web analytics

By David Vance On October 17th, 2017

Meet “Hannah Mouncey”. Let’s cover this from the Legacy media POV first, shall we?

THE AFL has knocked back transgender footballer Hannah Mouncey’s nomination for Wednesday’s AFLW draft.

The AFL had initially said the decision would be made on the morning of the draft, but the game’s governing body moved on Tuesday afternoon to release its decision. In a statement, the AFL said Mouncey’s physical disparity was significant and that it would give her an unreasonable advantage when competing in the AFLW.

Now the reality check.  “She” is of course a “He”, and naturally HIS physicality will provide an unreasonable advantage to HIM.

But when you look at some of these charmers, this is already the case. The advance and acceptance of the tranny agenda is remarkable as we sprint towards Gomorrah.

First off, meet Caster Semenya. “She” regularly beats the girls with her feminine physique. You can see why.

Now meet Delia Johnson, pictured below, an adviser to several sporting bodies on transgender issues. What could POSSIBLY go wrong here? The fact of the matter is that transgender people deserve care and  understanding for their mental illness but indulging their wish to be something they are not is foolish at best.

24 Responses to “”

  1. “She” is of course a “He”, and naturally HIS physicality will provide an unreasonable advantage to HIM.

    Absolutely, DV, and it would be quite an advantage with his opponents all stretchered off. Aussie Rules is a tough old game. It’s quite possible that this decision has saved a woman’s life. (Why ladies are allowed to play is is another, degenerate matter of course.)

    Snowflakes: there are two sexes only and zero “genders”.

  2. I notice that ‘legacy media’ is steadily creeping into the lexicon alongside, ‘Common Purpose’ ‘dhimmi’ ‘the Stupid Club’ ‘enrichment’ ‘all cultures are equal’ etc.

    Anyone care to explain origin / etymology?

  3. ” Legacy media ” = the media that the vast majority of people read/listen to / watch

    We’re not in a know nothing blog only age quite yet.

  4. Jesus, I’ve just clicked on the ‘legacy media’ link and saw the source!!

    Political Correctness gone maaaaaaaaaad. I tells ye. Woulda thunk?

  5. Anyone care to explain origin / etymology?

    People waking up, mainly. But you commies own “enrichment” and “all cultures are equal”, along with “diversity is our strength”, “anti-racism isn’t anti-whiteness, promise” and “I like the blue ones, nurse”.

  6. So no, then just blah blah bollox Pete. Okay then.

    Speaking of the ‘legacy media’ I’m sure some here will just love this:

    https://www.channel4.com/news/neo-nazi-national-front-organiser-quits-movement-comes-out-as-gay-kevin-wilshaw-jewish-heritage

  7. It is inappropriate for transgender individuals to take advantage of the physical discrepancies in sport.

  8. Paul –

    You ought to know better than that. “All cultures are equal” derives from postmodern critical theory, or “Marxist nonsense” as decent people say.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory

    In sociology and political philosophy, the term critical theory describes the neo-Marxist philosophy of the Frankfurt School, which was developed in Germany in the 1930s. Frankfurt theorists drew on the critical methods of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Critical theory maintains that ideology is the principal obstacle to human liberation. Critical theory was established as a school of thought primarily by five Frankfurt School theoreticians: Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, and Erich Fromm. Modern critical theory has additionally been influenced by György Lukács and Antonio Gramsci, as well as the second generation Frankfurt School scholars, notably Jürgen Habermas.

    Yes, the 1968ers really did absorb this guff, and many of them now have power. Yes, this guff is still being taught in universities. In fact it’s never been so popular.

    Universities didn’t just become hotbeds of Marxist nuttyness. They were deliberately taken over.

  9. A lot of bollocks Pete.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/19/cultural-marxism-a-uniting-theory-for-rightwingers-who-love-to-play-the-victim

    Now, would you like to describe the etymology of Rightworld’s new buzz phrase or are you going to try and hang your coat on the ‘all cultures are equal’ myth?

  10. Pete’s theory is clearly spelled out in that book The Greening of the White House….

  11. If all cultures are not equal, which are the better ones and which are the worst?

  12. Outstanding Mahons 🙂

  13. The Anonymous post……

    David put a Title on it……

  14. The greatest culture in the world is quite obviously the Irish while all the others are clearly inferior.

    Seriously Phantom. Try and resist the temptation of railroading this into another one.

    I quite like my European culture which I think is superior to most if not all others.

  15. Paul –

    The Guardian thrives on ignorance. Stop feeding it. To claim that “cultural Marxism” is bollocks, when even its proponents coined and used the term, is beyond obtuse.

    You keep on asking your question. I’ve given you the answer. Have the grace to accept it.

  16. More bollocks Pete.

    ‘Cultural Marxism’ is merely a modern appropriation of the Nazis ‘Cultural Bolshevism’ and is what right extremists use to label anything they don’t like:

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/78mnny/unwrapping-the-conspiracy-theory-that-drives-the-alt-right

  17. Paul, you’re linking to people barely old enough to shave. Have respect for yourself. Just look at this nonsense from that Vice piece: “You might have heard the term thrown around by figureheads of the new radical right.”

    The author thinks that someone coined a decades-old title just last week.

    Stop it, just stop it.

