I was interested in this story concerning a change in our penal regime.
“Violent extremist prisoners could be held in separate special units inside jails under government plans to stop other inmates being radicalised.”
For ‘Violent extremist” please translate as … radical Muslims.
Justice Secretary Liz Truss will reveal the new measures on Monday, following a review into extremism in prisons led by former prison governor Ian Acheson.
For “extremism” please translate as …. Radical Islam.
One of his key recommendations was to “incapacitate” violent extremists by keeping them away from other prisoners. His report will only be published in summary for security reasons. But it is understood to be critical of the current system in which extremist inmates are dispersed across eight high-security prisons.
Correct. These vile specimens should be put in solitary and not given ANY opportunity to spread their hate gospel. Allowing them freedom of movement is insane. It means they can corrupt and recruit.
So. the UK has a terrific Olympics and finishes 2nd, ahead of China and way ahead of every other Nation. I am sure that most would have to agree this was a very credible performance but then again, that is to underestimate the hate filled self loathing of the regressive Left. Here are two headlines from today.
Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, Huma Abdedin, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.
One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign Web site is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee.
However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-First Lady Clinton.
And the punchline,,,
If fighting for women’s rights is one of Clinton’s greatest achievements, why has she retained as her closest adviser a woman who gave voice to harsh Islamist critiques of her Beijing platform?
Well then, the Rio Olympics are coming to an end and it clearly has been a SENSATIONAL result for the United Kingdom, as we finish 2nd! I understand victory parades are being planned in London and Manchester! Meanwhile, I can reveal that the Republic of Ireland has also decided to have a victory parade. Here’s the venue…
And lest the po-faced get too red-faces, I was sent this most amusing video clip by none other than Mike Cunningham, formerly of the parish, and missed by me. Give it a whirl, it’s a gas.
Martin McGuinness has dismissed as “ludicrous” claims Sinn Féin’s leadership knew about communication between its former MLA Daithi McKay and loyalist blogger Jamie Bryson. Mr McKay and Thomas O’Hara are alleged to have coached Mr Bryson before his appearance at Stormont’s National Management Agency (Nama) inquiry. The DUP has complained to the Assembly Standards Commissioner. Mr McGuinness said any investigation would vindicate Sinn Féin.
It’s amusing to see the Provos wriggle on this one. Of COURSE McKay has “taken a bullet” for sure (a bit of an unfortunate term I guess when discussing IRA/Sinn Fein) and I am sure this is ALL about damage limitation and making damned sure other – more senior Sinn Fein figures – do not get dragged into this fiasco. We can only speculate who it might be.
Do you remember an ATW thread with the same title as this from YEARS ago? I recall it touched a nerve and a huge amount of comment. Back then, of course, it was only yours truly arguing for such a ban. Now, the German State agrees with me!
Germany could impose a ban on women wearing burkas or full-face Islamic veils at schools and universities and while driving under new proposals announced on Friday by Angela Merkel’s party.
The burka “does not belong in our cosmopolitan country”, Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister and one of Mrs Merkel’s closest allies, said as he announced the new policy. “We all reject the full veil — not only the burka but also other types of full veil that only leave the eyes visible. They have no place in our society.”
Now then, when I first urged a ban all those years ago, I guess I was a voice crying in the dark. And Europe had not imported millions of Muslims. That has all changed. We have Jihad across the continent.. And now they try to deal with the symptom, not the disease. I doubt they will ban the Burqa but rather like in France, this is now tinkering around the edges. When you welcome a medieval death cult, there are serious consequences and one of those may be the end of European civilisation as we know it.
France has suspended the ban on the Burkini. Next up - paint a niqab on the Mona Lisa, her half smile is provocative to #ReligionofPeace
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM
You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.
Copyright & copy; 2010 A Tangled Web (All rights reserved). Comments on articles here are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of A Tangled Web or David Vance. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise unacceptable may be deleted by the Editor. However the fact a particular comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by David Vance of the views expressed therein.