web analytics

As ye sow, then so shall you reap

By Mike Cunningham On April 23rd, 2015 at 1:34 pm

In the avalanche of dismal news regarding the General Election, with all the usual suspects gobbing off on how many jobs they would ‘create’, how much money they would ‘save; along with all the other lies, fabrications and bullshit: there shines a single news item which should encourage many in their pursuit of both free speech, free elections and, primarily, Justice.

Yes, as predicted, Lutfur Rahman has been found ‘Guilty as Charged’ on counts of election fraud, subverting democracy, postal voting manipulation and fraud.

Barrister Francis Hoar stated ‘Since the beginning of his political career, he has been prepared to take whatever steps, use whatever means, recruit whatever support, to obtain power – power for himself, power for his friends and most importantly, power over his community.’

Good news for Tower Hamlets in the Mayoral Election, which was subverted by this amoral Muslim thief, crook and fraudster; and this should be a signal to examine, in detail, all the other Fifth Columnists of his ilk as they prepare to lie through their collective teeth to gain power at Westminster.


at the twilight’s last gleaming?

By Mike Cunningham On September 30th, 2014 at 10:10 am

Seems as though some bloke called the cops because he feared that one of his neighbours was flying an Arabic flag.

So the fuzz arrived, speedily, because you just never know if someone has dared to fly a Tricolour instead of the Union flag, or even worse, a flag which supported death, terror and destruction, like the one which Sinn Fein flies.

But what did the PSNI find when they arrived? Even worse than was suspected!


Those whom the gods wish to destroy….

By Mike Cunningham On May 29th, 2014 at 10:53 am

anenoch12I place, without editing of any form, the text of one of the  most famous, and also probably the most fulminated-against and distorted, speeeches ever made in modern British politics. It was of course the speech made by Enoch Powell, possessor of one of the finest and honourable minds and characters ever to have graced the benches of Parliament, in which he foretold of the catastrophe, as he saw it, of the oncoming floods of black and brown immigrants  from Commonwealth countries. He also spoke out against the proposal to join the then European Economic Community, also foreseeing the turmoil generated by a group whose sole purpose was to minimise the role of Nation-States against the power of an unelected and unaccountable bureacracy, which is exactly what we have today.

Powell’s only errors, as far as I can see, was firstly to stress the ‘foreign-ness’ of the Carribean migrants national culture, whilst forgetting the simple truth that the one item which sets apart a good 50% of the migrants from the East of the Commonwealth were of a religion which demands obedience, which preaches bloody revolution where it does not hold sway in the minds of the majority; and demands that all bow before its statements that their God is the One God, and those who do not worship that God, and agree with the words and actions of its prophet, should be destroyed. His second mistake was not understanding that the EEC was possibly the more dangerous of the two proposals which he spoke against so stridently, as with the morphing of the EEC into what is now nearly the United States of Europe, with governance in all areas given over to a bunch of proto-Nazis in plain-clothes, hiding behind the subterfuge of the bureaucracy of the EU Commission, but just as rigid in their goals of domination over 500 million Europeans.


This is the full text of Enoch Powell’s so-called ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech, which was delivered to a Conservative Association meeting in Birmingham on April 20 1968.

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: “If only,” they love to think, “if only people wouldn’t talk about it, it probably wouldn’t happen.” Read the rest of this entry »

Over here as well, unfortunately!

By Mike Cunningham On May 31st, 2012 at 10:52 am

We here in these Dis-United British Isles have long been accustomed to ‘experts’ and other busy-bodies telling us what do eat, to drink, to wear, to drive etc., etc., because they, and they alone, seem to know what is going to be ‘good for us’.

We cannot smoke in bars, restaurants, offices, even bus-shelters because a bunch of well-funded clowns got a law passed which stops us from doing so because of the ‘perils’ of ‘second-hand smoke’! Don’t get me wrong, I used to smoke, heavily. But I stopped, on my own, and without any of the billion-pound anti-smoking products pushed by the NHS. I stopped because I wished to stop, because I benefited from not smoking, and incidentally because I saved a hell of a lot of cash by not buying cigarettes. But I would stress that it was my decision to stop, not because some Government-funded arsehole was insisting that I stop.

