26 3 mins 4 yrs

It’s a remarkable tale worthy of a piece of fiction by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. I refer to the strange case of the 4000+ people who went to Whitehall on Sunday afternoon and then, mysteriously, vanished into the media ether.

Here is the last known image of the missing in action.

4000+ people vanish in London on a Sunday afternoon.

Those tenured cucks “world class” journalists at the BBC were unable to locate this substantial rally for Free Speech at the heart of Government in London and just a few yards from the steps of Number Ten Downing Street. Other media outlets including LBC seemed equally unable to locate the masses gathered together to protest censorship.When LBC’s Iain Dale was asked about this on Monday he responded that it was old news by that point and thus LBC, and he, would not cover it. Dale, of course, is part of the problem.

But hush, not ALL the legacy media failed to locate the massive crowd. Oh no. The Guardian reported that…

4000+ people vanish in London on a Sunday afternoon.

I’m not sure how many years it has been since Tommy Robinson left the EDL but the left wing media love a good targeted wolf whistle in a headline to excite their feral base. Never mind that amongst those present were liberals, atheists, Christians, Jews, ex-Muslims, Sikhs, members of the LGBT community.

It appears that to merely demand free speech is now to be labelled as “right wing” if not “Nazi” thus proving that the left are all about censorship and restricting free speech.

Of course the highlight of the day, for me, was the speech given by our very own Shazia Hobbs. Here is an brief excerpt;


The way in which the legacy media has ignored this large public display vindicates the point of it. Of COURSE they don’t want to hear what the voices present have to say. Of COURSE they are happy to collude with the political class and label patriots as “far right”. And of COURSE the next such rally should aim to be twice the size!

We’re not going anywhere and legacy media will eventually be ignored in the same way as it ignored the Day for Freedom.

You see in the final analysis the legacy media doesn’t want to report on the problems the stellar gallery of speakers highlighted because it is PART of the problem. We won’t get freedom until we marginalise the utterly corrupt cucked media.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

26 thoughts on “4000+ people vanish in London on a Sunday afternoon!

  1. It appears that to merely demand free speech is now to be labelled as “right wing” ..

    In a way it is Right Wing. The Left has won the culture war, so the Left now opposes free speech because it’s the Left and the Left’s strictures which will be targeted by free speech. So the Left has ceded that battleground to the Right.

    In fact there was a small Left Wing counter-demo yesterday. Yes, the Left actually counter-demonstrated an apolitical rally in favour of free speech. One that had gays and socialists at its head.

    The Guardian misrepresented it of course, and the BBC still hasn’t noticed thousands of what it would regard as extremists in Whitehall. These are fake news organisations.

  2. agree with that petem to a degree, i remind my christian colleagues that the cultural wars as far as issues like abortion, gay marriage and so on have been lost . Ireland is about to vote on abortion. Be a brave pundit who calls it for the status quo to remain.

  3. The real reason it wasn’t reported much in the media is because it was peaceful. Peaceful gatherings are dull in a 24 hour media cycle that demands BREAKING NEWS. Had there been fewer demonstrators but it had descended into rioting there would have been live updates all evening.

  4. I’m not sure how many years it has been since Tommy Robinson left the EDL

    I’m pretty sure that Robinson is still right wing, no matter how much he tries to reinvent himself as a ‘journalist?’ I’d also be pretty sure that’s why the Guardian’s headline correctly included the adjective ‘former’

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/06/thousands-of-far-right-protesters-march-in-london-in-support-of-free-speech

    The left wing media love a good targeted wolf whistle in a headline to excite their feral base. Never mind that amongst those present were liberals, atheists, Christians, Jews, ex-Muslims, Sikhs, members of the LGBT community.

    Seems like the ‘left wing media’ are damned if they do report and damned if they don’t.

    I can almost taste the cant and begrudgery from here.

  5. The real reason it wasn’t reported much in the media is because it was peaceful

    The left wing thugs Antifa didn’t bother then?.

  6. More of a march for ignorance
    to write “Islam promotes killing people” is lunacy
    to write “some sects within Islam promote killing” is correct.
    I would attend a march that would help us get back to good grammer 😉

  7. // the strange case of the 4000+ people who went to Whitehall on Sunday afternoon and then, mysteriously, vanished into the media ether.//

    Why strange? I thought thousands of people disappear all the time in war zones.

  8. I thought thousands of people disappear all the time in war zones.

    Magnificent 🙂

  9. From the Guardian article:

    Yiannopoulos told the crowd: “Truth and righteousness are behind you. You are the vanguard, you are the dark nights, the first men and women to proudly stand with your heads above the parapet, caring nothing for the bullets that come your way and I salute you.

    Milo whatisname is obviously trying to claw back some credibility after being thrown under the bus by the Alt Right for invoking his right to free speech and declaring that he thinks it okay for older peadophiles to have sex with under age boys.

  10. Milo whatisname is obviously trying to claw back some credibility after being thrown under the bus by the Alt Right for invoking his right to free speech and declaring that he thinks it okay for older peadophiles to have sex with under age boys.

