web analytics

No-one gave a damn!

By Mike Cunningham On August 5th, 2015

1400 White kids groomed, raped and sexually used and abused over a period of seven years in Rotherham by (wait for it) men of Pakistani Heritage……………..Police activity……………….Nil

Two separate allegations of paeadophile activity levelled against a DEAD former Prime Minister over a three-day timescale …………………FIVE major police forces, services; whatever, commence immediate and high-profile investigations.

Can anyone else besides me see a pattern of events developing? I mean, all those White kids in Rotherham, Rochdale and again in Oxford: the council, the social worker teams, the police; no-one can say that the warning signs were not there. And yet; until the whistle finally blew, and the Jay Report was delivered, NO-ONE gave two shits for those kids in that miserable, so-called ‘multi-cultural’ Muslim-dominated town in Yorkshire!

But when two allegations of the new ‘Holy of Holies’, of Historic Sexual Abuse emerge, a charge which cannot, ever, be conclusively proven one way or another; mainly because the suspect is DEAD: not one but Five Police Forces jump, and commence ‘investigations’ of a man who had held the highest political office in the land!

Just by the way, whatever happened to those allegations of a Very Senior Labour Politician who was thought to be involved in paeadophile practices? All those headlines, all those hints; and then….Nothing. Strange, that silence; or is it?

39 Responses to “No-one gave a damn!”

  1. Mike – Ted Heath’s sexual deviancy has been known to the police for decades and any ‘activity’ by the police is diversion from high-level paedos who have one major difference from Heath (and Saville) – they are alive and need protection. Perhaps they should ask Peter Mandelson for his opinion 😉 There is no Labour/Tory thing here because there are no real differences amongst any of the Establishment’s parties and politicians.

  2. Allan 1129 about Ted Heath and police

    How would you know such a thing?

  3. There is a list, plus images in one of the newspapers, (the Sun) I think, of all the sexual child molesting deviants that are, or have been under serious investigation, it is a full page spread.

    As I have said many times before, and make no mistake about it, we are being led by monsters.

  4. Harri

    I do not doubt that what you say may be possible. I don’t doubt it for a second.

    But Allan speaks with such absolute, breezy certainty here, about what was ” known ” about an individual, and there is no way that someone in his position could know such a thing.

    Especially as all his information would be hearsay, perhaps from media sources that on the next thread he’ll be telling us should never be trusted.

  5. What’s blindingly obvious (to me) is that the this dead Paedo hunt is being stage managed to distract the media’s attention away from the living still offending paedo’s in the establishment. And VERY effective it is too. Did I hear you mention Operation Ore? or Rotheram or half a dozen other locations where Pakistani gangs have Racially targeted white girls? No? No I flippin didn’t. The BNP were in this case spot on. Can I get an apology from the vocifereous twatterati who pooh poohed Nick Griffin? Nope I cannot. David Icke was less loopy than I thought. Wonder if there really are Lizards leading us?

    It’s Bread and Circusses…really the nations collective idiocy is whats depressing me more than anything else.

    Readers are reminded that this time Jimmy Saville remains dead. There are also currently no plans to exhume Heath and slap the corpse around a little but wait for a while ..it’ll happen. Next dead sleb with a penchant for young boys…ooooh lets say someone famous ..long dead…..how about…..Clement Atlee. Remember you heard it here first.

  6. Dogis…,

    Not everyone dismissed the BNP, as you would find if you read this.

  7. Phantom, on August 5th, 2015 at 1:20 PM Said:
    But Allan speaks with such absolute, breezy certainty here, about what was ” known ” about an individual, and there is no way that someone in his position could know such a thing.

    Phantom – for some reason, you just can’t stop yourself, can you? It is well known that Heath was being protected by the police. I’m at work at the moment but here’s a starter:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11780308/Sir-Edward-Heath-child-sex-abuse-claim-Wiltshire-Police-faces-investigation.html

    The astonishing revelations came as it was announced that the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) was investigating claims that the police had quietly dropped a criminal trial in the 1990s after the defendant threatened to expose Sir Edward as a paedophile.

    That’s the ’90’s – but things go back way before that.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1549607/Heath-warned-about-gay-sex-trysts.html

    Mr Coleman, writing for the New Statesman magazine’s online edition, was responding to a call by Peter Tatchell, the gay rights campaigner, to reveal “gay public figures”. Mr Coleman said he disagreed that public life would be “healthier” if voters knew about gay MPs.

    He said: “The late Ted Heath obtained the highest Office of State after he was supposedly advised to cease his cottaging activities in the 1950s.”

    Now someone in my position, sitting on my seat at my PC, can know these things simply because I’m not watching soaps and football. It’s simple – just look and you’ll see it.