We are harried from morning to night by fools telling us what to do, whether it be eating the ‘wrong’ sort of food, or drinking incorrect quantities of alcohol. We already face the threat of the new Gestapo, the totally-politicised and thuggish British Police Service, ever eager to carry out their political masters’ wishes by crushing any dissent, except of course Muslim dissent. We face the days when the huge raft of anti-democratic Laws passed and active within the last fifteen years are already stifling free speech, in what is spoken, or written; and the day is fast approaching when what we think will probably be monitored as well!

And now of course the epidemic has reached the streets of New York, with yet another man who thinks he, and he alone, has the answer to the ‘Obesity’ problem apparently raging through the streets and homes of that wonderful city. God bless Mayor Bloomberg, because few others will!



Numbers count!

By Mike Cunningham On March 30th, 2012 at 8:50 am

After the ‘stunning’ defeat of Labour in Bradford West by the Iraqi candidate Galloway, I was just wondering how many postal votes were cast?


No Fairy Story this, Hans Christian!

By Mike Cunningham On January 28th, 2012 at 9:55 am

One of the better things which right-wing commentators look forward to is the occasional news item which demonstrates that the liberal, metrosexual, ‘rights for everyone except normality’, touchy-feely brigade don’t get their way all the time.

So it is with some enthusiasm that I draw your attention to the name and actions of Dr. Hans-Christian Raabe. A more unlikely Don Quixote than this man one could not imagine or create. A German national, he has lived and worked in Manchester as a G.P. because he likes working for the NHS, and because he sees the problems caused by drugs in and around Manchester, he has long campaigned with a charity which helps drug addiction.

But he did something really stupid recently. He volunteered for an unpaid position on the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). So the trawl began to unearth something, anything, which his opponents could use against his appointment. Why does this mild-mannered man have opponents? Because he campaigns against the legalisation of drugs of any kind; because he speaks out in the face of the liberal elite which is marching to a very different drum-roll!

From the maelstrom of accusations and insults whipped up when he was appointed to the council in January last year, another grievance against him emerged. His opponents exhumed an academic report he co‑authored in 2005, while he was living in Canada, linking homosexuality to paedophilia.

The report, a collaboration between several doctors, was written when the Canadian Parliament was debating whether or not to legalise same-sex marriage, to which Dr Raabe — while  he is not against civil partnerships —  is opposed.

‘The paper summarised scientific evidence, which was in the public domain, and it was one paragraph, mentioning homosexuality and paedophilia together, which — so the Home Office tells me — caused them “embarrassment”,’ says Dr Raabe.

The offending paragraph states: ‘While the majority of homosexuals are not involved in paedophilia, it is of grave concern that there are a disproportionately greater number of homosexuals among paedophiles.’

So now he has two strikes against him; the first is that he speaks out against drug use and legalisation, and now the larger crime seemingly against everything held so dear by the liberal self-appointed elite amongst us, which is to state that he is of the belief that homesexuality finds much in common with paedophilia.

So Hans-Christian was dismissed from his post with the ACMD before he had been able to attend a single meeting. And then he decided to sue!

For Dr Raabe, there is a moral imperative at stake. 

‘There has been such enormous resistance to my sitting on the ACMD panel that I feel it is a matter of principle to challenge it,’ he says.

‘Besides, I see so many people, especially the young, whose lives are being messed up by drugs, I feel that to sit back and do nothing about it would simply be wrong.’


He might not win his post back; if he does he will be vilified from pillar to post, he certainly will lose his anonymity, but I do so wish him the best of luck!


The only proper outcome

By Mike Cunningham On June 23rd, 2011 at 8:42 am

As noted on various websites, Mr. Geert Wilders has been cleared of all charges of inciting hatred against Muslims.

There is only one comment which I would make upon this truly political show-trial which even the prosecuting authority did not wish to pursue, and that is to ask one simple question.

Will the present British Government now present Mr. Wilders with a formal apology for banning him from presenting his ‘Fitna’ documentary in the House of Lords, that banning being at the instigation of the muslim peer lord ahmed?

