web analytics

FEMINISM IS A CURSE

By Pete Moore On May 15th, 2019

The birth rate in the United States hit a 32-year low last year as the number of babies born dropped for the fourth straight year, federal health officials said in a report released Wednesday …

The total fertility rate in the United States also dropped 2% since last year and hit a record low at 1.728 births per woman, meaning not enough babies are being born to replace current population levels.

The total fertility rate “in 2018 was again below replacement – the level at which a given generation can exactly replace itself (2,100 births per 1,000 women),” health officials said in the report. “The rate has generally been below replacement since 1971 and consistently below replacement for the last decade.”

Thus long-term trend is reinforced, and it’s based on women choosing to become mere tax units instead of having fulfilling lives as mothers. Yes, women ought to be at home, married, and raising the young. It is nature and destiny. Feminism is a cancer which fights against the natural order. Western women have unprecedented levels of choice, but they are more miserable than ever. The profile of the unhappiest American is an unmarried, childless, 42 year old woman with a profession. They have spent all their adult lives living the feminist ideal, and now they are miserable because of it.

Because so many many women have been driven from matrimony and the home and into the work place, Western Civilisation is is in deep peril from chronically low birth rates. Women should be happy. They should be fulfilled. They should be married, with children, and at home.

35 Responses to “FEMINISM IS A CURSE”

  1. Should be this, should be that.

    They are going to decide for themselves, I’d say. I agree there should be more babies born in the west, but you aren’t going to get that without something more a bit more tangible and helpful than your admonishing.

    Massive tax breaks for mothers. A larger part of the tax they previously paid to be refunded. After rearing 2 or 3 kids at home, with say 2 or three years spent at home per child, no income tax from mum for the rest of her life.

  2. The rate has generally been below replacement since 1971 and consistently below replacement for the last decade.

    The conservatives in the deep south have a simple answer – make abortion illegal. As some of us (ahem) have been predicting, Roe v Wade is now firmly in the firing line and Trump fervently hopes to see it struck down before the 2020 campaign gets started. Let’s remember that the Evangelicals voted for the pussy-grabber by 80:20 and he needs to deliver to get re-elected:

    “Lawmakers in Alabama on Tuesday passed America’s most restrictive abortion bill. The bill, which cleared the state senate 25-6, would outlaw abortion at any stage of pregnancy, including for survivors of rape or incest, and threatens abortion providers with a prison sentence of up to 99 years. It is obviously, glaringly unconstitutional – the 1973 Supreme Court case Roe v Wade established access to safe, legal abortions as a constitutional right – but that is the whole point. Alabama’s lawmakers are joining a national race by anti-abortion extremists to push the issue back up to America’s highest court, in the hope that the conservative-dominated Supreme Court will overturn Roe v Wade. Just last week, Georgia became the fourth state this year to pass a ban on abortions after six weeks.

    The architects of these bills are quite transparent about their intent. “This bill is about challenging Roe v. Wade and protecting the lives of the unborn, because an unborn baby is a person who deserves love and protection,” Alabama state representative Terri Collins, the bill’s sponsor, said.”

  3. Link to my 8.19:

    https://www.newstatesman.com/world/north-america/2019/05/alabama-has-passed-america-s-most-restrictive-abortion-ban-what-happens

  4. It is not feminism that is reducing the birth rate. It is prosperity. The more peoples income rises and the opportunities that come with having better lifestyles the less they desire to keep pumping out children which is what poor women have done for centuries because they had nothing else to do and no wider life opportunities available to them. The declining birth rates may well cause their own problems, but they are the product of the success of Capitalism , modern technology and the growth of material and social largesse .

  5. It is not feminism that is reducing the birth rate. It is prosperity.

    Prosperity is now limited to a dwindling minority in the formerly ‘white world’. Real wages in the de-industrialised US peaked in 1970 and that would probably be similar in the UK. However, feminism has allowed women to have lots of meaningless sex without babies to worry about, and this lifestyle has had lots of promotion to the point where having the ‘right’ to kill a child in her own womb is the apex of her liberty.

