web analytics

Give the f@**ckers power, and they will f#@cking use it!.

By Mike Cunningham On June 24th, 2015 at 2:07 pm

Writing, as I do, as an elderly and old-fashioned Englishman; I am often puzzled by the use, by politicians, of the oldest trick in the political armoury: along with its bland acceptance by the 57-million strong herd of mute sheep which is the British voting population. The politicians write, discuss, amend and then vote into Law proposals to combat a certain problem; and then profess complete surprise and dismay when others then use this Law in an entirely different manner, against people who could not possibly be considered active in regard to the first problem. Allow me to intrude upon your comfortable existences on this late June day, and, by giving examples; to tell you how you have been lied to in the past, and how you will almost definitely be lied to in the future.

Remember the ASBO, or the Anti-Social Behaviour Order? They came about through the Blair Govt’s need to show that they were ‘doing something’ about harrasment, public drunkenness and intimidation of neighbourhoods. The intent, or at least the published intent, was aimed at teenaged gang members who could be singled out, and banned from congregating with their fellow-members. Unfortunately, the use of ASBOrders went out into the wider world, and they were used to supposedly stop a young woman from committing suicide by jumping off bridges, to stop pigs from digging under a fence; an ASBO was proposed to stop a pet sheep from eating cemetery flowers, but this was rescinded when the true dastardly culprits were discovered: namely, a pair of wild deer owned by Princess Michael ( who strangely enough was not threatened with an ASBO); and a woman being banned from her own privately-owned home because the neighbours objected to her visitors. ASBOs were later removed from Statute, and replaced by the less-easily remembered CBO or Criminal Behaviour Order, which is a bit like a C.B.E. but much easier to obtain. Read the rest of this entry »

Er, what was that name again?

By Mike Cunningham On August 31st, 2014 at 2:23 pm

As of the date when the Rotherham Child Betrayal Report was first published, many millions of words have been published on this story of the complete betrayal of a generation of young, female, WHITE children who have lived, or rather existed, in towns and cities where Pakistani Muslims men, mainly from the Pashtun tribal regions of Kashmir, Bangladesh and Afghanistan have systematically raped, beaten, sexually exploited them, under cover of a self-satisfied horde of politicians, social workers and, worst of all; Police, who did absolutely nothing to rescue these girls from this hell-hole of a life. When the girls told their parents, and the parents complained, the Police told them that their daughters were just part of a bunch of white ‘slappers’, who deserved everything they got; and this was the opinion of the social bunch and the politicians as well!

It has taken one fearless woman, Professor Alexis Jay, to rip the veil, or should that be the niqab, from the slime which was the truth behind the Muslim peril which existed, and indeed still exists, just one small step away from the ever-so-righteous Muslims who parade in and out of the Rotherham, Rochdale, and Manchester mosques, as well as those in Luton and in many other towns and cities across this land which once spoke of itself as a free Country.

But we were warned that this sort of thing was happening; the gang-rapes, the fearsome brutality, the organised exploitation of White schoolgirls who had the great misfortune to be sent to a Council ‘Care Home’. We were warned ten years ago! But the problem was that, because  the person who first made those warnings was not politically acceptable; was not accepted as being trustworthy, was in fact accused of criminal behaviour for uttering that very warning, his words and his warnings were rejected and ignored.

Who was that man?

His name was Nick Griffin



A letter, and a partial, tiny result

By Mike Cunningham On February 15th, 2014 at 11:25 am

copy of a letter to my MP:-

Dear Roberta Blackman-Woods,

I write in connection with the reported voting fraud in Tower Hamlets, and would wish to address several questions to the Home Secretary

•        Why have all enquiries known about so far resulted in no prosecutions whatsoever in the field of electoral fraud or ‘personation’?
•        Why have the police not instituted, despite documented evidence, enquiries leading to prosecutions in this matter?
•        Why have polling stations in the Tower Hamlets area not been freed of voter intimidation as alleged on the blogsite; as well as the arrest of any person deemed to be harassing a prospective female voter on the grounds of ‘not being modestly dressed’?
•        May I also enquire, through your office as my M.P., why the Electoral Commission has not been directed by the Home Office to institute a thorough and all-encompassing enquiry into the allegations of fraud within the Tower Hamlets area?
•        Finally, will you ask the Home Secretary if any Police actions or investigations have been curtailed because of ‘cultural awareness’?.

If such questions can be asked within the House of Commons, or alternatively by written questions, I, as well as many, many others, would agree that true democracy is being served!

Yours sincerely,

Mike Cunningham

Well, one out of five, even at a distance, isn’t too bad!

and Islam sends its own message to the UK

By Mike Cunningham On February 29th, 2012 at 10:59 am

As the subjects of my post on my own site are deeply dispiriting to the cause of freedom, but at the same time are the subject of Injunctions, all I would write or comment on within the pages of ATW is that which is available on both the Telegraph website as well as the web pages of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions, with regard to the written evidence of Mark Burby.

Our Laws are being used to serve the needs of extremely wealthy people, and their needs and reasons are definitely not ours!



