal offences

PM to announce today that UK will sign up to Council of Europe’s convention on violence against women, which could mean criminalising unwanted verbal conduct

It’s like I’ve woken up in some marxist-feminist hellhole. Oh wait-

I might as well say cheerio now. It can’t be long till I’m in chokey for some crime against wimmin. Revving the motor or doing up my shoelaces in a sexist way, something like that.

If I’m allowed parcels I’d appreciate the occasional book about how we were once a free people, if they’re not samizdat by then.

Many congratulations to the patriot Geert Wilders for winning out against those who subjected him to a political persecution and trial. His victory is not just for himself but also for those who believe in liberty everywhere. His real “crime”, I suspect, in the eyes of his accusers is to stand in defence of the Dutch people and their traditions. Those accusers range far beyond the Dutch judiciary of course. The spiteful BBC report to which Mike links below is proof of this.

As he says, he was not on trial in Holland, but freedom and truth. That he was on trial at all is disturbing and would have been unthinkable until very recently. Below is his speech to the court at the close of the trial. Like Ed West, I wish that European “liberals” would hear it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnjZEZggkkA&feature=player_embedded

Sensible people, the Dutch.

Have you wondered what life would be like if feminism had never happened? If we were all housewives? If we were not required to live on our wits and our adrenaline, and were able to take up a hobby? If men were happy to step up to the mark and look after us?

Am I talking about travelling back in time to see what life was like in the Fifties? No, it is much simpler than that. I am catching a flight to Amsterdam.

Not for them the tempting – though ultimately unsatisfactory and enslaving – creed of feminism. Our Dutch friends, sensible, conservative types that they are, have never forgotten that men and women are different with different needs, wants and desires. Girls, be honest with yourselves; it’s time to free yourselves of ideological tyranny. Cast away the sensible office shoes, bin that Blackberry and ditch the office politics. Instead, fulfill yourselves: stay home, marry and have children. Deep down you know you’ll have happier, more wholesome lives when you are true to yourselves, your destinies and human nature. Don’t take my sensible word for it, listen to your Dutch sisters.

But then I meet a young man heading home at Schipol train station, arms full of tulips. ‘Do you have a girlfriend?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Does she work full-time?’ ‘Are you kidding? No, it is my job to worship her, to make her happy and fulfilled.’

Peter Hitchens suggests today that the British State has become a spiteful and bureacratic tyranny. He’s right of course.

OUR SERVANT HAS TURNED INTO A TYRANNICAL MASTER … JUST ASK MYLEENE KLASS 

Do you remember Neil Kinnock, when he was trying to persuade us that the Labour Party was all right really, saying that he wanted a state that was ‘beneath our feet, not above our heads’?

Poor old Neil failed to fool the voters – and I’m still glad to say that I helped him to fail. Then, like so many other anti-British socialists, he went off and threw in his lot with the European Superstate, which is certainly way above our heads. But even if he didn’t mean what he said, it’s a good phrase.

There was a time, not very long ago, when the British State was our servant and not our master. A lot of us still remember town or county halls that had small staffs on modest pay, who emptied the bins and swept the streets, mended the roads, and provided public libraries that were full of books we wanted to read, and schools that taught children how to read, write and count in orderly classrooms.

We also had small local police forces that knew their neighbourhoods and patrolled them on foot. They didn’t need CCTV or ASBOs. Despite having no computers, BlackBerries, or even mobile phones, these organisations were surprisingly efficient and comparatively cheap. And they were usually polite to us too.

That, until recently, was the British State; modest, effective, small and our servant. A history should be written of how and why it became our master as it has done. We see the change in the smallest things. Instead of collecting our rubbish, a task it is amazingly bad at, it monitors our bins and fines us for putting the wrong things in them.

Your local council, which couldn’t clear the pavements of snow and ice even in town centres, will no doubt employ a small battalion of climate-change compliance officers. And any of you who tried to contact the authorities for help in the recent cold weather will probably have found – as I usually do – that it takes fierce persistence to get anyone to admit responsibility for anything.

The police are just a vast nationalised industry serving the liberal establishment. I really wouldn’t mind about the officers caught sledding down a snowy hillside while on duty – it’s a sign they’re human – if it weren’t for the fact that they did so on riot shields, equipment a constable in this country ought never to need, and wouldn’t need if it weren’t for the long, slow breakdown in order caused by Left-wing social policies.

The only thing that surprises me about their treatment of Myleene Klass – rebuked for waving a knife at some intruders – is that anyone was surprised, or that Miss Klass was fool enough to tell them she had done this.

Are there still people who don’t grasp that the police are much more excited about hanging on to their monopoly of force than they are about defeating crime and disorder?

If an ancient, famous, contented and free country were to turn, slowly but definitely, into a spiteful, bureaucratic tyranny, isn’t this exactly how it would happen?

We are not becoming a police state, we have arrived at that point already, which must be quite obvious to anyone with eyes and ears. He’s right also that until very recently it wasn’t this way at all. As the rule of law and civilisation recede, the easier it will be to delude the welfare-dependent masses that it was ever thus, that their foreign-ruled and now strange country has always been like this.

Our fight is against time as much as it is against the genuinely wicked who have destroyed what was once a society known for its gentility and politeness. The sooner we recognise and accept what has been done against us, the sooner we can reclaim and rebuild our nation.

WE can’t say they didn’t warn us. A “new Britain” is precisely what the Labour Party promised in 1997 and millions of drones voted for it. Thanks alot, arseholes.

Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

We we haven’t been swamped by millions of aliens, dispossessed of our ancient liberties and robbed of our nationhood only because Labour is a faction of revolutionary communists who despise our nation and actually believe the Marxist sociology that was pumped into their heads at university in the 1960s and 70s. These things happened also because New Labour wanted to rub the Right’s nose in diversity.

The destruction of British society by toxic racial aggravation; not the policy of misguided, overgrown students but the intended objective of the government since 1997.

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within Government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”

The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

Sean Gabb, in his recent speech, stated:

The purpose of the Government that took power in 1997 was to bring about a revolutionary transformation of this country – a transformation from which there could be no return to what had been before.

In the entirety of English history, an Englishman would have lived and died in a land recognisably his own; the language, customs, laws, liberties and civil values were Anglo Saxon in origin and his own. This wicked revolutionary Labour junta has denied us our Anglo Saxon way of life and made our land unrecognisable in little more than a decade. We are foreigners in our own land, our children are denied their heritage, our customs crushed and our laws are turned against us “to rub the Right’s nose in diversity”. 

The next election (please, Labour voters, feel free to kill yourselves first) is about more than kicking out the worst government in our history, a regime which long made itself illegitimate, the election is about crushing for good this cancer on our nationhood.