web analytics

This Woman is Dangerous

By Patrick Van Roy On October 11th, 2018

The woman crime boss is rare, but always the most evil in every way. Hillary Clinton is such a person. Listen as she nonchalantly justifies and calls for violence in the American Political Process.  During this interview she describes to the letter her own exact actions and behavior attributing these to President Trump.

Just as it was she who colluded with a foreign spy and the russians to destroy Trump while he ran for office and then manipulated their political pawns at Justice to actually open an investigation with zero evidence and no crime only the ACCUSATION of one.  (we’ve never seen that have we).

Watch the interview, if you don’t laugh and you are not disgusted….. YOU need to check your moral compass.

66 Responses to “This Woman is Dangerous”

  1. Yuck.

  2. Hillary’s definition of “regular order” = power in the hands of the Democrats. end of story.

  3. Patrick and Patty

    She lost the election. Get over it 😉

  4. The sorest winners of all time

  5. Another cadaverous equid being flagellated.

  6. By saying that Democrats cannot be civil at this time, but can do so only after they get their way in the next election, She and the likes of Eric Holder are playing absolutely into the hands of the Republicans on the eve of the midterm elections

    They are about to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-cannot-be-civil-1539211192?emailToken=ad213b86741729acc5c64ad31a586f48D2DNe6OxRAN9/M4BQBWLThmOIypdxHC9plNaNhsEHoqEbkA8b6jSvceQhMMgoO+m&reflink=article_copyURL_share

    The above article is recommended

  7. Hillary Clinton will help cause the Democrats degeat in two elections in a row

    Bill Clinton was the best politician of his generation by a mile, she is the worst

    Utterly tone deaf

  8. Defeat

  9. cadaverous equid being flagellated

    Have you swallowed(and regurgitated)a dictionary Paul ? 🙂

  10. The most ardent supporters of one side usually are unable to be critical of their own standard bearer. Such is the case here.

  11. But here I don’t even think that Most Democrats will see her as The leading spokesperson

    She was the architect of a loss last time, and the left wing of the party and the young voters despise her

    The Republicans have Crooked Trump as their undisputed leader now. The Democrats have the same tired faces With no one on the horizon

    It’s very bad for the country

    You would want two healthy parties and I don’t even think we have one

    We have a crime party and an Antifa lite party

  12. I seldom swallow anything Colm.

  13. One can not give Colm a line like that…

  14. The beast is unscrupulous, a warmonger, manipulative, egocentric, power hungry etc and will undoubtedly do damage to the Dems’ campaign but I don’t think she’s the black death, as Pat alleges.

  15. Colm readily takes every line given to him Mahons

  16. Pat “ Uranium One “ and Pete are too extreme to give correct analysis to Political or economic issues

    They see their side as 100% correct all the time And everybody else as 100% wrong all the time and life ain’t like that

    Sometimes the other guy is right

  17. Ya think this brilliant statement will get her a place on the “no fly” list? If so they’ll have the FBI confiscate all her brooms. Gee, just two weeks before her annual fly-over too!

  18. once again nonsense Phantom I do not see my side as 100% correct all the time And everybody else as 100% wrong all the time I have blasted the GOP on here continually.

    I have said other than involving the War GW was a lousy President. I attacked his Holiness John McCain at every opportunity when he was alive and when he died. I can list a dozen republicans I have trashed on these pages.

    It’s fine that you don’t care for me, It’s fine that you don’t agree with me, but it’s not fine that you continually lie. You are a metrosexual led by your emotions and blinded by your hate in oh so many areas.

    Obama was a modern Leninist and Hillary is a mobster. They both violated this country and yes Colm Hillary lost but she didn’t go away and those who broke the Law for the two of them have yet to be prosecuted, and until they are I WILL NOT LET IT GO.

  19. Again you lack all self awareness

    Your side is warmongering/ constant interference in affairs of all other countries / Israel before America / the American worker should have no rights to organize but corporations should have all rights / an AR-15 assault weapon in every bedroom / destroy the EPA and trust the polluters to protect the environment/ no government role in organizing health care

    This is the hell on earth that you support , all here know it, be proud of this lunatic worldview which is shared by no one here in its entirety

  20. Obama was a modern Leninist and Hillary is a mobster

    That’s simply untrue Pat.

    The two of them have yet to be prosecuted, and until they are I WILL NOT LET IT GO.

