web analytics

Beer and Sandwiches

By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 11:31 am

As far as I am aware (correct me if I’m wrong) the British Labour Party in the only socialist movement in Europe that is directly funded by trade unions.  In fact the trade unions were instrumental in establishing the Labour Party.  On the other hand we were told by Tony Blair that, under his stewardship, the unions would receive ‘fairness, not favours’.  As far as the great majority of the UK populace was concerned, there would be no repeat of the likes of Jack Jones, Hughie Scanlon and Joe Gormley traipsing in to Number 10 to be cosseted by a Labour leader in hoc to their demands and their party contributions.

A problem we now have is that Tone made his promise in the days when Labour had a large membership and could, therefore, rely on individual contributions from rapacious young Lefties.  Fast forward to 2007; with a membership now some 100,000 less than Cameron’s ‘Conservatives‘ – and still in freefall; and you begin to see how Labour, under jaw-dropping Gordon, could again revive its subservient position to the worst excesses of trade union philosophy.

I was always under the impression that ‘New Labour’ was an artificial construct tailored to a strategy to win elections under the specific leadership of Tony Blair.  It would not outlast either Blair, or the point when the party could not win comfortably in a given General Election.  Those phenomena, both in play today – and in the context of a rapidly declining membership, means inevitably that union considerations will feature far more prominently.  Firstly because their influence will be organically linked to the financial survival of Labour.  Secondly because Brown will not have the same ideological aversion to trade unions held by the present Prime Ministerial incumbent.

Thatcher took years to tame the unions.  Is Brown going to resurrect the sort of arrogance we currently see in Tony Woodley, as he supports British Airways staff in their pledge to disrupt the holiday plans of thousands, across the spectrum of the trade union movement?  They were booted out of office for doing the same in the 1970s.  You’d think they would learn from their past mistakes.


By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 10:25 am

Wonder what you make of the news that police stations have been closing at the rate of more than one a week since Labour came to power? Figures show that 582 local stations have shut since Labour’s 1997 election victory. The closures have been partly counterbalanced by the opening of stations in the same period. Overall, there were 2,059 police stations in 1997 but by 2005 this had fallen to 1,791 – a net loss of 268. Many of the new ‘stations’ are actually smaller offices far removed from the traditional, centrally-located buildings they replaced.

It strike me that when you review Labour’s period in power – which I hope will be coming to an end soon – it become apparent that despite all the carefully crafted rhetoric about being "tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime", the reality has been the EXACT opposite!

Labour has closed police stations, tied up the police in red tape, created legions of pointless offences to ensure that resources are stretched to beyond breaking point. Then, when anyone is actually convicted of an offence, they are given either a light rap on the knuckles – (with all due diligence to the Human Rights Act) – and let off, or send to prison where they enjoy plush conditions and can walk free if they take the notion! Some justice.

The leftists in NuLabour have proven by their actions that they will not deal effectively with crime.

Closing our Police Stations is but one symbolic example of their failure.


By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 10:01 am

nhs23bt.gifYes, of course the idea of "free" Health Care for everybody is noble. It is also supremely unrealistic – a utopian notion that can never be achieved, and worse still  is well on its way to being a living hell for some.

I was shocked to read about a female patient in a packed NHS ward who was left stunned after she returned from the lavatory to find another woman had been put in her bed. Pat Roberts, 59, was forced to sit in her wheelchair for four hours before nurses could find another space for her.

Her shocked husband Ron Roberts, 71, said she had only been away from her bed for a few minutes while he took her to the toilet. It gets worse! To add insult to injury Mr Roberts says he was then told his wife did not need the bed because she had a wheelchair. Oh – the luxury of it. Just how cosy is a wheel-chair?

Government interference is killing the NHS. All the billions that Brown has poured in have not dealt with the systemic problems that afflict this socialist construct. It has a demotivated workforce, many of its hospitals are filthy, and the approach to patient care – as this case vividly illustrates – is shocking at times.

My father was in hospital over the Christmas Period. On one of my visits to his ward, I observed staff set up a TV room solely for their use, with soft drinks, newspapers and crisps for themselves whilst on-duty – and they then proceeded to ignore the small number of very ill patients in that ward for the rest of that Christmas afternoon. Angels????

The NHS is doomed as it is currently constituted. I think that virtually any change that reduces the role of politicians within this structure would be welcome. I believe that all of us have to take responsibility for our own Health Care – I don’t WANT Government providing this for me – and sooner rather than later, the NHS will collapse under its vast bureaucratic weight. At that point, it will be the most frail and most needy who suffer the most. I’m not sure how far we are from that point, but when a female patient is told that she doesn’t need a bed because she has wheel-chair, I figure it can’t be far away!


By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 9:44 am

Isn’t it wonderful to work for a quango in the public sector? I mean, you get to spend tax-payers money as you wish and nobody can really stop you.

