web analytics


By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 10:40 pm

I’m sure that you may have read that the "Weather Channel’s" most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming.

This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to "Holocaust Deniers" and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists. Well, here’s an experienced Meteoreologist who has an opinion worth hearing…

I have been in operational meteorology since 1978, and I know dozens and dozens of broadcast meteorologists all over the country. Our big job: look at a large volume of raw data and come up with a public weather forecast for the next seven days. I do not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype. I know there must be a few out there, but I can’t find them. Here are the basic facts you need to know:

*Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story. Even the lady at “The Weather Channel” probably gets paid good money for a prime time show on climate change. No man-made global warming, no show, and no salary. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab.

*The climate of this planet has been changing since God put the planet here. It will always change, and the warming in the last 10 years is not much difference than the warming we saw in the 1930s and other decades. And, lets not forget we are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North America and Northern Europe.

If you don’t like to listen to me, find another meteorologist with no tie to grant money for research on the subject. I would not listen to anyone that is a politician, a journalist, or someone in science who is generating revenue from this issue.

In fact, I encourage you to listen to WeatherBrains episode number 12, featuring Alabama State Climatologist John Christy, and WeatherBrains episode number 17, featuring Dr. William Gray of Colorado State University, one of the most brilliant minds in our science. WeatherBrains, by the way, is our weekly 30 minute netcast.

I have nothing against “The Weather Channel”, but they have crossed the line into a political and cultural region where I simply won’t go.

instead of just a’wishin!

By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 8:28 pm

When Nick Griffin and his compatriot Mark Collett were secretly filmed while making speeches at a private function, the police jumped to investigate after the films were shown on ‘The Secret Agent’ on Al-Beeb. Their findings were given a high priority, and the Crown Prosecution Service decide to go for a ‘Full House’ and sent both for trial on two charges of using words or behaviour intended to stir up racial hatred in a speech in Keighley. After a re-trial, held because the jury were unable to reach a verdict first time around, both were found ‘Not Guilty’ and discharged from the trial.

We will all now set our watches, or computer clocks, or even the ‘Slowest Clock in the World, so we can gauge when the police and the C.P.S. will finally decide to lay charges of ‘using  words or behaviour intended to stir up racial hatred’ after the ‘Undercover Mosques’ film from Channel Four, already the subject of posts from Alison, David and myself! As I commented (on the same topic) upon another blog, “I wrote my own M.P., but I ain’t holding my breath whilst awaiting a reply!”

One small point has possibly escaped the attention of many commentators; is anyone as amazed as I was to view a factual documentary giving the real ‘low-down’ on the hidden Islamics in our midst made by, and broadcast on, Channel Four?

I Hear You Knocking

By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 6:01 pm

Many of us have probably applied to join a club or a society sometime during our lives.  For the most part we are successful.  There are times when our lifestyles preclude membership of eligibility.  For example, if I want to take possession of an American Express platinum card, I have to hold an offshore bank account.  As I don’t have one there would be no point in me applying.  The response would always be the same – ‘No!’

This principle should apply with asylum seekers and, in all honesty, in most other countries – notwithstanding any formal declarations to the contrary – it probably would.  But most other countries don’t have a government with the ideological commitment to dilute and destroy the indigenous numbers and culture that this New Labour government has.  Therefore, if you are an ‘asylum seeker’ who has explored every possible avenue to gain a foothold in this country – and failed – you will be allowed to re-apply.

‘Ah, but isn’t that a part of our international obligations?’ I hear the liberals cry.  Yes it is.  However, I suspect this administration will be far keener on honouring every dotted ‘i’ and crossed ‘t’ when it comes to facilitating the maximum number of aliens they can possibly manage than the likes of our European neighbours.  Go to any EU member state and you will know that the UK is first and foremost at adopting every single directive emanating from Brussels; far more so than the so-called ‘committed’ members.  You also have a situation in northern France where towns are crowded with ‘asylum seekers’ who have travelled through many EU states without claiming asylum.  But the underlying belief is that they will eventually find their way to the UK, so why bother trying to deport them.  ‘Them Brits ‘ill take anybody in.  The softest and silliest idiots in the world, them Brits are..’ goes the unspoken truism when it comes to asylum and immigration.

