web analytics

Tommy Interview with Tucker Carlson

By Patrick Van Roy On August 3rd, 2018 at 3:42 am

The Libyan connection…

By David Vance On August 2nd, 2018 at 7:12 pm

I am cross posting this as I thought you might be interested!

“Altnewsmedia is asking the question today; who exactly were the other ‘110 British citizens”evacuated from Libya with the Manchester Arena Jihadist Salman Abedi in August 2014? How many of them were in fact Libyan jihad terrorists whose families has been previously granted British Citizenship?

Manchester Arena Jihadist

In May 2017, jihad terrorist Salman Abedi detonated a suicide bomb at an Ariana Grande pop concert in Manchester. 22 people were killed and hundreds injured. It has been revealed in the past few days that Abedi was rescued by HMS Enterprise from the coast of Libya in August 2014,three years before the Manchester attack. Who were the the other “110 British citizens” evacuated with him, exactly? What was the precise purpose of this evacuation mission?

In the 1980’s the British government gave asylum to members of the LIFG(Libyan Islamic Fighting Group) The LIFG is a jihad group that was trying to overthrow Gaddafi, who has committed hostile acts against the UK. Most of the LIFG members were settled in Manchester and received British citizenship. Salman Abedi was born in Manchester, the son of an alleged senior LIFG commander. When the Libyan war started in 2011 most of the Manchester based LIFG terrorists moved back to Libya to wage war against Gaddafi. Salman Abedi’s father is allegedly currently fighting Jihad in Libya.

Gaddaffi was killed in October 2011. At that time there had been hundreds of British civilians (nurses, oil workers, teachers, doctors etc) working in Libya. They were evacuated almost immediately the war started. By 2014, Libya was a deadly warzone with mass killings in every city. Three years after the war began, who exactly were the “110 British citizens” being evacuated in August 2014? Why had these “British citizens” remained in a deadly war zone three years into a ferocious civil war?

In June 2014, there was an election in Libya. The “Jihad” parties lost the election but refused to accept the result. They launched a wave of terrorist attacks on the “secular” anti-Jihad forces of General Haftar. In response General Haftar made a major push to defeat the Jihadis. By July 2014 many were trapped in Libya’s coastal areas as General Haftar’s forces advanced against them. If Hafter had captured them, these LIGF terrorists would most likely have been executed. Trapped at the coast, they were desperate for rescue.

Is it possible that the Royal Navy was dispatched by the British government to rescue these LIFG terrorists and their families, and evacuate them from almost certain death by Haftar’s forces? Again, who are the “110 British citizens” that were extracted from Libya at that time? As the UK has most recently also evacuated hundreds of “White Helmets” from the defeated jihad-controlled areas of Syria, this question becomes even more pertinent.

Altnewsmedia asks has the British Government been actively providing savage Jihadi and their supporters with sanctuary in the UK? If so, and these Jihadi such as Salman Abedi then slaughter innocent British citizens, we must ask why Government is helping to kill it’s own citizens.”

Quick Trump update

By David Vance On August 2nd, 2018 at 6:46 pm

Hope the Dems and their media lackeys keep up with the “Muh Russians” narrative, it’s working so well!

The New York Times is hiring – racists should apply!

By David Vance On August 2nd, 2018 at 6:09 pm

Dear ATW readers, may I introduce you to Sarah Yeong. She has just been appointed to the editorial board of the New York Times. Here are a few of Sarah’s opinions.

 

She appears to hate white people in general, and white men in particular. I wonder how she got the job?

UPDATE.

The NYT admits it was fully aware of her racist tweets before they hired her, yet hired her anyway.

Quasimodo

By Mahons On August 2nd, 2018 at 1:27 pm

The Ninth Circuit Court has ruled that President Trump’s Executive Order to deny Federal Funds to Sanctuary Cities is unconstitutional as it reprsents the Executive branch usurping the purse string powers of Congress. Legally, they are right. Poltically, it is a Trump victory.
The concept of Sanctuary Cities involves local cities refusing to cooperate with Federal Authorities on illegal immigration. I dont favor this approach, and most Americans dont either. Nothing plays into Trump’s narrative better than liberal cities (San Francisco, Santa Clara) favoring illegal aliens and being protected by a liberal Court. Losing the battle is winning the war.
The whole issue turns the political debate on its head. Liberals preaching states and local rights, conservatives suddenly in love with the Federal Government. Confusing, no?
People who are not here legally need to have their status legally and humanely determined. And once illegal status is determined, absent extraordinary circumstances, they need to be deported. Abuses in this process are rightly the subject of challenge, but such challenges must also remain within the letter of the law.
In order to gain politically, or should I say maintain politically, Trump doesn’t need to solve the problem. He needs to keep the problem. And keep it in the news. Those opponents of his who see this ruling as a setback don’t understand he won. They don’t understand for whom the bell tolls.

