web analytics

“Kill The Bastards”

By ATWadmin On April 10th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

Shabangu_Susan.jpgSOUTH AFRICA’S deputy security minister has had enough. A murder rate 32 times that of the United Kingdom means that Something Must Be Done. Well Susan Shabangu, the happy looking girl on the left, aims to please. She’s just given a little pep talk to the SA police on how to deal with criminals, and the message is clear: kill the bastards.

You must kill the bastards if they threaten you or the community. I want to assure the police station commissioners and policemen and women that they have permission to kill these criminals. You must not worry about the regulations. That is my responsibility. Your responsibility is to serve and protect. I won’t tolerate any pathetic excuses for you not being able to deal with crime. You have been given guns, now use them. I want no warning shots. You have one shot and it must be a kill shot.

Let’s hope Mr Shabangu had her dinner ready on the table after that little lot. What I want to know is, does she fancy being the Mayor of London?

A Queen In Name Only

By ATWadmin On April 10th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

The role of a constitutional monarch is to personify the democratic state, to legitimate authority, to assure the legality of its measures and to guarantee the execution of its popular will.

– Queen Elizabeth II on a visit to Canada in 1964.

You’re not the only one who’s gloomy, love
Eight years after those words, in 1972, she signed the European Communities Act 1972 in an attempt to legitimise Prime Minister Heath’s treachery and Parliament accepted the superiority of European law within Great Britain over our own statutes. Heath earlier had been warned by Lord Wilberforce that the signing of the Treaty of Accession to the Treaty of Rome, together with the recognition of the superiority of the European Court of Justice to our own system of appeal, would mean a total loss of Sovereignty. Heath went ahead and signed the Treaty which, in reality, is an article of capitulation. The Sovereignty of the British People which the Queen embodied – the actual embodiment of which made her our Sovereign – was surrendered to a foreign power. Having surrendered that Sovereignty, in an act of abdication, the Queen ceased to be Sovereign, as had her uncle Edward VIII in 1936 when he abdicated and ceased to be Sovereign and our Constitutional Monarch. Like the concept ‘unique’, a Sovereign either is or isn’t. Elizabeth Windsor cannot be Sovereign while being subject to the government and law of a foreign power. In Edward’s case the Sovereignty moved directly on his abdication to his brother who became our Constitutional Monarch George VI while Edward became the Duke of Windsor. "The King is dead; long live the King.” This ensures the continuity of our Constitutional Monarchical system of government.

Having ceased to be Sovereign, Elizabeth Windsor also ceased to be Queen under our Constitutional Monarchy, as her uncle had ceased to be King. No longer embodying the Sovereignty of the British People, she accepted mediatisation as had many of her German forebears in the 19th.Century when Metternich was constructing the German Federation after the collapse of the Napoleonic Empire in 1815. This left her with a titular role as Queen but without any constitutional or governing power. In this way the loss of our Sovereignty was disguised from the British People in a charade that has been continued to the present day. This charade of normality will continue until some later date, when those who govern us illegally feel it safe to reveal. Lord Falconer, Alderman the Rt.Hon.Sir Gavyn Arthur as Lord Mayor of London, Lord Brittan and many more with authority have said that Parliament is no longer sovereign, and has not been since the signing of ECA1972. This is a tacit admission that, if the Queen is no longer Sovereign in Parliament, she is no longer Sovereign anywhere and has not been Sovereign since she granted the ECA1972 the Royal Assent.

Therefore, as she ceased to be Sovereign in 1972, from that moment she has not had constitutional authority to call a Parliament and thus legitimate its authority to legislate. Indeed all the things that she said she could do in her speech in 1964 she can no longer do. Therefore the thing that has been called "Parliament" since 1972 has had no authority and in fact is not a legal Parliament. It also has not had any constitutional authority to "pass" any of the "legislation" it is said to have passed since ECA1972. In fact we now have no national means at our disposal so to do. As she now no longer embodies the sovereignty of the British People she has nothing to pass on to the rightful Heir to the Throne. The succession to the Throne has been destroyed along with our Constitutional Monarchy.



