web analytics

Scoff if you will

By Patrick Van Roy On November 30th, 2020

On Friday General Flynn was interviewed on WVW-TV

WVW-TV Exclusive: Lt. General Michael Flynn’s First Interview Since President Trump’s Pardon Includes His Talking About the Ongoing Coup w/ Guest Lt. General McInerney and Mary Fanning.

The Interview

Now you can’t get this interview from any other site except WVW, which is:

The Worldview Weekend Broadcast Network is the World’s Premier Biblical Worldview, Web-Based, Radio, and Television Network.

That will scare all the left away from the get go. Any Organization that presents from a Biblical perspective must be immediately dismissed. You can’t trust them Bible Thumpers. Truth means nothing to them. Which I find to be a funny view, but ask. It’s a going concensess….. never trust those Bible Thumpers. It also doesn’t help that this station slapped copyright violation complaints on any clips of the interview to prevent it from being viewed anywhere but their site.

Lt General Flynn  United States Army lieutenant general who was the 25th National Security Advisor, Flynn’s military career included a key role in shaping U.S. counterterrorism strategy and dismantling insurgent networks in the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, and he was given numerous combat arms, conventional, and special operations senior intelligence assignments.[2][3][4] He served as the 18th Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, In September 2011, Flynn was promoted to Lieutenant General and assigned as assistant director of national intelligence in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. On April 17, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Flynn to be the 18th director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.[33][34] Flynn took command of the DIA in July 2012.[35] He simultaneously became commander of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, and chair of the Military Intelligence Board.

Yet I understand that a large part of the audience believe the Lt. General Flynn is RUSSIAN SPY. Why because WaPo & the NYTs say so, PT Barnum was right there is a sucker born every minute.

Listen to the interview, believe, or don’t believe it, but if you don’t listen for yourselves you really have no clue honestly what he said.

The other part of the Interview is with Lt General McInerney (another Russian Spy).

Mcinerney’s military awards and decorations include the following:[2]

McInerney has also been awarded the Third Order of the Rising Sun by the Japanese government. McInerney was inducted into the USAF Order of the Sword in July 1980.

It’s amazing that our President, and all these people work for the Russians, but that’s what WaPo & the NYTs want you to believe. Now according to Lt General McInerney at 43 min into The Interview he claims not only was there a raid in Frankfurt Germany of a server farm, but several members of the U.S. Military were killed in the action.

Now is this True? I don’t know. I do know neither of these men are Russian Spies. The information is here for you to hear and decide for yourself.

48 Responses to “Scoff if you will”

  1. That will scare all the left away from the get go.

    Eh? Guy admits to lying to FBI about Russian contacts gets pardoned by corrupt buddy.

    That’s the substance of it.

  2. you’re really that stupid ?

  3. No, but it seems you are and believe everyone else is.

    I’ve sent you a blog.

  4. //The Interview he claims not only was there a raid in Frankfurt Germany of a server farm, but several members of the U.S. Military were killed in the action.//

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!

    Several members of the US military killed raiding a computer server in Germany? 🙂 🙂 :-).
    What a joke.

    It’s good that Trump attracts so many of the the truly brainless, leaving the air away from that dunce much purer for those who prefer sane conversation.

    Biden won by a landslide. Trump and Trumpism have now been rejected by the American people for the second time in 4 years, this time by an even greater majority than the last. Well done, the people of the US. This is who we are.

    Soon all these clowns will follow the Lunatic in Chief into the garbage can where they belong.

  5. Soon all these clowns will follow the Lunatic in Chief into the garbage can where they belong

    Interesting one. When reality means that the charade can’t be propagated any further I was wondering if any of the rats would jump ship.

  6. It’ll probably be like that “Tea Party” thing, anyone remember them? They’ll probably keep making fools of themselves on the silly fringe of politics, ignored by most people and laughed at by the rest.

    They’ll keep whinging about stolen elections and Deep State and other miscellaneous nonsense until they gradually fade away.

