web analytics

The Mueller Report, where we are

By Patrick Van Roy On March 24th, 2019

Friday the Report was dropped on the AG, he is reviewing the Report now.  You are hearing the Dems call for release of all the information in the report.  The following is The Great One Mark Levin explaining why that is both impossible, unethical, and a violation of Law.

Do yourself a favor listen to the 10 minutes, educate yourself to the procedures of how and why this is supposed to work. Especially listen to the statement he reads from the Watergate Prosecutor.

159 Responses to “The Mueller Report, where we are”

  1. Countdown to the summary conclusion of the Mueller report!! On the edge of my seat!! /s lol.

    The MSM beclowns itself over and over and over and over.

    “The public wants to know!” they say. …actually, the MSM and Washington DC wants to know.

    What the public wants is a wall on the southern border, full employment and some needed infrastructure. Oh, also school choice and less government regulation and taxation.

  2. Amen Patty

  3. Here’s my summary of the past 2 years spent investigating the “Trump campaign colludes with Russia” fantasy built around bogus campaign dirt, spread around DC by John McCain:

    Our globalist media conglomerates colluded with the Democrat Party to spread innuendo and lies about President Trump in order to build public anxiety and dislike of Trump Presidency in order to support his impeachment and removal from office.

  4. that sums it up pretty good

  5. https://dailystormer.name/russia-hoax-has-misdirected-people-away-from-evidence-that-trump-is-being-controlled-by-jews-and-israel/

    After nearly two years, Bob Mueller’s investigation into the theory that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election is now over.

    On late Friday afternoon, Mueller submitted his report to the Attorney General’s office and we will probably learn specific details about it over the next few days. Perhaps most significant is that there are press reports stating that there will be no more criminal indictments from Mueller’s office. Assuming this is true – and it is almost certainly true, given that the investigation is over – it means that Trump has been vindicated. He is not a Russian agent working for Vladimir Putin as the Jewish media has hysterically claimed over the past few years.

    Unless there is a major revelation in the coming days, this proves that the whole thing was an enormous hoax. But anybody who paid attention to this circus already knew that. The anti-climatic end to this fiasco is not a surprise except maybe to the small percentage of brain dead leftists who religiously watch MSNBC.

    But the Russia hoax has misdirected away from a glaringly obvious fact. If there is any foreign power subverting the Trump presidency and the United States for its own gain, it is Israel. This Russia hoax was merely a Jewish orchestrated scam designed to control and/or impeach Trump. It has been a classic case of Jews projecting their misdeeds on to someone else.

    Everything stated above is true, and its truth is demonstrated by the facts……

    Here’s some of what Trump has done for Israel.

    Recognized the Golan Heights as part of Israel.
    Recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moved the American embassy there.
    Provided billions of dollars in foreign aid to Israel.
    Cut foreign aid to the Palestinians.
    Completely cut all formal relations with Palestine.
    Attacked Syria twice over fake gas attack footage.
    Criticized Ilhan Omar as an anti-Semite for saying that the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC exists.
    Spent a good part of his recent State of the Union speech reminding people of the Jewish Holocaust hoax.
    Established a major arms deal to Saudi Arabia to help counter Iran, Israel’s main regional enemy.

    It may have been the case that Trump really did intend to build the wall that would prevent the 3rd-world invasion of the US, and he needed jews who control Congress to facilitate this one single measure on which he was elected – but the jews lied as they do.

    But there will be a beautiful wall, built around Israel and paid for by Americans

  6. what a shock…. Allan blames the jews….. lmao

  7. Here we stand: clowns to the Left of us, jokers to the Right …stuck in the middle with you!

  8. great song

  9. Trump called for the release of the report.

  10. yeah… so what does that mean it should just be dumped out there?

    Did you watch the video?

    What about what the Watergate Prosecutor said?

  11. The AG has to review it under the law. There are potential legal issues and national security issues that must be considered before the report is released in whole or in part. Levin is a braying character and I’d rather watch paint dry than his video.

  12. At least with the Lewinsky investigation, there was a red dress.

    With this Mueller investigation, nothing. nada. zilch.

    btw, I disliked in the extreme the Repubs. when they went after Clinton for sexual peccadilloes (I know, I know – Clinton lied under oath etc. ) as I now dislike what the Dems are doing.

  13. Way too many lawyers in politics.

  14. Patrick Van Roy, on March 24th, 2019 at 4:49 PM Said:

    what a shock…. Allan blames the jews….. lmao

    Yes, because it’s true. Here’s something from a wee while back, valid now……

    Allan@Aberdeen, on December 18th, 2013 at 5:38 PM Said:

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/srael-grants-first-golan-heights-oil-drilling-license-to-dick-cheney-linked-company/5347779

    Israel has granted a U.S. company the first license to explore for oil and gas in the occupied Golan Heights, John Reed of the Financial Times reports.

    A local subsidiary of the New York-listed company Genie Energy — which is advised by former vice president Dick Cheney and whose shareholders include Jacob Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch — will now have exclusive rights to a 153-square mile radius in the southern part of the Golan Heights.

    The point here is that the current government of Syria is not compliant, and should be replaced noting the warmongering against Syria and Assad by Murdoch’s publications.

