web analytics

BDS WILL BOOST BORIS

By Pete Moore On June 25th, 2019

Iain Martin is right. The British media has gone completely mad over Boris Johnson. It’s jolly amusing to see. All displays of hypocrisy are fun.

The cultural gauleiters have spent the decades pushing the boundaries, demonising marriage, affirming “alternative lifestyles” and eradicating God from public life. The same people are now throwing stones at Sinner Boris for his colourful private life. They are scandalised that he’s been married three times, which is the same number of marriages as Jeremy Corbyn, but no-one mentions that.

BoJo doesn’t need any boosting, but this BDS will propel him faster into Downing Street. We British like fair play. We invented it, after all. A witch hunt is distasteful and will only garner him more votes.

31 Responses to “BDS WILL BOOST BORIS”

  1. Jeremy Corbyn shakes hands with someone who said something mean about Jews is a fair question over his fitness to lead, while questions over whether or not Boris Johnson beats his mistress is suddenly a “witch hunt”?

  2. It is wise to consider that if a man cannot manage his own life well, how good will he be at managing government. Johnson’s life is chaotic and full of lies: Is that what you want in a PM?

  3. Seamus

    A shouting argument is not ” beating ” his ” mistress ”

    Lots of couples argue.

    Are you aware of any inside information or are you ” just asking questions “

  4. “A shouting argument is not ” beating ” his ” mistress ””

    Her screaming “get off me” is not a couple arguing.

  5. Seamus –

    Boris does not beat his missus. The Metropolitan Police will confirm that.

    NY –

    It would appear that he manages it pretty well, given all the chicks he upsets. Look, no-one cares. We voted to leave the EU. That’s all we want.

    If we want a teetotal family man we’ll send for GWB.

  6. “Boris does not beat his missus. The Metropolitan Police will confirm that.”

    They confirmed nothing of the sort. They confirmed that there were “no offences or concerns apparent to the officers”. That is not the same thing.

  7. So let’s have an inneuendo campaign.

    That’ll fix everything.

  8. Her screaming “get off me” is not a couple arguing.

    “Come here love, let’s have a hug, I’m sorry for spilling wine on your sofa.”

    “No you idiot, that cost a fortune. Get off me.”

    There, done. Women can fly off the handle sometimes. By the way, that same woman can’t go home now. She’s afraid of the Corbyn supporters waiting outside.

  9. “So let’s have an inneuendo campaign.”

    Have you seen the majority of the coverage of Jeremy Corbyn?

    “No you idiot, that cost a fortune. Get off me.”

    That’s one explanation. It is not the only one. And consider Johnson’s refusal to answer questions on the matter makes me think it isn’t that.

  10. So let’s see now:

    You just don’t care for anything because you’re spoilt

    You have no care for money or anything

    get off me

    An elitist, non fiscally responsible, suspected domestic abuser? Sounds just like the right guy to lead the UK to greatness.

    I can’t wait to see how long Pete’s adoration lasts:

    Former Tory MP Michael Portillo believes Boris Johnson as British prime minister will negotiate a Northern Ireland-only Brexit backstop – and will hold a referendum in the north to secure support for the plan

    https://www.irishnews.com/news/brexit/2019/06/15/news/michael-portillo-makes-prediction-over-boris-johnson-s-brexit-backstop-plan-1642500/

  11. An overheard remark means that he’s not fiscally responsible?

  12. Would his live in partner claiming he had no care for money suggest fiscal responsibility?

  13. People say a lot of things when they’re arguing.

  14. You agree on the face of it though that his live in partner who presumably knows hime very well accusing him of ‘having no care for money or anything’ wouldn’t suggest fiscal responsibility, yes?

  15. I want Boris to win because I believe he will keep us in the EU, not necessarily by design but by default because he won’t have the patience or stamina to wade through the Brexit treacle the way May for all her faults did. He will have the chutzpah to cancel Brexit without blushing when the going gets rough.

  16. Interesting summing up of Bojo,warts and all, over at Slugger:

    https://sluggerotoole.com/2019/06/25/there-is-a-case-for-boris-johnson-the-only-one-able-to-bring-off-the-biggest-screeching-u-turn-of-our-times/

    Precisely Colm. Among the many things that Johnson is one of the most prominent is he’s an opportunist. As a former Tory grandee comments in the Slugger piece:

    [Johnson is] a man who waits to see the way the crowd is running and then dashes in front and says, ‘Follow me’

    He knows that there’s no appetite for a no deal Brexit and he’s got too much of an ego to let such a disaster blemish his potential legacy.

  17. I can’t wait to see how long Pete’s adoration lasts

    I wouldn’t call it that, but I know how long an explanation lasts in the memory on ATW. I have some sympathy for him, because the press is all out to get him. The want him to throw in the towel so Jeremy Hunt (May-in-Trousers) gets the gig.

    If BoJo becomes PM there certainly is a chance that he reverses on Brexit. Then about ten seconds later the Tory Party will be finished. That’s fine by me, because Nigel Farage will be the next PM.

