web analytics

NO RETURN FOR ISLAMIC STATE MONSTERS

By David Vance On February 18th, 2019

Our knowledge of Islamic State concubine Shamima Begum has increased in recent days. Initially all we understood was that this ‘British School Girl” had travelled from the UK to join up with the dark ages death cult Islamic State. She made this decision in 2015 which was AFTER the world became aware of the genocidal savagery that characterised that group. So it is safe to conclude that the barbarism attracted her – not surprised her.

WHAT WE NOW KNOW

In the past few days our understanding of Ms Begum has been enhanced as follows;

  1. Begum says she “did have a good time” during her years embedded with IS. Thousands of innocent people were murdered and maimed in the most savage way imaginable during this period but perhaps she was having SUCH “a good time” she overlooked this?
  2. Begum declared she had no issues with the decapitations of human beings because “it is allowed in Islamic law”
  3. Begum believes that the massacre of children at the Manchester Arena was “justified”
  4. Begum has named her son “Jarrah”,as she says her ISIS terrorist husband wanted. The obscure name comes from a Jihad warlord named “Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah”, who launched a genocidal massacre of the entire Jewish population in Khaybar, over 1300 years ago.

In addition to the above she feels that she is fully entitled to return to the UK and is due our full “sympathy”

Her team of lawyers (yes, she has a “team” of legal experts seeking her return to the UK) have gone so far as to compare her to a returning WW1 soldier!

CHARACTER REFERENCES

It’s useful to also understand that her main legal adviser is Tasnime Akunjee.  He is the man reputed to have claimed that the UK security services “created”serial beheader Jihadi Johnand that British Muslims should not co-operate with the police.In the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, he  is reputed to have written on his Facebook page ‘Please don’t REPEATEDLY poke a sleeping bear then cry when it bites “your head off’

How charming.

In terms of character reference Hanif Qadir, who once fought for Al Qaeda, says Shamima Begum should be brought back to the UK so that she is given the chance of rehabilitation.

That’s right – a former Al Queda terrorist recommends we accept back this Islamic State terrorist.

NO RETURN FOR IS MONSTERS

Begum betrayed the UK when she chose Islamic State. She forfeits any right to return. Her Bangladeshi father can apply for her to get a Bangladeshi passport. She can then seek sanctuary there. Under no circumstances should the UK provide her with a safe haven.

If the UK is so weak as to let her back then we signal to the world that we welcome unrepentent Islamic State monsters. The consequence of that will be measured in body bags.

18 Responses to “NO RETURN FOR ISLAMIC STATE MONSTERS”

  1. Strong post.

    ” Monsters ” is the correct word.

    I’m not sure if they deserve to be allowed to breathe my air anyone on the planet, but they definitely don’t deserve to be in your lands.

    This isn’t a game, legal or otherwise. They can never be allowed back.

  2. This isn’t a game, legal or otherwise

    Interesting perspective. International law should be flouted?

  3. I didn’t stutter.

    These people merit no sympathy, and should be dealt with as the extreme threats that they are.

  4. “International law”
    Begum left the UK using her sister’s passport.
    She is currently in an ISIS prison camp in Syria
    The UK has no diplomatic arrangements with Syria
    The UK cannot issue her with a passport
    Therefore she cannot return to the UK
    That is International law.

  5. The right to self defense is enshrined in all national and international law that I am aware of.

    Not allowing the satanic murderers back is self defense.

  6. David, she is a British national and whilst consular assistance in Syria has been suspended she as a British national is still entitled to consular protection in any of the several countries that border Syria.

    The right to self defense is enshrined in all national and international law that I am aware of

    Pre emption isn’t self defence.

    And this isn’t an argument for her to be allowed back, I don’t think she should. It’s the reality of how things aren’t as cut and dried as you seem to suggest.

  7. here we have one also….

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/17/us-woman-hoda-muthana-deeply-regrets-joining-isis-and-wants-return-home

  8. Bring them home and lock them up….

    We have two choices they all go back to the country where they are a citizen or turn them over to the Syrians.

    If we bring this woman home she should be locked up for life or executed, but we either bring them home and try them or turn them over to Syria.

  9. As far as I am concerned, these creatures are home. They chose to go there. They chose to take husbands there. They chose to have children there. If they are unhappy there then I suggest they go and live somewhere where they can be happy, because they can never be happy living in a county and its people who they obviously despise. May I suggest they go and live in any number of the Arab or Muslim majority countries throughout the MENA and Indian Sub-Continent ?

  10. Restore the power on banishment to the pI’mjqhmonarchy.

  11. As far as I am concerned, these creatures are home. They chose to go there. They chose to take husbands there. They chose to have children there. If they are unhappy there then I suggest they go and live somewhere where they can be happy, because they can never be happy living in a county and its people who they obviously despise. May I suggest they go and live in any number of the Arab or Muslim majority countries throughout the MENA and Indian Sub-Continent ?

    Well said Sir.

    These Islamic Jihadist should not have to suffer the horror and indignity of living amongst civilized tolerant infidels in a tolerant civilized society.

    Leave them in their Islamic paradise.

    Let Allah sort them out.

  12. Can someone not arrange for an empty island somewhere where all these losers can be put and left to organise their island caliphate?

    Where’s the UN when you need it.

  13. Can someone not arrange for an empty island somewhere where all these losers can be put and left to organise their island caliphate?

    A similar solution of an ethnically religious homeland was implemented in 1948. It’s been a bit troublesome since.

  14. Can someone not arrange for an empty island somewhere where all these losers can be put and left to organise their island caliphate?

    That island for those losers of the brutal Islamic caliphate, would not be required if the ME had a Saddam Hussein, or a Colonel Gaddafi in charge…uh oh, hold on a minute..

  15. Comparing Israel to the caliphate.

    Yea, sure.

  16. Phantom, on February 19th, 2019 at 4:17 PM Said:
    Comparing Israel to the caliphate.

    Yea, sure.

    Its those pesky Jooos again.

    😏

  17. Your knickers seem to be twisted over nothing again Phantom. Noel suggested imposing a mono religious / ethnic state and I was just stating that such an imposition had previously been a teensy weensy bit problamatic.

    AFAIK there is no living memory of a caliphate to compare Israel with and while The Israelis have at times been zealous with the old overkill they’re certainly no comparison whatsoever to the insanely brutal bastards of ISIS, one of the most evil forces in human history.

  18. Its those pesky Jooos again

    Did I read somewhere that you had Jewish heritage Harri? 🤣🤣

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.