    Trump has now complied with Israel’s intentions to annex the Golan Heights. I agree that Israel should hold some kind of military presence there, but annexation would mean that the wall that Israel is extending and which Americans are paying for would include areas where a company controlled by the Rotties is appropriating Syrian oil.

    Clearly Trump is jewish property

  15. Patty – Monica’s Dress was blue albeit with white stains. You missed details on Mueller’s investigation, in particular multiple convictions and guilty pleas.

  16. so because you don’t like Levin you can’t watch something where you might learn something relevant.

    The statement he reads from the Watergate Prosecutor is educational and informative on the current situation….. but as a narrow minded democrat to listen to someone you don’t care for is asking to much of you…. that makes you illinformed.

    I read the NYT, Huffpo, WaPo and will watch CNN and MSNBC, I like varied views and sources that I don’t agree with so that I can make INFORMED opinions about events….

    but I don’t live in a bubble

  17. in particular multiple convictions and guilty pleas.

    and not a single one to do with Russian Collusion.

  18. I don’t respect Levin. He is the type of guy dumb people mistake for smart.

  19. You skim very fast

    You seem to have little to no knowlesge of what the NYT or BBC are all about

    You just regurgitate what right wing critics of those organizations say about them

  20. Levin often uses crude personal insults

    That’s why crude and vulgar people think that he’s smart

  21. Trump ‘did not conspire with Russia’

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47688187

    Does this now mean that the slurs and smears against Muller were in fact untrue or is his credibility intact?

  22. This is the attack chihuahua who they think is a genius

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cqmD9Zf8VUs

  23. Notice how the bubble brothers are in Harmony on their views and opinions…. lmao

    you can’t make comedy like that up.

    thanks for proving my point fellas… lol The Bubble Brothers

  24. I disagree with mahons on all sorts of things

    But you lick the feet of Levin and Limbaugh and don’t disagree with them on anything

    If your AM radio broke, you’d be speechless

  25. I hope the Dems keep beating this dead obstruction/collusion horse.

    I am surprised that Hollywood hasn’t pointed out that a good drama – even a soap opera – needs 3 acts.

    You can’t just have the same act, over and over. unless you intend to bore and then alienate your audience.

    But, what do I know? Keep at it, CNN and Nadel.

    Keep at it. 🙂

  26. The letter from AG Barr is released. Basically it is a no on conspiracy with Russia and no judgment on obstruction of justice.

    Some of the report will be made public when the AG decides to do so. Today’s letter leaves a ton of unanswered questions. For example, what was the Trump tower meeting with the Russian agent about? Or, why did Manafort give internal polling data to a Russsian agent? And, many more.

    Meanwhile several investigations at the federal level and state level continue. It is temporary relief for Trump, but he and his cohorts are not near out of the woods.

  27. Phantom you and Mahons THINK you have a rounded view of things but all you both are is echos of mainstream NY media and the wacked out people that surround you.

    There is nothing wrong with being one sided, but as with ALL the NY and Beltway crowd you think your one sided view is the only view….

    Limbaugh is an Idiot yet he has had the number one show for over 30yrs so nobody shares his views. I’m a gun nut yet I only own 3 and there are over 300 Million LEGALLY owned guns in the country… that’s an awful lot of Gun Nuts.

    Half the country voted for Trump those 62 million are all stupid.

    The Special Prosecutor looked into every aspect of Trumps life and found nothing, but he’s a crook and a Liar…. never mind what the Law says you say different and you believe you are right.

    Sorry bubble boy your views don’t match the facts of reality.

  28. New Yorker, on March 24th, 2019 at 9:16 PM Said: Edit Comment
    The letter from AG Barr is released. Basically it is a no on conspiracy with Russia and no judgment on obstruction of justice.

    OH MY!

    roflmao

  29. I always thought there was no collusion with Russia. I don’t think there was any reason why the Trump campaign would have wanted or needed to.

  30. for ya all Big Don

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7I_y5qCUPc

  31. “Meanwhile several investigations at the federal level and state level continue. It is temporary relief for Trump, but he and his cohorts are not near out of the woods.”

    lol. please. carry on.

  32. The Special Prosecutor did not look into every aspect of Trump’s life. He conducted a focused investigation and found (thankfully) no collusion and did not comment on obstruction. The AG’s office opined there is no reason to pursue an obstruction charge and that seems fair enough to me. Mueller’s investigation appears to have been conducted fairly and thoroughly.

  33. Colm

    “I always thought there was no collusion with Russia. I don’t think there was any reason why the Trump campaign would have wanted or needed to.” The Trump campaign and nearly everybody else thought they would lose to Hillary, they needed all the help they could get and they were not scrupulous people. There was good reason for help from the Russians. They got social media help and maybe other types of help. We do not know the detail of the Muller report yet, but the Congress will do everything to get it.

  34. Mueller did a fair investigation

    Now will the sniveling Trumper buttmunch brigade take back their slanderous and innuendo laden comments against him?

