web analytics

Tell me who you believe Tony or Joe ?

By Patrick Van Roy On October 28th, 2020

Decide for yourself. 

an Interview with Tony Bobulinski

They keep scrubbing the video…… thanks youtube.

 

The link to the interview at Rumble

https://rumble.com/vav8lp-tucker-carlson-with-tony-bobulinski-full-video.html

 

The original video is on rumble at the Link above…… here is a recap PLUS MORE AUDIO TAPE…… scrubbed again Here it is again……

128 Responses to “Tell me who you believe Tony or Joe ?”

  1. Complete crap
    Biden has released his tax returns
    In that there is no profit recorded from any of these accusation
    Tucker has his knickers in a twist
    In future people may refer to a bibulinski
    A measurement of bullshit detection close to an election .
    Related to hearsay innuendo.
    Show us the bank accounts

    On the other side we have the numbers where trump gained Hundreds of millions in unpaid loans
    Money from Dutches bank which was Russian laundered money
    Not declaring is felony tax crime at the very least .

    See pat when you pull these stunts you get paid back a double portion

    Learn your lesson there’s only one corrupt guy his name is Donald trump

  2. Joe

  3. on one side we have zero signatures, zero accounts – that’s the bobulinki
    on the other side we have actual Trump signatures, figures, accounts
    Deutche bank loans.and hard evidence of Deutsche bank scandals worth billions

    Its a bit like comparing Trumps record in office of felonies committed by his staff as compared to Obama, trumps lot indicted, charged imprisoned = hundreds
    Obama – zero criminal charges / indictments/ prison sentences of any of him and his staff

    won’t stop the hopeless becoming more and more discombobulated
    or is that discombobulinskied ( that’s for colm ) 😉

  4. I lasted 7 minutes. No way am I going to subject myself to almost an hour of that unmitigated pish.

    Joe

  5. Etymology of scraping the bottom of the barrel – the dregs

  6. As I said on the China Joe post, watch this space for multiple ‘anteefa instructed by Dems’ screaming.

  7. Wait a sec. Paul, by jove you’re right.

    No-one at Sleepy Joe rallies…but millions of anteefa rioters out rioting.

    That’s what’s happening: all the dastardly Dems have stopped going to rallies and instead have made a collective decision to riot, loot and destroy America’s greatness.

  8. Sad you haven’t the stomach to hear from a man whose family have been American Naval Officers for four Generations who himself was Naval Officer who ONLY came forward after he was called a russian spy.

    But as I said yesterday….. none of you are interested in hearing ANYTHING that might provide a different set of facts.

    You are not interested in even knowing both sides….. your view is right and my god to sit for an hour to hear from the man the possible next President of the US has labeled on national tv as a Russian Spy…. well shit you don’t have to hear what he has to say Joe says he’s a spy, the bbc/cnn/msnbc say he’s a spy he’s a spy…….

    Well no one hear can say they couldn’t find what the man has to say……. I put this FULL Interview up so that everyone here would have the most information.

    Horses to water and the 3 monkeys…..

  9. Sad you haven’t the stomach to hear from a man whose family have been American Naval Officers for four Generations who himself was Naval Officer who ONLY came forward after he was called a russian spy.

    Which has what to do with what, exactly?

    Horses to water

    As I said before, the analogy would be more horse to person who says he has water and might produce the water at some unspecified time in the future.

    No-one at Sleepy Joe rallies…but millions of anteefa rioters out rioting.

    Yes Reg, creepy, sleepy, China Joe is Schrödinger’s candidate.

  10. I listed on and off to about half of it while I was experiencing my regular insomnia and trying to drift back to sleep. I don’t believe he is a Russian spy, but he clearly is someone who feels hard done by through his experiences with Hunter Biden and is lashing out so a lot of what he says has to be taken with a pinch of salt.

    I honestly think there has been some murky dealings and Joe will at the very least have indulged his wayward son to some extent as fathers will do. I cannot know exactly what are the facts and neither does anyone here on ATW but I think the truth is probably ( as happens in most of these cases) somewhere between the two seperate claims from both sides.

  11. Sad you haven’t the stomach to hear from a man whose family have been American Naval Officers for four Generations who himself was Naval Officer who ONLY came forward after he was called a russian spy.

    Not really sure what being officers has got to do with the point you’re making Patrick? Are you saying they should be given more respect of trust because of this? If you are that’s a bit hypocritical, you certainly don’t respect or believe decorated war heroes.

  12. We live in Trump Twilight zone
    Where dictators are fetted , the senate is spineless , and Lesley Stahl, an impeccable journalist with 30 years experience terrifies what’s left of the GOP.
    You couldn’t make it up .
    Trump lost the moral authority to govern the day after he lied about the size of the inauguration crowd

  13. Tell me who do you believe, Tucker or Joe?

    Anyone who believes Carlson deserves to stay dumb. The man is a brazen liar.

    I’m not even going to soil my ears listening to his horseshit; there are already quite enough lies from that political corner and anyone who has lied so plainly as he doesn’t deserve another chance.