  18. Pete. It’s a myth propagated first by the Nazis and then jumped on by people like yourself:

    http://iasc-culture.org/THR/channels/Infernal_Machine/2017/04/politics-is-downstream-from-culture-part-2-cultural-marxism-or-from-hegel-to-obama/

    It’s still a myth though as the spectacular failure of the alleged phantom of Cultural Marxism, supposedly everywhere from universities to churches and everywhere in between, to populate society with classical Communists at every sphere of influence will attest to.

    Give your muddled head a shake mate.

    Now that the origins of the spectre of ‘Cultural Marxism’ have been properly explained could you now do the same with ‘legacy media?’

  19. What are you talking about?

    It’s still a myth though as the spectacular failure of the alleged phantom of Cultural Marxism, supposedly everywhere from universities to churches and everywhere in between, to populate society with classical Communists at every sphere of influence will attest to.

    You don’t understand a thing. It’s cultural Marxism. Not flat out Bolshevism. Stop it Paul, you’re wasting my time.

  20. Oh I understand it Pete, I perfectly understand it.

    It’s a contrived, non existent phantom label that extremists attach on to things that they disagree with which was appropriated from the Nazi’s ‘Cultural Bolshevism’.

  21. Let’s look at some of the key personnel behind cultural marxism because, if it doesn’t exist, neither could they:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci

    Gramsci is best known for his theory of cultural hegemony, which describes how the state and ruling capitalist class – the bourgeoisie – use cultural institutions to maintain power in capitalist societies. The bourgeoisie in Gramsci’s view develops a hegemonic culture using ideology rather than violence, economic force, or coercion. Hegemonic culture propagates its own values and norms so that they become the “common sense” values of all and thus maintain the status quo. Hegemonic power is therefore used to maintain consent to the capitalist order, rather than coercive power using force to maintain order. This cultural hegemony is produced and reproduced by the dominant class through the institutions that form the superstructure.

    What does that mean? It means that those who are in charge can impose the ‘culture’ hence transgenderism, militant homosexuality, political correctness such as female firemen (seriously), feminism, paedophilia, perversion and pornography……..things that really are happening

    Gerald Warner summed it up perfectly:

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/gerald-warner-impact-of-politically-correct-britain-1-3128346

    Political correctness is cultural Marxism. The term was coined by Anton Semyonovich Makarenko, Lenin’s education guru and favourite wordsmith (he also invented the phrase “dictatorship of the proletariat”). From the beginning, Marxists recognised there was a lot more involved in imposing totalitarian social control than nationalisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange. In Hungary in 1919, during the short-lived but murderous Communist dictatorship of Bela Kun, his deputy “commissar for culture”, Georg Lukacs, introduced a programme of “cultural terrorism” under which he imposed pornographic sex education on schoolchildren, promoting promiscuity, denouncing the family and encouraging pupils to mock their parents and religion. The question Lukacs posed was: “Who will save us from Western Civilisation?” Four years later, Lukacs was one of the founders of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, from which emerged the obscenity known today as Frankfurt School Marxism, dedicated to the destruction of civilisation. Max Horkheimer, its sometime director, followed up Lukacs’ experiment by grafting Freudianism onto Marxism. In this he was followed by Herbert Marcuse, an admirer of the Marquis de Sade, who expressed his belief in “polymorphous perversity”. This was complemented by the cultural Marxism of Gramsci and other adherents such as Adorno. Whether or not the Frankfurt Marxists had become sceptical of the command economy as an economic instrument, their main target was “the culture”.

    And how was ‘cultural marxism’ imposed?

    By corrupting the educators, Frankfurt Marxism secured its ascendancy over the elites. Education, the media, publishing, politics – all the commanding heights have been occupied by the cultural Marxist forces of anti-civilisation. The targets are vestigial Christianity, traditional ­institutions, national identity, the family – seen as an intolerable rival to the ­intruder state – and relations between men and women. The instruments of subversion are mass immigration and multiculturalism, to abolish homogeneity and national identity; the imposition of politically correct language (foreseen by Orwell as “Newspeak”) to prevent the articulation of dissident ideas; hate laws (also predicted by Orwell as “thought crime”); feminism, designed to alienate women from traditional motherhood and family roles; and promotion of the homosexual agenda (because anti-family). The introduction of “aggravated” offences has ended equality under the law.

    This is where we are today. Terms like ‘firemen’ are being removed because “6-foot hairy arsed blokes who break down doors” are unacceptable whereas women who cannot break down doors are recruited, as an example from yesterday.

  22. More phantom menace invented bollocks.

  23. Let’s look at what effects the march of cultural marxism through academia has had – and this is current.

    Tucker Carlson on Fox News interviewed ‘Professor’ George Ciccariello-Maher (Drexel University) and the real demolition begins at 7.30 when Carlson asks what the writings mean. This really does show how damaging the assault by cultural marxism on academia has been and how genuine academic rigour has been replaced by utter bull-shit

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aikF-M-59OA

    The reason why the ‘professor’ has been challenged is because he wrote…….

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/Drexel-officials-Professor-George-Ciccariello-Mahers-White-Genocide-tweet-was-utterly-reprehensible.html

    A Drexel professor whose tweets about white supremacy sparked an uproar on social media says his words were misinterpreted satire.

    “All I Want for Christmas is White Genocide,” associate professor of politics and global studies George Ciccariello-Maher wrote on Christmas Eve.

    He then wrote on Sunday: “To clarify: when the whites were massacred during the Haitian revolution, that was a good thing indeed.”

  24. More constructed paranoid bolloxology.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.