web analytics

BEHOLD THE KINDLER, GENTLER POLITICS

By Pete Moore On June 4th, 2019

The unwashed protesters were pitifully few today in London. Crowds were down to hardcore nutters, the Praetorian Guard of “tolerance”, “inclusivity” and “diversity”. And just to prove how tolerant they are of diversity, they assaulted a peaceful pro-Trump protester. It’s just as well someone sane was there, because these loons were about to go fully tolerant on him –

My advice, when confronted by the loony left, is to get your retaliation in first, because violence is now standard procedure on the Left. This is unarguable. When you can smell them it’s time to start windmilling.

50 Responses to “BEHOLD THE KINDLER, GENTLER POLITICS”

  1. The faces on those protesters. Utterly deranged. Only Trump, Brexit and Farage can do this. Stalin, The Gulags and sheer evil just doesn’t generate any outrage in them. Amazing how out of whack their moral compass is.

  2. You ever seen the reaction that anti-Trump protesters get at Trump rallies?

  3. These milkshake people deserve a hard right to the jaw.

  4. I just don’t get all the hate ? You may not like someone and strongly disagree with them and their views, but to attack someone is straight out the Fascist playbook.

  5. To disrupt a rally is not that much better than physically attacking someone. It’s trying to start a fight.

    And it’s not the right or any Trumpers who have mainly been disrupting.

  6. To disrupt a rally is not that much better than physically attacking someone. It’s trying to start a fight.

    Eh? Disrupt a rally?:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN3BzdIuW_Q

    A handful of Cockney head the balls show up at an anti Trump rally wearing MAGA hats, screaming ‘we love Trump’ and (brilliant) saying the EU is like the USSR and their ‘rally’ is being disrupted?

    I’d say if anything they’re appearance was a deliberate provocation designed to disrupt.

  7. Look at how incapable the policewoman is during this melee. In all of this, I would reckon that when a POTUS is in the UK, even Trump, then those for and against should be able to accept their differing viewpoints, especially on Trump. The fact is that under Trump there is……
    a) no wall
    b) record 3rd-world immigration, uncontrolled
    c) globo-homo takeover of schools and institutions

    These deranged loons should be in favour of the POTUS who is actually delivering all the degeneracy that they want.

    On the left part of the left-right combo, the idiocy is limitless……

    https://dailystormer.name/hbos-chernobyl-is-whitewashed-what-about-the-somalian-ukrainians-who-designed-the-reactor/

    Most of the media has been silent about the fact that HBO’s new Chernobyl show has whitewashed history, removing all of the Somalians, Pakistanis and Zulus who helped design and build the famous nuclear reactor.

    One brave Tweeter had the nerve to point this out.

    Yes – a brave anti-racist femninist has complained that there are no PoC in HBO’s Chernobyl series 🙂

  8. The fat ugly shrieking woman has been identified. She works in the NHS, is into LGBT issues and cares about mental health.

    She’s clearly so nice.

  9. Seamus, Paul

    Do you think that such attackers deserve to be arrested and punished?

    Direct response always appreciated.

  10. She works in the NHS, is into LGBT issues and cares about mental health.

    No – she doesn’t care about mental health, not really. LTBG are the most mentally-ill of all people and should be assisted out of their illness, but the left doesn’t want that because the left IS the LGTB – sickos

  11. Do you think that such attackers deserve to be arrested and punished?

    Yes, I think it should be investigated and those guilty made to pay dry cleaning bills and fined. I also think the Cockney head the ball Trump disrupters should be investigated for possible incitement / breach of the peace.

  12. “Do you think that such attackers deserve to be arrested and punished?”

    As Paul says yes they should be however so should the instigator of the whole thing, the “victim”.

  13. ?

  14. This, Phantom:

    A handful of Cockney head the balls show up at an anti Trump rally wearing MAGA hats, screaming ‘we love Trump’ and (brilliant) saying the EU is like the USSR and their ‘rally’ is being disrupted?

    I’d say if anything they’re appearance was a deliberate provocation designed to disrupt.

  15. The victim wore no hat and screamed nothing.

    So apart from all the details, that’s a great observation.

  16. Let’s talk about what’s on film. No need for what about this or what about that.

    That’s a premeditated physical assault.

    Paying dry cleaning bills and writing a check is not close to a proper punishment.

  17. “Let’s talk about what’s on film. No need for what about this or what about that.”

    Let’s talk about what’s on film. A pro-Trump supporter wades into the middle of an anti-Trump rally looking for a reaction. And he got one. So yes the person who assaulted him should be punished but so should he as the instigator of the whole thing. It is at very least a public order offence.