    I don’t think that the various US investigative and judicial agencies read ATW Pat and if the above is your intention then I suspect that we’re in for a long ride as much of what you allege regarding both tends to be imagined hyperbole.

    You are a metrosexual led by your emotions and blinded by your hate in oh so many areas

    I know that discussion here can be a bit robust at times and for whatever reason you tend to reserve your special ire for your fellow Americans Mahons and, in particular, Phantom but I think the above was a tad personal and tatoally unwarranted.

  21. Sky doesn’t have the slightest idea what Leninism or communism is

    On issues like this, he is on the same intellectual desert island is Pete Moore

    Words have meanings. It helps no one to just make shit up

  22. -This guy –

    Sorry this is voice recognition and I’m moving around!

    I’m beginning a convoluted journey that will take me to South Bend Indiana!

  23. “She lost the election. Get over it”

    Please tell that to the Democrats, the political party that carried on like screaming children having a tantrum at the routine Senatorial confirmation of a Presidential pick for the Supreme Court.

  24. “She lost the election. Get over it”

    And while you’re at it, tell that to Hillary Cinton and The Resistance, who are now advocating violence against their political opponents.

  25. Patty, people shouldn’t ‘advocate violence’ against their political opponents except in the most extreme of circumstances, of which this certainly is not.

    However, are you suggesting that after elections if people don’t agree with the person elected or the policies implemented that people should just keep schtum and suck it up?

  26. There are many ways aye of communicating witihout predatory ambushing

  27. I’ve communicated With my state and local representatives Plenty of times

    I disagree with them on some things

    I’ve never suddenly appeared out of nowhere and out of context With cameras pre-positioned

    This is highly inciivil behavior

    And you notice that none of the Americans here support these tactics

  28. These bridge burning tactics are self-defeating

    The activists Are losing supporters for the Dems Every time they pull stunts like this

    Trump realizes this; They are completely playing into his hands

  29. I was specifically referring to this comment Pantom:

    The political party that carried on like screaming children having a tantrum

    This is highly inciivil behavior

    So what? Politics is a dirty game. If someone can’t afford the big $ of the professional lobbyists in order to reach the ivory towers and prefers to take the opportunity of more direct accountability that, IMO, is okay by me.

  30. It is a dirty game

    Let’s not make it dirtier

    These tactics are unsound – I guarantee you many who might vote Dem. esp now, Are completely turned off by all of this. And it is well noted that few leaving Democrats condemn these things, while a number of leading Democrats
    support it – Waters, Ellison, Hillary Clinton, many others

  31. Harrassing people trying to eat a meal in a restaurant is intruding on someone’s private life, not making them accountable. Two ladies robusty questioning a Senator in his place of work is.

  32. Two ladies robustly

  33. this is one of your best spiels yet….

    Phantom, on October 11th, 2018 at 2:06 PM Said: Edit Comment
    Again you lack all self awareness

    Your side is warmongering/ constant interference in affairs of all other countries / Israel before America / the American worker should have no rights to organize but corporations should have all rights / an AR-15 assault weapon in every bedroom / destroy the EPA and trust the polluters to protect the environment/ no government role in organizing health care

    This is the hell on earth that you support , all here know it, be proud of this lunatic worldview which is shared by no one here in its entirety

    Your wording is hostile and intended to denote negative connotations but lets look at what you are saying and I’ll explain why I’m right.

    Your side is warmongering/ constant interference in affairs of all other countries / Israel before America
    Defense of our nation is not warmongering and undermining threats is justified interference.

    The Russians just spent 100s of billions of dollars modernizing their weapons systems including a first strike cruise missile while of course they have seized two large chunks of other countries with military force.

    The Chinese are also spending 100s of billions on their military including building islands from scratch to base their new advance weaponry to take control of an international trade region.

    The Iranians, Saudis, and Turks are a powder keg waiting to go off. Israel is our first line of defense in the ME. Strategically it’s more important than east Berlin ever was.