Comes the news from David Gordon over at the Belfast Telegraph that RUC/Special Branch is facing a second Police Ombudsman investigation into officers’ collusion with UVF killer Mark Haddock. The follow-up probe is centring on suspected links between Haddock and two UVF murder bids on a north Belfast man in the 1990s.

OK – here’s my take. If ANY member of Special Branch colluded in protecting a known UVF killer, then any moral advantage in running such an informer, is obviated by his repellent actions. Thus evidence of Special Branch complicity must be uncovered and prosecutions brought in court. Simple.

But I’m curious about another aspect of collusion which no-one seems to want to discuss. Did Special Branch also know the identity of the IRA leadership during the past 35 years? If so, why did it let such thugs remain free? It has been said in the House of Commons that Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness occupied very senior positions in this terrorist cabal. During this time THOUSANDS were murdered. Why were these IRA leaders allowed to remain free? Did any politicians intervene to ensure that these godfathers remained untouchable? When, and why, was the decision taken to leave the IRA leadership alone? Who concluded it was best to leave the terrorist leadership intact so it could direct thousands of terror attacks? Shouldn’t we be getting at this truth also?

And as for the UVF, a terror group ATW consistently castigates, can someone tell me why, despite the fact that it has never decommissioned or disarmed or ceased its violence, it’s leadership remains at large? Does the PSNI not know who commands this gang of thugs? Who has decided not to move against them?

The thing about collusion is that any form of it is reprehensible. I get the feeling that those working the loudest noises about Special Branch wish to remain mute on the broader aspects of it. Did the Irish Government collude to set up the PIRA? Did the Garda collude with the Provos? Mmmmm….a wide web of collusion indeed.


By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 9:24 am

question203.jpgDid you watch "Question Time" on BBC1 last evening?

It featured a marginally less demented audience than usual, and the panel appeared quite interesting.

Poor Geoff Hoon was there to try and defend Government policy. His role was akin to that of a coconut shy at a fairground. He got belted.

Then there was Matthew Parris, witty, interesting and a tad too liberal for my liking. He’s always worth a listen and his measured opinions should not be instantly dismissed.

Deborah Bull – a former BBC Governor and Ballet dancer (Now THERE’S  a combination for you) seemed a bit airy-fairy to me, waffled a lot, and said nothing. A metropolitan nobody.

Ann Atkins, someone who I have had hitherto some time for, was a huge disappointment. She was easily the most leftist of all the panelists – at one point seeking to IMPOSE minimum prices on food! Socialism alert!

Nicholas Soames, Churchill’s grandson, was excellent. He have good answers, skewered the Government’s ineptitude on a range of issues, and seemed to speak pretty honestly. Most impressed. I’ve heard him before but thought his performance last night was very good indeed. I thought he dealt with the issue of Blair’s no-show in the Commons the other day very well, contrasting that with the behaviour of his grandfather – who made a point of keeping the Commons informed personally in the dark days of WW2. 

Londonderry Air

By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 8:33 am

Aside from the fact that no opportunity must ever be wasted to antagonise Irish nationalists, I don’t really know why I’m bothering to waste time on writing about the High Court’s decision that the official name of Northern Ireland’s second largest city is still LONDONDERRY.  I’ve said repeatedly that the court ruling would be a foregone conclusion, even when insurrectionists on here and on Slugger (have a laugh at them positively biting their tongues off with fury, and making all sorts of ridiculous claims about when anschluss is achieved (dream on!) they will be able to revert back to the old Oak Grove definition.  So much for respecting ‘Britishness’ in a Fenian Nirvana) were insistent that a council name-change back in 1984 also immediately altered the name of the city.

If anything, what this ruling shows (and it is highly unlikely that HM Government will bring forward legislation to have the Royal Charter changed due to time, parliamentary legislative importance, scrutiny, the price of opposing inevitable legal challenges and, most importantly, the sheer cost of the whole exercise and what it would mean on the ground) is how dirt-poor Irish nationalist understanding of UK constitutional law really is.  We are talking about a community who thought that the Act of Union and Section 75 of the Government of Ireland Act 1920 had been scrapped or neutered when the Belfast Agreement came into play.  This is what Londonderry’s own butcher’s apprentice had to say on the matter at the time:

‘We fought and got the repeal of the GOIA which underpinned the Union, and insisted that other relevant legislation including the Act of Union…must also be altered, repealed or rendered inoperable by any new Act.’ (Martin McGuinness in in a speech to party delegates in Dublin in April 1998).

The Act of Union remains in force in its totality.  Section 75 of the GOIA means absolutely nothing.  Its removal did not alter the basis on which NI remains in the United Kingdom – either in domestic or international law.  What the insurrectionists must have missed is the fact that Section 75 was reintroduced as Section 5(6) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, which brought the Belfast Agreement into law.  We are also talking about a community that thinks once a border poll is held, the government will be compelled to hold one every 7 years.  I could go on, but I fear my sides would split from laughing.

