web analytics

The destruction of American Sovereignty

By Patrick Van Roy On May 8th, 2012

The following article  is true, it is not a crazy conspiracy and it is just breaking through the public radar in the U.S. despite being ignored by the MSM. It is penned by famous toe sucker Dick Morris. Mr. Morris is a man I personally despise, he was to Bill Clinton what Karl Rove was to Bush. On this topic, and for this information though I give him thanks.

Obama’s Sneaky Treaties

By Dick Morris on February 8, 2012

Published on TheHill.com on February 7, 2012

President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are entering negotiations over — or seeking ratification of — five treaties that could radically limit our national sovereignty and the reach of our democratic institutions. Particularly scary is that the treaties, once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.


Those who wish to preserve our sovereignty and democratic control over our future must rally to block these treaties, either by pressing Obama and Clinton not to sign them or by blocking their ratification.

• International Criminal Court — Clinton has reversed George W. Bush’s policy and entered into negotiations over U.S. participation in the court. Specifically, the leftists who are sponsoring the court wish to create a new crime of “aggression,” which is essentially going to war without the approval of the United Nations. If we submit to the court’s jurisdiction, our presidents and Cabinet officials could be prosecuted criminally for going to war without U.N. approval. This would, of course, give Russia and China a veto over our military actions. Clinton says she will stop our military’s hands from being tied, but we all must realize that once we accept the International Criminal Court, we go down a slippery slope. The court could even prosecute Americans who have been cleared by our own judicial system.

• The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) has been signed, and the Obama administration — with the aid of RINO Sen. Richard Lugar (Ind.) — will push for its ratification as soon as Lugar’s primary in Indiana is over this year. LOST requires that the United States pay an international body half of its royalties from offshore drilling. The body would then distribute the funds as it sees fit to whichever nations it chooses. The United States would only have one vote out of 160 regarding where the money goes. LOST will also oblige us to hand over our offshore drilling technology to any nation that wants it … for free.

• Small-arms control — Clinton is about to negotiate on a global ban on export of small arms. It would only apply to private citizens but, of course, most small-arms deals come not from individuals or private firms but from governments, specifically those of the United States, Russia, China and Israel. The treaty would require each nation to adopt measures to stop exportation of small arms. It is easy to see how this could be a backdoor way to require national registration of all guns and to assert federal regulation over firearms. It would also require the registration of all ammunition to track its source once a gun is fired. The Second Amendment be damned!

• Outer Space Code of Conduct — Under the guise of stopping debris from accumulating in outer space, the European Union has enlisted Clinton in negotiations over a code of conduct. The code would prohibit activities that are likely to generate debris in outer space — space littering. The code might inhibit or prohibit the United States from deploying anti-missile missiles on platforms in space, denying us the key weapon we need to counter Iranian, Chinese and North Korean missile threats. European leftists reacted angrily when G.W. Bush opted out of the ABM treaty banning defensive weapons. Now they seek to reimpose it under the guise of a code of conduct.

• Rights of the Child — Even more fanciful is a treaty Clinton plans to negotiate setting forth a code of rights for children, to be administered by a 14-member court set up for the purpose. The draft treaty obliges rich nations to provide funds for shelter, food, clothing and education for children in poor nations. This provision could create grounds to litigate to challenge the level of foreign aid we give as inadequate to meet our treaty obligations. Already, leftists in the United Kingdom are using the treaty to attack welfare cuts by the Cameron government.

European liberalism is advancing — masked — by way of these treaties. Defenders of liberty must say no!

The point highlighted in RED is in the Senate right now, and is the most financially destructive piece of crap ever considered. That Treaty alone will cripple the U.S. as a financial power, and end all hope of ever recovering from our current depression.

10 Responses to “The destruction of American Sovereignty”

  1. Perhaps, we can now agree, America is .. ‘not really the land of the free’ 😉

  2. Not with the traitor progressive, Liberal Obama in the driver’s seat Harri.

    But, Not to worry things will change soon.

    Slippery snake-oil salesmen have plied their evil trade for hundreds of years in America.

    Fortunately, the America public sees through their scam and runs them out of town on a rail.

  3. You people will believe anything that you are told, sheeple!

  4. Remember this is Troll’s version of what these supposed Treaties actually mean.

  5. By Dick Morris

    It is actually Dick Morris’s version of what these supposed Treaties actually mean.

  6. The guys who draw up legislation like this don’t always reveal their full intentions at first. You need to get the camel’s nose in the tent first.

    The post has the usual self defeating overdose of paranoid nonsense, but skepticism is called for.

    Personally, I would not fund or participate in the International Criminal Court, for multiple reasons of sovereignty and any involvement by China and Russia and other nations that will approach every issue from a starting point of extreme bad faith.

  7. Fews

    Yes, I am aware of that, but it is Troll’s opening and closing comments that are designed to ring the alarmist bells.

  8. It is funny, Dick Morris has had it in for the Clintons since his toe sucking scandal a number of years ago, and he’s been writing dire predictions of the fall of democracy due to the Democrats ever since. He can be funny, he can be astute. He can also be Chicken Little.

  9. The fact that ALL these treaties have been around for years, and what’s in them is well known is irrelevant to the above cabal of gits is not surprising. Simple fact checking on what the State Dept and Obama are pushing to get done before the end of the year I know is beyond your depth.

    The fact that your all(those across the pond) are sitting in countries that gave away your sovereignty to the EU without letting you vote on it, yet you have the balls to sit there and doubt that Obama would do the same here is both laughable and pathetic

  10. Saw on the Website that publication of this articleSenator Lugar has lost in the Primary. Will this mean that Obama’s point man will not be pushing for the LOST to be Found?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.