  7. Paul McMahon, on November 30th, 2020 at 5:56 PM Said: Edit Comment
    No, but it seems you are and believe everyone else is.

    I’ve sent you a blog.

    But I’m a Bully, a Liar, and Anti-Free Speech……. why would such a person publish ANYTHING from someone else?

  8. Because you were asking people to contribute here? If you don’t want to publish it then don’t, I don’t really care.

    Although I’ve never called you any of the above if you still insist that the reason for Seimigate was that he called you a liar then that is indeed a lie.

  9. But I’m a Bully, a Liar, and Anti-Free Speech

    You’re also proving what everyone already knows: You’re a childish prick, who is enjoying his tiny little bit of power. Now put away your tiny little penis insecurities, and post Paul’s piece. It’s got to be better than the mental dribblings above.

  10. if you still insist that the reason for Seimigate was that he called you a liar then that is indeed a lie.

    No need to go into all this again. Everyone on the site – everyone – knows Troll lied. Everyone.

  11. Paul I was kidding……… look at the frontpage……. but how about you supply a title next time…….

  12. Hey Seimi….. kiss my Irish/Italian Ass…..

  13. Troll, go fuck yourself. Even you know you lied. Even you. Somebody probably had to explain a lot of it to you, but you know you lied.

  14. I think Seimi for patriotic reasons would only kiss the Irish half of it 🙂

  15. Can we let ‘Seimigate’ go now please please please. It’s getting boring 😤

  16. Colm

    Troll is a Septic Tank. He’s not Irish and he’s not Italian. Besides, no-one can kiss his ass – he’s too busy talking out of it.

  17. don’t tell me Colm……

  18. Can we let ‘Seimigate’ go now please please please. It’s getting boring 😤

    Sorry if it bores you, Colm. Blame Troll. If he wasn’t such a prick, it wouldn’t have happened.

  19. Hey Seimi how about this FU plain and simple you inbred terror supporting little wuss….

    Why don’t you go cheer your children and civilian murdering heroes down on your knees servicing them as you desire?

    Let’s take the gloves off, how’s that ?

  20. Patrick

    My comment wasn’t aimed at you.

  21. Let’s take the gloves off, how’s that ?

    Go for it.

    My comment wasn’t aimed at you.

    Who was it aimed at? Me?

  22. Fine you child murder supporter. Give it your best shot.

    Let’s see who lasts longer.

  23. Let’s take the gloves off, how’s that ?

    Or do you just mean that you’ll ban me again, whenever I cross whatever imaginary, arbitrary line you think up in your head?

  24. Troll

    One of the two of us has lied, multiple times, on this site. Everybody knows it. Even you know it. And everyone knows that it wasn’t me.

    So when you call me a ‘child murder supporter’, why should anyone believe you?

  25. Fine you child murder supporter

    Did you not advocate blanket bombing villages of orphans, Pat? Don’t such comments make you the very thing that you accuse Seimi of?

  26. Also, in case we (or I?) bore Colm anymore, why don’t you create a dedicated post?
    Then, when it gets too uncomfortable for you, you can just delete it and pretend (lie) that it never happened/

  27. Seimi you support masked murderers that killed your fellow countrymen woman and children over politics.

    You’re the scum that cheers the scum….. if you were on fire in the street I wouldn’t piss on you to put you out I’d break out marshmallows to toast in the flames.

    The only post I’ll dedicate to you is the celebratory one when you’re gone.

  28. Gentelman I made a joke with Paul and now you are going off.

    I will clean house.

    This nonsense will stop.

    Seimi you’re an ass. You were made an example of…. aww did it hurt your feelings? To damn bad.

    Get over it, or LEAVE.

  29. The only post I’ll dedicate to you is the celebratory one when you’re gone.

    Pathetic. Whilst I may comment less these days, I’m not intending on leaving. So, to get rid of me, you will have to ban me – again. And that would prove (yet again!) what a truly pathetic, inadequate little man you are. You don’t want debate. You don’t welcome any difference of opinion from your warped reality.