  18. I’m telling you, speak with a leftist long enough and the madness appears. They can’t hide it forever.

  19. The demonstrator just so happened to have a milk shake on him.

    I never go to a demonstration without a milkshake on me.

  20. This is becoming the equivalent of the video from the White House where those pro-life youngsters supposedly assaulted some Indian guy – but did nothing of the sort, as video footage really did make clear. In this one, somebody i.e. one person, unthreatening, who has a different opinion to the deranged around him, is jostled, harangued and assaulted – that is what the video shows. What is also clear is that those who do not want free-speech see things totally differently from those who do. I have no problem with those who have different opinions to me voicing their opinions pretty much anywhere without repercussions – but that is not reciprocated

  21. Every time these guys do something like this, it’s more votes for their enemies.

    This clip makes me want to write a $100 donation to the Trump campaign.

    Keep rationalizing, boys.

  22. send a

  23. Phantom, are you telling me if I went to a pro-Trump rally and started an argument with the Trumpers that I’d be perfectly fine?

  24. Let’s talk about what’s on film. No need for what about this or what about that.

    Okay then:

    A handful of Cockney head the balls show up at an anti Trump rally wearing MAGA hats, screaming ‘we love Trump’ and (brilliant) saying the EU is like the USSR and their ‘rally’ is being disrupted?

    I’d say if anything they’re appearance was a deliberate provocation designed to disrupt.

    As a matter of fact:

    To disrupt a rally is not that much better than physically attacking someone. It’s trying to start a fight.

  25. I’d think that if anyone hit you first, or threw a beverage at you, I’d want them put into prison for thirty days, end of.

    This stuff is not OK.

    And the cops should separate opposing sides. That’s what the NYPD always seeks to do. They try to talk to all sides before the demo and keep them apart.

  26. Where is this guy’s MAGA hat

  27. He’s wearing it in a different video of it. He starts scuffling with protestors, it gets knocked off his head, he then gets milkshaked.

  28. And a police officer is present during it, trying to get this guy away from them but he goes back into the crowd to have another go.

  29. Here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN3BzdIuW_Q

  30. Whoever threw the fluid should go to prison.

    You don’t have any right to physically assault someone.

  31. “Whoever threw the fluid should go to prison.”

    He also throws it. In retaliation but you know the law is the law after all. So should he go to prison?

  32. Seamus

    You’re being very cute. Are you angling for Paul’s job?

  33. The law is the law. He throws the milkshake carton at some one. Should he go to prison?

  34. But Phantom:

    To disrupt a rally is not that much better than physically attacking someone. It’s trying to start a fight.

    Who said that?

    I also think the Cockney head the ball Trump disrupters should be investigated for possible incitement / breach of the peace.

    You would agree, no?

  35. Paul at 11.24pm – that’s a good video but are you sure that it supports your position? I see an old guy with a MAGA hat just stating his views on the occasion of a visit to the UK by the POTUS. The ‘liberal’ opponent says “you can’t stop me – it’s a democracy” and then says that “Brexit will never happen: Brexit’s dead”.

    I just can’t see the MAGA guy in a threatening manner, but then, his opinions differ from the deranged loons so those opinions are the threat.

  36. The lazy cops should have separated the sides. Their procedures are miserable. The Met Police needs better leadership than they have.

  37. “I just can’t see the MAGA guy in a threatening manner, but then, his opinions differ from the deranged loons so those opinions are the threat.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SupYE9E8EWo

    And in this view? Where he rips the sign out of the hands of someone before he his hit with milkshake?

  38. Police in the UK have been very wary about being too heavy handed with demonstrations. In a protest in 2009 the police killed a guy. Since then they have been very hands off with demonstrations.

  39. Seamus

    Did you even look at the video?

    The bum at 18 seconds is in the process of aiming the stick at the older man, as if to prod him with it.

    Quit this footsie, if you would.

  40. “The bum at 18 seconds is in the process of aiming the stick at the older man, as if to prod him with it.”

    But didn’t hit touch him. At which point the guy violently rips the sign from him. A lawyer’s dodge I guess but still you are the one going massively over the top from the legal point of view.

    The guy was belligerent. Was looking for a fight. Went to get a reaction and he got one. If there is to be a court case then he should answer for it as well.

  41. Two of your friends sought to hit him, one was successful.

    None of those videos are favorable to your side.

    Cheers.

  42. “Two of your friends sought to hit him, one was successful.”