A few years ago we topped the global league for the number of ‘asylum seekers’ relative to our population.  We are still one of the favoured destinations.  Has anybody ever thought of the reason why.  Don’t fall for all this MSM guff about ‘historical tolerance’ and a ‘welcoming attitude’.  We have these leeches here (and let’s not beat about the bush.  That’s what they are!!) because we have a welfare system that is the laughing stock of the developed world.  ‘Come on in, there’s plenty of room.  Have a house.  Have a wardrobe full of clothes.  Have your 14 kids educated in mainstream schools at taxpayers’ expense.  Have a variety of benefits to choose from.  Have this, that and the other’.  And all this when those who are born here and have worked all their lives get the drippings from the government’s pension table.  It’s all well and good to have international obligations.  But when you have a government positively committed to a mass influx, irrespective of reason; and when you have a welfare system ripe for the picking, you’re going to have trouble keeping people out!



By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 5:50 pm

Here we are, back in the normal spot and with a real classic rocking’ song. I associate this tune most particularly from a scene in "An American Werewolf in London" – a hilarious horror movie from years ago but it is of course one of the vintage rock and roll numbers. I love the ominous lyrics, and whilst this live version isn’t quite as good as the single version, it’s still pretty cool. It exudes energy. Hope you like it…


By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 2:02 pm

I laughed when I read a contrite Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt say that "in hindsight" ministers would have wanted to ensure that British GP’s doctors did not take so much out of their inflated contracts!  Unsurprisingly, the proportion of profits GPs take out of their practices has increased since the generous new contract started in 2004, pushing average pay well above £100,000.  In exchange for this higher pay, many GP’s have generously decided to stop working out of surgery hours and weekends. Hurrah!

So the tax-payer has to pay MORE for their higher salaries, and then MORE for the medical cover required for the hours that British GP’s just won’t do. Hewitt claims "no-one" could have foreseen that GP’s would have opted for more money and less hours. LOL! If you need to get a GP out of hours these days, as has been my experience in the past few years, it will most likely by some earnest Eastern European doctor, with AT  BEST pidgeon English and no knowledge of the patient. Still, Ms Hewitt is fond of telling us that our WONDERFUL NHS has never been better! Who’s kidding who?

Talking Point – 19.01.07

By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 11:38 am


  1. ‘This picture, in its entirety, is an accurate metaphorical depiction of the battles currently underway between the various strands of the republican untermenschen on whether or not to support the only legitimate forces of British law and order in Ulster.’   Discuss.

On This Day…19.01

By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 11:32 am

1840 – American explorer Charles Wilkes discovers the coast of Antarctica.

1848 – Gold in first discovered in California.

1915 – Britain’s first air-raid casualties when German Zeppelin airship bombs Great Yarmouth in Norfolk during World War I.

1942 – Birth of British actor Michael Crawford, famous for playing the bumbling Frank Spencer in the 1970s comedy Some Mothers Do ‘Ave ‘Em.

1966 In India, Indira Gandhi becomes Prime Minister following in the footsteps of her father Jawaharlal Nehru.

1978 – End of the line for the original Volkswagen Beetle, when the last of the 16 million produced since 1938 rolls off the production line.

‘who’s up for eviction’

By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 9:13 am

A letter dated 7th January 2007 from Shouaib Ahmed, Secretary General, Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith UK to Andrew Smith of HardCash Productions Ltd, the C4 Dispatches programme maker – in which the SG is very concerned about bigotry and hatred. Only not foremost for the kind that is being spread and was clearly exposed in the moderate mosques he attends. He also expresses concern for incitement to violence but not for what is being preached.

The allegations are dismissed as comments taken ‘out of context’ and ‘manipulation’ – for which the programme makers might one day suffer in Hell.  The use of the word kuffar was simply to describe someone who covers up the truth (conveneniently) though he stops short of giving an explanation of the term ‘kuffrocracy’ used in the mosques sermons . When someone talks of randomly killing Jews they simply meant the IDF. And random hatred towards christians may have been intended as a reference to Srebenica.