  14. The boy who cried wolf quotes from the network who cried wolf, yet again.

    Even Ted Cruz, in a rare moment of candor, admits that the last minute Hunter Biden attacks are not working at all.

    https://www.axios.com/ted-cruz-hunter-biden-trump-f38805a0-6748-44a6-88f0-2d76fb59d7a0.html

    Oct 27, 2020 – Axios on HBO
    Ted Cruz doesn’t think the Hunter Biden attacks are working
    Jonathan Swan
    Jonathan Swan

    Screenshot: “Axios on HBO”
    Republican Sen. Ted Cruz told “Axios on HBO” he doesn’t think the Trump campaign’s focus on the Biden family’s business dealings are having any sway with voters.

    The big picture: After watching the Trump-Biden debate with “Axios on HBO” on Thursday night, Cruz said he thought Trump had done very well. But when asked whether he thought voters were moved by the release of the Hunter Biden emails, Cruz replied, “I don’t think it moves a single voter.”

    Cruz also said that “one of Biden’s best points was when he said, ‘All of these attacks back and forth about my family and his family, they don’t matter. What matters is your family.'”
    Why it matters: Cruz is not alone in this view. One of Trump’s top advisers told me he had urged Trump to stop talking about anything to do with Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton’s emails or “Russiagate” and to instead focus solely on the economy.

    “I think we should be unifying, we should be explaining, we should be lifting people up,” Cruz said. “I think it’s a turnout election. But my assessment of turnout is the left is showing up no matter what. That those who hate Trump will crawl over broken glass to vote against him.”
    “The big unknown in this election is: Is everyone else gonna show up?”

  15. It’s crazy. One week before the vote and already half the entire turnout for 2016 have cast their votes in this election. Looks like it’ll be a massive turnout by the time all are counted (which may perhaps be only in late November).

    Whatever way the vote goes, this is good news for democracy.

  16. Not sure I agree, Noel. High voter participation doesn’t necessarily mean a healthy democracy.

    There’s a touch of the Fermanagh and South Tyrones about this US election i.e. voter turnout is so high only because the result will be close and both sides f@#$ing hate each other.

  17. Some of the early voting being driven by fear of the pandemic, especially in the many states where the process is not organized right and where there will be long lines on Election Day.

    Some ( incredibly stupid ) early voters want to change their vote, and in some states they can actually do that.

    And the president who wants to throw every monkey wrench in the world in the voting machinery actually endorses the ability to do that, to complicate a troubled process even more.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/change-vote-trump-thinks-people/story?id=73854468

  18. Some ( incredibly stupid ) early voters want to change their vote, and in some states they can actually do that

    I’d be surprised if the IT systems were set up to do something like that.
    I remember being asked to modify a system to allow a change of gender. F****** me, that was a change and a half.

  19. //High voter participation doesn’t necessarily mean a healthy democracy.//

    I know what you mean, but a healthy society and healthy democracy are two different things. The US is now probably more riven by political partisanship than at any time anyone alive today can remember; even more than in the darkest days of Vietnam protests, and that ain’t good.
    Voting day in Fermanagh-South Tyrone is like a family reunion by comparison 🙂

    But from the POV of participation in politics and belief in the democratic process, this can only be good news. When we were young, the lethargy of the US electorate was legendary. Reagan won his first outing with only 50.7% of the votes cast, and the number of votes cast in turn represented only 52% of the electorate (which is in turn even less than the potential electorate as many people don’t even bother registering).
    So (if I understand these things right) probably less than one quarter of the population of voting age supported the man who became president for 8 years (turnout the next time was still only 53 pc).

    Political discourse has gone to the dogs, but stronger public participation is generally a good thing.

  20. The higher turnout is always good for democracy but it looks as if the Supreme Court is already starting the process of trying to tip the election in favour of Trump and the Republicans.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/us/kavanaugh-voting-rights.html

  21. The procedures are a mish-mosh, each state is different.

    In some states, the counting of early paper ballots has already begun. You couldn’t possibly accommodate a change of mind in that scenario.

    In other states, paper ballots are held in secure or not so secure places, with the count to be done starting November 3. I suppose you could allow for a change of mind in this set up, but someone would have to go find the actual initial ballot, which may be in a sealed envelope. Such requests would add burdens on already very busy ballot workers.

  22. Carlson is a racist jerk. I wouldn’t believe a word that comes from his lyimng mouth.

  23. As recently as a couple of days ago, Trump has appeared at multiple events where many attendees did not wear masks, did not distance themselves at all.

    Such as this one.

    This is gross negligence at best.

    https://bangordailynews.com/2020/10/27/news/bangor/levant-orchard-regrets-that-trump-event-drew-such-large-unmasked-crowd/

    The owners of a Levant ( Maine ) apple orchard that hosted an impromptu campaign visit by President Donald Trump over the weekend have expressed regret that the event grew so large and that its attendees did not practice good social distancing or mask-wearing in the middle of a pandemic.

