web analytics


By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 11:41 pm

Bet the Mullahs are dancing with joy at the news that The One has promised to “engage” with Iran and committed his administration to the search for Middle East peace from “day one” of his presidency, pledging that the US would be an “interlocutor” between Israelis and Palestinians. WRONG. There is no room for interlocution between right and wrong and there is no point in any engagement with Iran that does not involve bombing the hell out of its nuclear facilities. Liberals believe that dialogue is the solution to all our ills, some of us consider dialogue with evil but the beginning.  


By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 11:31 pm

We frequently hear what an outstanding economic success Scotland has become since devolution. Here in Northern Ireland, the little Ulster Nationalists in the DUP often quote Scotland as a template we can use, something to which we can aspire.

SO…get this.

“Scotland is on course to become the third most state-dependent country in the world. Only Cuba and Iraq spend more taxpayers’ money on public service. Economic forecasters predict that by 2012 public spending will rise to the equivalent of 67 per cent of Scotland’s gross domestic product. In Cuba that figure is 81 per cent and in Iraq it is 87 per cent..

…but give the SNP enough time! Scotland is a State run basket case and the English tax-payer is picking up the tab I am afraid.


By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

So, Prince Harry gets himself into bother with the media today over a remark he made three years ago! It seems that the Prince referred to a member of his Platoon as “our little Paki friend.” The guy concerned took no offence as it was made without malice but the British media, and other elements on the blogosphere, have seized on as the first bash of the Royals in the New Year.

I was entertained to read that Mohammed Shafiq, director of Muslim youth organisation the Ramadan Foundation, said Harry’s comments would offend many Asians. “The use of this sort of racism has no justification and I am saddened by those that are advocating using this term is not racist.”

Did anyone see some of the placards and hear the chants directed at Jews in London yesterday? They appear to have missed Mr Shafiq since he was mute about that overt racism.

Just a few points. I would have thought Mr Shafiq should concern himself with the psycopathic behaviour of a significant of his co-religionists before pronouncing on the Prince’s choice of words. When I am called an infidel by Muslims, isn’t that racist?

I also happen to rather agree with the view that “most nicknames (which are usually only abbreviations of ethnonyms) are only considered offensive if the group so designated thinks itself as threatened or disliked in some way by the other. ‘Aussie’ and ‘Kiwi’, and even ‘Canuck’ are happily used as self-designations. The Allies routinely referred to ‘the Japs’ and ‘Jerry’ during the war, but most would now frown at that usage. Referring to South Asians as ‘Asians’ has always seemed strange to me, and quite unfair to 2 billion other Asians. ‘Raghead’ seems a fine term to me. It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with sartorial choice.”

So. is Prince Harry guilty of racism? No. Is he guilty of clumsy language? Yes. Is it worthy of the lead story on the British news on the same days that thosuands turn out to support Israel? No.

This is for Frank and the other “Consensus” wingnuts

By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

The Consensus….LOL


Earth on the Brink of an Ice Age

The earth is now on the brink of entering another Ice Age, according to a large
and compelling body of evidence from within the field of climate science. Many
sources of data which provide our knowledge base of long-term climate change
indicate that the warm, twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather
soon be coming to an end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age conditions
for the next 100,000 years.

That is the first paragraph in a 3 page story in Pravda. You just have to laugh. Where is the consensus, I thought it was decided the Earth is warming and it’s mans fault.

Oh that’s right it’s not Global Warming anymore it’s Climate Change. So make up your mind are we going to burn or freeze. Either way it’s all caused by the less than 1% of our bad breath in the atmosphere.

In their 1976 paper Imbrie, Hays, and Shackleton wrote that their own climate
forecasts, which were based on sea-sediment cores and the Milankovich cycles, “…
must be qualified in two ways. First, they apply only to the natural component
of future climatic trends – and not to anthropogenic effects such as those due
to the burning of fossil fuels. Second, they describe only the long-term trends,
because they are linked to orbital variations with periods of 20,000 years and
longer. Climatic oscillations at higher frequencies are not predicted… the
results indicate that the long-term trend over the next 20,000 years is towards
extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation and cooler climate.”

During the
1970s the famous American astronomer Carl Sagan and other scientists began
promoting the theory that ‘greenhouse gasses’ such as carbon dioxide, or CO2,
produced by human industries could lead to catastrophic global warming. Since
the 1970s the theory of ‘anthropogenic global warming’ (AGW) has gradually
become accepted as fact by most of the academic establishment, and their
acceptance of AGW has inspired a global movement to encourage governments to
make pivotal changes to prevent the worsening of AGW.

So much for “Consensus”, this weekend my girls are very upset because they wanted to go sledding. The “Forecast” was for 6 to 8 inches of snow. Well we got less than a half inch, it didn’t even cover the grass on the lawn. Yet 50 years from now unless we kill all the pigs and cows and stop burning everything. Were all gonna cook or freeze.

Tonight’s forecast Dark continued dark with widely scattered light at Dawn…LOL



By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

I thought it might be interesting for you to see two sides to London.

Yesterday saw a public demonstration in favour of Hamas.