Are you carrying Pentaerythritol tetranitrate?

By ATWadmin On January 1st, 2010 at 8:59 am

I believe that the most abused word, in the whole lexicon of politically-correct speech, as approved by the likes of Bliar, the other Bliar, along with all the fellow-travellers and usual suspects, is OFFENCE!

We mustn’t offend, so ban Carols which use the term ‘Man’. We mustn’t offend, so we have to ban free speech, in case some rag-head with a psychological twist takes umbrage at something which has existed as part of our heritage for decades. We mustn’t raise an eye-brow when some (alleged) female comes dressed in a large sheet of black-out material into a supermarket, because she may be offended at our struggles not to burst out laughing at her ludicrous get-up! We mustn’t comment at the predilection of local councils to hand out scarce and sometimes costly accommodation to bogus asylum seekers, on the grounds that we might offend their sensitive little psyches while they are ‘only doing their jobs’. We must never single out people for extra scrutiny at airports because they share a common heritage, skin colour or belief with a motley collection of f******* nut-jobs who have blown themselves into smithereens.

As I posted some time back on this subject, I have no desire to repeat myself; but perhaps a gentle reminder to the likes of Gordon McDoom, to the effect that treating everyone as a suspect just doesn’t work, as was demonstrated by Mr. Andrew Gilligan. Unfortunately, the Government’s ears are closed to all but the voices of their yes-men, advisors, and the rest of the creepy circus which Labour party politicians routinely surround themselves.

You voted for them!!!

By ATWadmin On November 4th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

As I have been busy scanning Publishing options and contracts for my forthcoming book, I have also been reading odd items which our Lords of Misrule have sent down the turnpike to add to the general misery. One item which I picked up, as it hasn’t been given a great deal of publicity, is the latest angle from our revered Nazi Justice Secretary himself, Jack Straw. I use the term ‘Nazi’ as the latest judicial wheeze is only symptomatic of a State regime which cannot tolerate opposition, and therefore penalises any who dare query any decision made in the name of that same authoritarian Government.

Not content with spreading the possibility of ‘secret’ courts, secret Coroners’ Inquests and even ‘secret’ courts of the Public Guardians, he has now imposed a further burden on those who would question this direct theoretical descendant of Himmler and Goebbels. He is stating that any who oppose, or challenge through the courts, the imposition of traffic fines will be liable for all their own costs, EVEN IF THEY WIN!


 Sign the petition, even though the Westminster clowns take no notice of them, because it will only serve as a foretaste to the drubbing this bunch will hopefully get at the Election!

think it possible you may be mistaken?

By ATWadmin On August 28th, 2009 at 7:51 am

Ever thought about protesting?

Ever got so hacked off with the inertia of officialdom so that you want to protest, by taking direct action?

Ever believed that you still lived in a country where the right of protest was ingrained into the very fabric of society?

Well, my friends, are you happy with how you live now?

In America, even with it’s Constitution where a proud nation of individualists built their Union and Nation because of their belief of the freedoms which so many had fought and died for, there is significant doubt. Both in the Independence struggle from the Colonial hand of England, and in the Civil War, fought on the right to secede from that Union, the very idea of Protest was foremost in the American psyche.

In this United Kingdom, the so-called cradle of modern Democracy, we used to have free assembly guaranteed, and Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park where anyone could stand on his soap-box and spout about anything. I say ‘used to’ because you just try and speak on, say, an anti-homosexual theme, or for that matter an anti-muslim stance, or associate muslims with anything worse than picking fruit, and you will land in the slammer faster than the speed of light!

In America, for daring to comment on, or protest against, an overwheening and arrogant President and Executive’s plans for socialised healthcare, you will be labelled as ‘a right-wing nut-job’ or bullied and threatened by a ‘Rent-a-Mob’, complete with professional posters and transport, paid for courtesy of the ruling Party.

Do you sympathise with the anger, frustration and annoyance of Daniel Duckfield, who was arrested and cautioned for threatening to take the law into his own hands, because he had been ignored by that same law, or do you consider him just another ‘fruit-and-nut’ case?