    In a note posted to the Treworgy Family Orchards website on Tuesday, the business said that it was initially told “this would be a small, unpublicized, surprise, private, photo op which gave us no cause for alarm.” The business has also said the event was not meant as a rally or an endorsement of any candidate.

    While the orchard normally tries to enforce a policy on masking and social distancing, it said that it was unexpectedly forced to delegate all crowd control for the visit to the U.S. Secret Service.

    “We share the concerns of many over the size of the gathering, lack of social distancing and mask wearing during the event,” the business wrote. “If something had changed within the White House or campaign planning for this visit, we were not made aware of it during the process. If we had it our way, the visit would have gone just as we had initially been told: an unannounced photo op with the President and his team.”

  24. Trump lost an important court ruling yesterday. And there is a stained dress with possible DNA evidence. Sound familiar? Trump consigliere “Attorney General” Barr tried to get the case dismissed but failed:

    “The lawsuit Ms. Carroll initially filed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan accused Mr. Trump of lying in several public statements last year when he firmly denied he had attacked her in a dressing room in Bergdorf Goodman, the high-end Manhattan store, in the mid-1990s…

    Shortly after the account came out, Mr. Trump denied that he had ever met Ms. Carroll and accused her of lying, adding, “She’s not my type.” In a written statement, Mr. Trump also said Ms. Carroll was “trying to sell a new book.” He added, “It should be sold in the fiction section.” In her lawsuit, Ms. Carroll said that Mr. Trump’s denials had harmed her reputation, causing her to lose the good will and support of her readers. Mr. Trump, initially represented by private lawyers, sought to delay the case on the grounds that as a sitting president he was completely immune to civil lawsuits in state court.

    But in August, a New York State judge, Verna L. Saunders, denied his request. She cited a ruling by the United States Supreme Court this summer, which rejected a claim by Mr. Trump that, as president, he was immune from a state criminal investigation. That dispute arose after the Manhattan district attorney’s office subpoenaed Mr. Trump’s accountants for his tax returns. Justice Saunders’s ruling also put additional pressure on Mr. Trump by opening the door not only to requiring him to be deposed before the November election, but also to compelling him to give a DNA sample. Ms. Carroll saved the dress she wore during the encounter and maintains that it has her attacker’s genetic material on it…”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20201028&instance_id=23557&nl=the-morning&regi_id=92386359&segment_id=42559&te=1&user_id=88a853b48475ac441e2bca51f72ddacb

  25. lol….. ya gotta love it the only person on this thread with any integrity is Colm

    Good assessment Colm, the truth is probably in the middle.

    The rest of you idiots don’t know where the middle might even be because you’re only interested in one side as usual….. a pack of 3 monkeys

  26. When real journalists start covering the story, rather than shock jocks, tabloids and entertainers, then I’ll pay attention to it.

    If Fox News, the New York Post or random right-wing blogs are reporting on it but the Wall Street Journal aren’t then it is safe enough to take it with a pinch of salt. Similarly if the Washington Post and the New York Times aren’t covering a story but MSNBC and CNN are then you can also take it with a pinch of salt.

  27. So Dave are you John McCain’s illegitimate kid ?

    You seem awfully offended that I dislike and disapprove of the late traitorous pos scumbag Senator McCain….

    McCain earned the feelings I have for him by living a lifetime of corruption staining that uniform he wore and the office he held. So to answer your question yes I give more weight to someone who has worn the uniform.

    It’s also why I am harder on Phantom and no matter how much we disagree will always respect Phantom….. because he wore the Uniform.

    stop trying to pick old fights, prove you have a thinking brain and find a new one….. I always present opportunity to do so…

  28. Seamus, on October 28th, 2020 at 3:55 PM Said: Edit Comment
    When real journalists start covering the story, rather than shock jocks, tabloids and entertainers, then I’ll pay attention to it.

    So if the MSM doesn’t think you need to see it you don’t…. that’s how the chinese work… lol

  29. Fox News is amazing.

    Watch it any night, you will hear full-throated, impassioned, hour long Trump campaign ads from Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson, one after the other.

  30. “So if the MSM doesn’t think you need to see it you don’t…. that’s how the chinese work… lol”

    It isn’t that they don’t think I need to see it. If a story is there they will report on it. The idea that the Wall Street Journal, a conservative newspaper, isn’t reporting on it to help cover it up is complete tinfoil hat stuff.

    If real journalists cover it (of any political stripes) then it is a legitimate story. That real journalists aren’t covering it speaks volumes.

    “Watch it any night, you will hear full-throated, impassioned, hour long Trump campaign ads from Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson, one after the other.”

    State media, exactly how the Chinese work.

  31. The rest of you idiots don’t know where the middle might even be because you’re only interested in one side as usual

    Patrick

    Since when were you interested in the middle? You have supported Trump 100% since he was elected. Whatever he does or says is fine by you, even when he take Putin’s side against his own country. You are so deluded that his thousands of lies seem the total truth to you. I guess that’s what Fox does to your brain.

