web analytics

AND?

By Pete Moore On July 18th, 2019

Those evil Republicans and their child protection laws!

The implication is that Democrats will protect the sexualisation of boys, who can have gay men slip money into their skimpy clothes while they put on a show. Actually that might be true.

34 Responses to “AND?”

  1. I agree child drag shows are an abuse of children and should at the very least be strongly discouraged, but by the same token why haven’t these Republicans demonstrated the same loathing of the equally tacky child beauty pageant parades where girl toddlers are sexualised into looking like overmade up tarts. All such tacky and unhealthy exploitation of children by adults should be equally discouraged.

  2. Child beauty pageants are degrading and disgusting.

    But I’d never heard of ” child drag shows “. Surely this is a joke. Some parents must really, really hate their kids to have them participate in that.

  3. Phantom –

    Google “Lactatia” and “Desmond Is Amazing”, but not from work. It’s not a joke.

  4. But I’d never heard of ” child drag shows “. Surely this is a joke. Some parents must really, really hate their kids to have them participate in that.

    You need to get out of your bubble, and it’s not an attack because we all like our bubbles – but what’s going on is degenerate beyond Weimar…..

    https://www.thecollegefix.com/video-undercover-moms-expose-graphic-teen-pride-public-library-event-then-get-doxxed-by-antifa/

    Moms also kicked out of library via police

    Two concerned mothers who attended a recent “Teen Pride” celebration at a public library in Renton, Washington, told The College Fix that they have now been doxxed for their efforts to expose the event, which included a graphic dance by a drag queen and the distribution of other adult sex and gender materials.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7001531/Man-chopped-penis-testicles-nullo.html

    A man sliced off his own penis and testicles using an ultra-sharp ceramic knife so he could become a genitalia-free ‘nullo’ – and then kept his severed organ in the freezer until his mother threw it out.

    Trent Gates, a 23-year-old from Washington DC, removed his testicles in a DIY surgical procedure performed in his own apartment in April 2016, before chopping off his penis in a North Carolina motel room eight months later.

    The same surgeon stitched him up on both occasions.

    He told Metro: ‘They made sure I got psychiatric treatment just to make sure I was sane and that it was a good decision. ‘The therapists and the psychiatric staff said “Yeah, yeah, he’s good, he’s sane…miraculously”.

    The psychiatric staff said that the man who wanted to chop off his penis and testicles is sane

  5. No

    Thanks for letting me know that this exists, but I don’t want to see it.

    This reminds me of the stories of the ” dancing boys ” who are exploited in Afghanistan by men. You’d have a hard time thinking of worse adults than those who have anything to do with this.

  6. Sounds like something Trump’s good buddy Jeff Epstein would be into. Trump has a talent for befriending the depraved.

  7. I am surprised it’s Republicans, aren’t they the ones who usually get busted kiddie fiddling?

  8. OMG…. I found a video of Pete talking sports….. 3 min it’s a piss

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTERzdCjEwE

  9. the end is the best

  10. I enjoyed that Patrick.

    ‘Cricket is just hurling for the gays’. LOL!

  11. glad Dave I thought it was hysterical but what I find funny most don’t so I wasn’t sure.

  12. The implication is that Democrats will protect the sexualisation of boys

    I don’t think that’s the ‘implication’ at all. All these tacky, vulgar ‘pageants’ where children are sexualsed and exploited are disgusting.

    I say that vid the other day Pat. Have a look at this:

    https://www.facebook.com/joshpraycomedy/videos/479993336085193/UzpfSTEwMDAwNTk1MjAzNDg3OToxMTYxOTM1MDI3MzQ4MjIx/

  13. oh that was great

  14. “Of course I watch the World Cup in the football, just to see England lose.”

    An honest Irishman. Of course that’s why they watch it. Their own country never qualifies, because they’re rubbish.

    ‘Cricket is just hurling for the gays’. LOL!

    Excellent news. Things can be “gay” again, by order of the Irish and Dave Alton.

  15. Their own country never qualifies, because they’re rubbish.

    One case where Pete thinks the ‘invasion’ is the greatest gift etc etc.

  16. Just a reminder that Republican lawmakers want to make child drag shows illegal….Pink News

    This looks as though Pink News is opposed to making child drag shows illegal and, by reasonable extension, opposed to the Republicans who intend to make child drag shows illegal. The opposition to Republicans is Democrats.

    The implication is that Democrats will protect the sexualisation of boys

    Child drag shows sexualise children, and gays target boys so Pete’s comment above makes sense.

    I don’t think that’s the ‘implication’ at all.

    OK Paul – what is your take on this?

    I don’t think that’s the ‘implication’ at all.

  17. The opposition to Republicans is Democrats.

    Ah okay. So everything that Republicans oppose Democrats have to endorse and vice versa?

    GSCE politics at best

  18. Paul – the alternative to Republicans in the US is the Democrats, and the Democrats do actually support all perversion, so Pink News cited “Republican” intentions to make child drag shows illegal and the implication is that Democrats would not make them illegal. What is your take on the matter?

