In American Democrat’s Showcase of a Gun Free City this was their weekend. The Future Weekend Hillary and the Democrats would bring us ALL.
Also everyone of these had to be responded to by some man or woman wearing a badge to sort out the mess.
17 Dead, 41 Wounded In Chicago Weekend Shootings
October 31, 2016 7:36 AM
CHICAGO (CBS) — At least 17 people, including four teenagers, were killed and 41 others were wounded in shootings across Chicago between Friday evening and Monday morning.
The weekend’s latest homicide happened shortly after 4 a.m. Monday in the Englewood neighborhood on the South Side. A 28-year-old man was found with gunshot wounds to the chest and head on the kitchen floor of a second-floor apartment in the 1100 block of West Garfield, according to Chicago Police. He was pronounced dead at the scene. The Cook County medical examiner’s office did not immediately provide information on fatality. Area South detectives are conducting a homicide investigation.
Rumour has it that the wounded Clinton campaign is leaking to the Clinton-approved media stories that Trump is under FBI investigation for his links to…tata…Russia! Yes, Comrade Donald and the Russkies are supposed to be knee deep in intrigue! If that one doesn’t work they have more tapes of Trump going back some years using inappropriate language and they too will be released.
That’s the plan, it seems. Watch and wait.
Of course all sense readers know that there is a word for all of this. Desperation. It seems around a third of Clinton supporters have indicated the current scandal engulfing her campaign has made them less likely to vote for her. And THAT is the real game in play as our many astute readers know. It’s obvious to me that this will not cause Democrats to vote for Trump but it will mean that a minority will choose NOT to vote for Hillary and in a tight election (and this one is very tight nationally) this could well be decisive!
Anyway, prepare for more dirt from Team Clinton as they batten down the hatches ands fume at the FBI for daring to investigate her email litanies.
Since his candidacy was announced, the UK media as been unrelentingly hostile to Donald Trump. Even so-called “right wing” press like the Daily Telegraph runs an attack article a day on him, with little if any scrutiny given to the Penitentiary Candidate Clinton. However even I was taken aback by this item they run today..
“The Rise of Donald Trump may have contributed to a spike in the number of British children being counselled for anxiety, new figures from the NSPCC suggest. The charity said concerns about the state of the world – including, specifically, the US election – were helping drive a spike in calls to its ChildLine service. In the year to April 2016, ChildLine received 11,706 contacts – either by telephone or online – in which children mentioned anxiety, up 35 per cent on the previous year.”
So, here we have a once reputable British broadsheet pushing this trash by the fake charity, the NSPCC and suggesting Donald Trump is causing emotional stress in British children. I suppose if, by children, we mean Clinton shills in the media, that MAY be true.
Andrew McCann writes..
“Have you ever been walking down the street when you get an itch right in the centre of your back? The sensation is strong enough to distract you but just out of reach. Eventually, in desperation to get rid of it, you end up rubbing up against a tree trunk like Baloo the bear in Disney’s Jungle Book.
Clegg and Blair are like that itch. They refuse to go away. First we had Blair calling for the EU vote to be effectively overturned. Now we have Nick Clegg, former employee of this leviathanic, self-serving racket as well as one-time leader of the Lib Dems (thank heavens those days are over!) ‘agreeing’ with every word his ideological mentor has uttered.
I cannot think of one of political phenomenon in British history where a clear majority vote in a free plebiscite has been so casually dismissed by Establishment figures on the losing side. It sets a really dangerous precedent. What would happen, for example, if (God forbid!!) Jeremy Corbyn won a General Election under the first-past-the-post system? Would I, as a staunch Conservative, have the right to challenge that result, dismiss it out of turn, or seek to overthrow it? Can you imagine the brouhaha it would cause?! We would be told, ad infinitum, that it was the democratically-expressed view of a majority of voters. Well, so is the Brexit result.
“It is a woeful re-writing of history to claim that the country expressed one single opinion or, even worse still, which is now the additional re-writing of history, that they knew exactly what Brexit meant.”
Let’s take Clegg’s statement at face value. Do we therefore accept that the Remainers had a similar lack of unity of purpose when they voted to keep us shackled to the European Union? When all is said and done, those 16 million Remainers must – by Clegg’s logic – have been a pretty diverse bunch too: Right along the spectrum from voters who swallowed the apocalyptic scare stories to those for whom the very thought of smooching with prats like Juncker, Schulz and Tusk causes a tumescent bulge in their underpants.
Britain may not have spoken with one voice (the very nature of diversity and democracy means such an outcome is impossible in a free society), but it did speak with a majority voice. That majority voice was essentially predicated on two basic aims: Controlling immigration and restoring the right of Parliament to be supreme in every law passed the length and breadth of this land. And, notwithstanding Clegg’s hope for a rethink, polls indicate the people are in no mood to be second-guessed by arrogant, aloof politicians on this matter. We had a vote, Nicky boy. You lost. We’re leaving. You suck it up, pal!”
In July 2016 Donna Brazile Tweeted That Republicans Are “Damaging Rule Of Law By Attacking FBI Director Comey.” “Wash. Post Editorial Board: Republicans Are Damaging Rule Of Law By Attacking FBI Director Comey” (Donna Brazile, Twitter Feed, 7/7/16)
Do as I say, not as I do. That’s politicians for you.
Listening to a desperate Clinton campaign blaming the FBI for having the temerity to re-open the investigation into her emails, one could be forgiven for thinking that FBI Director General James Comey is the guy in the dock. Yet this is the reality of what is happening…
The US security services said 560,000 e-mails on disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner’s electronic devices are being searched as part of an investigation into him “sexting” a 15-year-old girl.
They revealed thousands of the messages may be tied to Presidential candidate Mrs Clinton’s personal server.
Thousands. Some may contain classified information. The FBI would not have re-opened this case on a whim, and the probability is that Clinton will go to the polls seeking the votes of the US electorate as someone under active FBI investigation.
Clearly the Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner connection is what has popped her campaign balloon. Just watch the polls in the next few days.
Clinton has come out insisting that…
“If you’re like me you probably have a few questions about it. It’s pretty strange to put something like that out with such little information right before an election. It’s not just strange, it’s unprecedented and deeply troubling because voters deserve to get full and complete facts. “
She who operates in secrecy and who erased 33,000 emails and then had her server bit-bleached now demands full transparency??? What is strange, unprecedented and deeply troubling is that this felon is the best the Democrats could put up.