    I think that we all know the answer to that one

  35. Half the country did not vote for Trump

    Only 58% showed up to vote at all

    And a minority of that 58% voted for Trump

  36. So about 27% of eligible voters voted for trump

  37. The Left is insane.

  38. The base of both crooked parties is insane

  39. This is a great relief for the GOP. Because if Mueller had found evidence of active collusion they would have been forced to retreat to the trench called “So What?” Because most of them would defend their man even if he was shown to have collaborated. That doesn’t just apply to Bretitbart-Fox-Limbaa-Jones, but to the bulk of the GOP base.

    I’m sure they will correct me if I’m wrong.

  40. Yes, because how many times did the snivelers say “ Collusion is not a crime “?

    As if

  41. No, Phantom. The “base” of both parties is not insane. Your party is insane. The Left.

    2 years, 20 million dollars and 90% of the global media conglomerate later – and we have….nothing.

    Another hoax gone, just like that.

    Here’s a sad fact – socialism and global warming are also hoaxes but don’t tell anyone.

    With the Mueller obstruction thing coming up empty this would be too much heartache for one day

  42. Phantom: you really should be angry at the scam artists at CNN who have been feeding you bullcrap for over 2 years now.

  43. I watch CNN rarely

    The US version of CNN, like Fox, doesn’t report the news.

  44. It is a matter of historical record that Russian endeavored to influence our election through a variety of means. The investigation was proper.

  45. socialism and global warming are also hoaxes but don’t tell anyone

    LOL! Socialism is a political system which has always failed. You will get no argument from me there.

    Global warming is a fact, evidenced by melting glaciers on every continent for many decades. And an increasingfly unstable climate with more and more extreme events in the form of typhoons (East Africa last week), drouts (California and Australia for most of the past decade) and heatwave records (every continent in 2018).

    The fact that GOP goons like Troll and Patty bracket the two together speaks to their willful ignorance. And Patty lives in California! No evidence of global warming there, it’s just “weather”, right Patty?

  46. Arctic melt since 1979. Just “weather”, move along please, nothing to see here:

    https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/155/video-annual-arctic-sea-ice-minimum-1979-2018-with-area-graph/

  47. “Last week, scientists learned that 40-foot piles of compacted sea ice — some of the oldest and most durable clusters in the Arctic — are breaking away from the coast of Greenland and drifting out to sea. One meteorologist called it “scary,” but it was hardly unexpected. As the earth’s climate heats up, the idea of a “blue Arctic” — that is, the disappearance of sea ice for at least part of the year, leaving only open ocean — has long been predicted by climate scientists. Some researchers believe that you might be able to kayak to the North Pole as early as 2030”

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/arctic-ice-melting-716647/

  48. “No evidence of global warming there, it’s just “weather”, right Patty?”

    You mean a prolonged drought followed by a year of torrential rain? That’s the typical weather cycle here.

  49. Nothing to see here, this is a hoax:

    “NASA said this year’s maximum reached an area of 5.71 million square miles or 14.78 million square km. And at 332,000 square miles (860,000 square km) below the 1981 to 2010 average, the Arctic is now missing an area of ice the size of Texas.”

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1103852/Arctic-sea-ice-nasa-melting-arctic-ice-maximum-melting-ice-caps

  50. You know what’s also typical here in So. Cal? After several years of drought we have fires and then shortly after fires, we have torrential rains and then….then…..

    all of these flowers bloom out of nowhere on the hillsides – usually bright purple and yellow – carpets of color.

    It’s truly magnificent.

  51. I hear we have more polar bears than ever, Peter. Turns out that they weren’t going extinct, after all.

  52. And the decades-long and accelerating Arctic melt, is that a “typical weather cycle” there?

  53. ” One meteorologist called it “scary,” but it was hardly unexpected.”

    lol. hardly scientific. scary.

    oh wait, Rolling Stone is your source? wasn’t that the paper that trumpeted the fake rape scandal on some campus – the girl raped on a glass table by a bunch of white boys…turns out she made it up…one of those hoaxes…..

    scary!!

  54. https://climate.nasa.gov

  55. Patty and Troll

    You guys need to accept that the ice is melting. But you are still in denial like your goofbag POTUS. You will be much happier when you accept that the world is warming, trust me on this. You will still be be able to shill for fossil fuels but you will have at least have accepted the reality of melting glaciers. We don’t need thermometers for that and as anti-science guys that should be a relief to you, no?

  56. I’m sorry, Phantom and Peter – I don’t have the time to discuss global warming climate change with zealots.

    Carry on. Believe it if you wish.

    If you didn’t believe this hoax, you would grab on to another. There is always another one around the corner.

  57. Good link Phantom, but like their hero Trump, Patty and Troll hate NASA as a bunch of commies.

    They also deny Darwin, which tells you all you need to know.

  58. Peter, it hasn’t been officially warming, though for at least 20 years…but don’t let that stop you.

  59. Peter is relentlessly fact based

    I rarely discuss the subject but know that it is important

  60. Patty

    Great comment at 11.23, you win.

  61. You see, Peter, I have learned that the Left only likes “science” when it confirms a preferred hoax, like global warming.

    When it comes to conception and abortion, science need not apply. Babies are just clumps of cells unless they are wanted.

    When it comes to gender – well, that’s fluid. Chromosomes don’t matter.

