THE ASIAN PROBLEM
By David Vance On July 30th, 2012I am sure you may have come across this story. It concerns a G4S employee who allegedly called a soldier a ‘baby killer’ as they worked at a Games venue. The Asian civilian guard, who faces the sack, is said to have spat at the serviceman and made the abusive remark at the archery contest at Lord’s Cricket Ground.
Well, when I say you “may” have come across it, that would be if you read The Mail here. Or the Telegraph here. But the BBC don’t seem to have decided this particular G4S story is NOT a story, or, if they have, I can’t readily find it. Bit of a surprise given their hitherto intense interest in all things G4S.
Also…as regards this “Asian” – hands up all who think it is Chinese guy? No. How about a Thai? No? How about a Muslim….?
Asians are great people.
The real Asians, that is.
Now imagine if the serviceman had spit at the ” Asian ”
It would be ” stop the presses ” , a story for the ages.
Phantom
Precisely
Look,
if you’re going to graft a multicultural society onto what was a historically white Anglo Saxon/Viking/Mongrel Celtic society, what can you expect?
85% of our country is still made up of Noel Cowsrd’s “This Happy Breed”.
If true, the reason that “Asian” could spit at that soldier and call him a baby killer, was because that “Asian” is living in a free liberal democracy, developed over hundreds of years; not back in his homeland.
Where by now his widow would have sold his collection of headgear…
Where by now his widow would have sold his collection of headgear…
Sorry Agit8ed, she would not have time to sell his head gear. She’d be moved, kids and all, to the local brothel for use by his male family and friends. A widow has to keep herself and any dependants. This is how they do it. Don’t knock it, it’s their culture and is just as valid as ours!
7 odd years ago we thought of leaving to go and live in New Zealand, one day I’m going to have to look my kids in the eye and explain why we didn’t go………It’s not going to be easy!
Someone didn’t close the italics command or something.
1) why is there no photo of the “Asian” in either article? I see soldiers,
2) no mention whether or not this “asian” is a british citizen or not.
3) your government brings in 18,000 soldiers because they hired a company that couldn’t do the job, a man obviously hostile to western culture is a SECURITY GUARD at the worlds highest profile sporting event, something made this soldier key in on this man can we say “high risk”
italics
‘Asians’ from the UK don’t half get around, do they?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=32115
- Radical Islamists with “British accents” are among the coalition forces looking to topple Bashar Assad, says Jeroen Oerlemans, a photographer who was held hostage in Syria for a week. He said that none of the fighters was Syrian.
About 40 per cent of the militants spoke English. In fact, several apparently talked with recognizable regional British accents, from Birmingham and London.
The UK Foreign Office has launched an investigation. -
test
test
Ah well.
I think david has to turn it off from editor mode
This bout of ‘anti-italicism’ from ATW contributors is pure bigotry.
Chinese and Thai are nationalities. Muslim is a religious denomination.
Either one or the other would be much preferred?
I’d imagine that there are Chinese Muslims and Thai Muslims?
“a man obviously hostile to western culture is a SECURITY GUARD at the worlds highest profile sporting event,”
Thanks to Human Rights
and Equal Opportunities 
it is more important that he can express his contempt for the soldiers that protect those freedoms than express any kind of gratitude to his new homeland..
And perhaps rightly so; if you believe rights come before anything else.