    To not maintain Israels strength and to not flex our own military strength is an invitation to our enemies. The world is in a constant state of warfare it is civilizations natural state. To not do these things would be negligent to the american people and their safety.

    the American worker should have no rights to organize but corporations should have all rights
    This is a canard… a settled issue. Unions as a need and a positive force are no longer needed and no longer exist. They are nothing now but a destructive parasite and exist solely for politics on the national level not the benefit of the individual worker. There is a reason the largest and only growing Union in the nation is the Federal Workers Union.

    an AR-15 assault weapon in every bedroom
    Assault weapons are illegal and do not exist in the general population….. there are exceptions but the statement is idiotic. As a matter of common practicality every home should have a shotgun for home defense and the right of the Law Abiding Adult to carry a Firearm should not be infringed. Self defense is a keystone of our society whether you like it not.

    destroy the EPA and trust the polluters to protect the environment

    Conservatives…. what does the word mean ? There are ample laws on the book to protect the environment, the US is the cleanest industrial nation on the planet. The leninist weaponized the EPA to attack American Industry and not for the benefit of the environment but to provide opportunity for graph from the promotion of industries that are not yet viable. That is not the governments job to pick winners and losers… it’s the markets.

    no government role in organizing health care

    Your damn right The problems with our healthcare system before Obamacare were caused by government regulation and the commie socialist bastards made it worse with Obamacare NOT better.

    You live in a bubble Phantom an echo chamber of one sided lunacy and you do nothing to broaden your view, and your views are just simply wrong.

  34. Paul I pick on my fellow americans because they are americans and I expect more from them. (no offense intended)

    And two paid agitators invading a secure elevator, mind you it has a guard are you aware of that? Are you aware the guards job is to prevent lunatics and paid agitators from invading that space and the guard on duty should be fired.

    That was not two robust constituants it was two female thugs presenting a threat…. they should have been taized.

  35. And two paid agitators invading a secure elevator, mind you it has a guard are you aware of that?

    Well let’s take your guards / secure elevator at face value and presume that it’s correct, (and I’m not sure that it is), then what should the two ladies be charged with? tresspassing?, a totally different story entirely. Should the alleged security be fired for not doing their job?

    If what you say is correct, (and I’m not sure that it is), how does it explain that prior to the elevator the two ladies had been at Flake’s office talking to his staffers?

    https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/30/politics/suzanne-malveaux-reporters-notebook-jeff-flake-elevator/index.html

    Could it be plausible to assume that the women had permission to be in the hall where the elevator was and wouldn’t that then negate the charge of tresspassing?

    It’s my understanding that Maria Archilla works for an NGO in NYC but so what if both are paid advocates? They’te doing what professional lobbyists get paid (hundreds of?) thousands of dollars to do.

    That was not two robust constituants it was two female thugs presenting a threat

    Much like your ‘violent act’ yesterday this is another straw man. The absolute absence of violence or force means that there was no ‘act of violence’ nor ‘threat’

    Paul I pick on my fellow americans because they are americans and I expect more from them

    How and why do you ‘expect more from them?’ Are you suggesting that because of some accident of birth they are instilled with some kind of super power?

  36. here ya go Phantom the interfering of St Barrack……

    (Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch obtained 32 pages of records showing the Obama administration sent U.S. taxpayers’ funds to a group backed by billionaire George Soros, which used the money to fund left-wing political activities in Albania, including working with the country’s socialist government to push for highly controversial judicial “reform.” The records also detail how the Soros operation helped the State Department review grant applications from other groups for taxpayer funding.

    but it’s us rightwing warmongers that do the interfering…….

  37. Paul…..

    There was a guard on the elevator. The two thugs had access to the public hallways, there is more area in that building that is OFF LIMITS to the PUBLIC than OPEN to the public and venturing into those areas IS TRESPASSING and trespassing on Federal Grounds is a FELONY. It is NOT a strawman argument. Intimidation is an act of violence and trespassing on Federal property is a crime.

    As for this………

    How and why do you ‘expect more from them?’ Are you suggesting that because of some accident of birth they are instilled with some kind of super power?

    By the blessing of God they were born and raised in the United States and it may not give them “Super Powers” however it does give them a naturally superior intelligence and a far superior morality than those not as fortunate as those of us who were blessed to be born in the true promise land.

  38. There was a guard on the elevator. The two thugs had access to the public hallways

    Please supply evidence to support this claim and the allegation that the two women were not allowed in the vicinity of where they were.

    It is NOT a strawman argument. Intimidation is an act of violence

    There was no violence real or imagined. Your insistence is a straw man.

    However it does give them a naturally superior intelligence and a far superior morality

    How very Allanesque of you.

    That Trump guy was really moral in ‘trying to fuck’ his married tv co host and bedding a porn star while his wife nursed their infant son wasn’t he?