  62. “Peter is relentlessly fact based
    I rarely discuss the subject but know that it is important”

    don’t let me stop you.

    you and Peter also believed Russian collusion.

  63. I’m pretty sure you both believed the Covington hoax (boy in MAGA hat versus the Indian) and the Smollett hoax (Hollywood actor hired Nigerians to attack him).

  64. When did I say that I believed in collusion?

    You and the other Patty are the ones who bang on about this, the serious people have barely commented on it

  65. Patty are you high?

    By the way I am still waiting for your retraction on your Puerto Rico hoax

    That was you you you and no-one else you you.

    Confess and repent.

  66. it hasn’t been officially warming, though for at least 20 years

    Can you back that up with a credible link? Because a huge volume of ice has melted in the last 20 years on all continents. Utzi the Iceman was discovered in the Alps about 30 years ago after 3,000 years and climbers who died on Everest 100 years ago are now being discovered as the glaciers melt. It’s hard to understand how that could happen without rising temperatures, but maybe you have an alternative explanation? Global cooling?

  67. ” the serious people have barely commented on it”

    lol.

  68. I don’t expect to see anyone on the Left comment on the Mueller hoax now that it’s been totally exposed for what it was/is.

    Intellectual honesty is not your strength.

  69. Patty is the greatest intellect in the Trump movement

  70. Hmmm….you do realize that “intellectual honesty” is not the same as “intellect” – right?

  71. http://www.atangledweb.org/?p=70918

    The author of this unretracted bit of nonsense should not be giving lectures on honesty

  72. Wow. You are really weird, Phantom.

    I actually had forgotten that. I remembered when I posted up about Obama’s Fast and Furious something and you claimed that I made it up. I was confusing the two.

    So tell me, how do you know that this video isn’t/wasn’t true? What makes you so sure?

  73. Just accusing me of being dishonest because I post a video that you disagree with doesn’t cut it.

    It looks authentic to me.

    Were you in Puerto Rico? Do you know this cop? Do you know anyone in the government? Did CNN do a piece on this reporting that you heard?

    Please tell me. Because I would like to know what makes you so sure that this piece of video isn’t true.

  74. “The author of this unretracted bit of nonsense should not be giving lectures on honesty”

    It is not nonsense to recognize that many of Puerto Ricans problems with aid distribution were of their own political making and not because Trump.

    Sorry. It just is what it is. I don’t know why you can’t tolerate a little truth from time to time.

  75. You posted it

    Now please tell me what the name of this alleged cop is?

    You posted a fake audio of a nonexistent cop Spinning fake news

    And then you give endless lectures about the evils of mainstream media

    What is the police officers name Patty?

  76. What is your problem, Phantom? I think and thought it was legitimate “citizen journalism” when it was news way back when. It’s not news now.

    That’s permitted, you know. People take videos and post them up on the internet.

    It seems real to me. Why the big outrage from you?

    You think some Puertan Rican actually posted up a fake video, pretending to be a cop? – to what end? Why would someone do that?

    I wish I had also posted the photos of the bottles of water being hoarded, not distributed. Maybe that was photoshopped – lol.

    What exactly is going on here with you?

  77. I think that you should be a little more humble about condemning “ main stream media “ when you recklessly posted some an obvious fake, and that you haven’t taken it back more than a year and a half later

    I got tricked by the WP recently on the Kentucky student thing, and I openly took it back quickly when that’s where the evidence led me

    There is no evidence here.

    You fell for a hoax and you’re still falling for it

  78. “And then you give endless lectures about the evils of mainstream media”

    I do not pretend to be objective and while I try not to post straight up garbage and pass it off as real, I don’t have the means or the time to adequately get two sources to verify whatever I might post.

    I am not paid. I am a blogger. I try to put up items that will either create debate or interest and/or inform. I’m interested primarily in debates about policy.

    I’m also interested in funny stories or things I might not know about, like the crowds in London this weekend at the marches. I don’t necessarily think that the posts and posters are God’s Truth or the last word on the issue, but I like to see what they post. I can think for myself.

    The thing that really puzzles me is that you seem to think that I am some New York Times reporter or CNN newscaster. What’s up with that?

  79. “I think that you should be a little more humble about condemning “ main stream media “ when you recklessly posted some an obvious fake, and that you haven’t taken it back more than a year and a half later”

    I’m not going to take back something I think is real just because you want me to, Phantom. The Puerto Rico item, for example.

    also, I do not have any pretense that I am like the MSM. Unlike you. I am not objective. I am not paid. I have no reporting or investigative budgets nor do I have any editors or researchers.

    I can critique the MSM all I want and it has nothing to do with humility or lack thereof – the MSM purports to be objective. They are paid. They have resources. They claim they are informing the citizenry etc. etc.

    If you can’t see the difference between you and me and simple blogging and the MSM – then, it is you that needs to practice some humility.

    You are not a journalist. Neither am I.

  80. It is healthy to be skeptical of The BBC, NY Times etc I welcome that.

    Please be at least as skeptical about dramatic reports from entirely unknown and unvetted sources, or from left or right biased sources of any kind.

  81. Hey Phantom

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMzd40i8TfA

  82. “I got tricked by the WP recently on the Kentucky student thing, and I openly took it back quickly when that’s where the evidence led me”

    Of course you did. You like to believe the MSM.

