web analytics


By Pete Moore On April 12th, 2019

“….The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!”

I have no problem with this. In fact I think it’s a splendid. most democratic idea. It’s a matter of great political corruption, in both the US and UK, that many people are protected from the consequences of their vote. Many British immigrationistas would be horrified at the idea of living next to an immigrant. They want cheap nannies and cheap waiting staff and cheap Polish handymen to jet-wash the driveway. That to them are the benefits of no-borders immigration. But live near those people? No, they can live in poor neighborhoods.

So with Venezuela. My sympathy for the people is tempered slightly by the fact that many of them voted for Chavez and Maduro. They voted for socialist theft and they got socialist theft. But now there’s nothing left to steal. Your choice, suckers.

So I have no problem with the feds dumping thousands of illegals, every month, in Democratic cities. Particularly when the idea is presented through the medium of god-like trolling.


  1. Nancy Pelosi does not want these brown migrants in her district, AND THAT IS AN OFFICIAL POSITION.


    Washington Post:

    White House officials have tried to pressure U.S. immigration authorities to release detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities” to retaliate against President Trump’s political adversaries, according to Department of Homeland Security officials and email messages reviewed by The Washington Post.

    Trump administration officials have proposed transporting detained immigrants to sanctuary cities at least twice in the past six months — once in November, as a migrant caravan approached the U.S. southern border, and again in February, amid a standoff with Democrats over funding for Trump’s border wall.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco was among those the White House wanted to target, according to DHS officials. The administration also considered releasing detainees in other Democratic strongholds.

    Pelosi’s office blasted the plan.

    “The extent of this administration’s cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated,” said Pelosi spokeswoman Ashley Etienne.

  2. The main driver of illegal immigration in the US is the willingness of employers to break the law by employing people illegally.

    One employer that is a serial offender in this regard is something called the Trump Organization.

    We need to find out who is the owner of this criminal enterprise and lock him up.

  3. Ramzpaul explains the Congressional investigation of white nationalism……


    2 days ago
    I wish this was actually satire but it’s actually a very accurate summary of the hearing.

  4. dump them all in California and continue the wall right up to Canada…. 😉

  5. It would be illegal to do what Trump proposes. But illegality does not bother him.

  6. Illegal??

    Catch them at the border: release them at ICE’s office in Pelosi’s sanctuary. There is nothing illegal about that at all.

    Clearly, ‘liberals’ believe that diversity is only for pooer whites

  7. wait wait it would be illegal….. that has to be the hypocritical statement of the day but you would not be alone in making it.

    Lets look at this shall we the the lens of sober reality.

    There was a meeting yesterday morning where the President unlike the Congress was trying to figure out what to do with 1 to 3 million ILLEGALS that will be added to the 20-30 million ILLEGALS that are already here.

    Jokingly it was stated dump them in the Sanctuary cities. The press that were there were told don’t print that it was a joke…. so of course it was immediately printed.

    First it was denied and responded to with that was a joke. Then something magical happened. The Democrats went OFF……

    It’s illegal, it’s cruel, it’s an attack on your political opponents, IT’S DANGEROUS, etc etc etc

    The Hypocrisy that immediately erupted from the Democrats was stunning, and serious. Not only that but the Democrats are totally tone deaf. They did not and still do not see how glaringly idiotic they looked.

    Seizing on this public display of idiocy the President doubled down and in the afternoon said No we’re serious we are thinking of placing these people in the states and cities that have declared themselves Sanctuaries.

    According to the Democrats there is no difference between Legal and Illegal immigrants, according to the Democrats the people pouring across our border benefit our society so much so that they choose to protect even those convicted of violent crimes from being deported. They have passed laws and policies in their states and cities to make it illegal for the police to cooperate with ICE.

    They lecture the rest of America that we are racist and cruel because we don’t want illegals flooding our neighborhoods, our schools, and our social welfare systems, let alone the 10% that are hardcore criminals.

    But the suggestion of sending these people to their district….. My God NO!

    They did more damage to themselves on one day on this issue than all the arguments that have been put forth.

    As for this being something new or illegal that is nonsense. Obama dumped 100s of thousands of illegals all over the country and especially into republican strong holds. He changed an entire town in Pa and Vermont from cities with less than 10% latin to MAJORITY Latin.

    In 2014 Obama tried to locate a giant “refugee” camp for illegals literally right across the street from Jeff Sessions house because Sessions was an immigration hawk.

    Sanctuary states and cities tell us they exist because these people are jewels that we need, yet just like with DACA when it comes to putting their money where their mouth is they freaked.

    It was a very good day yesterday for progress on sealing the border.

  8. Getting the ‘refugees’ into the areas inhabited by the Open-Borders crowd is absolutely necessary:


    White liberals can be maddening. They proceed through life happily proclaiming their devotion to progressivism, completely oblivious to the brewing demographic dangers on the horizon. Indeed, most polls show them doubling down on their beliefs in the era of Donald Trump. If you try to warn them, they will stare at you blankly. If you are a friend or relative, count yourself lucky that they still tolerate you and your beliefs.

    Unfortunately, such delusional obstinacy cannot be ignored. Their views are a fundamental component of the broader, systematic threat to Western Civilization. History has shown what the world’s European peoples can accomplish when we are reasonably united. No foreign enemy or ideology could destroy us without the assistance of a substantial share of our own people. To turn the tide, we must win them back.

    White liberals are neither evil nor irredeemable. They are temporarily misguided.

    No – many white liberals are evil and irredeemable. They openly profess their wish to destroy the civilisation and people of their forefathers. Nonetheless…….

    The implications of this research are clear. Most white liberals will not be convinced by rational arguments, no matter how strong or well-supported those arguments may be. They will only be convinced by threats to their basic safety. This, in turn, points to the real barrier. Most white liberals do not feel threatened.

    That’s why it’s vital to place the threat in beside liberals. Of course, at a fundamental level, the evil and irredeemable such as Nancy Pelosi know this,which is why she has stated AS A METTER OF RECORD that she doesn’t want this threat near her: its’ everybody else that has to deal with it.