    Here’s the US before (((Hart-Celler))) Immigration Act sent it spiralling down the toilet: thanks, jews:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7027827/Newly-discovered-color-images-offer-rare-glimpse-1950s-America-boom-years.html

    The images that show 1950s America – its turquoise and teal colored cars, Chinatown and the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, the Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, New York City and Chicago streets during the day and at night, and a stretch of road in Cripple Creek, Colorado – are from Wild’s collection and a collector named Michael W. Gorth, who is based in San Diego.

  6. Japan, Korea and Singapore have very low birth rates, and they’re hardly feminist societies

  7. American woman aren’t feminist they’re american.

    American woman are the ideal women the finest creatures in the world, beautiful, brilliant, successful, powerful, fierce, creatures that cut their own paths.

    No woman from anywhere else can compare.

  8. Patrick

    Your missus told you to say that 😉

  9. No worries Pete with the overthrow of Roe v Wade there will be thousands more poor, poorly raised, morally bankrupt and intellectually incompetent babies to make up the numbers

    But imagine the cannon fodder available in 20 years

  10. It’s curious that the fertility rates in traditionally conservative European countries like Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece are the lowest in the continent, whereas in feminist Sweden and France and other northern countries they are the highest.

  11. Your missus told you to say that 😉 your darn right…..

  12. Your missus told you to say that 😉 your darn right…..

  13. Another woman must have gotten promoted over Pete Moore.

  14. Noel, on May 16th, 2019 at 9:54 AM Said:

    It’s curious that the fertility rates in traditionally conservative European countries like Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece are the lowest in the continent, whereas in feminist Sweden and France and other northern countries they are the highest.

    It’s curious that the immigrant populations of Sweden and France re-produce more quickly than natives thus driving the higher population replacement / birth rates.

  15. Ya know alan they say even a broken clock is right twice a day, how does it feel to be less reliable then a broken clock?

  16. It’s curious that the fertility rates in traditionally conservative European countries like Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece are the lowest in the continent, whereas in feminist Sweden and France and other northern countries they are the highest.

    Could generous maternity leave and excellent state-funded nursery care have anything at all to do with it? Because the Scandanavian countries lead the world in both departments.

    Just saying.

  17. The solution to the birth rate deficit in the US is immigration. But instead of having a good immigration policy to assimilate those who want to come to the US we have one that does all possible to keep immigrants out. Demographics have a direct effect on the economy and current US immigration policy assures a negative economic result. The Germans also have a birth rate deficit. They took in 1.5 million immigrants who are being assimilated and will turn out to be a positive in their economic future. Not only did the Germans do the right thing from a humanitarian point of view, it was also a very smart things to do from an economic point of view.

  18. It’s curious that the immigrant populations of Sweden and France re-produce more quickly than natives

    I’d like to know what data that conclusion’s based on.

    It always brings a wry smile when Pete and Allan complain about birthrate. IIRC Allan has two children while Pete has none.

    Could generous maternity leave and excellent state-funded nursery care have anything at all to do with it?

    Nail struck squarely on head Peter. Spot on.

  19. They took in 1.5 million immigrants who are being assimilated and will turn out to be a positive in their economic future. Not only did the Germans do the right thing from a humanitarian point of view, it was also a very smart things to do from an economic point of view.

    Bullshit and, if it had come from somebody less ignorant, I would have called it as a lie. The enormous criminality caused by these ‘immigrants’ from Ghana, Afghanistan, Iraq etc who fled the Syrian war is bad enough, but for them to be considered some kind of economic gain which will destroy Germany’s pensions is utter lunacy….

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/820480/Germany-migrant-crisis-refugees-long-term-unemployment-benefits-Angela-Merkel

    Aydan Özoğuz, (A@A notes – a Turk!!!) commissioner for immigration, refugees and integration, told the Financial Times that only a quarter to a third of the newcomers would enter the labour market over the next five years, and “for many others we will need up to 10”.