  18. He knows that there’s no appetite for a no deal Brexit

    Apart from it being the single most desired outcome in the country, that’s a spot on comment.

  19. If BoJo becomes PM there certainly is a chance that he reverses on Brexit

    I’d say that you should put the kettle on for it.

    That’s fine by me, because Nigel Farage will be the next PM

    Dream on. Did the Peterbrough by-election teach you nothing man?

  20. No, Peterborough taught me nothing about Labour vote fraud. I knew about it already.

    It should have taught you that The Brexit Party beat the incumbent party, the corrupt party which printed votes, two months after forming.

  21. Apart from it being the single most desired outcome in the country

    Utter bollocks

  22. Dry your eyes Pete:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-48680715

    Probably some Common Purpose, globalist, EU nefarious plot or something though, probably.

  23. Speaking of which what happened to harri

  24. This very week, leftists at ATW saw a woman beaten and battered by a Conservative MP and then thrown out just for being peaceful. A few months ago, same leftists saw white youths taunting, intimidating and abusing a defenceless old man whose path they had blocked. Now, same leftists claim that Boris Johnson (bought-and-paid-for by the jewsual suspects) battered his (female) partner. I saw none of these things so, clearly, to be leftist is to be deranged

  25. Unless somebody has evidence to the contrary, as far as I know Boris hasn’t been accused of assault.

  26. In a referendum put to the electorate in the UK, the result was that the UK shall Leave the EU, and this event was three years ago. That the UK is still in the EU shows the true nature of the political Establishment, but that leftists believe this betrayal to be laudable shows the true nature of leftists. Here is who leftists are……

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/06/what-is-the-metaphysics-of-the-left-part-one/

    For Leftists, moral excellence consists exclusively in the “fair” and “compassionate” treatment of others. There are no obligations, however, to oneself; in other words, no conception of any imperative to develop one’s body and mind, to restrain one’s appetites, and to discipline oneself. The “lifestyle” of a childless gay hedonist is regarded as just as “valid” as that of a man who sacrifices self-indulgence in order to support a family. Both are simply “choices.” Choosing to be a fat slob and choosing to be an Olympic athlete are both “valid.” And the Leftists’ practice of “fairness” and “compassion” often consists merely in “affirming” everyone’s right to be let alone to make as big a mess of their lives as they choose. (This is the reason “libertarianism” is actually closer to the Left than to the Right.) Leftist belief in “choice” reaches its limit in the case of those who choose not to agree with them.

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/06/what-is-the-metaphysics-of-the-left-part-two/

    The outcome of the Leftist metaphysics is death. And what else could it be? This is an ideology that insists that nature, including human nature, is infinitely malleable. It denies difference and natural inequality. It loathes the strong and lauds the weak. It denigrates beauty and raises up ugliness. It denigrates family and celebrates the hedonism of the childless. It denies truth, while asserting what it takes to be absolute truths. It uses logic to reject logic. It moralizes, while denying morality. It promises a glorious future, while causing misery in the present. It demands we love strangers and hate our own. When the attempt is made to remake reality according to this nest of contradictions, the result can only be the destruction of life, health, happiness, civilization, and nations. It is absolutely deadly – and this is not, of course, mere speculation. The track record of the Left is one of murder, torture, tyranny, famine, poverty, and general misery unparalleled in human history. Leftism is the worst disaster ever to befall life on Earth.

    And we should not entertain, even for a moment, that all of this was the awful result of noble intentions gone awry. One need only look at the gleeful, shrieking, hate-filled faces of the misshapen creatures who call themselves the Left today. There is no question that at the root of Leftism is a virulent nihilism: a will to destroy, to profane, and to corrupt all that is strong, healthy, and decent. At some level of their awareness, all Leftists know that their ideals will not work – and they do not care. The real point of Leftism is not to improve the world, but to destroy it.

  27. //Her screaming “get off me” is not a couple arguing.//

    So, while the other candidate was mounting a campaign, Boris was apparently mounting something completely different.

    I couldn’t care less about what a politician does with his wives or mistresses or pets back home, and Boris looks like an interesting kind of guy who’d be fun to know.
    But note that this post is coming from the same Pete who used to go all apopletic about “the serial rapist” Clinton and who got months of mileage from a faked video of Obama “grabbing his genitals” in front of female journalists.

  28. Noel,

    //But note that this post is coming from the same Pete who used to go all apopletic about “the serial rapist” Clinton and who got months of mileage from a faked video of Obama “grabbing his genitals” in front of female journalist//

    It’s almost like Pete is a huge hypocrite, with massive double standards.

  29. so Boris badenov beats the missus…..

    Well if he’s screwing the ladies and abusing them maybe he’ll do it to the people less.

  30. It’s almost like Pete is a huge hypocrite, with massive double standards

    I don’t nessecarily think that’s the case Dave I just think that Pete says whatever is expedient to his narrative at the time regardless of what he may have said before or how contradictory his utterances may be.

  31. Noel –

    This is the video. What’s faked about it?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mehb5sqKyrI