    You have a lot of nerve trying to bust on me for a home made video about which you know absolutely nothing.

    We are going to have to agree to disagree because plainly, I think you are a fool and from what you say, you feel the same about me.

    Bye now.

  83. “It is healthy to be skeptical of The BBC, NY Times etc I welcome that.
    Please be at least as skeptical about dramatic reports from entirely unknown and unvetted sources, or from left or right biased sources of any kind.”

    Basically, you think I should take my news from the MSM (while retaining some healthy skepticism, of course)
    but I should not feel free to post up any other type of video – especially if it goes against your political POV – because then you will call me a hoaxer…..am I getting this right, Phantom?

    well, that’s not going to happen. F u and the horse you rode in on.

  84. Patty

    Who created your Puerto Rico video?

    What was the cop’s name?

    What radio station was it broadcast on?

  85. Peter, on March 24th, 2019 at 11:23 PM Said: Edit Comment
    Good link Phantom, but like their hero Trump, Patty and Troll hate NASA as a bunch of commies.

    They also deny Darwin, which tells you all you need to know.

    There is no such thing as Man Made Global Warming and you have no clue about my thoughts on evolution Peter

  86. You also said that Mexican troops had crossed the border into the US

    Do you have anything further to report on that?

  87. Here is an interesting timeline on Trump’s lies about climate change:

    From this in 2009:
    “12/6/09: Trump signs a letter calling for urgent climate action. As Grist reported in 2016, Trump and three of his children signed a 2009 letter to President Barack Obama calling for a global climate deal. “We support your effort to ensure meaningful and effective measures to control climate change, an immediate challenge facing the United States and the world today,” declared the letter, which was signed by dozens of business leaders and published as an ad in the New York Times. “If we fail to act now, it is scientifically irrefutable that there will be catastrophic and irreversible consequences for humanity and our planet.”

    To this in 2018:

    “12/8/18: Trump sides with authoritarian petrostates in refusing to endorse climate report. At the climate talks in Poland, the United States joined Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait in declining to “welcome” a major UN study warning of the dangers of global warming. “The United States has not endorsed the findings of the report,” the State Department said, according to CNN. The US delegation was subsequently heckled at the conference when it led a panel discussion promoting the use of fossil fuels.”

    https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/12/trump-climate-timeline/

  88. Phantom
    who told you Trump was a crook?
    Where are the arrest reports?
    What Newspaper or TV channel played the Story?

    Stop badgering the woman……

  89. mother jones…. lmao

  90. She will be badgered every time she lectures the media, while she is the queen of Fake News herself, as naive as Allan

  91. There is no such thing as Man Made Global Warming and you have no clue about my thoughts on evolution Peter

    LOL

    There is and I have. See melting glaciers for global warming and see your posts in favour of “intelligent design” many times hereabouts. Intelligent design = creationism-lite, but you could still get lynched for it in the Confederate States. They believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old and that dynosaurs were a threat to Adam and Eve.

  92. mother jones…. lmao

    Please point out where the story about Trump is wrong. Or stfu, whatever.

  93. I’m sure that you read Mother Jones all the time too

    Like Palin, you read every publication there is

  94. No to both of you……

  95. “Who created your Puerto Rico video?
    What was the cop’s name? What radio station was it broadcast on?”

    lol. This is both quaint and funny because apparently, you don’t understand how youtube and the internet work.

    And the fact that you fell for the Covington hoax – which was obviously a hoax….oh well, no sense talking to you.

    Badger on, my friend.

    And while you’re at it, FU and the horse you rode in on!

  96. Phantom if you want to continue your misogyny create your own post.

    Peter the Sun and the Earth’s orbit controls the planets climate man can’t change it if he wanted to, and intelligent design is not creationism lite.

  97. Patrick: Phantom and Peter are people who believe whatever they hear on CNN. There is no reasoning with such people because they don’t want to think for themselves – they want to be told what to do – by someone with an upper crust accent, if possible.

    Phantom proudly doesn’t read Thomas Sowell, Ayn Rand, CS Lewis – he is an anti-intellectual posing as an intellectual which is why he clings to his “experts.” He is a purveyor of Conventional Wisdom.

    The fact that Peter cites Rolling Stone and Mother Jones is a bit of a riddle – I mean everyone knows that these rags are biased propaganda arms – but that’s for another day, I guess.

  98. PVR

    Kneel before Zod

    This isn’t your site, please remember that

  99. I did read some of Ayn Rand, the abortion lover.

    She couldnt write, her material was laughable

  100. If your Zod I’m Kal El

    and no it’s not my site, not yours either.

    You want to talk to David about it?

    I’ll be glad to.

  101. “She will be badgered every time she lectures the media, while she is the queen of Fake News herself, as naive as Allan”

    This is just so rich. Phantom falls for Covington hoax – even does a stupid post about it – and yet he calls me and Alan “naive.”

    I don’t agree with Alan’s anti-semitism tick but he is a superior intellect to Phantom.

    Phantom falls for Covington hoax and yet he has the nerve to think that my Puerto Rico video is a hoax – just because he doesn’t understand how youtube and the internet work.

