web analytics

Is this a pillock I see before me?

By ATWadmin On November 5th, 2006

I read earlier this week that Ken Livingstone, the terrorist sympathizer and IRA apologist has had to change his tune somewhat.

Mohammed Kamel Mostafa, the son of jailed ‘hookie’ Hamza, who is at present appealing against his conviction, was discovered to be working on the London Underground network, but he seemed to have lied about his previous existence in the Yemen, where he had served a three-year stint for plotting a terror bombing!

Our Ken, at first seemed complacent with the ‘status quo’, saying ""Has he broken any law here in Britain? [No, so] we are happy to have him working for us,"; but after some reflection, went with the flow, and stated that he was " not aware of this man’s convictions at the time of my press conference this morning, only of his family. It is clear that anyone who has been involved in terrorism in any form cannot be employed on the London Underground."

Seems that the sub-contractor was only slightly put off when Hamza’s job application was scanned, as it seemed to say:-

Interests outside of work?

"Bringing the Caliphate to the godless hordes of Britain, and beheading those who mock my great Religion, whose only call is for Peace, light and happiness!"

5 Responses to “Is this a pillock I see before me?”

  1. eh? Surely the point it that Ken would have been a pillock had he ignored the new revelations.
    Is there any point to this post other than Muslim bashing?

  2. Sir Percy,

    Me? Muslim bashing? Surely not! I only query the motives of an elected official who, as the London Mayor, has access to all the relevant information, even about a sub-contractor’s employment policies, then goes on record stating that Hamza Junior is perfectly entitled to work on some pretty sensitive areas, like UNDERGROUND TUNNELS and TRAINS; and then has to recant; and confirm that ‘Hookie’s’ eldest had terrorist convictions in Yemen, and as such was not the best of persons to employ on the London Underground, where three of the four bombings happened just over a year ago!

  3. Sir Percy,

    I don’t think Livingstone responded to new revelations, he knew about the man’s conviction and dismissed it – why else would he have emphasised that the man had no convictions IN THIS COUNTRY? He "clarified" his position when he knew he’d gone too far.

  4. Pod says – Ken is an extremist in the same mould as Ruth Kelly

  5. Mike the answer is yes!

    I did think that the

    "Bringing the Caliphate to the godless hordes of Britain, and beheading those who mock my great Religion, whose only call is for Peace, light and happiness!"

    didn’t actually happen. However nothing actually would suprise me.