    Not my friends. He started it. Its like a guy squaring up to a guy in a bar and then complaining when the other guy hit him.

  43. The anti-Trump rallies show the world that there are many sane people in the UK, as will those in Ireland in the near future.

  44. Phantom, do you think that the Cockney head the ball Trumpies should be arrested and questioned for possible incitement and / or breach of the peace?

  45. Look at these desperately sick people whose hatred of whites is written on their faces. David Cole, jewish in some way, explains…….

    https://www.takimag.com/article/the-whites-are-our-misfortune/

    Generally speaking, far-rightists in the U.S. who hate Jews hate them more for their politics than for their identity. Whites, on the other hand, are totally hated by leftists just for being white. Whites are now hated for the exact same reason Jews were hated in the past: They exist. The parallels between current anti-whiteness and old-timey Jew hatred are strong. Whites are born cursed (white privilege), and they walk the earth to torment the good and the decent. Everything bad that exists today, and everything bad throughout history, has been because of the white menace. Whites are “the source of the world’s ills” (that’s an exact quote from The Guardian, frighteningly similar to the motto on the masthead of Der Stürmer: “Die Juden sind unser Unglück!”—“The Jews are our misfortune!”).

    And whites, if not stopped, will kill us all through “climate change,” which is caused by whiteness (yes, “scientists” actually do make that claim).

    If you’re nonwhite, you get to pin your every problem on whites. Whites made you sick. Whites are why you got fired. Whites are why you robbed that liquor store. Whites are killing you with their evil thoughts, which are sucking the life out of you like the aliens in Lifeforce. The very presence of whites forces women of color to miscarry (I’m not making that up…and this lunatic claim is found not in a Nation of Islam pamphlet, but on “mainstream” news sites).

    As a Jew, I take no pleasure in seeing the “evil demon scapegoat” baton get passed to a new group of people. But as a historian, I do take a certain amount of cynical interest in witnessing the consequences when a society long past its Dark Ages imports millions of immigrants from nations still immersed in theirs.

    So enjoy watching history repeat itself. Same script, but recast for today’s young, urban, multicultural market.

  46. Pete Moore

    You will no doubt be pleased to learn that the woman in question has been hounded from her job, after she was identified and burried under a blizzard of right-wing snowflakes:

    “A petition did the rounds calling for her to be sacked and around 1,700 people signed it before she stepped down. The UCLH told the Mail that she left so as to save UCLH or the NHS any more ‘negative attention’. In less than 48 hours, the outraged became the target of outrage, and we all died a little more inside.

    Reading the petition – now signed by over 3,000 people – is a reminder that snowflakery is now almost as bad on the right as it is on the left. What Prigent did was ‘an outrage’, it splutters, and the NHS should ‘not tolerate such behaviour’. It could have been written by a students’ union officer incensed that someone used the wrong pronoun.”

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/06/07/the-right-wing-snowflakes-strike-again/

  47. Peter –

    You should doubt it. I didn’t call for her to lose her job. For some incidents, and for a certain kind of person, the shame and embarrassment of being found out is punishment enough. I think that’s the case here.

    Two caveats:

    1) It’s not so much right wing snowflakery as giving the left a taste of its own medicine.

    2) Some might say that her NHS job was funded by taxpayers, and that’s different from having a private employer. Tax-funded individuals have a line they cannot cross. They must be seen to treat individuals equally. This is the principle which saw patriots hounded out of teaching jobs. So goose, gander and all that.

    This woman’s family and friends have said that she was nice and normal and that they don’t know what happened to make her a hate-filled harridan. Or words to that effect.

    Left-liberalism happened to her. Left-liberalism is poison. It destroys sense and reason in anyone who contracts it.

  48. No and no Pete. From the linked article:

    “Going by their fulminations on Twitter, it seems some right-wingers think this is about playing the left at its own game, as right-wingers have been the targets for myriad twitch-hunts in the past. But these people are just dressing up their own lack of principle and shrill, pearl-clutching authoritarianism as tactical nous.

    Some are saying she was not some lowly nurse but a self-employed management consultant, and so we should have no sympathy for her. But given that precisely the same people are – rightly – outraged when prominent, well-off right-wingers lose certain positions, I’m not buying that argument here.”

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/06/07/the-right-wing-snowflakes-strike-again/

  49. Peter –

    I said that the shame and embarrassment of being found out is punishment enough. And for some on the right it is a case of playing the left at their own game.

    I’m not really in favour of that. We’re not leftists. We’re decent people, better than them.

  50. If you say so Pete. The woman’s behaviour was abominable for sure.