By Pete Moore On February 1st, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Four muslims have been found guilty of planning bomb attacks at the London Stock Exchange, the American Embassy and other targets in London. The Telegraph reports they’re from London, Stoke and Cardiff. Such is the genuine catastrophe of mass immigration inflicted on British society by the ruling elite.  Point of order: though they were born in London, Stoke and Cardiff, they are wholly alien to those places with no historical or cultural link. In this fundamental sense they will always be from somewhere else.

Beachhead, or Blockhead?

By Mike Cunningham On August 1st, 2011 at 12:45 pm

We are advised twice by the City of Westminster Counter Terrorist Focus Desk

It states that anarchy is not good. It states that Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy. Any information relating to anarchists should be reported to your local Police.

So the Anarchists are the main threat, or so the ‘Griffin Briefing’ thinks. Fair enough, the images of black-clad figures hurling stones at windows gives pause for thought, but apart from the Gilmour incident, which made a substantial rise in blood pressures throughout the nation, I honestly can’t recall much that the Anarchists have actually done to make the Police so upset. Especially when the largest thing extant upon an anarchy website is an advert for the Seattle Anarchy book fair.

Nothing is said or highlit about, say, Muslim terrorism or Islamic Fundamentalism apart from the usual bullshit about Al Queda, which is rather strange because the Muzzies paint themselves rather high in the blood and gore race, as they intend the Caliphate, and no-one will be allowed to object; you are either bowing down, or you are dead! A big hand is given to Irish terror threats, but there again, if you are a ‘Dissident Republican’, it is understood that you will get a free pass from prison after approximately seventeen days, because it is part ‘of your culture’ and we have to understand that particular manner of expressing your worries, i.e. large semtex bombs in wheelie bins, pipe bombs next to childrens’ playgrounds etc. are but normal for that type of thinking, and it all comes under ‘the right to express yourself’.

So why the Anarchy flag? Could it be that they haven’t got much to write about, and decided that the Anarchy bunch needed some free exposure?

I mentioned that we were warned twice. The Second warning seems to be that the people who actually author the Griffin Report cannot spell correctly, as we are advised that there will be a bad outbreak of Beech Volleyball in August!

Well, its a start, but possibly a false start

By ATWadmin On June 8th, 2010 at 2:25 pm

I note that an American  singer has been refused entry to Britain on the grounds of a serious criminal offence in his past. Now that’s fair enough, if you have rules, you have to live by those rules.

But what is to happen if all you have done is preached hatred, and called for the execution of Muslims who change their faith, described Americans as “pigs” and said that “every Muslim should be a terrorist”. If you are Zakir Naik, and you have been invited to speak and preach in Britain, what do you think your chances of getting into a British city?

There are none so blind…….

By ATWadmin On May 16th, 2010 at 11:53 am

According to just about everybody in the Obama Mal-Administrationthere is no such thing as Radical Islamic terrorism, despite


& This:-

and initially This:-


X-Posted from Fire, Pillage & Plague

We can only hope…..

By ATWadmin On February 13th, 2009 at 10:51 am


So Lieutenant Colonel Yvonne Bradley believes that her client Binyam Mohamed is near to death’s door after his extensive foreign travel to seek enlightenment with islam, capture and subsequent confinement, vicious and continued torture, decison to go on hunger strike at ‘Gitmo, and general feelings of unhappiness!



Well, as I said in my heading, “We can only hope!!!”

Enough is now ENough

By ATWadmin On December 6th, 2008 at 8:00 pm

From Ben Shapiro:

“Enough with the pseudonyms. Western civilization isn’t at war with terrorism any more than it is at war with grenades. Western civilization is at war with militant Islam, which dominates Muslim communities all over the world. Militant Islam isn’t a tiny minority of otherwise goodhearted Muslims. It’s a dominant strain of evil that runs rampant in a population of well over 1 billion.

 Enough with the psychoanalysis. They don’t hate us because of Israel. They don’t hate us because of Kashmir. They don’t hate us because we have troops in Saudi Arabia or because we deposed Saddam Hussein. They don’t hate us because of Britney Spears. They hate us because we are infidels, and because we don’t plan on surrendering or providing them material aid in their war of aggressive expansion…

 ...Enough with the myths. Not everyone on earth is crying out for freedom. There are plenty of people who are happy in their misery, believing that their suffering is part and parcel of a correct religious system. Those people direct their anger outward, targeting unbelievers. We cannot simply knock off dictators and expect indoctrinated populations to rise to the liberal democratic challenge. The election of Hamas in the Gaza Strip is more a rule than an exception in the Islamic world.

 …After the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the plane downed in Pennsylvania, the endless suicide bombings, shootings and rocket attacks in Israel, the Bali bombings, the synagogue bombing in Tunisia, the LAX shootings, the Kenyan hotel bombing, the Casablanca attacks, the Turkey synagogue attacks, the Madrid bombings, the London bombings, and the repeated attacks in India culminating in the Mumbai massacres — among literally thousands of others — it’s about time that the West got the point: we’re in a war…”  (my emphasis)

Read the article.