  8. Mike -would not class you as vociferous twatterati m8. I was referring to the shouty rentamob who blighted his tv spot and stopped him addressing the Oxford union debate…couple of years ago.

  9. Allan

    Your own sources

    cite investigations by the IPCC of certain claims

    and

    cites ( unproven ) allegations in a magazine

    None of this is proven by the ” evidence ” that you display here.

  10. Phantom – I wrote that the police knew about Ted Heath’s sexual proclivities for many years, and that’s my OPINION backed with evidence as linked. What exactly do you want – absolute proof? And how is the ‘proof’ to be conveyed?

    Occasionally, there is ‘leakage’ which is then promptly plugged. Warning – this site is ‘unapproved by Phantom’

    http://educate-yourself.org/tg/franklincoverupexcerptwashtimesphoto.shtml

    A homosexual prostitution ring is under investigation by federal and District authorities and includes among its clients key officials of the Reagan and Bush administrations, military officers, congressional aides and U.S. and foreign businessmen with close social ties to Washington’s political elite, documents obtained by The Washington Times reveal.

  11. So nothing was done when he was alive (how familiar), but five forces have suddenly jumped into looking at what Ted Heath did.

    The only certainty is that something else is going on.

  12. If true all these recent allegations just proves that the adage expressed by many that government/authority/police/society were more moral and trustworthy and honest decades ago is untrue.

  13. You have no idea of what the police ” knew ” and neither does anyone else here.

  14. My comment was of course addressed to Allan

    And Colm, stop making sense you are interfering with the conspiracy

  15. Phantom

    Although in all honesty I can well believe a lot of these allegations are true and that senior ‘respectable’ political and other power figures got away with all sorts of sexual abuse largely because not just of institutional corruption but because society just didn’t want to deal with the seamier side of life and preferred to sweep such things under the carpet and told victims to ‘stop making a fuss’ or that they were ‘dirty minded troublemakers’.

  16. I do not doubt that.

    A respected politician had status that would always enable him to stare down any youth who reported him. It was the same situation as with some priests, Jimmy Savile etc.

    The difference in social status was so great, these guys had a license to do what they did.

    I only call Allan to heel when he expresses things about an individual dead ten years as a certainty when it is not a certainty. . It would be far easier if it was.

  17. Phantom,

    Agree with Colm re communal standards all you like, the sixties and seventies were when the decline of those pillars of our community’ ‘got under way’, and they have continued on a downward path ever since. There were days, – and I can still remember them, – when a ‘bobby’ was who we turned to as children, when in need of help. Scout and choirmasters were to be wary of, even then. Times were not perfect ‘back then’, but there is no denying that they have continued to decline ever since.

    I blame the Beatles and rock and roll for the continuing terminal decline! 🙂

  18. I forgot to mention that ‘public schools’ such as Eton were also well known as ‘dens of iniquity’, small wonder that the likes of Heath and other public figure in positions of authority are at the front of todays accusations.

  19. the adage expressed by many that government/authority/police/society were more moral and trustworthy and honest decades ago

    Colm – who wrote to that effect?

    Phantom – the cops knew about Heath years/decades ago, and ex-police are coming forward to say so. And yes – it’s a certainty. What would you bet on now, given your your recent losses:

    Phantom, on August 1st, 2015 at 1:51 AM Said:
    Oh for Gods sake.

    Shame on Allan – that’s really a misrepresentation on his part if what Fews says is correct and I bet that Fews is correct…

    and that didn’t end well 🙂

  20. Phantom, on August 5th, 2015 at 6:52 PM Said:
    My comment was of course addressed to Allan

    And Colm, stop making sense you are interfering with the conspiracy

    Phantom – what is the conspiracy and who are conspiring to do what?

  21. Earth to Allan

    Saying that you’re ” the winner ” does not make you any sort of winner, no matter how often you repeat it.

  22. Ernest

    I’m sure Phantom would strongly disagree with you that the decline of western civilisation was the fault of the Beatles.

    He would put the blame firmly on ABBA 😉

  23. Boy, I’d have a hard time blaming the Beatles on too many of the bad things that have happened since the 1960s.

    They sang against violent revolution , and an awful lot of their work were songs of love and happiness and optimism, things that we could use more of, then and now.

  24. the adage expressed by many that government/authority/police/society were more moral and trustworthy and honest decades ago

    “Society” undoubtedly was.

    The previous three have always been natural attractors of corruption and filth. They always will be. That’s what power over others naturally does.

  25. Way back at lunchtime Phantom asked:

    How would you know such a thing?

    Unsurprisingly, the answer never came.

  26. The reason the police are chasing after Heath after all these years may be more prosaic than you realise:

    As prime minister he was universally loathed by the public, and even by his own ministers. It’s impossible to annotate the trail of destruction he wrought through the political & social fabric of the country during the early 70’s.