    The Institute for Employment Research (IAB) found only 45 per cent of Syrian refugees in Germany have a school-leaving certificate and 23 per cent a college degree.

    Statistics from the Federal Labour Agency show the employment rate among refugees stands at just 17 per cent.

  20. Full assimilation of immigrants and entry into the workforce in Germany will not happen instantly. But, it will over time as the number of native born declines. A good and smart decision by Germany that puts it ahead of the rest of the world.

  21. Germany – average IQ 100, and it is replacing its natives with those of average IQ 85 as its contribution to the population replacement program. A “good and smart decison”, written by a person of IQ 70

    I’d like to know what data that conclusion’s based on.

    https://www.thelocal.se/20081103/15408

    Foreign-born women living in Sweden are giving birth to more children on average than women born in Sweden, new statistics show.

    A study by Statistics Sweden finds that foreign-born women had a fertility rate of 2.21 children per woman, while Swedish-born women reproduced at a rate of 1.82 children per woman.

    https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/data/france/births-fertility/births_nationality_parents/

    I’ll leave Paul to read this for himself, though I’ll explain if it’s beyond him

  22. Foreign-born women living in Sweden are giving birth to more children on average than women born in Sweden, new statistics show.

    More than 50% of the “foreign-born women” in Sweden are from eastern Europe, so there is still hope for the white race:

    “According to Statistics Sweden, as of 2016, there is a total of 400,203 residents of Sweden who hold citizenship from European Union states and other countries in Europe, 273,787 from countries in Asia, and 110,758 from countries in Africa.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Sweden

  23. Foreign-born women living in Sweden are giving birth to more children on average than women born in Sweden, new statistics show.

    Yep, unfortunately for your theory ‘foreign born women’ are classified as those born in other European countrieswith as per 2012 the higest number of foreign born babies in Sweden were born to Finnish mothers:

    (Your Local article is from 2008)

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/assessing-immigrant-integration-sweden-after-may-2013-riots

    As for the French claims, what’s to say that the ‘foreign born’ parents aren’t coallated in the same way?

  24. foreign born babies

    Apologies, foreign born

  25. Apologies, for the convolution above. I meant :

    as per 2012 the higest number of foreign born in Sweden were Finnish

  26. Paul – non-Europeans in Sweden and France are reproducing at higher rates than native French and Swedes respectively

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Sweden

    Additionally, the birth rate among immigrant women after arriving in Sweden is higher than among ethnic Swedes.[11]

    https://www.scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/Publiceringskalender/Visa-detaljerad-information/?publobjid=9030++

    Vi vet att fruktsamheten för vissa grupper av kvinnor som invandrat till Sverige är högre än de inrikes födda kvinnornas.

  27. Additionally, the birth rate among immigrant women after arriving in Sweden is higher than among ethnic Swedes

    ‘Immigrants’ are those classed as not born in Sweden:

    The main countries of origin for immigrants to Sweden (from economic, humanitarian, and other streams) include Finland, Iraq, Poland, the former Yugoslavia, and Iran

    Country of Birth Number of Foreign Born
    Finland 163,867
    Iraq 127,860
    Poland 75,323
    Former Yugoslavia 69,269
    Iran 65,649
    Bosnia and Herzegovina 56,595
    Germany 48,731
    Turkey 45,085
    Denmark 44,209
    Somalia 43,966

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/assessing-immigrant-integration-sweden-after-may-2013-riots

    You really are a slippery one aren’t you?

  28. Paul – non-Europeans are those who are not European and, when cited in the link at 11.33pm one reads

    Immigrants from the Middle East have been a rapidly growing share of Sweden’s population. According to the government agency Statistics Sweden, the number of immigrants born in all of Asia (including the Middle East) rose from just 1,000 in 1950 to 295,000 in 2003.[10] Most of those immigrants came from Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria, according to Statistics Sweden.[10] A significant number of Syrian Christians have also settled in Sweden. Since the European migrant crisis, Syrians became the largest group of foreign-born persons in the Swedish civil registry in 2017 with 158,443 people.