    How many times have you challenged others here to debate with you, on a dedicated subject? But now that I offer you it, you back down.

    Coward.

  30. Seimi

    A little over a week ago Patrick posted an apology for his removal of your commenting rights. You responded almost immediately saying that was all you had wanted and you regarded the matter as over. I just ask, why was that not the end of the matter ?

  31. Seimi you’re an ass. You were made an example of…. aww did it hurt your feelings? To damn bad.

    Get over it, or LEAVE.

    So your weal apology earlier this week meant nothing? I suspected as much.

    Do you lack the belief or the integrity to discuss this properly with me? Or can you only call me ‘scum’ and ‘child murder supporter’? Is that the extent of your argument?

  32. no I meant it, but your an asshole who doesn’t know when to let things go.

    You keep opening this back up, you keep whining, you keep acting like an asshole.

  33. “You keep opening this back up, you keep whining, you keep acting like an asshole.”

    You were the one who started it – both in your unjust banning of Seimi (which you seem to go back and forward on – from lying about why you did it to apologising for why you did to back to lying about why you did it) – and then today with your response to Paul. Given your actions over the past month you can’t expect people to know when you are saying something in humour and when you are being serious – because your above humour could just have easily have been said in seriousness by you over the last month.

  34. Ok gentleman I’m asking do you want to remain on the site ?

    A simple Yes or No will suffice.

  35. Colm, on November 30th, 2020 at 6:57 PM Said:
    Seimi

    A little over a week ago Patrick posted an apology for his removal of your commenting rights. You responded almost immediately saying that was all you had wanted and you regarded the matter as over. I just ask, why was that not the end of the matter ?

    Colm,

    That sounded so unlike how I remembered it, that I had to go back and check. And lo and behold – it was absolutely nothing like wht happened! Troll apologised for suspending me, I pointed out that he banned me! I said it was a f*cking joke – it was, and still is! I said the apology was significant, because it was an admission by Troll that he lied. He did, but look at his response above:

    Seimi you’re an ass. You were made an example of…. aww did it hurt your feelings? To damn bad.

    He didn’t mean it, any of it.

    Get over it, or LEAVE.

    I’m not leaving, unless it’s by being unjustly banned again.

  36. “A simple Yes or No will suffice.”

    It isn’t a simply yes or no. It would depend on what yes entails. I want to remain here, I’ve said that in the past, but it is not unconditional. If yes means sycophantically sucking up to you, being unable to challenge your obvious bullshit, being unable to call out your behaviour when we find it reprehensible, then no I would not want to.

  37. Colm,

    I believe it was me, not Seimi, who asked for an apology to Seimi to draw a line under the issue. And was happy to move on considering that apology. It would seem by his words today that Troll has retracted that apology.

  38. Ok gentleman I’m asking do you want to remain on the site ?

    A simple Yes or No will suffice.

    Another threat? Pathetic. Truly pathetic.

    To answer your threat question – Yes, and if someone tells a straight up lie, I will say so. If that person habitually tells lies, I will call them a liar.

    Does anyone have an issue with that?

  39. Seamus

    You are correct, my mistake. Apologies Seimi. It was Seamus who posted the comment about being content with the apology.

    As to the continuing flaring up of the ban on Seimi. It can’t be undone. It happened and boy was a lot said about it. But really, is it destined to be dragged up almost every day for ever. I don’t care who mentions it first on any new thread it’s just miserable and pointless. Can it just stop without anyone saying “ x started it”

  40. Yes entails maintaining civility.

    Seimi is constitutionally unable to control himself. Banning him was a Low Blow even if I thought it was justified. I did apologize for it and I meant it. 3 weeks later it’s still a daily attack, so while I apologize I still have to deal with daily abuse?

