web analytics

For my baby girl…..

By Patrick Van Roy On June 6th, 2018 at 8:21 pm

Today she Graduates High School….. bless her heart…..


By Pete Moore On June 6th, 2018 at 7:06 pm

Alice Johnson, imprisoned for life 21 years ago, for a first-time, non-violent offence:

President Trump just commuted her sentence. She’ll be back with her family soon. The Kenyan didn’t do that. Trump did. This just after we learn that black unemployment has (again) hit record lows in the US. I was told that Trump is a racist. I was promised a white supremacist. He’s the worst racist I’ve ever seen! Jeez, let’s hope for that blue wave later this year.


By David Vance On June 6th, 2018 at 1:10 pm

The willingness that some people display in accepting unreality as reality is quite alarming. Just consider this story;

Got that? Sophie, who is biologically a MAN, has graduated from the Jo Cox Women in leadership programme.  See the problem? Read on….

Labour under Jeremy Corbyn have fully embraced the gender dystopia agenda by insisting that their “Women-only” shortlists for elected office (tick one box for virtue signalling) are open to…men.

And let’s not forget the recent promotion of Eddie Izzard to Labour’s National Executive Committee. Here he is connecting to the ordinary Labour voter…

It doesn’t end there. Because Labour is not the only Party that embraces this insanity.

Let’s consider what Maria Miller, an influential Conservative MP, suggests;

Passports and driving licences should not state if the holder is male or female because it causes problems for transgender people, a Conservative MP has said.

WHAT? And as a further insight….

A person’s gender was not relevant on official documents and created an unconscious bias in job and university applications, she said.

Miller’s comments came during an inquiry by the committee into transgender equality, which heard evidence from NHS England that there were around 4,500 referrals to gender identity services each year, including increasing numbers of children.

Got that? Increasing number of kids, many under the age of 10, are now being routinely referred to the NHS for “gender identity” services. Back in the day this was called ‘growing up” but nowadays it is classified as a condition and encouraged. of course it is worth realising that the NHS actually encourages gender dystopia in the young.

Children as young as ten are being asked by the NHS if they feel ‘comfortable with their gender’, it emerged last night. The questionnaire being handed out to schools in Lancashire asks questions such as: ‘Do you feel the same inside as the gender you were born with? (Feeling male or female).’ Pupils in Year Six are also asked to tick a box to fill in their gender, where they are given the choice of ‘girl’, ‘boy’ or ‘other’.

And it’s not just the NHS pushing this cognitive dissonance.

Consider this “advice” from a school.

A secondary school in Oxfordshire has reportedly banned boys from wearing shorts in the hot summer months – but said they are free to wear skirts instead if they wish. Chiltern Edge School in Sonning Common recently introduced a new, stricter uniform policy that states pupils can only wear trousers or skirts. When one parent asked if their son could wear tailored shorts for summer, he said he was told “no” by staff as shorts were not allowed – but as they had a gender-neutral policy, boys could opt to wear skirts.

So, boys are actively encouraged to wear skirts and we wonder why so many kids are increasingly confused about what their gender actually is?

Let’s face it – there are only two genders biologically speaking. Male and Female. Most of us can identify our gender by simply looking under the hood, so to speak. Yes I know there are some very confused individuals who are conflicted and we should offer them every understanding and help. But playing along with their delusions does not help anyone in the long term and simple stores up even more problems for the future.



By Pete Moore On June 5th, 2018 at 9:33 pm


The founders of London’s first women-only private members club are to open a second venue, in Mayfair, following “unprecedented demand”.

You go girls*. I hope it’s a roaring success. But then I’m a genuine (classical) liberal. The legions of purple-haired harridans demanding that men-only clubs, golf clubs and Oxford colleges be banned – more fascist then liberal.

(*Just be home in time to make dinner and do the washing, ok?)


By David Vance On June 5th, 2018 at 5:59 pm

Each day we see more evidence of the liberal hell we are being asked to quietly descent into.