  39. How very Allanesque of you.

    Nothing I said was racist, race based or anything of the sort….. Americans of every race, color, and creed are better than any citizen of any other country… sorry that’s just way it is…. what can I say.

    we are far from perfect, but we’re still better than everyone else… I mean c’mon we are American after all.

  40. Pat, Allan bases his opinions of a person’s character on an accident of birth with the only difference being that while his notion of superiority is based on skin tone yours is based on nationality.

    It is differing degrees of precisely the same principle.

    That point on morality was quickly put to bed wasn’t it?

    Growing up who would you rather have had as a neighbour? Ted Bundy or Mahatma Gandi?

  41. Paul

    There is a difference between Patrick and Allan. Patrick types those comments with a sense of knowing he is winding up us Euroweenies, whereas Allan is humourless in his ethno superior intent.

  42. …PS, I think Ted Bundy would be worried about having Patrick as a neighbour 😉

  43. Patrick types those comments with a sense of knowing he is winding up us Euroweenies

    I know that many times Pat’s tongue is firmly in his cheek when making these ridiculous statements Colm, I mean how could you speak about superior morals of a nation when their top dog has the morals of a snake?

    For all his insanity and pugnacious belligerance I know that Pat isn’t a racist and doesn’t believe that superiority is based on race or nationality. Responding to such faux smugness with equally faux affront is all part of the game.

  44. Patrick is unfocused, inconsistent, and has the most exceptional anger management issues.

    Allan is delusional in his own controlled demolition way, but his deep hatreds give him a constant focus. He’s not angry at all, he’s as cool as Heydrich walking into a meeting.

  45. I Have no idea whether Patrick is racist or not

    But when a white guy brags all the time about how non-racist he is, one should not accept that at face value.

  46. I Have no idea whether Patrick is racist or not

    Like everyone else here I’m basing my opinions of others on their utterances on ATW Phantom.

    On that, I note that his utterances regarding my request for evidence to his claims above are conspicuious by their absence.

  47. quite excellent

    But on the same incident, you I believe referred to the two women as sexual assault victims

    Like Patrick, you’ve been noticeably silent at requests for evidence to back up your own claims. How are you making out?

  48. Paul

    I like your 11:38 last sentence explanation. You play the game well sir. 😊

    Phantom

    Allan will be modestly pleased by your Heydrich comparison !

  49. You I believe referred to the two women as sexual assault victims

    Yes, much like the comments on ATW I have to take what I read in the media and what they say at face value as I have no way of verifying either way. If you wish to disprove or cast doubt on them I’m certainly open to persuasion.

    They made the claims, not me. Pat made the claims regarding the elevator in question being a guarded senators’ only elevator and the two ladies having no permission to be in that part of the building. I presume he has evidence to support the claims HE makes?

  50. Do not assume , In the absence of any evidence at all

    That’s the whole purpose of the discussion of this issue

    Kavanaugh has been condemned in the minds of many, Based on a mixture of unproven allegations and disapproven allegations

    No one at this point should be blindly accepting Self descriptions by hit team activists Or anyone else with an agenda

  51. Patrick’s comment that the elevators in question are designated for use by Senators and are not for general public was correct. He males enough incorrect statements that I could see how one would assume he might be wrong

  52. Yes mahons that sounds right.

    The desire for extremely violent police brutality in that situation was wrong, the read of the situation about right

  53. Firstly Phantom I don’t think I’ve been ‘been noticeably silent at requests for evidence to back up your own claims’ as when I’ve been asked for evidence I attempt to provide it.

    I don’t think that, until now, I’ve been asked to provide anything on this.

    I have have taken at face value and repeated the claims of sexual assault which the press have reported on and have no means of verifying the claims. If you wish to challenge them I’m all ears. Pat on the other hand has made the claims that this was a senators’ only elevator and that the two women had no permission to be there off his own bat. I’d be interested in seeing the source of these claims.

  54. Patrick’s comment that the elevators in question are designated for use by Senators and are not for general public was correct

    Was it Mahons? There are some elevators for senators use only and they are clearly signed:

    https://www.google.es/search?q=Elevator+for+senators+use+only&rlz=1C1CHBD_esES788ES788&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjmm6jq8YDeAhUP66QKHQOAAa4Q_AUIDigB&biw=1517&bih=695

    I’ve looked at the picture of the two women and senator and see no such sign on THE elevator in question. There’s also the claim that the two women didn’t have permission to be in that part of the building.