    And another stained dress could be pivotal to a POTUS. I don’t believe in karma but…

  32. Yes.

    The WSJ is legit. They have editors and won’t print things that have not been verified to the best of their ability.

    Yes, Fox News is state media. And they accuse the ” MSM ” of being in the tank for the power structure which is unintentionally funny.

  33. BTW, no great loss, but instead of the screen above I now see a blank with message

    “This video contains content from FOX News Network, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.”

    (“Who has”?)

    Is that the same in the UK, Ireland?

  34. If anyone in Europe has Roku TV, Fox distributes material on that platform here, and presumably there as well

  35. The rest of you idiots don’t know where the middle might even be because you’re only interested in one side as usual….. a pack of 3 monkeys

    You want me to take this rubbish seriously? Post credible evidence.

  36. The featured video is now unavailable in the US as well.

  37. Patrick

    So Dave are you John McCain’s illegitimate kid ?

    What amazing debating skills you have Patrick, is that the best you’ve got? How childish. But I’ll be proud to have a decorated war hero, and a man who risked his life to save the lives of others as my father.

    You seem awfully offended that I dislike and disapprove of the late traitorous pos scumbag Senator McCain….

    I don’t care whether you like him or not Patrick. What I’m bothered about is your repeated nasty lie that he caused the deaths of 134 men through incompetence. when the demonstrable facts show he was not responsible for the fire and acted like a hero that day.

    stop trying to pick old fights, prove you have a thinking brain and find a new one….. I always present opportunity to do so…

    I’m not trying to pick a fight Patrick, I’m just pointing out your hypocrisy as usual.
    In that your respect for someone in the the military, is only for those whose politics you agree with

  38. The rest of you idiots don’t know where the middle might even be because you’re only interested in one side as usual

    I’d be amazed if you could keep a straight face when you typed that.
    Your level of projection astounding.

  39. I found this amusing:

    https://twitter.com/marylee_losardo/status/1321448431571841026/photo/1

  40. do you believe miles taylor or not?

    he’s just come out as the anonymous source who was tweeting for months as inside staffer at WH

    Donald Trump is a man without character. It’s why I wrote “A Warning”…and it’s why me & my colleagues have spoken out against him (in our own names) for months. It’s time for everyone to step out of the shadows. My statement:

    https://milestaylor.medium.com/a-statement-a13bc5173ee9

  41. Do you believe miles taylor or not?

    Of course he doesn’t. The Great Leader doesn’t lie.

    No doubt Taylor is just (yet another) ‘disgruntled former employee’

  42. do you believe miles taylor or not?

    HA HA HA – who?! The NYT ran these Anony-miss stories as if it was a White House insider or some Cabinet level whistleblower. Years later we find out he was some junior no-one. Another media hoax and fail.

    I love how these people believe every BS story under the Sun about Trump without the slightest evidence. You just need to type, without any evidence to back it up, that Trump peed on Russian tarts in Moscow and they sincerely believe it because they want it to be true,

    But a Naval Intelligence vet and former business partner of the Bidens, with tons of texts, email and tape to back up his claims? It’s simultaneously false and Russian disinfo!

    These poeple are such moral and intellectual cowards they do not deserve a hearing.

  43. Years later we find out he was some junior no-one.

    Chief of Staff for Secretary of Homeland Security isn’t exactly a junior no one.

    With tons of texts, email and tape to back up his claims

    Yet again, if there are ‘tons’ there should be no problems linking to these actual ‘tons’ and those specifically which incriminate Biden Snr in criminal dealings?

  44. Naval Intelligence vet and former business partner of the Bidens

    Why would a good vet want to be in “business” like that in the first place

  45. Paul –

    You’ll find tons of stuff here. These people had the laptop. Consider it linked.

    https://thenationalpulse.com/

    Phantom –

    Bobulinksi thought it was a legit operation. He got out when he realised it was a Biden racket.

  46. I have always said that everything that Hunter Biden did in ” business ” was sleazy … and that none of this reflects well on Joe Biden, either.

    This isn’t new. Nothing said over the past weeks changes any of that.

    But why would you rush to believe a guy who knowingly chose to become entangled in a borderline dirty at best enterprise?

  47. Our comments crossed paths.

    Will ponder.

  48. Consider it linked.

    Yeah Pete, okay. It’s a firehose of rubbish from a Breitbart front and even if (and it’s a big if) the claims are verified where are the alleged links to Biden Snr?

    The National Pulse you say?

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-national-pulse/

    Edited by Raheem Kassam you say?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raheem_Kassam

    Wise up.

  49. Pete

    The news staff of the ( conservative ) Wall Street Journal didn’t buy think that this was a legitimate story.

    Does that make you re-consider at all?

  50. Thanks Paul, I know who Raheem Kassan is. Your predictable response is why I won’t waste any time linking to to this stuff. If I thought that you’d read it but still disagree I would bother. But I know that you won’t bother, so I won’t bother.

    Phantom –

    This Wall Street Journal?

    Now Corruption Story Is About Joe, Not Hunter

    How long can the media blackout continue?