Extracts from a very long letter below from which FreeBornJohn has also highlighted some key parts:-.

"I am writing in response to your letter dated the 28th December 2006 which appears to have been written just when you knew we would be celebrating the ‘Id al-Adha, thereby giving us less time in which to respond to what in any case appears to be a programme whose content has already been decided. …

Naturally I am surprised that you appear to have already more or less decided what words you are going to put into my mouth and that you did not even have the courtesy to request an interview with me so that my viewpoint could be included in your programme. In my humble opinion the mark of balanced investigative journalism is to do just this, to talk to everyone who is going to feature in an article or documentary, even if this means that some preconceived notions may prove to be unsustainable before they are aired….

If, which I hope is not the case, this is going to be just another attack on Islam and Muslims, which is very much in vogue nowadays, then I must remind you that if I or any member of my staff or anyone who worships at the Green Lane Mosque or the Mosque itself are subjected to any form of physical attack as a result of your programme then you, HardCash Productions Ltd and Channel 4 will all be liable to prosecution for incitement to commit a criminal act….

Towards the end of a long letter, FreeBornJohn also noted that some aspects of Islam are explained and remarks how Saudi-style salafism is moderate and the middle way:

Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was an 18th century reformer who sought to restore that middle way where it had been ignored or abandoned by the people of his time. He called on them to follow the Qur’an and the Sunnah, just as all sincere Muslim teachers and leaders do, whatever group they belong to. Many views and excesses are attributed to him that were not his – and which if anything characterise those who have abandoned the middle way….

As regards corporal punishment, the teachings of Islam permit a light smack as a mark of disapproval, but never the violent physical abuse of either children or marriage partner ……As regards amputations, whippings, and crucifixions, […] Some of the hadd (fixed punishments) punishments in Islam work as an effective deterrent, even for those who do not fear Allah and the Last Day……


The Secretary General, also noted on their website: 

“We reject all forms of extremism. It is deeply alarming that a few sentences have been taken out of context in order to create the impression that our institution is a hotbed of fanaticism".

He needn’t have been so worried. As far as social expose’s goes and the concern and debate that results over what is being said and what was meant,  Jade generated the most heat.


By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 7:34 am

wolfsheep.jpgI was interested to read that the Alan Harper, the Primate elect of the Church of Ireland – (the Anglican community in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland) – has shown his liberal colours straightaway by calling for the Act of Settlement to be repealed and for the disestablishment of the Church of England. Amusingly, this wise sage has concluded that the foundations of his Church and the constitutional basis of our Monarchy “belongs to its time and we should move on”

I wonder if he feels the same about the teachings of the Bible? I wonder how he views the 39 Article of Faith to which he swears allegiance one moment and then rejects the next?

The Bible warns of us of people such as Harper. I attach the visual cue. He may LOOK like an idiot……

Hat-tip to Slugger O’Toole.


By ATWadmin On January 19th, 2007 at 7:23 am

Yip – the faux row over alleged racist comments on Big Brother continues!

Last night, I watched panelists on the Northern Ireland version of Question Time (“Let’s Talk”) being asked about this topic and they all agreed that the remarks made by Jade Goody and her coven on the Channel 4 programme were racist. There was also a general consensus that “we” are a racist society and that “something must be done” to “fight” this innate racism.

I say this is garbage. We are NOT a racist society, though our tolerances have been stretched to the limit by the invasion of illegal immigration that Labour has presided over. Britain’s are, by and large, VERY tolerant of other races, and the self-loathing liberals who are keen to beat up on themselves sure as hell do not speak for me.

Then there is the question of what racism actually is. Why, please tell, have the media ignored comments made by Big Brother housemate Jermaine Jackson that other occupants were “white trash”? Isn’t that equally as horrible as anything said about Ms Sheety? How can it be that the MSM ignored that aspect of this event?

The truth is that it is NOT racism we witness in Big Brother. It is gross stupidity and ignorance. If people don’t like it, turn the thing off. Those freaks and egotists who choose to go onto such a programme really don’t warrant our attention in this way were it not for the liberal media’s determination to “prove” just how bad and vile British society has become.