Today saw a public demonstrations in favour of Israel.

I am sure you can work out which is which.




img_4142nazi2img_4163Gaza demo by bambinoimages II.

My thanks to the excellent Harry’s Place and Biased BBC for the images that say it all.

The Israelites

By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

David has asked me to write an account of my attendance at this morning’s rally for Israel in Manchester.  To be in the presence of between 1,500 and 2,000 Jews and Christians (I don’t go in for statistical exaggeration; I leave that to the BBC) in Albert Square was heartwarming.  I was there with a family member and two friends in what seemed like the coldest January morning for 2 million years.

We were told to be in Albert Square (the one in front of Manchester City Hall as opposed to the one in East Enders) no later that 10:40.  The rally was scheduled to take place between 11am and 12-noon.  When we arrived at 10:25 there was hardly anyone there.  Marshals from CST welcomed us and directed us towards the podium where prominent speakers had started to gather.  However, by 10:45 the entire square was packed out.  As we stood there familiarising ourselves with Jews and Christians who had come from places such as Middlesbrough, Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham and Hull, we heard a commotion from beyond the podium.  Suddenly there came into view something like 200 pro-Palestinian demonstrators who were only prevented from attacking our crowd by the strong presence of Greater Manchester Police. 

Several of us climbed on to Prince Albert’s memorial to get a good look at the opposition.  I would say around a quarter were your typical long-haired, wooden-beaded student types.  The remainder were made up of our Muslim ‘friends’ who’d taken an hour out of their breeding time to come into the city in a vain attempt to either silence our rally or disrupt it altogether.  They succeeded in doing neither.  There was such a difference in the conduct of our respective rallies.  Whilst ours was largely good-natured and respectful of the speakers who’d come to show their solidarity, the pro-Pally scum were viscerally anti-Semitic – hurling insults and abuse across the police lines from the other side of Cross Street.  The PA system brought along for the rally was so powerful, it managed to obliterate the disgraceful chanting from the Hamas apostles.  The only direct response they got came from the likes of myself and around 50 other people who chanted ‘1, 2′, 3′ 4, never Pal-es-tine no more’ from our brief vantage point on the Albert Memorial.

Just before the rally commenced, we positioned ourselves next to two guys from Warrington who held up a banner with the words ‘Christians for Israel’.  As the first speaker, Jonathan Roe, was about to take his position on the podium, there was a kerfuffle to my left.  Some Islamic scumbag had managed to enter Manchester City Hall; climb on to a ledge outside a first-floor window; and unfurl a Palestinian flag, which he waved provocatively at the crowd below.  He was quickly dragged back inside by security officers, and I think the security firm involved will have some very searching questions to answer tomorrow morning when normal council business resumes.

We had a message of support from the Bishop of Manchester, the Rt Rev Nigel McCullogh; as well as a rousing speech from the Deputy Ambassador of Israel, Mrs Talya Lador-Fresher.  Political representation was afforded by Louise Ellman MP, Ivan Lewis MP and the former MP for Rochdale, Lorna Fitzsimons.  Their messages were similar: what country is expected to endure continuous terrorist attacks for years at a time and sit by doing nothing?  There will be no peace in the Middle East until the Arab world collectively recognises the right of the Jewish people to live at peace in an Israeli State afforded the full trappings of unanimous recognition.  The rally ended with God Save the Queen followed by the National Anthem of Israel, Hatikva (meaning ‘Hope’).  Indeed, it was interesting to see how many Jews were also carrying Union Flags.  As we began to depart I turned to a Jewish lady from Liverpool and said how pleased I was to see so many Jews proudly waving the Union Flag.  She replied (in a broad Scouse accent):

‘Well darlin’, that’s the difference between this crowd and the one across the street.  We’re loyal to this country.  They just want to take it over.’

Some food for thought for ATW readers in the coming weeks and months.  It was a great success.  No rioting, no vandalism, no abuse, no burning of Palestinian flags.  There’s a lot more than just national loyalty that differentiated us from the rabble across the street.




By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

Here we have an image of a Mullah triumphant, having taken riot gear from the the police.

This was “peaceful” London yesterday (If you believe the BBC that is) as the Hamas loving scum waged riot in our Capital city and the police failed to fight back lest they be accused of political incorrectness or, heavens, insensitivity.

Frankly, sending in the SAS against these violent hate mongers would have been the better option. I feel sorry for the police officers that had to endure these vicious attacks but if they cannot prevent parts of London being turned into Gaza style riot zones, then better send in the professionals and see how many shoes can be upturned.

Let us be clear what yesterday was all about – it was a demonstration of raw Islamo-fascism and rather than congratulate ourselves how very liberal and modern we are at permitting it, we should instead ask WHY were these rioters not instantly taken into custody and charged with a breach of the peace? London is not Gaza – we must resist the Islamo-fascists, not indulge them.Of course I know we operate to more civilised values than the savages that the rioters hero-worship but that should not mean we look away from the sort of street violence visited upon London yesterday.

I hope the guy in  the picture is now up in court, if not, why not?