    And this Wall Street Journal?

    The Press of Conformity

    WSJ Opinion: Media Ignores Escalating Biden Family News Story

    Someone there thinks it’s a legitimate news story. That they didn’t have the laptop is significant. If you don’t have the scoop with this kind of thing then you only have opinion.

  51. Strassel does a great job in the Journal making these naysayers look like the gits they are.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-biden-family-legacy-11603409528?mod=djemalertNEWS

  52. If I thought that you’d read it but still disagree I would bother

    If it’s like the firehose above don’t bother. I listened to the audio and read the transcript. It doesn’t say what they claim it does.

  53. Pete

    Those are opinion pieces. The WSJ prints a lot of opinions in their very good op ed section

    The news department was skeptical about this story and they remain so.

  54. once again dave…..

    I’m not trying to pick a fight Patrick, I’m just pointing out your hypocrisy as usual.
    In that your respect for someone in the the military, is only for those whose politics you agree with

    John McCain was a corrupt pos…. even if I agreed with his politics I still would feel the same he was corrupt politician who made millions off his office while leading a career long vendetta against the first amendment.

    He stained that uniform and pissed on it. So he took any credibility bonus that uniform gave him. get over it the guy is dead and it’s not hypocritical of me to dislike a corrupt pos… it’s kind of all I care about. The Law and the Constitution he spit on both.

  55. Paul –

    You didn’t listen to the audio. You said above: “I lasted 7 minutes. No way am I going to subject myself to almost an hour of that unmitigated pish.”

    So you didn’t listen to the audio. I don’t blame you. I didn’t even click on it. I don’t have to. I can see the individual allegations elsewhere and few people have the time to listen to an hour of even detailed and reasonable allegations against the Biden crime syndicate.

    But you didn’t listen to the audio.

    My link breaks down the allegations, and you aren’t interested in those either. I know you’re not, so we can stop pretending that you are.

  56. Pete

    You are not interested in the truth. You are interested in promoting anything true or false which impacts negatively on the Biden campaign. Truth matters little to most people with strong political views. Propaganda is what interests them. I am not interested in the truth of the Biden ‘scandal’ either but only because I don’t really care enough about it.

  57. Colm –

    “You are not interested in the truth. You are interested in promoting anything true or false which impacts negatively on the Biden campaign.”

    I’m interested in both. We can have both. But if you can remind me of anything “false” I have written about about the senile, dementia-ridden, corrupt, kiddie-fiddling, Chinese-stooge Joe Biden that would be helpful.

  58. You’ve helped yourself with that last sentence , every word of it false… but then you know that don’t you ?

  59. You didn’t listen to the audio

    The audio in your breathless ‘consider it linked’ National Pulse link. You speak like there’s no audio nor transcript of the audio on your own link. Did you even examine it before posting?

    It doesn’t say what the NP claims it says. It’s firehosing rubbish.

  60. look at the state of the democrats…..

    A Black Supreme Court Justice just swore in a Female Supreme Court Justice….. and they’re fit to be tied…. come on man!

  61. So can any of you tell me why Rob Walker the Biden family private representative said when Bobulinski told him on the Phone ” That if Adam Schiff didn’t publically retract that this russian disinformation he was going public and to the justice department Rob Walker said “Tony you’re just gonna bury us all man” …… BURY THEM ALL.. why ? how? there’s nothing to see here…..

    He has the conversation ON TAPE of him and Rob Walker saying it… the tape is played for your own ears in the video….. but no see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil The Sainted Joe Biden shall slay the evil Dragon Trump……

    you guys are to dumb to know how sad you are….

  62. That’s what’s going down though pat
    So at least you know prior what the story is
    Saint joe Biden defers evil dragon trump

    And I’ll remind you who was too dumb to see it happening
    How will you handle it ?
    Watch how quickly your fav shocks jocks ditch trump
    An£ start talking about rebuilding the party and the next leader
    How bout monkey man jim Jordan
    The guy who talks faster than he thinks
    I love watching him on tv it’s like a freak show
    Guilty pleasures observing the carnival of creeps or what Colin Powell described as the crazies .

  63. kurt I really worry about you….

  64. here ya go kurt an hour of education for you…. you skip the comercials

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWJQhxShQms&ab_channel=DanBongino

  65. Oh Lordy they done got up an vanished

    https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1321608055549775872?s=20

    Tucker claims president changing secret docs have disappeared

    More monkey biz

    Pat I’m fine I’m just roflmao

    My sides are in pain though from laughter if that’s a worry

    Oh re the video thanks I like good bong on occasions , thanks 😂😂😂

  66. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/10/tucker-carlson-lost-only-copy-of-documents-nailing-biden.html

  67. https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-says-he-had-authentic-damning-new-hunter-biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084

    https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/tucker-carlson-lost-his-papers_n_5f9a1b71c5b61d63241f32e4?ri18n=true&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016

  68. By the way anybody else find it hilarious how easily Mayor Pete slaps around faux news and the turnipistas

  69. That if Adam Schiff didn’t publically retract that this russian disinformation he was going public and to the justice department Rob Walker said “Tony you’re just gonna bury us all man” …… BURY THEM ALL.. why ? how? there’s nothing to see here…..