    Oh my.

  102. Please create all the unnecessary drama you wish to.

  103. “This isn’t your site, please remember that”

    It’s not your site, either, Phantom. Badger away if you want to bully – I can’t/won’t stop you.

  104. I don’t believe that you ever read Ayn Rand, Phantom. I don’t think you read much at all.

  105. no I have no desire to, you however are being abusive to a woman creating unnecessary drama.

    And anytime you’d like to discuss the rules of this site with David please let me know I will gladly set up a skype/zoom call for the 3 of us.

  106. Patrick: check this out.

    Phantom writes: “She will be badgered every time she lectures the media,”

    David writes in his header: “a dissenting review…”

    Now, I’m no genius but it’s pretty obvious that a “dissenting review” includes – nay, requires – criticism of the media.

    yet, Phantom says he will bully me every time I criticize the media.

    This is in direct disregard to the “mission statement” in the header of this very site.

  107. I think Phantom thinks this is his site.

  108. “You also said that Mexican troops had crossed the border into the US
    Do you have anything further to report on that?”

    Yes. Much. Perhaps I’ll do a post on it.

    In the meantime, if you are interested, read “Cartel Chronicles” over at Breitbart. The cartels are well- organized and are working hand-in-glove with not only Mexican border politicians but some American politician/indian tribesman as well.

    It’s a story worth knowing about if you can find the time after CNN hoax/news like Covington.

  109. He’s a git Patty

  110. It’s hard to believe that Phantom says that he’s going to harass me if I criticize the MSM.

    No one tells him what he can and cannot say.

  111. Especially since today is the day the MSM have been exposed as charlatans and scam artists with their 2 year, 30 million dollar Russia hoax.

    The Russia hoax makes the Covington hoax look like child play.

  112. Mueller: No collusion with Russia.

    Mueller: No obstruction of justice.

    Wasn’t it frequently said of despots, that faced with domestic difficulties at home, they looked for someone, something, anything abroad to blame for their ills.

    The Democratic party should stop conducting their domestic politics on the international plane, it infantile, and highly dangerous.

  113. For clarification the AG indicated no collusion and that he (the AG) declined further action on obstruction. Mueller apparently made no recommendation on that.

  114. “The Special Counsel, therefore, did not draw a conclusion – one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction,” the letter read. “Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out ‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the President’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.”

    In his communique to lawmakers, Barr underscored that the special counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

    From letter to Congress by AG Barr
    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/amid-mueller-report-anticipation-democrats-demand-details/story?id=61909158

  115. t took the White House about a half hour to start misrepresenting the contents of Attorney General William Barr’s letter to Congress about the results of the Mueller investigation. “The Special Counsel did not find any collusion and did not find any obstruction. AG Barr and DAG Rosenstein further determined there was no obstruction,” Sarah Sanders, the White House press secretary, tweeted shortly after 4 p.m. on Sunday. “The findings of the Department of Justice are a total and complete exoneration of the President of the United States.”

    Actually, on the subject of Robert Mueller’s probe into whether Donald Trump obstructed justice, Barr’s letter said this: “The Special Counsel . . . did not draw a conclusion—one way or another—as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.” The letter went on, “The Special Counsel states that, ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’ ” Barr’s letter, however, did contain a determination that Trump’s actions—which might include the firing of James Comey, the head of the F.B.I., and trying to fire Jeff Sessions, Barr’s predecessor—failed to rise to the level of obstruction of justice. But it was Barr and Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General, who made that determination. As it has done so often in the past, the White House was lying, when it said that Mueller exonerated Trump on the obstruction question.

    Mueller Punted and the White House lied. That’s what we know for now.

  116. “It’s hard to believe that Phantom says that he’s going to harass me if I criticize the MSM.”

    Actually I don’t think he said he would harass you. He said he will continue to point out your hypocrisy. The MSM get stuff wrong from time to time and you latch on to that to discredit the stuff they get right (it is why you continue to blather on about CNN instead of one of the more credible media companies – despite there being few if any people here who watch CNN on a regular basis). Phantom pointed out that you posted fake news and did not retract it – ie you were doing the very thing you attack the media for doing.

  117. there’s the Nugget that Mueller gave them at a cost of 30 Million Dollars…… Trump didn’t commit obstruction but I can’t quite make the call that he wouldn’t have tried…..

    There ya go that’s your 30 million dollar nugget… he might have obstructed, but there isn’t enough EVIDENCE of it….

    So tell me Boys what crime could he have obstructed?

  118. “Trump didn’t commit obstruction but I can’t quite make the call that he wouldn’t have tried”

    Actually Mueller didn’t seem to give an opinion on that. The Barr letter (Trump’s own attorney general) quotes the report saying ‘The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”‘

  119. “So tell me Boys what crime could he have obstructed?”

    That isn’t how the law works Patrick. If there is an investigation in Incident A, and you obstruct that investigation then you have committed a crime, even if it is then concluded that Incident A was not a crime.

    So Trump could have committed the crime of obstruction even if the investigation he obstructed uncovered no crime.