By ATWadmin On April 10th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

OK – from the author’s mouth….! 


By ATWadmin On April 10th, 2008 at 7:23 am

unionism%20decayed%201.jpgTen years on.

It’s ten years since the Belfast Agreement aka the Good Friday Agreement was "signed" (It was never signed by any of the local participants by the way!) and the peace processors in are celebration mood, with the likes of my old pal US Senator George Mitchell jetting in town. Alas Blair and Clinton couldn’t make it, never mind!

Ten yars on. So what have we got?

Well, the IRA remains intact, it’s Army Council still functions, it has continued killing and its leaders now sit in government and on the policing board. The UDA and UVF remain intact, still armed, still active. Unionism has embraced all those toxic provisions they once opposed.  It’s now considered normal for convicted murderers, bombers and bank-robbers to present themselves as first-tier politicians. Naturally there is no justice for the victims of terrorism  but there are four victims commissars!

What else? Oh yes, I’m OUT of politics and now present here for your edification and delight.

So what better day for me to announce that after ten years, my book exposing the UTTER CORRUPTION of the Good Friday Agreement is just about set up and ready to go on sale. Yes, "UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007" HAS FINALLY made it to publication stage. It sums up my political adventures over the past decade, my encounters with the great and the good and the bad, and my fury at the betrayal of principle that has accompanied this evil process. Plus there are some good one-liners – I think! 😉

I want to do a VLOG on it later – just talking through some of those moments I lived through, those heated political arguments, those highs and lows. Of course we mustn’t take it all too seriously – life is more  than lousy politics, thanks god!

"Unionism Decayed 1997-2007" will be available here in the UK and also in the US direct from my publisher – details to follow. However I am making 50 pre-publication copies available for those on ATW who would like a personalised greeting from me – all you need do is email me at the editor address here on ATW and I will confirm all details. The book costs a mere £9.99 (+posting) and a mere $14.99 (+posting). It will take a week or so to get copies going out to you but you will be the first to get one – even ahead of the great and the good in the media and elsewhere. I look after my own.

Ten year on from the "God Friday Agreement"?

I’ve never had so much fun damning it and all those who put it together. Keep smiling… 


By ATWadmin On April 9th, 2008 at 7:30 pm

It sickens me to read that…. 

" a formidable coalition of businessmen, politicians, religious leaders and community workers will pledge their support tonight for an amnesty for illegal immigrants who have been resident in the UK for several years and can pass strict tests to prove their contribution to British society. All four of London’s main mayoral candidates – including, against the official policy of his party, the Tory candidate Boris Johnson – will back the campaign to offer undocumented workers the chance to be integrated into mainstream society and obtain papers allowing them to work and pay taxes legally. In an unprecedented move that will exert even more pressure on the Government to heed calls for an amnesty, they will be joined by an array of influential figures from outside the political world, including Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, leader of the Muslim Council of Britain and Stephen O’Brien, one of the City’s leading businessmen."

Well, I say shame on them all for condoning these law-breakers! The Mayoral candidates are clearly pandering to London’s large numbers of illegal immigrants and sending a signal that it doesn’t matter of you break the law today because a few years later there is always the prospect of amnesty. You do not engender lawful behavior by condoning unlawful behavior, except in the minds of leftists.

Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor has absolutely no excuse for joining in this immoral jamboree and should be singularly criticised for his folly.


By ATWadmin On April 9th, 2008 at 7:06 pm

carter.jpgDid you read that America’s WORST living President, Ol’ Peanut brain Jimmy Carter, is reported to preparing an unprecedented meeting with the leader of Hamas, an organization that the U.S. government considers one of the leading terrorist threats in the world? The Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hayat reported Tuesday that Carter was planning a trip to Syria for mid-April, during which he would meet with Khaled Meshal, the exiled head of the Palestinian terror group Hamas, on April 18. Deanna Congileo, Carter’s press secretary, confirmed in an e-mail to FOXNews.com that Carter will be in the Mideast in April. Pressed for comment, Congileo did not deny that the former president is considering visiting Meshal.