    He has the conversation ON TAPE of him and Rob Walker saying it… the tape is played for your own ears in the video…..

    There’s a few things here Pat, firstly everything above is hearsay and even if it weren’t who specifically does ‘us all’ refer to?

    If you want me to listen to the tape direct me to the time in the video it is played.

    I suspect that this is nothing but Trumpworld preparing it’s case for Wednesday.

    You guys are to dumb to know how sad you are….

    Pat not ‘throwing the first punch’ but maybe an open handed slap?

  70. Pat not ‘throwing the first punch’ but maybe an open handed slap?

    Pat nearly always casts the first insult.

  71. Interesting Newsweek link, EP:

    On Tuesday, Carlson interviewed Hunter Biden’s former business partner Tony Bobulinski, who claimed that he had information linking the Biden family to questionable Chinese business dealings. When Bobulinski claimed to have information connecting the Bidens to the dealings, high-profile conservatives on social media saw it as a watershed moment for the party lagging behind by double digits in nationwide polls. Bobulinski’s claims are unverified at this time.

    Documentation published by the New York Post in October regarding the matter received widespread backlash, with some saying that the story was based on uncorroborated sources. The report, which revived allegations of corruption against the former vice president, used emails and information obtained from a laptop that had been abandoned at a computer repair store in Delaware. The store’s legally blind owner could not confirm that the laptop was owned by Hunter Biden. President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani reportedly delivered the contents of the hard drive to the Post

    That’s about the sum of the ‘evidence’ they’re pishing their knickers about.

    O/T

    Jihad terror attack in France. Three dead:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54729957

  72. Jihad terror attack in France. Three dead:

    I was just reading about this. It’s horrific, the attacker apparently beheaded two of them.

  73. F the French

  74. ahhh gentleman that is spin…….. and you bought it… so my you guys are really dumb wasn’t even a slap it was a statement of fact……..

    Even if Carlson’s team had lost the documents….. which I highly doubt… Bobulinski already the morning after the debate turned everything over to the FBI and gave his statement….

    Pluss the WSJ has a complete copy of all of Bobulinski’s stuff….. lol wanna buy a bridge Sunny….. the desperation of the leftwing spin machine and you geniuses eat it right up….

    god you can’t make comedy this good up.

  75. If you want me to listen to the tape direct me to the time in the video it is played.

    lol…. NO

    But I thank you Paul for proving my point….. you have no clue… and no interest in informing yourself…. I provided you with information to judge FOR YOURSELF, but either you are to lazy or more likely not interested in anything that might give you information you don’t want to hear…. 3 monkeys.

    There is a Ton of information in the interview, but you’ll just never know…. will you. lol

  76. Now go to 40:15 in the clip….

    that’s the time in the tape above

  77. here this is great…..

    https://image-cdn.parler.com/L/I/LI76Sp7ScX.jpeg

  78. Paul

    If you want me to listen to the tape direct me to the time in the video it is played.

    But if you do that Paul, you’ll miss the numerous times Tony Bobulinski mentions that he and his family have served their country.

  79. good mornin Dave

  80. So I just followed up…. unlike any of you on the “missing” documents… they are not missing THEY WERE STOLEN…

    The Package of Documents that was sent was dropped of at the carriers office in Manhattan and when it reached LA the handler at that facility reported that the package had been ripped open and the contents were gone….

    There is an ongoing investigation into the THEFT by the carrier and the FBI.

  81. Good afternoon Patrick.

  82. 🙂

  83. Since YOUTUBE keeps scrubbing the interview I’ve had to replace the video 5 times now….

    but there’s no censorship occurring….. for the overly lazy…. this video is only 19 min.

    Although that is probably still longer than your attention spans……

  84. The video above also includes what happened with the STOLEN Documents…….

    for the truly attention span limited among you that info is at 8:40

  85. It’s the pandemic, stupid, apologies to the great Carville.

    No one in the country cares about this Hunter/Joe Biden issue, however real it may or may not be.

    You guys are obsessing on the most meaningless thing at the worst possible moment for you.

    You are trying to lose the election by as big a margin as possible.

  86. Well that’s good Phantom, because the Peoples anger over the Pandemic is directed at the Democrats NOT Trump…….

  87. See you on Election Day.

  88. Yup

  89. I’ve watched, (well, listened while I’m working) to the video Patrick.
    To me there’s not enough information to decide who’s telling the truth either way. I can’t understand why you’re so obsessed with this.

  90. But I thank you Paul for proving my point….. you have no clue… and no interest in informing yourself….

    You either seem to have problems reading or the memory of a knat, Pat:

    I lasted 7 minutes. No way am I going to subject myself to almost an hour of that unmitigated pish

    1. You have no point to prove

    2. I have lots and lots of clues, hence my refusal to swallow this bullshit without question

    3. My main interest in politics is informing myself of facts and forming conclusions based on those facts. What I have no interest in is being expected to swallow baseless balls by political activist liars posing as journalists like Carlson.