Check out this charming graph.

Now then, you might think this speaks volumes to reckless personal sexual decisions. But you would be wrong because….

So there you have it, it is “Government cuts” that force men to have reckless and dangerous sex with each other. Who knew?

Meanwhile in our universities…

And in our schools….

Across the piece, the cognitive dissonance is strong. And the Left own it.


Quis custodiet ipsos custodes in Rotherham?

By David Vance On June 5th, 2018 at 5:09 pm

Recent times have seen the tip of the iceberg emerge concerning the widespread scale of Muslim rape gangs operating across the UK. One of the big questions is WHY have the Police been reluctant to investigate and convict. I offer you two quick stories by way of evidence.

A member of the grooming gang jailed for raping and prostituting teenage girls in Rotherham was caught with one of his victims in a police station car park but let go, it has emerged. Bannaras Hussain, 36, was jailed for 19 years on Friday after pleading guilty to 10 charges including rape, indecent assault, procuring a woman to become a prostitute and actual bodily harm

Got that? In a POLICE car park. But let go.

Then this….

Two local councillors, one of whom is still serving, and a police officer have been accused of having sex with victims involved in the Rotherham child abuse scandal.

The three most senior police officers in England and Wales have expressed concerns that funding cuts and pressure on resources are hampering their ability to tackle serious crime.
… it seems reasonable to question exactly what their priorities are.
What is more serious than the industrial scale sexual abuse of young girls and boys UNDER their noses, and in the Rotherham case, with the alleged collusion of one of their own officers and IN one of their own car parks? Where is the humility from the Police and the apology to the thousands of families that they have let down? How can we continue to pour taxes into British Policing when it seems that they are more focused on arresting people for hurty tweets than for rape?
Let me be clear, I have lots of respect for our Police. I know many officers who work hard to try and deliver justice. They have an unenviable task and I admire them. But when I talk to them, they tell me they are overly burderned with irrelevant administration, that they ARE stretched to breaking point, and that “management” determines priorities. For example, “Hate Crime’ is pushed from the top as the issue that gets most focus. Ironically, mass grooming is not a “hate crime” whereas an offensive tweet CAN BE a “hate crime” and on that basis resource is allocated.
Something is very rotten in the Police State.


By David Vance On June 5th, 2018 at 5:01 pm

This is how CONSERVATIVE voters view those in the CONSERVATIVE government based on performance.

You can see Theresa May’s bland uninspiring Brexit leadership is turning off her OWN core supporters. My opinion of May remains unchanged. She was a Remainer and she remainers a Remainer. Her aim is to make Brexit so limp and worthless that it becomes worthless. She should go.

Vance Vents

By Patrick Van Roy On June 5th, 2018 at 2:48 pm

A True Presidential Disgrace

By Patrick Van Roy On June 5th, 2018 at 2:19 pm

Here is a sexual predator who is still in denial.  He has been accused of Rape, Sexual Attacks and has admitted to sexual harassment of a woman 27 years his younger when he was President.  Yet because he signed into Law as a Governor a Sexual Harassment Law and hired a Female Attorney General he believes that exempts him on preying on young women in the work place.

A Challenge, explain why you believe this to be wrong

By Patrick Van Roy On June 5th, 2018 at 1:51 pm

A President can’t Pardon himself because he can’t be charged with a crime while he is President.

The Constitution clearly states the only recourse against ANY President is Impeachment.

Before any Criminal Charges can be brought against a sitting President he must first be removed from office.

Since he can NOT be charged with any Criminal Act before Impeachment let alone be convicted of any, he can not Pardon Himself.

That is Constitutional Law.

The ONLY Legal Recourse against ANY sitting President is Impeachment.

If you believe otherwise make your case in the comments below. If you hold ANY position pro or con, make your case with reason, facts, Law, Precedent, spell it out like a reasoned person.