  19. What is your take on the matter?

    This:

    GSCE politics at best

  20. GSCE politics at best

    Paul – you would fail GCSE Politics

    Allan@Aberdeen, on September 6th, 2018 at 9:10 PM Said:

    Paul – a legislator on a matter outside his field would receive the best technical back-up in order that the legislation would be effective. In the oil sector following the Piper Alpha disaster, there was the Cullen Report, and Lord Cullen had best technical support for his report was the basis of subsequent legislation. Why do you believe that jurists would have no back-up from scientists active in the field affected?

    Paul McMahon, on September 6th, 2018 at 10:09 PM Said:

    Allan, a jury trial is an adversarial process where opposing points of view attempt to convince the jury that they’re correct. The Cullen Report was the culmanation of a Public Inquiry into a disaster. Both are completely different beasts from drafting and passing legislation.

    Allan@Aberdeen, on September 13th, 2018 at 6:27 PM Said:

    I wondered how and why “jury trial” could have been brought into the discussion and then I saw what I had written previously…….

    Ah – It’s the term ‘jurist’ which seems to have flummoxed Paul

    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/jurist

    An expert in or writer on law.

    Paul – are you sure that you have had training in Law?

    Your geography is none-too-handy, and you would certainly fail maths/arithmetic owing to profound innumeracy. Paul – face it: you’re useless

  21. Allan, stick to your childlike, simplistic ‘everything that Republicans oppose Democrats have to endorse’ and vice versa’ and stop making a cunt of yourself.

  22. Paul – what’s your take on the matter? I gave you mine, so what’s yours? If Pink News is not implying that Democrats would stop the move to make child drag shows illegal, what then is the implication of

    Just a reminder that Republican lawmakers want to make child drag shows illegal

    Pete and I agree that it is urging gays to vote Democrat. What’s your take? Emphasis on the use of the term ‘Republican’

  23. This is my take on it:

    All these tacky, vulgar ‘pageants’ where children are sexualsed and exploited are disgusting.

    I suppose that would make me one of those Republican lawmakers that you refer to above.

  24. I suppose that would make me one of those Republican lawmakers that you refer to above.

    OK – you agree with me and Pete on this one

  25. Yeah, I’m an American Republican lawmaker.

    Okay then.

  26. I suppose that would make me one of those Republican lawmakers that you refer to above.

    They’re so culturally conditioned that it has to be dragged out of them.

  27. I don’t think my 4.10 above required any dragging at all Pete.

    And I’m not an American Republican lawmaker either.

  28. Look at the cluster-fuck that Paul makes of a thread. Finally, after having to expose his ignorance in HIS OWN FIELD (so he says) do I get an answer, and now he’s starting an argument about the answer 🙂

    Allan@Aberdeen, on July 19th, 2019 at 10:30 PM Said:

    I suppose that would make me one of those Republican lawmakers that you refer to above.

    OK – you agree with me and Pete on this one

    Right – now that should have wrapped it up, but ‘no’

    Paul McMahon, on July 19th, 2019 at 10:33 PM Said:

    Yeah, I’m an American Republican lawmaker.

    Okay then.

    WTF is that? Seriously – WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT?? Either you agree with Pete, me, Phantom AND those Republicans OR you don’t, but there’s no need to backpedal on what should have been a reasonably clean conclusion

  29. Allan, are you drunk?

    I clearly disagree with these pageants. It doesn’t make me an American Republican lawmaker.

    Pete’s stupid premise, which you agree with, is that if Republicans agree with something Democrats must disagree with it and vice versa. It’s absolute horse shit.

  30. Paul – you are an extremely irascible person. This thread should have concluded at 10.30pm.

    Now, I don’t believe this…..

    is that if Republicans agree with something Democrats must disagree with it and vice versa

    Pink News wrote……..

    Just a reminder that Republican lawmakers want to make child drag shows illegal

    and everybody knows that there are two parties of office in the US: Republicans, and Democrats.

    Pink News did not write that Democrats are supporting Republicans in this matter otherwise it would have been written as

    ‘Ohio lawmakers…….’

    That should be comprehensible to most at ATW

  31. Pete wrote the implication is that Democrats will protect the sexualisation of boys

    Implying that if Republicans support it Democrats will oppose it. I don’t think that’s the implication all. I certainly wouldn’t be an American Republican and I think that the ‘pageants’ shoukd be banned.

    I would imagine that most logical people would see the point being made here.

    Now please, babble on like a fucking lunatic with your semantic bolloxology if you wish but don’t be surprised if I don’t indulge your bullshit.

  32. Paul, you’re making a bad fist of clearing this up.

  33. Not my fault it’s do difficult for you to understand Pete although I suspect what we have here is a veriation of ‘ask my brother if I’m a liar’, you impish little devil you.

  34. * so difficult