web analytics

“You better lawyer up and get out of my office.”

By Patrick Van Roy On January 27th, 2021

John Paul Mac Isaac, the Delaware computer shop owner who unwittingly came into possession of Hunter Biden’s laptop, says an FBI agent initially gave a stern warning to his family when first offered a copy of the explosive evidence about Joe Biden’s son: “You better lawyer up and get out of my office.”

In a wide-ranging interview Monday with Just the News, Isaac described what concerned him most about the contents on the laptop, his extensive efforts to get authorities in law enforcement and Congress to pay attention to it and his anger at the news media, Democrats and even security officials who initially accused him of carrying out a Russian disinformation campaign or trying to make money off the discovery.

29 Responses to ““You better lawyer up and get out of my office.””

  1. So this guy wants to be believed that this wasn’t a political hit, or Russian disinformation, and his solution is to give an interview to John Solomon’s conspiracy theory site?

  2. He quotes an FBI agent whose name he does not know at a meeting that he did not attend.

    Sounds credible to me.

  3. So tell us Phantom what is the credible reason that the FBI had this Laptop for a year and half and were supposedly doing a “Fraud” investigation on the son of the man running for President yet it took a whistle blower to let the public know?

  4. I don’t know.

    And I’ve said a million times that Hunter Biden is dirty and that his father should have done something about the son’s open sleazy trading on family connections.

    But the repair guy was extremely treacherous and unethical to his customer. Others in that industry have said so. How could anyone on the face of the earth trust him again? No one should honor such a person.

  5. If there was a fraud investigation that had yielded no evidence of fraud, why would there have been any reason to ” let the public know “?

    Do the police or FBI let ” the public ” learn of everything that they’re looking into?

  6. If it yielded no evidence why is it still an active investigation that can’t be discussed by the FBI ?

  7. Do the police or FBI let ” the public ” learn of everything that they’re looking into?

    They did with the Trump Family….. so it’s Ok to for the FBI to leak and put out statements about Republican Candidates families, but NOT Democrats.

    Ok Comrade

  8. “They did with the Trump Family….. so it’s Ok to for the FBI to leak and put out statements about Republican Candidates families, but NOT Democrats.”

    What statements or information did the FBI leak about the families of Republican candidates?

  9. It’s fun to just make stuff up every day

    Comey harmed Hillary Clinton with his statements ( about her server ) , not Donald Trump.

    Patrick has no idea of anything that happened.

  10. So what did I make up?

    How many anonymous sources from the FBI were printed in the NYT about Trumps kid meeting with the Russian ?

    How about the Head of the FBI admitting that he leaked the information from the fake steele dossier ?

    You have a very selective memory.

  11. “How many anonymous sources from the FBI were printed in the NYT about Trumps kid meeting with the Russian ?”

    That is disingenuous and you know it. Trump Jr was not the son of the Republican candidate. He was a senior political advisor to the Trump campaign. He was not there as a private citizen.

  12. But Pat thinks that there was no collusion

    So why was Trump Jr. meeting with a hostile power’s emissary at that time

  13. 4 years and 50 million dollars worth of investigation PROVED there was no collusion.

    Please point to one conviction for collusion…. or accept it didn’t happen except in your brainwashed mind Phantom.

  14. They met with Russians for no reason at all

    But we should never speak about the attempted overthrow of the government three weeks ago. Because that would be TDS

  15. The met with the Russians…. that’s a crime?

    Where are the convictions?

  16. Why would they want to meet with Russians during a campaign

    What was the purpose of such a meeting

  17. Why did the Hillary campaign commision an English Spy to gather Russian disinformation and plant it in the Press and use it to create Crossfire Hurricane ?

    There is real bought and paid for Russian Collusion that led to a Fake Federal Investigation.

    What did the “collusion” of Jr meeting with the russian lead to ?

  18. “4 years and 50 million dollars worth of investigation PROVED there was no collusion.”

    No it didn’t. It found that the evidence of collusion didn’t rise to the either a criminal level, or where it did couldn’t be proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

    And there was no trial. Is that not your new argument? No trial, then no conclusion?

  19. Patrick will never answer the question, because he knows very well what the meetings were about

  20. what were they about Phantom…. specifically what, and what was the illegality of it.

    You can’t answer because after being thoroughly investigated by the FBI they found nothing, they charged nothing, no one was convicted of anything.

    You can say it was wrong till the cows come home, but you can’t name single thing illegal about it….

    You are also spinning as you always do the Jr meeting with the spy was LEAKED by the FBI. That’s why we went down this line.

    You being fine with leaks against Republicans it being good in your view but leaks about Democrats you lose your mind.

    Get control of your TDS and stay on topic, but you can’t… the TDS may be terminal.

  21. They didn’t have enough to prove criminal collusion

    But there was collusion

    Trump publicly colluded with Russia on TV and Russian Wikileaks to release Hillary emails

  22. ahh so no evidence, but it was collusion….. do you know how insane you sound?

    and citing a sarcastic remark only proves that you are mentally incapable of processing reality.

  23. “ahh so no evidence, but it was collusion….. do you know how insane you sound?”

    No evidence, but there was election fraud…

  24. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-asked-russia-to-find-clintons-emails-on-or-around-the-same-day-russians-targeted-her-accounts

    Trump asked Russia to find Clinton’s emails. On or around the same day, Russians targeted her accounts
    Politics Jul 13, 2018 6:01 PM EST
    Russian officials began to target email addresses associated with Hillary Clinton’s personal and campaign offices “on or around” the same day Donald Trump called on Russia to find emails that were missing from her personal server, according to a new indictment from Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

    “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press,” Trump said in a July 27, 2016 news conference.

    If that’s not collusion, the word has no meaning.

    Patrick is the servant who loves his master. Admirable in a certain way.

  25. lol….. seek help Phantom.

  26. You can print all the spin you want I watched what he said live. And I watched two years of lies in the press spinning it….

    You have TDS. No one was charged let alone convicted of Collusion or even the real Charge of Conspiracy in regard to Trump, the Trump Family or the Trump campaign with the Russians.

    The fact that you can’t grasp that, and the fact that as the Person who is President NOW is dismantling the first Amendment and the Economy while you are stuck on stupid still about a man who is no longer in power and are unable to deal with the issues today shows the depth of your brainwashing.

  27. “No one was charged let alone convicted of Collusion or even the real Charge of Conspiracy in regard to Trump, the Trump Family or the Trump campaign with the Russians.”

    But none of them were acquited either. There were no trials. And you have made it quite clear, when convenient for you, that no trial means no conclusion. And so because they weren’t indicted, and never brought it to trial, then it is open ended as to whether they were guilty or not. Those are your rules.

  28. “ahh so no evidence, but it was collusion….. do you know how insane you sound?”

    No evidence, but there was election fraud…

    No evidence, but John McCain caused the USS Forrestal fire.

    I think I’m spotting a pattern here.

  29. One doesn’t need evidence when one has unwavering belief 😉