  55. You are the one that wrote that here, after the many comments about the complaints on Kavanaugh as being based on nothing that could be remotely proven

    I think that you were very naive, especially after the discussions we’ve been having, that you simply believe something that you thought you read somewhere.

    I use the word allege a lot. It is not a wishy washy word.I recommend that you consider using it in discussions on things like this.

    You have no idea whether these women are or are not victims of anything and neither do I and neither does any dopey and naive reporter that might have said that they were without doing any research.

  56. https://qz.com/1406848/who-were-the-two-women-who-confronted-senator-jeff-flake/

    The statements by one or both are utterly unknowable.

    Does not mean that they are lying.

    No one here knows.

  57. The veracity of the statements is unknowable.

  58. You are the one that wrote that here

    Wrote what where?

    I base my opinions on these two ladies holding the Snator to robust direct accountability on what the media have cited. What do you base your challenge on and what does Pat base his elevator / tresspassing claims on?

  59. Paul

    Don’t beat this to death.

    You wrote that these two were victims of something.

    No one else here has described them as that.

    At a time of many disputed charges, show the slightest amount of skepticism, accept nothing at face value. Especially when coming from someone who is from an activist group.

    Not to much to ask.

    Now, off to breakfast in sunny Ohio.

  60. I’m afraid you’re the one beating it to death Phantom.

    My point and comments were on how I found the two ladies holding the senator to account to be absolutely justified.

  61. Paul of course a large part of my comments are tongue in cheek they always have been but you ask why I pick on Mahons and Phantom….. Alright let me be honest.

    I pick on Mahons because by all measure he is a highly successful lawyer very well respected and highly intelligent, yet he refuses to contribute at the level he should and he refuses to present logical arguments for his positions. I always expected more from his contribution. Add to that his constant calling me a Liar when I have never Lied on this site and he has never been able to show a single Lie, yet even in this thread he calls me a liar.

    As for Phantom over the years I have really come to dislike him. Where your and my arguing over the years Paul has led to what I consider a friendship the arguing between Phantom and I has gotten bitter and hateful.

    We all strongly believe are core issues mine are the constitution, and constitutional Law. And I truly enjoy breaking balls, but I have always been honest about it. If I’m fucking with someone they know it. I don’t try to hide my anger or dislike in fake reason.

    Look at these statement

    Phantom, on October 12th, 2018 at 11:51 AM Said: Edit Comment
    Patrick is unfocused, inconsistent, and has the most exceptional anger management issues.

    I have never been inconsistent about ANYTHING my positions have never wavered. If I come off unfocused at times there could be several reasons for that. As for anger management issues I vent my anger, I let it out I don’t hide it or bury it.

    and this statement….. is typical Phantom bullshit.

    Phantom, on October 12th, 2018 at 12:04 PM Said: Edit Comment
    I Have no idea whether Patrick is racist or not

    But when a white guy brags all the time about how non-racist he is, one should not accept that at face value.

    That without question is Phantom saying I’m a racist. He couches it in a logical statement with wording like he is analyzing, but he’s not he’s saying I’m a racist without having the balls to actually say it.

    There is a long list of reasons for why I dislike the man, I’m not going to list them. I’ve tried to end the bitterness between us multiple times over the years he refuses, so I no longer try and I take pleasure in pointing out how wrong he is on so many issues.

    My picking on those two has now been explained…. no sarcasm, no tongue in cheek.

  62. You constantly say that you are accused of being a ” liar ” when all it usually is that you are enraged at being called out on your endless mistakes and misstatements.

    Saying that every correction is an accusation is yet another example of logical confusion.

    You’n’Allan are probably not liars at all. You believe what you say, including the false things. Doesn’t make you a liar. It makes you wrong.

  63. I wrote Patrick that you wrote incorrectly, not that you lied here. Comprehend.

  64. He’s said That people here call him a liar hundreds and thousands of times

    I don’t think I’ve ever called him that,, Maybe somebody else has, but not very often

    He’s a hypersensitive snowflake , One who really really really hates being proven wrong- But he’s proven wrong all the time which is why he’s angry all the time

    Why not try to be right some of the time?

  65. I didn’t write that comment to argue with either of you.

    Paul asked for an explanation for why I fu** with the two of you more than others. I gave him a straight answer.

    I am not being drawn into it today.

  66. Onward!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.