    He reduced the working population to a three-day-week; took the country into the European federal state; enraged the unions; ruined industrial relations; further cocked-up Northern Ireland; tried to form a coalition with the Liberals and lost two elections.

    Throughout all of that (and after) he was frequently photographed at the helm of his 30ft yacht, which he pompously pronounced “Morning Cleeowd”.

    But the real reason the police now want his guts-for-garters, was his eventual destruction of the political career of Enoch Powell — a man who was immensely popular with the police and other workingclass people.

    Heath then retired comfortably as ‘Father of the House’, thus escaping any accounting for his short reign of disaster.

    I remember it all very well!
    His corpse should be disinterred and his head stuck on a spike at Tyburn Hill. (though getting at him for paedophilia will do, for now)

  27. Bernard

    You are nuts, but in a likeable way 🙂

  28. …so are you..

  29. Petr Tarasov, on August 5th, 2015 at 9:47 PM Said:
    Way back at lunchtime Phantom asked:

    How would you know such a thing?

    Unsurprisingly, the answer never came.

    That’s like a naive zebra asking a smarter one why does he believe that the lion is out to eat him – How would you know such a thing? It’s so innocent, it tugs at the heart-strings 🙂

    I’ve known for some time because, when one examines the modus operandi of the ‘protective authority’ one sees who are being protected. This matter has featured previously, the matter being the paedophilic network which covers pretty much everywhere and, like the ether, just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist. Here is a thread on ATW way back in 2012, and strangely, the same pattern, same naive parties, same smarter respondents:

    http://www.atangledweb.org/?p=36079

  30. No one here has said that there isn’t a network.

    You said things about the dearly departed Heath, and about what police ” knew “, and you have zero knowledge about the matter. There have been allegations, but we do not know if they are true.

    Everyone here may have suspicions, but no one here knows, and no honest person pretends to know.

  31. Phantom – what’s the ‘conspiracy’ and who are conspiring to do what?

    As for Heath, given that he is now dead, then very shortly what I ‘know’ will soon be confirmed and his victims will receive compensation from his ‘foundation’. But without the police to protect him, just like the pakis who rape British girls, Heath wouldn’t have got away with it. The problem appears to be the police, and who is going to police the police?

  32. Oh dear.

    Moment whip in Sir Edward Heath’s Government revealed that his job was to cover up scandals ‘involving small boys’ and the PM kept details in a ‘dirt book’

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3185922/Moment-Whip-Sir-Edward-Heath-s-Government-revealed-job-cover-scandals-involving-small-boys-PM-kept-details-dirt-book.html#ixzz3i0whsRd8

  33. Even when I was a kid there were stories, and jokes, around about Ted Heath and young boys, and that was in Ireland. People didn’t take these things as seriously then as they do now.

    I always thought the great “Funny he never married!” sketch was about Heath, but now I see it’s older.

    The British MI5 (or 6? I’m always confusing them) also had its eyes and ears deep in politics then, used to bug party meetings etc. So there’s little doubt that the authorities “knew” about Heath’s capers, although there was probably little in the way of forensic evidence.

    Although he was the PM of Internment and Bloody Sunday, I always sort of liked Ted Heath. He was so English he was almost a parody.
    My view of paedos is that so many people in power have always abused minors, of either sex, simply because so many people have that inclination. It’s evil, causes terribe damage over several generations – but we are going to have to face up to that fact, and moral outrage is no use.

  34. Phantom, on August 5th, 2015 at 6:52 PM Said:
    My comment was of course addressed to Allan

    And Colm, stop making sense you are interfering with the conspiracy

    Phantom – what is the conspiracy and who are conspiring to do what?

  35. Noel – yes, excellent sketch 🙂

  36. Allan

    You are speaking of a 100 year conspiracy. Or maybe it was longer. Perhaps it was a 200 year conspiracy. Only you can figure it out.

  37. But the real reason the police now want his guts-for-garters, was his eventual destruction of the political career of Enoch Powell — a man who was immensely popular with the police and other workingclass people

    ….His corpse should be disinterred and his head stuck on a spike at Tyburn Hill. (though getting at him for paedophilia will do, for now)

    Oh dear…..

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tory-mp-enoch-powell-investigated-as-alleged-member-of-westminster-paedophile-network-10142235.html

  38. Phantom, on August 5th, 2015 at 6:52 PM Said:
    My comment was of course addressed to Allan

    And Colm, stop making sense you are interfering with the conspiracy

    Phantom – how is the ‘conspiracy’ affecting the matter of this thread? Which particular part of the ‘conspiracy’ is pertinent here?

  39. a man who was immensely popular with the police and other workingclass people

    Yeah, and we can’t be having that can we .. nothing to see here, move along now.