    Now go to 40:15 in the clip….

    that’s the time in the tape above

    There is no tape above.

    So I just followed up…. unlike any of you on the “missing” documents… they are not missing THEY WERE STOLEN…

    Convenient that he didn’t make copies, some journalist. Still, it’ll be more innuendo for the Trumpites to whine about how the whole world sabotaged the election next week.

  91. Your video’s been taken down again Patrick, you might want to link to this one:

    https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7x407x

  92. no the tape that was above was scrubbed…. but there is no censorship issue….

    But if you knew how to read there is a LINK to the video hosted on Rumble where you could go to that point of the tape…….

    1. You have no point to prove

    I lasted 7 minutes. …… you’re right that’s an admission of how limited your attention span is…… lol I don’t have to prove what you freely admit.

    Convenient that he didn’t make copies, some journalist. Still, it’ll be more innuendo for the Trumpites to whine about how the whole world sabotaged the election next week.

    More proof of your lack of reading comprehension…. I clearly state in comment above that both FBI and WSJ have copies…….

  93. You’re at bat and the pitcher is preparing to throw a wicked slider.

    And instead of looking at the pitcher, you’re fidgeting all around, reading gossip on your cell phone, thinking about ten other things, in the middle of the game.

    You and your president are trying to lose, taking the biggest dive in the history of US politics.

  94. Is that the tape that Pat linked to above Dave? Because it’s very heavy on ‘my family and I served out country’ & ‘he said this and he said that’ without any actual proof that anything was said by anyone.

    I lasted 7 minutes. …… you’re right that’s an admission of how limited your attention span is

    Yes, I decided to give the lying bullshitter Carlson the benefit of the doubt and could only stick 7 minutes of his propagandising balls. If Dave links to the same tape above tha you did my decision was absolutely vindicated.

    I clearly state in comment above that both FBI and WSJ have copies…….

    Of the documents that you allege were stolen in the mail? Carlson shouldn’t have any problem in producing them then?

  95. Patrick’s video has been taken down several times, and that cannot be denied. Why is YouTube taking down a video?

  96. Read the post.

    Fox News owns that content, it is they who asked that it be taken down.

  97. Video no disponible
    Este video tiene contenido de FOX News Network, quien lo bloqueó por razones relacionadas con los derechos de autor.

    According to my message Fox have blocked their own content for copyright reasons.

    But don’t let that spoil the conspiracy.

  98. yeah….. it’s not blocked though on Rumble…. funny Fox Corporate would block their number one trending story on one platform but not the other…. hmmm gee sounds logical

    So did you check the rumble link…… on the first video?

    See I have no sympathy for the uninformed.

    I read the NYTs Wapo, Politico, Huffpo, etc because I WANT to know as much information as I can and besides I can then predict what excuses and bull are thrown at me.

  99. Skimming is not reading

  100. https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giuliani-vents-to-trump-that-attorney-general-bill-barr-is-screwing-up-his-hunter-biden-play?ref=scroll

    Say it isn’t so for once Barr isn’t being a toady ass kisser, well thats a real slap in the face

  101. https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/vermont-demands-supreme-court-correct-brett-kavanaughs-erroneous-claim-in-voting-rights-case/

  102. here ya go for the mentally handicapped From Fox on youtube…… but I guess this isn’t really here….

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zLfBRgeFFo&t=452s&ab_channel=FoxNews

    go to 9:25…… and respond to the tape.

  103. Phantom, on October 29th, 2020 at 4:31 PM Said: Edit Comment
    Skimming is not reading

    Unlike you bubble boy I read everything……..

  104. Re the video:

    It’s very heavy on ‘my family and I served out country’ & ‘he said this and he said that’ without any actual proof that anything was said by anyone.

    Re Carlson’s ‘stolen’ documents:

    Of the documents that you allege were stolen in the mail? Carlson shouldn’t have any problem in producing them then?

    Isn’t that right, Pat?

    This is the sum of ‘evidence’:

    On Tuesday, Carlson interviewed Hunter Biden’s former business partner Tony Bobulinski, who claimed that he had information linking the Biden family to questionable Chinese business dealings. When Bobulinski claimed to have information connecting the Bidens to the dealings, high-profile conservatives on social media saw it as a watershed moment for the party lagging behind by double digits in nationwide polls. Bobulinski’s claims are unverified at this time.

    Documentation published by the New York Post in October regarding the matter received widespread backlash, with some saying that the story was based on uncorroborated sources. The report, which revived allegations of corruption against the former vice president, used emails and information obtained from a laptop that had been abandoned at a computer repair store in Delaware. The store’s legally blind owner could not confirm that the laptop was owned by Hunter Biden. President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani reportedly delivered the contents of the hard drive to the Post

    (Hat tip to EP)

    Isn’t that right too, Pat?