Republicans in Londonderry have had their little exercise in wasting taxpayers’ money on a squalid little sectarian endeavour rooted in nothing more than titular supremacy.  They’ve lost.  They can seek to waste more money by continuing with their intolerance, or recognise and accept that the name is Londonderry in accordance with the historical role London merchants had in building the settlement up from a tiny riparian community into the regional trading centre for the island at the time.

Look at the two coats of arms below.  The top one is the Corporation of London.  The second is the City of Londonderry.  See the similarity?  What I’m saying is if you deny the name of Londonderry, you are denying history.  And we should leave the denial of history to idiots like David Irving.

coat of arms 2.gif












coat of arms 1.gif

On This Day…26.01

By ATWadmin On January 26th, 2007 at 8:26 am

1788 – First consignment of convicts from England arrive at Sydney Cove in Australia.

1828 – In the UK, the Duke of Wellington (commander of British troops at the Battle of Waterloo, 1815) becomes Prime Minister.

1907 – ‘Foul language’ causes a riot in the Abbey Theatre, Dublin, on the first night of JM Synge’s play – ‘Playboy of the Western World’.

1925 – Birth of American acting legend Paul Newman.

1965 – Hindi is proclaimed the first official language of India.

1994 – A protester fires two blank shots from a starting pistol at Prince Charles as he prepares to address an ‘Australia Day’ rally in Sydney.


Is There No Beginning To His Talents?

By ATWadmin On January 25th, 2007 at 2:16 pm

The Deputy Prime Minister has given an interview to BBC Radio 4 about his days as a Ship’s Steward. We learn:

During another incident, he was trying to keep a flaming dish of bombe jubilee alight and inadvertently set fire to a passenger’s eyebrows and burnt them off.

Hardly an intellectual rapier thrust at the heart of government, but very, very funny.

now that’s funny!

By ATWadmin On January 25th, 2007 at 11:43 am

There should be no legislation which attempts to stop a man from making a complete fool of himself! The preceding statement is written in response to proposed legislation before the Italian government to outlaw statement which deny the Holocaust, similar to the ban already existing in Austria, and also proposed to be spread throughout the European Union by Germany!

David Irving, recently released from a jail term in Austria, says that Auschwitz held no crematoria, and that it was his opinion that the notorious Death Camp was, in fact, a tourist site!

While the moderate amongst us, of whom I am proud to count myself, simply shake their collective heads, mutter such choice epithets as “!**&%***&&*@@@” and wander on through life regardless, there are the singularly humourless who seem intent on stamping out the eccentric, foolish and plain fool-hardy amongst us all, who would welcome a law which states that you cannot state something which is blindingly obviously untrue, because it might ‘upset’ someone!

If I were to write, for example, that Her Majesty was planning to overthrow the British Government, I might get the response I deserved, which would be absolutely nothing apart from laughter! For it is plainly ridiculous that this wonderful woman would ever get so pig sick of the mess that her so-called Government has landed us in, as to attempt steps to remove same ‘Government’!

So what is the difference between that claim, and any claim that the Nazi’s did not kill, amongst so many others, 6 million Jews?


The Show Must Go On

By ATWadmin On January 25th, 2007 at 11:29 am

“ Britain is a nation built from and by people from other countries,” says Alan Johnson, Secretary of State for Education and ex-communist. Oh really? That may be so to a man for whom history began in October 1917, but he doesn’t speak for my Britain. The Secretary of State was speaking following the publication of a government-funded report into the teaching of ‘Citizenship’ in secondary schools. One recommendation, according to the BBC, is that “Schools in England should teach "core British values" alongside cultural diversity”. Leaving aside the point that the State has no business teaching ‘core British values’, until the discredited idea of ‘cultural diversity’ is consigned to history, our society is destined for a troubled future. We must adopt urgently the American expectation that immigrants do not merely immigrate and swap passports; they must become ‘one of us’ down to their bootlaces.

The multicultural revolution reached an inevitable milestone on 7 July 2005 when four muslims, three Yorkshire-born, murdered 52 innocents and maimed and injured many hundreds more in the name of islam, an alien belief system imported to our country without our consent. It was not just the presence of islam in our country which made this act of savagery inevitable, although it must be noted that where islam exists in any significant way violence usually follows, but also decades of liberal multiculturalism which has waged a war on British culture, our heritage, history and birthright. One would hope that following this act of mass murder, the perpetrators of this kulturekampf would check themselves, offer some recognition of what they have done and realise that elevating incompatible cultures above that of the indigenous British population, is stupidity and recklessness of the highest order.

But no, of course they won’t. It’s business as usual. Removing this traitorous government isn’t just an urgent need; it’s a matter of national survival.