Carter REALLY is a menace. He appears to have no common sense, no concept of how his serial folly aids the enemies not just of the USA, but of civilised nations everywhere. There should be NO talking to Hamas other than asking for their unconditional surrender. I doubt Jimmy will be doing that.


By ATWadmin On April 9th, 2008 at 6:45 pm

I read that Irish Euro-enthusiasts are furious because the French have announced, in advance of their EU presidency, that they want to harmonise business taxes across the EU.

"Ireland’s Europe Minister, Dick Roche, called the French economy minister’s remarks “untimely, unhelpful and inappropriate”. Note his language: “untimely” rather than “untrue”. What he really means is: Why couldn’t that Frenchwoman keep her big gob shut until after our referendum?

Irish people understand that their country’s extraordinary growth during the 1990s was fuelled mainly by tax-cuts and not, as many European observers believe, by Brussels subsidies. They know, too, that the harmonisation of corporation tax is a long-standing EU goal: it was first cited 50 years ago in the Treaty of Rome. “You cannot have a single market without a single rate of corporation tax”, say Euro-integrationists. "

What would such a business taxes "harmonisation" do for the Republic? Nothing good, I fear. Yet will Irish people nonetheless turn out and vote for the ..sssshhhh …constitution that will pave the way for such economic annihilation?


By ATWadmin On April 9th, 2008 at 6:28 pm

omagh.jpgI’m sure like many other people here in Northern Ireland and indeed around the world, mention of the word "Omagh" brings back memories of that dreadful day back in 1998  when vicious republican terrorists set off a bomb in that County Tyrone town killing 29 people in the most horrific way possible. In a court case today is was revealed that one of the Omagh bombers grinned as the car carrying the device was parked at the scene. A woman who caught his eye also claimed he looked calm and relaxed.

Grinned. Calm and relaxed. Just as carnage was about to unfold –  and so many families were about to tragically lose loved ones with devastating effect!. I believe there IS such a thing as evil and its grinning presence stalked Omagh on that awful day. Justice will only be seen to be done with the men who planned and executed this crime have their liberty taken away for the rest of their natural lives.


By ATWadmin On April 9th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

qatada_grab_226.jpgI’m NOT impressed to read that Islamic preacher Abu Qatada, a man dubbed "Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe"  has won an appeal against deportation from the UK which could lead to him being freed. The Court of Appeal said it was concerned that evidence allegedly obtained under torture may form part of a future trial in Jordan. The Jordanian national has been fighting extradition to his home country where he has been convicted for terror attacks. He entered the UK illegally but no one seems too bothered about that. Abu Qatada became one of the UK’s most wanted men in December 2001 when he went on the run on the eve of government moves to introduce new anti-terror laws allowing suspects to be detained without charge or trial. When questioned in the UK in February 2001, Abu Qatada was in possession of £170,000 cash, including £805 in an envelope labelled "For the Mujahedin in Chechnya". He was not charged, naturally. I think this a disgraceful decision by the judiciary and I could not care less what fate awaits Abu Qatata in Jordan. His continued presence in the UK is a real and present danger to British people. Get him to Jordan straightaway!


By ATWadmin On April 9th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

Remarkable! Did you read that Muslim sex offenders are asking to be let off a prison treatment programme on religious grounds? Rapists, paedophiles and other dangerous attackers are expected to discuss their crimes with other inmates as a condition of release. But Muslim prisoners complain that criminals should not have to talk about their offences – a "legitimate Islamic position", according to Ahtsham Ali, the Prison Service’s Muslim adviser.

One thousand inmates were put on the Sex Offender Treatment Programme last year with places usually reserved for the most dangerous attackers. Failure to complete the course can weigh against an offender at parole hearings. The possibility of an exemption for Muslims came to light in a letter from an unnamed inmate to Inside Time, a newspaper for prisoners. The convict said: "I have always insisted that it was against Islamic teachings to discuss your offence to anyone, let alone act it out within a peer group."  Experts said ministers, who have launched a review of the issue, could face a legal challenge from Muslims kept longer in prison because they had not undergone the treatment programme.

Fair enough – let them off the talking, just castrate them.