  120. Seamus Phantom and Mahons have harassed and badgered Patty for decades.

    Patty didn’t post fake news about Puerto Rico and how do you know what news channel anyone watches there are basically 3 news stations in the US CNN, MSNBC, and FOX, so which of the 3 do you think they watch FOX?

  121. “Patty didn’t post fake news about Puerto Rico and how do you know what news channel anyone watches there are basically 3 news stations in the US CNN, MSNBC, and FOX, so which of the 3 do you think they watch FOX?”

    She did. She posted unverified (which means to you fabricated) information that turned out to not be true.

    You assume they watch news programmes. Both strike me as newspaper people. Phantom and Mahons have both said they don’t watch CNN regularly (if at all) and both have criticised them regularly.

  122. Patty posted Fake News and you breathlessly believed it

    You don’t know the name of ” the cop “, don’t know the radio station that it was allegedly broadcast on, don’t know who posted it, but you believe it, because of course you do.

    Patty’n’Paddy = fake’n’faker!!

    The Troll, on October 1st, 2017 at 6:39 PM Said:
    WOW

    I heard on a couple of different outlets that both the locals and the aid workers were having problems with the local govt, but damn that was horrific.

    Thanks Patty

  123. Trump has been obstructing justice in broad daylight with his open witness tampering comments as per Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.

  124. Seamus THERE WAS NO “Incident A” it was all faked by the Clintons and the FBI so if there was NO CRIME there is nothing to obstruct……

    Was the Mueller Investigation hampered in anyway ? NO

    2800 Subpoenas, 500 witnesses, every document they wanted, no one plead the 5th and they spent 675 days and 30 Million…. so what was obstructed?

  125. PVR

    You are not an attorney.

    Stick to what you know.

    Things should quiet down quite a bit now.

  126. Phantom did Obama commit Obstruction when he said on National TV that Hillary didn’t break any laws while the investigation into her was taking place?

    Could you post a link to your comments saying he did when he made those statements, because I don’t recall you saying he obstructed while doing exactly what you accuse Trump of doing.

    Please provide the link.

  127. “Seamus THERE WAS NO “Incident A” it was all faked by the Clintons and the FBI so if there was NO CRIME there is nothing to obstruct……”

    Even if there was no crime to obstruct there was still an investigation. The obstruction of justice involves obstruction of an investigation, crime or no crime. So even if there were no crime (and please remember that the investigation has resulted in several indictments and convictions) it would still be illegal to hamper the investigation.

    “2800 Subpoenas, 500 witnesses, every document they wanted, no one plead the 5th and they spent 675 days and 30 Million…. so what was obstructed?”

    I have no idea. I haven’t read the report yet so I don’t know the conclusions. However the conclusion, upon reading the report, of Trump’s attorney general was that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

    So clearly there is no smoking gun, but there is still something there that is fishy.

  128. “Phantom did Obama commit Obstruction when he said on National TV that Hillary didn’t break any laws while the investigation into her was taking place?”

    Again if the only thing that Trump did was talk about how the investigation was wrong, and that he committed no crime etc… if that is all that Trump did then there wouldn’t be any real talk of obstruction. His firing the FBI director because of the investigation into links with Russia is a different kettle of fish.

  129. I accuse Trump of witness tampering. Obama didn’t do that there.

    I have always been critical of Hillary’s intentional mishandling of government correspondence, and I’ve said more than once that her actions sounded like a crime to me.

    Go find those comments yourself. The others remember, even if you don’t.

  130. Phantom, on March 25th, 2019 at 12:45 PM Said: Edit Comment
    PVR

    You are not an attorney.

    Stick to what you know.

    Things should quiet down quite a bit now.

    Does that mean you’re going to stop commenting?

    I mean you’re nothing but a glorified insurance salesman who knows NOTHING outside your bubble so I guess you won’t be commenting on anything other than the field you are paid for….

  131. Phantom, on March 25th, 2019 at 12:51 PM Said: Edit Comment
    I accuse Trump of witness tampering. Obama didn’t do that there.

    You are not an attorney.

    Stick to what you know.

  132. His firing the FBI director because of the investigation into links with Russia is a different kettle of fish.

    sorry wrongo Comey was an at will employee of the President he could fire him because he didn’t like his tie…. and Rosenstein recommended the firing.

    You are not an attorney.

    Stick to what you know.

  133. You are not an attorney.

    Stick to what you know.

    that’s gonna become my new favorite answer.

    Thanks Phantom

  134. “sorry wrongo Comey was an at will employee of the President he could fire him because he didn’t like his tie…. “

    He could. At will firing of people is to prevent legal claims against unfair termination. However even though Trump could fire Comey for any reason if he fired him to obstruct the investigation into the links with Russia then that would be obstructing an investigation. So if Trump used his legal powers in an illegal way then that would still be illegal.

  135. Trump has repeatedly tried to get witnesses not to cooperate.

    We all -know- that.

  136. what links to Russia? The ones Comey made up and then leaked to the Press? or the ones he Lied to the FISA court about ?

  137. Phantom, on March 25th, 2019 at 1:04 PM Said: Edit Comment
    Trump has repeatedly tried to get witnesses not to cooperate.

    We all -know- that.

    No we all know you just suffer from TDS.

