web analytics

What you are missing

By Patrick Van Roy On December 6th, 2017

Unless you get your news from multiple sources all day long, everyday you get a very slanted view. If you watch just FOX, or just CNN, MSNBC, the BBC, or SKYNEWS  you are getting a very limited view of events and you are getting one slant on any issue.

If you are outside the United States and are trying to get a view of what is going here…. good luck it’s not going to happen.  The view of events outside is even more filtered and convoluted.

 

Donald Trump and the charge of “Russian Collusion” ……. The Myth and the Madness

There is a Special Prosecutor investigating the Sitting President. The basis is Hillary Clinton lost the Election not because she ran a bad campaign, not because half the country believe she has been bribed and committed multple Felonies, but because the Russians and Donald Trump Stole It….

Now they can’t tell you what they colluded on, they can’t find a crime regarding the election let alone name one. This is the first Special Prosecutor to have ever been convened without an initial crime to go in search of one. Every person Mueller has charged ALL charges have had NOTHING to do with the Election.

The Team doing the investigation is a political hit team NOT a criminal investigation team…. Below is a 9 min clip that displays the ridiculousness and corruption that is occurring in in this investigation.

So before you believe that Flynn is going to Bring down Trump, or that anything to do with Mueller’s investigation is legitimate, watch this 9 min clip and see how ridiculous and corrupt this is. Or you can be a mushroom and Stay in the Dark and be fed Manure.

14 Responses to “What you are missing”

  1. Some people get the news from multiple sources, compare them, then think about what they have read and come to a decision. Not everybody buys into this slant or that slant. For some it is easy to discern when another person is the victim of slant rather than dispassionate consideration of what he read in several sources.

    Mueller is a prosecutor who has already charged four people with crimes. How can you say there is no crime? Prosecutors do not work on your schedule. You will have to wait as he builds cases and brings further charges. He was empowered by Congress to investigate and will do so thoroughly. That is the way our system works.

  2. Simple NYr he has charged 4 people with Crimes 2 people with fraud from ten years ago who were working with the Podesta Bros(democrats) when they committed their crimes, and 2 people with procedural crimes.

    It’s been a year and a half, they have foun d no evidence of the trump Campaign working with the Russians to interfere in our election.

    I ask you did you watch the clip above? Somehow I doubt it, the clip above goes directly to the integrity of the investigators Mueller hired. I take it you have no problem with conflict of interest.

    I will however NOT LET THIS GO.
    If you people tire of it complain to Phantom.
    He accused me of inciting violence, that is a charge I will not let slide and I will continue until hell freezes over until YOU Tom retract it.
    Phantom where is my apology?
    You repeated over and over two lies. You have tried to hem and haw your way out of it. Are you not man enough to admit you are wrong?
    You repeatedly accused me of calling for violence put up proof or apologize.

  3. so NY you don’t care about conflict of interest?

    You’re just another NYr who only cares that your candidate lost and to undo that lying and corruption is just fine….. ok then

  4. Either what Carlsson is saying is correct, or it’s not. That FBI agent Strzok is politically motivated and let Hillary’s aides off on the same charge that he’s attempting to nail Flynn is either true or not. From what I hear and linked to a few days ago, it’s true – and I suspect that Trump/Bannon is passing the FBI all the rope that it can use to hang itself.

  5. I have to say Allan on this we are in agreement.

    What amazes me are those who have their fingers in their ears and are humming so they don’t have to hear what they don’t want to hear.

    Look if Trump was Guilty of something he should be prosecuted, but we we are witnessing is that the LAW does not apply to one of the political party’s in the US.

    It threatens the Republic.

  6. It’s all part of the process isn’t it Pat, after all Clinton was under investigation for a supposedly corrupt land deal, not for nailing interns in the Whitehouse

  7. That’s what Special Counsels do… find crimes.

    I have no problem with that, lock up every corrupt bastard they come across.

    What I have a problem with is a prosecutor that applies different standards according to your political affiliation.

  8. I hear that the “very senior” transition official Flynn is talking about is Kushner.

    LOCK THEM UP!

  9. EP did you watch the clip?

    and what are you doing here this early in the day?

  10. Noel do you have a link to what you heard?

  11. “I ask you did you watch the clip above?” No. Tucker Carlson is worthless. And, I prefer reading to TV. The idea that Robert Mueller is conducting a partisan prosecution is ridiculous.

    He is finding criminals and charging them. Trump should be cooperating rather than hindering him, if he has nothing to hide. If Trump is clean, he should make the case and this will end. On the other hand…

  12. New Yorker, on December 6th, 2017 at 4:10 PM Said:

    “I ask you did you watch the clip above?” No. Tucker Carlson is worthless. And, I prefer reading to TV.

    OK – here, you can read it and now you have no excuses

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/two-senior-fbi-officials-on-clinton-trump-probes-exchanged-politically-charged-texts-disparaging-trump/2017/12/02/9846421c-d707-11e7-a986-d0a9770d9a3e_story.html?utm_term=.125d9c696aef

    The former top FBI official assigned to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election was taken off that job this past summer after his bosses discovered he and another member of Mueller’s team had exchanged politically charged texts disparaging President Trump and supportive of Hillary Clinton, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

    Peter Strzok, as deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI, was a key player in the investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server to do government work as secretary of state, as well as the probe into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election.

    Strzok was one of the agents who interviewed Clinton herself in the probe during a 3-hour testimony.

    Strzok and other Department of Justice officials eventually ruled that Clinton was “extremely careless” in handling her email communications, but recommended that no charges be filed against her.

  13. Strzok personally first downgraded the description of Clinton’s actions from ” gross negligence ” to ” extremely careless ”

    ” Gross negligence ” is worse under the law I believe, and I also believe that it is an appropriate description for her conduct with the server.

  14. Gross Negligence is the EXACT wording in an Espionage Charge.

    I will however NOT LET THIS GO.
    If you people tire of it complain to Phantom.
    He accused me of inciting violence, that is a charge I will not let slide and I will continue until hell freezes over until YOU Tom retract it.
    Phantom where is my apology?
    You repeated over and over two lies. You have tried to hem and haw your way out of it. Are you not man enough to admit you are wrong?
    You repeatedly accused me of calling for violence put up proof or apologize.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.