    The alt-right considers it not OK for older paedophiles to have sex with under-age boys, hence his move to the alt-lite.

  11. Milo whatisname does however and and despite being a peado enabler excuser was still given a platform with the other right wingers at this march.

  12. Paul McMahon, on May 7th, 2018 at 8:42 PM Said:
    Milo whatisname does however and and despite being a peado enabler excuser was still given a platform with the other right wingers at this march.

    Harriet Harman admits paedophile group joined her civil liberties group in the 1970s. 24 Feb 2014. One leaflet sent by PIE to MPs claimed: “Paedophiles are ordinary, decent, sensible human beings, …

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10659169/Harriet-Harman-admits-paedophile-group-joined-her-civil-liberties-group-in-the-1970s.html

  13. Harri, Milo whatisname said it was okay for thirteen year old boys to have sex with older men in 2017.

    Despite being a peado enabler excuser was still given a platform with the other right wingers at this march.

    Hardly the same thing mate.

  14. I consider the woman in the above video a friend. She is the salt of the earth, a good person, and a good mother.

    She is attacked and lives under threat because she has the cojones to speak openly and honestly.

    If you lot find something wrong with her you’re only revealing something wrong in YOU!

  15. Pat, I have no idea who the woman speaking is and have no particular interest in finding out.

    If she’s a friend maybe you could ask her as the salt of the earth, a good person, and a good mother, what her thoughts were on sharing the platform with a peadophile enabler excuser?

  16. Says the man who has shared drinks with people involved in planting bombs that killed innocent men woman and children.

    Sharing a drink with members of the IRA is a lot more intimate than sharing a venue, or would we be wrong to judge you by your standard?

    Her name is Shazia Hobbs.

  17. No, I’ve shared drinks and friendships with those who have been responsible for killing military personel and those who were responsible for formulating British Government policy in Ireland.

    I have never to my knowledge shared a drink or anything else with those that have knowingly killed innocents.

    Now, do you think it acceptable tha a peado enabler was given a platform to speak at this rally?

    Many thanx for hosting that blog Pat.

  18. All people have a right to speak.

    A concept all of your societies lack.

    Did he advocate sex with little boys or even little girls at this rally?

    I think not.

  19. Did he advocate sex with little boys or even little girls at this rally?

    I think not

    No he didn’t but he did advocate both adult hetro and homosexual sex with thirteen year old boys last year.

    Do you think it correct that promotion of such peadophile practices be forgotten about because he holds a political opinion that the organisers of the march agree with and thus it was proper for him to be given a platform?

  20. The controversy that follows Milo has always been more innuendo than fact or proven fact anyway.

    I personally have never been a fan, but the attacks he has suffered have far outweighed anything he has been proven guilty of. If someone promotes a point of view and you disagree with it you counter it with your own.

    No Milo may be the scum of the Earth, but those that have destroyed campuses, attacked people who lined up to see him, who brush anyone who shares an event with him with the brush of paedophilia at Free Speech Rally…. those are the ones that have no credibility.

    No they are the fascists.

  21. The controversy that follows Milo has always been more innuendo than fact or proven fact anyway.

    Not this time. He absolutely advocated having sex with thirteen year old boys and seems to defend clerical peadophilia too:

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/cpac-milo-yiannopoulos-pedophilia.html

    Who brush anyone who shares an event with him with the brush of paedophilia at Free Speech Rally…. those are the ones that have no credibility.

    I don’t know who’s brushed anyone apart from Milo whatsisname with peadophilia Pat.

    I asked was it acceptable that because he holds a political opinion that the organisers of the march agree with that promotion of such peadophile practices be forgotten and thus it was proper for him to be given a platform?

    It was you who brought the lady speaking into the equation.

    Once again, do you think it acceptable tha a peado enabler was given a platform to speak at this rally?

  22. I see that a Norwegian who holds views “which are not commensurate with British society” has been denied return entry to the UK and shall be sent back to Austria from where his return flight departed:

    https://sputniknews.com/viral/201805081064239667-norway-uk-entry-wrong-values/

    Tore Rasmussen, a prominent figure of the anti-immigration movement Generation Identity, has become yet another right-wing activist banned from entering the UK for committing nothing but “thoughtcrime.”

    By his own admission, Tore Rasmussen had been detained at Gatwick Airport, London, because British authorities believed his views represented a “serious threat” to the UK.

    Thirty-seven-year-old Tore Rasmussen has been living in London since last December. On Friday evening he arrived home after a trip to Austria, but was stopped at passport control by the border authorities. A few hours later he was handed a denial of entry and was ordered to return to Austria with the next flight.

    https://www.aftenposten.no/verden/i/7lwnLB/Nordmann-anholdt-og-nektet-innreise-pa-London-flyplass-pa-grunn-av-verdier-og-holdninger

    British ‘society’ voted to leave the EU: disagreement with this is not commensurate with British society.

Comments are closed.