  138. I feel very badly for Paul Manafort and his wonderful family. “Justice” took a 12 year old tax case, among other things, applied tremendous pressure on him and, unlike Michael Cohen, he refused to “break” – make up stories in order to get a “deal.” Such respect for a brave man!

  139. That was a message not to the broad public, but to Manafort himself.

  140. ya deciphered that with your secret decoder ring did ya..,.. lmao

  141. Everyone who heard that statement knew what it was.

    Everyone here knew what it was.

  142. ahh so the wackos who agree with you from inside the bubble and foreign countries well they KNOW….. yeah that and a dollar will get you a cup of coffee.

    TDS

    Trump was framed by the Clintons, Obama, the DNC the FBI/DOJ/NSA/CIA and they failed. 🙂

  143. “Patty posted Fake News and you breathlessly believed it”

    The only time you ever cared about “fake news” is when I posted a video from someone in Puerto Rico and because CNN felt Trump had caused the problems in PR, not the politicians, you decide to harass me.

    Well, Phantom, go ahead. Harass me. Harass me all you want.

    I will continue to post things outside of your little bubble.

    and btw, CNN sucks.

  144. “She did. She posted unverified (which means to you fabricated) information that turned out to not be true.”

    Now you are posting untruths, Seamus. You don’t know this. It’s your opinion.

    It’s my opinion that the video was true.

    I will continue to post items that might interest from citizens from around the world.

  145. Seamus this is what Phantom wrote:

    She will be badgered every time she lectures the media, while she is the queen of Fake News herself, as naive as Allan

    So, if I say “CNN sucks” then I will be harassed. my feet will be held to the fire for verification of all my opinions and I will have to scour the internet for sources etc. etc.

    Meanwhile, Phantom can say and quote and do anything he wants because apparently his opinions are “correct.”

    This is how the Left works.

  146. Any joke I make, any metaphor, will be taken seriously and literally. And I will be harassed and told that I “lie.”

    Any joke Phantom makes, any metaphor, will be taken as such and he will be given the widest latitude possible for interpretation.

    Any video from the public that I find and upload will require outside verification for veracity – Phantom can post Covington hoax videos and photos and he will require no outside verification.

    etc.

  147. Phantoms attempt to silence my dissent from the conventional wisdom of his chosen media outlets has basically made these comment threads echo chambers for the Left – it ruins any real debate or consideration.

    Shame.

  148. Patty

    You posted a fake news video from an entirely unknown source, voiced by a ” cop ” whose name you don’t even know.

    There’s no shame in being wrong. Everyone who talks a lot on political matters, is likely to be wrong at some point.

    But you should make some effort to be be correct. You aren’t trying to be correct.

    It’s not ” dissent ” to post fake videos and to then brazen it out.

  149. FU, Phantom. You should be ashamed of yourself for harassing me just because I speak my mind. I feel dirty commenting with you.

    ————

    Regarding the Mueller report: it’s very simple, there is no “obstruction of justice” because there was nothing to obstruct (there is not collusion). From NBC, talking about AG Barr and his opinion on possible obstruction:

    For one thing, he said in the letter, there was no evidence of the underlying crime of conspiracy, and “the absence of such evidence bears upon the president’s intent with respect to obstruction.”

  150. You are entitled to your own opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts.

    Nice drama, though.

  151. I grow stupid talking with you, Phantom.

    ————–

    Regarding Mueller:

    533,074 articles on Russia and Trump
    500 witnesses
    2800 subpoenas

    and guess what, nothing. no collusion.

    The Left wants to continue to say that they are the party of “science” lmao

    The Left also continues to posture that their news is legit.

    after “Hands up, don’t shoot!”, after Covington, after Jussie Smolett, after Russians! Russians! etc.

    The Left is totally discredited and shown to be either sheeple, idiots or cynical propagandists – out all of the above.

  152. CNN sucks. and so does Richard Maddow.

  153. We agree that CNN is lousy

  154. The American media conglomerates – especially CNN and MSNBC are not primarily interested in “news” or in informing the public of objective facts. They are primarily interested in political propaganda to advance their globalist agenda.

  155. 533,074 articles on Russia and Trump
    500 witnesses
    2800 subpoenas
    over 25 million dollars

    And, what? TRUMP WON THE ELECTION!

    Having failed at the Russia witch hunt, they are now pivoting towards business crimes and indictments for god knows what….shameless propaganda.

    But it’s a great day because….Hillary is STILL not my President!

  156. The American media conglomerates – especially CNN and MSNBC are not primarily interested in “news” or in informing the public of objective facts. They are primarily interested in political propaganda to advance their globalist agenda.

    Fox News is just as biased.

    Their biggest stars are in the tank for Trump.

  157. Fox News is part of the media conglomerates who propagandize for the globalist agenda.

    Everyone but you knows this.

  158. Now, you’re going the full Allan from Aberdeen

    Fox News, like CNN doesn’t report the news in the first place.

    They both specialize in political cops and robbers dramas for their respective brain dead bases.

  159. Phantom, on March 25th, 2019 at 4:47 PM Said:
    Now, you’re going the full Allan from Aberdeen

    Yes, she is telling the truth, telling it how it really is.

    And this is verboten.

    Dissent will not be tolerated.