web analytics

why are you carrying a large sack of fertiliser in london, sir?

By ATWadmin On May 27th, 2007

So once more in this beleagured country of ours, with over two thousand terror suspects, all needless to state muslim crazies of one race or another, being tracked by our under-staffed and under-funded Security services, the Government is promising us more laws, more police powers, more actions against totally law-abiding British subjects of the Crown! We hear and read that  Labour’s own Dr. Strangelove himself, John Reid, is considering giving our police forces further powers to stop, search and detain people without the previous caution of reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed.

Now I am amongst the first to back our police forces (Not SERVICES, that invention of scum such as Mandelson and Campbell) when they act legally to prevent murder on our streets, but I doubt very much if any of our so-called ‘masters’ have ever given one moment’s thought or consideration as to the legislation which has stuck them in this very place. Reid, Blair and the rest of the crow’s chorus shout out about the judiciary overwhelming the law with the judges support for the dreaded Human Rights of those under suspicion; and how such careful constructs such as the Anti-Terror laws, Control Orders and the like have been given short shrift by a liberal judiciary, against the will of Parliament and the people.  Don’t blame the judges, they’re only using the badly-constructed and ill-thought-through legislative toys given them by the Government. The answer is within the Labour leadership’s reach, but they will never grasp the ‘nettle’ of reality, and either derogate or dispense with the plethora of Human Rights legislation enshrined through our membership of the European Union.

Get rid of the bits of these laws which allow these judges to over-rule Parliament, and some good should surely come again! Unfortunately, the Scottish mafia, from Blair through Brown, Reid and the rest of the cabal won’t even touch their precious ‘Human Rights’ bullshit, because the liberal lefties all think it’s wonderful! The Labour M.P.’s, supporters of either Brown or Blair, won’t stand back and let their precious ‘rights’ legislation be tampered with either, because the Unions love the ‘rights’ goodies, and the Unions bankroll over half of the Labour M.P.’s now at Westminster.

So we’ll struggle on, swamped by a mixture of black, brown, khaki, yellow and all combinations in between, from Iraqi terrorist imams through Roma thieves, with the bombers making their plans while collecting their benefits from the DSS, and our overstretched Security services running from dyke to dyke, plugging the gaps with sellotape and expanding foam, until it is pointed out that the foam is actually destroying the environment!

 

 

3 Responses to “why are you carrying a large sack of fertiliser in london, sir?”

  1. "Why are you carrying a large sack of fertilizer, in London, Sir?"

    ‘Why Officer, I am just ‘Carrying coals to Newcastle’

    I take it that the above apprehension took place somewhere close to the Houses of Parliament!

  2. Security services & police forces (Not SERVICES […] )

    Why not sercurity forces? why not let intelligence units have a greater role in law enforcement? Like every other authoritarian system?

    Anti-Terror laws, Control Orders and the like have been given short shrift by a liberal judiciary, against the will of Parliament and the people. […] Get rid of the bits of these laws which allow these judges to over-rule Parliament, and some good should surely come again!

    yet another display of conservative contempt for the free and democratic system.

    why not just politicise the bench like the Soviets, Nazis or to a lesser extent the Bush Whitehouse.

    grasp the ‘nettle’ of reality, and either derogate or dispense with the plethora of Human Rights legislation enshrined through our membership of the European Union.

    So you are against the rights of the individual? you would prefer a system where the state can define their own limits and laws with a more flexible framework.

    Call it what you want chum, but thats one of the strongest indicators of totalitarianism. an intolerance of independant bodies, checks and balances or anything that gets in the way of placing everyone in their ideological yoke.

    the cabal won’t even touch their precious ‘Human Rights’ bullshit, because the liberal lefties all think it’s wonderful!

    Blair introduced it, and in his wisdom has sought to circumvent it ever since. you and him pretty are pretty much in the same camp. the ideology of his earlier career became rather inconvenient less than 4 years later.

    So we’ll struggle on, swamped by a mixture of black, brown, khaki, yellow and all combinations in between

    so lets conclude. youre a supremacist xenophobe with a propensity towards authoritarianism. you were born a century to early.

  3. mike if you are going to criticise our current system with such fervour you could at least suggest alternatives.

    have you got any?