America’s Anchorman

By Patrick Van Roy On August 1st, 2018 at 7:58 pm

Rush Limbaugh, the “Doctor of Democracy,” is known as the pioneer of AM radio. Limbaugh revolutionized the media and political landscape with his unprecedented combination of serious discussion of political, cultural and social issues along with satirical and biting humor, which parodies previously “untouchable” personalities and topics. His passion inspires millions of Americans to be the best they can be and keeps the country on course to a bright future.

On August 1, 1988, Rush launched his phenomenally successful radio broadcast, The Rush Limbaugh Show, into national syndication with 56 radio stations. Now, 30 years later, the show is heard on more than 600 stations by up to 27 million people each week and is the highest-rated national radio talk show in America. Rush was awarded the Marconi Radio Award for “Syndicated Radio Personality of the Year” by the National Association of Broadcasters in 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2014. He was inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame in 1993, the National Association of Broadcasters Hall of Fame in 1998, and the Hall of Famous Missourians in 2012.

30 years of the best political radio ever made. Thank You Rush for 3 decades of great radio.

JEREMY CORBYN IS AN ANTI-SEMITE

By Pete Moore On August 1st, 2018 at 7:41 pm

Jeremy Corbyn was forced to issue an extraordinary apology last night after The Times revealed he hosted an event that compared the Israeli government to the Nazis at the House of Commons on Holocaust Memorial Day.

In January 2010 when he was a backbencher, Mr Corbyn spoke at and opened a talk entitled Never Again — for Anyone. The event was part of a UK tour called Never Again for Anyone — Auschwitz to Gaza.

For a man who claims to not be an anti-Semite, Jeremy Corbyn has an awful lot of friends who are anti-Semites. And he winds up at an awful lot of anti-Semitic events. And the party he leads indulges an awful lot of antisemitism while hammering its Jewish members who complain of antisemitism.

It’s quite clear by now that Jeremy Corbyn is an anti-Semite. I don’t know why his supporters are coy about admitting it. We know now why Corbyn wouldn’t sign Labour up to the internationally accepted definition of antisemitism; it’s because he’s guilty on some points.

And we know that his extreme Left Wing tradition regards Israel is imperialist, capitalist and pro-Western, so must be brought down. Which is why his fellow travelers sail along happily in that boat. They simply ought to be honest and admit it. I don’t particularly mind. Some people are simply anti-Semitic. We are as we are. It’s the coyness about it all which is the giveaway. It’s so cowardly.

WELCOME HOME TOMMY

By Pete Moore On August 1st, 2018 at 7:32 pm

Our brother patriot, Tommy Robinson, is a free man tonight. His conviction for contempt of court has been quashed.

Yesterday the Court of Appeal found that that judge had rushed into proceedings despite Robinson having removed the video from the internet.

The appeal judges also found he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty, despite it being unclear what he was admitting to, and there had been a “muddle” about the nature of the contempt he faced.

The judges said they were satisfied that the decision at Leeds to proceed to committal to prison “so promptly”, and without “due regard” to rules governing procedures surrounding someone alleged to have acted in contempt of court “gave rise to unfairness”.

They added that the haste in bringing him to court back in May meant his barrister, found during a 33 minute adjournment, had “limited opportunity… to investigate mitigation” or obtain character references.

The case goes back for retrial. But what’s clear is that he was convicted by a kangaroo court for political reasons. He’s not the first patriot to so suffer, nor will he be the last. What a shameful episode this is, a dirty stain which will will never scrub clean.

SOME CULTURES ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS

By Pete Moore On August 1st, 2018 at 7:20 pm

A nine year old Afghan girl has been strangled to death by her 35 year old husband. She was given to him when she was seven years old, to settle a debt.

Can I suggest that we put Afghans on an immigration blacklist? Or would that not be nice?

WHAT POPULATION REPLACEMENT?

By Pete Moore On July 31st, 2018 at 9:58 pm

Remember commies, when you campaign for illegal immigrants and mass immigration, you’re just a tool of crony, globalist corporates who want to keep wages down. Don’t be dupes all your lives.

There’s nothing wrong with a so-called ageing population. Europe is too overcrowded in many parts already anyway. We need fewer people, not more, and certainly not millions of low-IQ immigrants fit for crime and welfare.