    Demographics

    According to Eurostat, in 2010, there were 1.33 million foreign-born residents in Sweden, corresponding to 14.3% of the total population. Of these, 859,000 (64.3%) were born outside the EU and 477,000 (35.7%) were born in another EU Member State.[27][28]

    So in 2010, roughly 10% of people in Sweden were non-European, and the higher breeding rates of such people means that today that portion would be higher. If I’m right, then it’s higher and if I’m wrong then it’s lower. So Paul, what do you reckon – are those of non-European ethnicity in Sweden at a greater proportion of the population today than 2010?

  29. Of these, 859,000 (64.3%) were born outside the EU

    With 217,000 being from the Former Yugoslavia and Norway. More than a quarter being from Europe.

    Wise up.

  30. Allan

    “Germany – average IQ 100, and it is replacing its natives with those of average IQ 85 as its contribution to the population replacement program.” Many of the immigrants in Germany have university degrees and some post-grad, so your foolish statistics on IQ are probably wrong and certainly meaningless. After an understandable period of learning these immigrants will be able to take positions to would go unfilled due to declining native demographics. They will bolster Germany’s economic strength into the foreseeable future.

    What is the UK plan to make up the democratic deficit in their workforce? Stop immigration and encourage immigrants already there to leave. Along with Brexit the hostility to immigrants will assure the UK economy will plummet and the future can be nothing but gloomy. Brush up on your German because the Germany will be the powerhouse economy in Europe. They did the smart things, the UK has done only stupid things. You have only yourselves to blame.

  31. Paul – the higher breeding rates of 3rd-worlders in Europe accelerates the population replacement.

    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/18/swedish-municipalities-head-chain-migration-causing-new-migrant-crisis/

    The chairman of SKL, which represents Sweden’s municipalities and county councils, has warned the country could be facing a new migrant crisis due to so-called “family reunifications” — chain migration — saying the influx could rival 2015.

    Anders Knape warned that the Swedish municipalities may not be able to handle the costs of so many new migrants taking residency in Sweden as part of the family reunification programme, and, according to a report in the newspaper Aftonbladet, said, “[Sweden is] facing the second wave of refugee reception, the family migration. As we don’t know how big it gets. It can be extremely powerful and mean that we are approaching the figures we experienced in 2015 and 2016.”

    And they’re not meaning Serbs and Croats….

    NY – 3rd-worlders are not as accomplished as Germans so no bolstering of economic performance. the solution is simply for Germans to have more babies, and that can be done easily as Poland shows.

    Of course, the idea that the population in a country is there to serve the (((economy))) is just bunk – the economy is there to serve the nation i.e. the people who are of that nation. Bringing in all these muslims will destroy the nation. Here’s the nation of England being destroyed from within:

    https://twitter.com/1Darbz/status/1129848055262601216

    and the police are seen to be escorting this crowd of muslims to the gathering of supporters of Tommy Robinson, then just standing back

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=1mnHzF70Now

    Sam Kennedy
    Sam Kennedy
    12 hours ago
    Who’s worse, the violent lads throwing rocks at women and children or the police who let it, no encouraged it, to happen?

  32. Allan

    “Of course, the idea that the population in a country is there to serve the (((economy))) is just bunk – the economy is there to serve the nation i.e. the people who are of that nation.” You do not know how economies operate. Your answer is pie-in-the-sky bunkum. If there are not enough workers for jobs to be done, the economy fails. The UK has no plan for maintaining a necessary workforce. In fact, the UK is doing everything to drive away requisite new workers to keep the economy running in the years ahead. The UK has been outsmarted by Germany.

  33. So, now that the claims that ‘Foreign-born women living in Sweden are giving birth to more children on average than women born in Sweden’ have actually been shown to mean the majority of ‘foreign born’ people in Sweden are from other European countries and render the ‘population replacement’ theory as absolute horseshit we go to the last line of mooncat defence, far right Breitbart and its predictive scare stories about what could happen in some dystopian future, (always the unverifiable future).