    I don’t think so. This is a political site, not a cult of personality for me or any of you. I have a job to do, I can not have Seimi going psychotic everyday and you, Paul, and Dave cheering him on.

    Now get over it or Leave. This no longer has anything to do with whether I’m a Liar or the pack of you support Terrorists. This has to do with the daily function of the site.

  41. “Yes entails maintaining civility.”

    When will you be leaving?

    “Now get over it or Leave. This no longer has anything to do with whether I’m a Liar or the pack of you support Terrorists. This has to do with the daily function of the site.”

    And yet it was you who brought it up on this thread. It was you who started it today. You can’t have one rule for everyone else and another rule for you. You can mention it but none of the rest of us can.

    “Now get over it or Leave.”

    You first. Because your above comments show that you clearly haven’t got over it.

  42. “Can it just stop without anyone saying “ x started it””

    Broadly no. If Troll is going to continually use the introduction of the issue a pretext for banning people (Dave, Seimi, Paul, myself etc… aren’t allowed to mention it – under threat of being banned) but Troll is allowed to introduce whenever he wants (knowing that if Dave, Seimi, Paul, myself etc… respond then we are under threat of being banned) then it is yet a further illustration of what is at the heart of Seimi’s banning (and something that renders Troll’s apology for it insincere). That fundamentally Troll doesn’t want anyone to challenge his nonsense.

  43. This is a NI/British/American Political site. It is also a community.

    If the community can’t be civil, it will be changed.

  44. Troll doesn’t want this talked about because he knows that he was 100% wrong in what he did. He tried every way he could to justify it, and couldn’t. So he wants it to go away, either by people not mentioning it, asking people to leave, threatening to ban them or just banning them.

    He is trying to make it sound like he is remorseful for what he did, by calling his banning of me, ‘a low blow.’ It wasn’t a ‘low blow.’ It was a dick move, carried out by someone who was being an asshole, and who never imagined the size of the blowback he would experience from it.

    But we are the ones who should just forget about it and move on. Suddenly, this is a ‘political site’ and not his little playground, where he can bully people and pretend he is someone.
    Why shouldn’t he be reminded of how he behaved? And continues to behave?

    Colm, you’re just too soft at times, mate. There is plenty of opportunity to debate subjects here. You don’t have to get worked up about the couple of posts where this is being brought up.

    And by the way – Troll is crying like a little girl over this being brought up again – but he was the one who brought it up himself – on two separate posts!

  45. and you, Paul, and Dave cheering him on

    Hold on Pat, you’re not getting away with that. This is what I said on another thread:

    Seimi isn’t ‘my dog’ Pat. He is one of my closest friends and while I think what happened was hugely unjust and will comment on it as and when the need arises I have as much control over how he responds to you as I have over how you respond to him.

    Above on this thread you implied, (apparently jokingly), that I called you ‘a Bully, a Liar, and Anti-Free Speech’, creating the current tone on this thread, I didn’t.

    I consider what happened with Seimi hugely unjust and an abuse of power when you were caught on a bad day and while you may want everyone to forget about what happened I’ll comment on it when I consider it appropriate.

    You can consider that ‘cheering from the sidelines’ if you wish but you’re wrong, not least of all because Seimi doesn’t need anyone to cheer for him.

  46. f the community can’t be civil, it will be changed.

    Sounds more like a regime than a community to me.

  47. “If the community can’t be civil, it will be changed.”

    You are at the heart of any uncivil comments at the site, and almost universally throw the first punch. Maybe if you sought to moderate yourself rather than others then this site would be far, far more civil.

  48. Seamus

    On several threads in the past couple of weeks people have brought it up in response to whatever topic Patrick has posted on. It has been brought up far more by some commenters here than Patrick. Yes he reacted to those comments on this thread in his remark to Paul about putting up his post but really is that the cue to get it all fired up again. How about a simple compact going forward. we just stop bringing it up. And yes that applies to Patrick too