By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 11:04 am

7FT 2 Inches to be precise!

One of the world’s tallest women, who claimed asylum in the UK on the grounds that her height made her a target of abuse in her home country, has had her application rejected. She previously told officials she would be persecuted for being a lesbian if she returned to Pakistan. But 7ft 2in tall Pakistani Zainab Bibi, 35, who lived in a council house in Stockport, Cheshire, until recently and claims £40 a week in benefits, will still be allowed to stay in the country because the Home Office is considering further claims from her lawyers. It will be the third application to stay here since she first arrived in 2006.

In the meantime, we pay for her lawyers, we pay for her benefits and we see the absolute stupidity of the Home Office! Like so many others, she is laughing at the impotency of our immigration law.


By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 10:55 am

I thought this an excellent summary over at The Raional Actor of the sheer folly of Obama’s shiny new economic stimulus plan. Naturally you can be sure the msm will not be asking tough questions of their man but I guess that makes it all the more important we do?.

“Obama announced today his stimulus plan will create or save 3 million jobs.

The cost of his plan is estimated at $800 billion to $1 trillion. If you take the low end of his estimate, that’s $266,666 spent on each of the 3 million jobs. People who have lost their jobs in the private sector will be given new jobs in the public sector, jobs for which there has previously been no demand. $266,666 represents only the initial cost of creating new jobs or maintaining those that are no longer needed. The long term costs are far greater. Instead of these people working at private sector jobs, earning a wage determined by the market, they will work jobs that, according to the market, do not add value, and will earn a wage arbitrarily determined by a bureaucrat. Unemployment will be artificially lowered and value will be drained from the economy rather than added.

In his January 3 radio address, Obama claimed 80% of the 3 million new jobs would be created in the private sector. That means 2,400,000 jobs in the private sector and 600,000 government jobs.

However, any jobs created by the public sector are government jobs, whether they are associated with a “private” company or not. The government is creating and funding the new positions, reportedly at a cost of $266,666 for each one. None of the new, government jobs can properly be classified in the “private sector.”

The nature of the new jobs is unknown, but Obama has suggested repeatedly they will be “green jobs” and will dramatically enhance our infrastructure. He raved about Communist China’s infrastructural accomplishments during the Olympics, apparently envious of what their 1,000,000,000+ slave population can accomplish. So, some of our unemployed stock analaysts can expect to be put to work on roads and bridges, and others can look forward to more glamorous endeavors like “green jobs.”

$266,666 per job is a surprising admission of inefficiency by the Obama team before their administration even begins. They perhaps failed to crunch the numbers, or knew scarcely anyone would notice the full weight of their announcement.”

What is being planned here is the moving of US debt to eye-wateringly high levels which will affect generations to come; the State wil be grown in an unparalleled and intrusive manner, and of course  the business of the re-distribution of wealth lies at the heart of all of this. You elect a socialist, you get socialism!

for those who are fighters do not jest

By ATWadmin On January 11th, 2009 at 9:38 am

Listening to the BBC Sunday programme, which is usually crammed with wishy-washy items about priests and vicars, imams and ‘none of the above’ who either have doubts, or grave doubts, about just about everything. Heard an incredible interview between Roger Bolton (the interviewer) and one Oliver Mctiernan, who is I believe an ex-priest or vicar or whatever. The subject was Gaza, and the various wrongs of Israel in having the temerity to actually kill people who were trying to kill Israelis. Bolton brought up the fact that Hamas’ covenant calls for the obliteration of Israel, something which is actually written down, and this clown McTiernan blithely states that he has worked with Hamas members for years and not one wishes the destruction of Israel. “All they want is an end to the ‘DISPROPORTIONATE’ use of force! All they want is for the crossings to be opened so food and supplies may flow through! All they want is peace!”

The favourite word used by this fool is of course the favourite of apologists for terror the world over; ‘DISPROPORTIONATE’! The Hamas terrorists hide their launchers next to UNRWA schools, in mosques, in ordinary homes, secure in the knowledge that if an Israeli F-16-delivered bomb wipes out the terrorist, it also wipes out the family, mosque or school which was the base for the rocket launcher. Then they just release carefully selected pictures of grieving widows , all of course picturesquely posed with arms thrown wide in horror, or allegedly dead children being whisked towards a hospital which of course then states that they cannot cope! All these pictures are greedily splashed all over the Mainstream Media circus pages, all pointing to the ‘DISPROPORTIONATE’ use of force. “Why send jets to punish just a few rockets which have killed hardly any Israelis?”

I’ll tell them why! It is because the only response to terror is terror in retaliation. Terror to make the population of Gaza understand that their Israeli neighbours are sick of the rockets, sick of the 15-second timescale to get their children into shelters before a random rocket blasts them into bloody smithereens! I applaud every one of the Gaza deaths, because that is the only thing that these scum understand. Hamas don’t want a cease-fire, they want the destruction of a nation, and if Israel has to kill ten thousand before they get the message, then SO BE IT!

Apologists for the terrorists can queue from the right to condemn my words, but this is what I believe, and if you don’t want to read the truth as I see it, you don’t have to read the post!