    But wait, the Breitbart article doesn’t seem to be what it is at face value?

    Fredrik Söderberg Bruce, Head of Press at the Migration Board, resisted Knape’s claims, however, saying: “In 2019, we estimate that approximately 27,000 people will be received in the country’s municipalities, then reduce to about 20,000 people in 2020 and 2021. This can be compared with 2016 and 2017 when approximately 68,000 people were received in the country’s municipalities annually.”

    Knape responded that, while he did not want to mislead people, the Migration Board had also been wrong in the past: “The regulations facilitate family migration. This may mean that over time, a large group will come and we must be prepared for it in our operations,” he explained

    So, according to Fredrik Söderberg Bruce it’s actually declining?

    While Knape states the regulations facilitate family migration

    Here are the regulations:

    Who has the right to family reunification?

    The right to family reunification depends on what type of protection status you have and, in certain cases, it also depends on when you applied for asylum.

    Your family has the possibility of applying for residence permits to join you in Sweden if you

    have been given a permanent residence permit
    have been given protection status as a refugee
    have been given protection status as a person eligible for subsidiary protection and applied for asylum no later than 24 November 2015.
    If you have been given protection status as a person eligible for subsidiary protection and applied for asylum after 24 November 2015, you only have the right to family reunification in exceptional cases.

    Only your closest family can join you

    The following are counted as family members: husband, wife, registered partner or cohabiting partner, and your children under the age of 18 years. Other relatives and children that are 18 years or older cannot join you in Sweden if you have been given a temporary residence permit. If you are under 18 years, your parents are counted as your closest family.

    If you have been given a permanent residence permit, the person you plan to marry or cohabit with in Sweden can also apply for a residence permit to join you.

    If you have been given a temporary residence permit, both you and your partner must be at least 21 years old before your partner can obtain a residence permit. You must also have lived together before you moved to Sweden. An exemption can be made from the age requirement if you have common children.

    Your family can only obtain residence permits for as long as your own permit is valid.

    https://www.migrationsverket.se/English/Private-individuals/Protection-and-asylum-in-Sweden/When-you-have-received-a-decision-on-your-asylum-application/If-you-are-allowed-to-stay/Family-reunification.html

    So, only your:

    husband, wife, registered partner or cohabiting partner, and your children under the age of 18 years

    Are allowed to join come as part of the ‘chain immigration’ system that Breitbart speak of?

    Bearing in mind that we are constantly told by people like yourself that the vast majority of immigrants to Europe are young, single men who, if arriving after 2015

    only have the right to family reunification in exceptional cases

    the above wouldn’t apply then would it?

    The claims above being demonstratively shown to be utter balls doesn’t matter though because facts are unimportant to promoting the narrative and this will quietly be discarded and another piece of misinforming bollocks will replace it.

  34. Paul – you can wriggle on the hook as much as you wish but the people of Europe are being replaced and dispossessed of all that is ours, and you have seen the numbers so don’t play the faux-ignoramus. NY advocates such population replacement and lauds ‘Germany’ for going ahead with it. As seen from 10.14am, police across Europe are refusing to enforce the law…..

    https://twitter.com/sotiridi/status/1130161519390539778

    Sotiri Dimpinoudis ❁‏
    ‏ @sotiridi

    #Breaking: Just in – Reports that undocumented immigrants are protesting in the Charles de Gaulle Airport in #Paris right now and won’t let people board their flights until they meet and talk with with the prime minister Édouard Philippe of #France, Riot CRS police on the scene.

    Now that the middle-classes are being inconvenienced, perhaps something may be done about the police……

  35. Don’t talk about wriggling on the hook in an attempt to mask your own duplicity. Every claim you make above has easily been demolished as chicane balls.

    #Breaking: Just in

    The claims above being demonstratively shown to be utter balls doesn’t matter though because facts are unimportant to promoting the narrative and this will quietly be discarded and another piece of misinforming bollocks will replace it

    Wise up and go to sleep ye obsessed eegit.