  105. look you can guys can live in denial, you can live in Phantasy world.

    Fox pulled it… it’s russia, Trumps a Russian asset, Trumps a crook, etc etc

    It’s called willful ignorance for a reason.

  106. Here ya go for the mentally handicapped

    Pat not throwing the first punch again.

    look you can guys can live in denial, you can live in Phantasy world.

    Your ‘evidence’ links are hearsay, innuendo bullshit.

  107. Yeah….. it’s not blocked though on Rumble…. funny Fox Corporate would block their number one trending story on one platform but not the other…. hmmm gee sounds logical

    So, the implication here is that Fox have not blocked it but Youtube have blocked it? Is that right?

    Here ya go for the mentally handicapped From Fox on youtube……

    So Youtube haven’t blocked it?

  108. Paul did I specify YOU as the mentally handicapped? NO…. must be your own guilt.

    So Youtube haven’t blocked it?….. They can’t keep up with how many people and times it’s being posted…..

    but to you it’s Fox and it makes sense theyed keep pulling their own report on one site but not another. With that kind of logic exhibited by you, you actually expect to be taken seriously?

    So I gave you the Rumble link and the time, did you go listen…. NO

    Bobulinski could be a fraud, he could also be guilty of crimes, but you will never know.

  109. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QGat1WxC14

  110. EP….. Winter is coming…..

  111. You insinuated Youtube were blocking it and then eight minutes later posted a video of it on……..Youtube.

    ???

    So I gave you the Rumble link and the time, did you go listen…. NO

    I listened to Dave’s abridged version of it hence,

    Is that the tape that Pat linked to above Dave? Because it’s very heavy on ‘my family and I served out country’ & ‘he said this and he said that’ without any actual proof that anything was said by anyone.

    So,

    Your ‘evidence’ links are hearsay, innuendo bullshit.

    And,

    Of the documents that you allege were stolen in the mail? Carlson shouldn’t have any problem in producing them then?

    And

    This is the sum of ‘evidence’:

    Isn’t that right?

    Paul did I specify YOU as the mentally handicapped? NO

    You didn’t specify anyone nor specifically exclude anyone so I naturally assumed we were all included. If you weren’t referring to me who were you specifically referring to?

  112. Patrick

    but to you it’s Fox and it makes sense theyed keep pulling their own report on one site but not another. With that kind of logic exhibited by you, you actually expect to be taken seriously?

    Fox and YouTube run automatic algorithms to content match videos, and automatically file a dmca takedown notice. Which YouTube have to comply with.
    No secret conspiracy.
    I helpfully linked to to a dailymotion version for you Patrick which has less chance of being taken down. Why don’t you link to that version.

  113. If Fox News wanted this online, they’d put it on their own robust website.

  114. Yes Yes gentleman…. nothing is being pulled, nothing happened, it’s russian disinformation,

    St Joe forgive me for my sins, I repent speaking bad of your son in the seminary, I testify against the hellspawn Demon Trump…. please oh holy Biden accolades of ATW I am but a lowly clinger to old documents and guns……

  115. Pat, the video is on Youtube.

    The documents that you allege were stolen in the mail? Carlson shouldn’t have any problem in producing them then?

    Yes?

    This is the sum of ‘evidence’

    That’s correct?

  116. UPS found the stolen documents…..

  117. Who told you that?

  118. the news…… try reading some

  119. You mean the lost documents?

    https://www.thewrap.com/ups-tucker-carlson-biden/

    There, I fixed that for you.

    I’ll look forward to more vacuous innuendo and hearsay bullshit from Carlson being posted here then.

  120. Hannity

    You have to stop making things up

    UPS located the package, they never said that it was stolen. How would they ” find ” something that was stolen from them?

    Packages are misplaced every day in the system

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/ups-confirms-mystery-tucker-carlson-package-disappeared-in-its-system

  121. that’s its paul, i fear the worst Hunter Biden is gonna lose the election
    oh wait, no sorry Hilary is gonna lose the election
    oh bugger I’m getting confused , who’s running again ?
    Its McCain vs Obama yeah ? I think Obama has a good chance on Tuesday
    what dya reckon ?

  122. so the package wound up in one place ripped open and empty the stuff inside took days of investigation to find…. no it wasn’t stolen….. lmao…. Elves did it….

  123. God I’m still laughing…..

  124. What else did the junk websites tell you

  125. Fox News just cut off Donald Trump and aired Joe Biden instead … funny is right pat

    at this point Fox News appears to have concluded that Donald Trump is likely to lose, and that Joe Biden is a better ratings draw, even for its right-leaning audience. Whether Fox viewers like Biden or not, many of them expect him to be the next President, so they’re interested in what he has to say and what he’s going to do.

    ROFLMAO … Flagship going down
    heyho u still got QAnon or whatever the feck they’re called ..

  126. man its great to hear a real president once in a while
    Obama at his best

    https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/1321912311985197058

  127. No it wasn’t stolen

    Good, Im glad you seem to have come to your senses.

  128. Pat

    WE THE NORTH