web analytics


By ATWadmin On October 25th, 2009 at 11:57 am

WHILE the government and its media mouthpieces have been feigning outrage over the BNP this last year:

Leading members of a group that wants to bring down the British state and replace it with a dictatorship under Islamic law have secured more than £100,000 of taxpayers’ money for a chain of schools. Accounts filed at the Charity Commission show that the Government paid a total of £113,411 last year to a foundation run by senior members and activists of Hizb ut-Tahrir — a notorious Islamic extremist group that ministers promised to ban.

I’m going out for a while and may be some time.

h/t old holborn


By ATWadmin On October 25th, 2009 at 10:17 am

“Secret court seizes £3.2bn from elderly… and even forces furious families to pay to access own bank account” says the MoS.

A secret court is seizing the assets of thousands of elderly and mentally impaired people and turning control of their lives over to the State – against the wishes of their relatives.

The draconian measures are being imposed by the little-known Court of Protection, set up two years ago to act in the interests of people suffering from Alzheimer’s or other mental incapacity.

The court hears about 23,000 cases a year – always in private – involving people deemed unable to take their own decisions. Using far-reaching powers, the court has so far taken control of more than £3.2billion of assets.

How lucky are we that the all-loving benevolent state is caring for us? This lucky:

The cases involve civil servants from the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG), which last year took £23million in fees directly from the bank accounts of those struck down by mental illness, involved in accidents or suffering from dementia.

Oh great, we now have an ‘Office of Public Guardian’. Where do I report for my morning exercises?

Thanks, Labour voters. The standard advice applies.


By ATWadmin On October 24th, 2009 at 11:55 am

WE can’t say they didn’t warn us. A “new Britain” is precisely what the Labour Party promised in 1997 and millions of drones voted for it. Thanks alot, arseholes.

Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

We we haven’t been swamped by millions of aliens, dispossessed of our ancient liberties and robbed of our nationhood only because Labour is a faction of revolutionary communists who despise our nation and actually believe the Marxist sociology that was pumped into their heads at university in the 1960s and 70s. These things happened also because New Labour wanted to rub the Right’s nose in diversity.

The destruction of British society by toxic racial aggravation; not the policy of misguided, overgrown students but the intended objective of the government since 1997.

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within Government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”

The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

Sean Gabb, in his recent speech, stated:

The purpose of the Government that took power in 1997 was to bring about a revolutionary transformation of this country – a transformation from which there could be no return to what had been before.

In the entirety of English history, an Englishman would have lived and died in a land recognisably his own; the language, customs, laws, liberties and civil values were Anglo Saxon in origin and his own. This wicked revolutionary Labour junta has denied us our Anglo Saxon way of life and made our land unrecognisable in little more than a decade. We are foreigners in our own land, our children are denied their heritage, our customs crushed and our laws are turned against us “to rub the Right’s nose in diversity”. 

The next election (please, Labour voters, feel free to kill yourselves first) is about more than kicking out the worst government in our history, a regime which long made itself illegitimate, the election is about crushing for good this cancer on our nationhood.


By ATWadmin On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:31 pm

YESTERDAY I posted the text of a speech by Sean Gabb, the subject of which is the revolutionary and liberty-destroying change that has been imposed on the British people. Part of that speech reads (my emphasis):

They tell us they want to end “child poverty” and “build a more equal society”. In fact, they have employed an army of social workers to terrorise every working class family in the country – an army of social workers backed by closed and secretive courts, and that may even be selecting children for legal kidnap and sale to barren middle class couples.

Today we discover:

An obese couple’s seven children are all to be taken into care after their newborn daughter was removed over fears she would become dangerously overweight.Three children had already been removed by social services before the infant was taken from her mother within hours of her birth. Now her ‘heartbroken’ parents have learned that their three other children will be taken away from them too. They say the children of the so-called ‘fat family’ are being removed over fears they would also become clinically obese.

Those seven children have been abducted by the state, at the order of a secret court which heard the testimony of the state’s ‘social workers’ but which did not allow the parents to speak.

But don’t vote BNP ok, ‘cos they’re vile. 


By ATWadmin On October 21st, 2009 at 9:10 pm

SO the old Generals accused the BNP of tarnishing the British military with the party’s adoption of iconic images in its publicity material. BNP leader Nick Griffin hit back, accusing the old Generals of being war criminals and reminding them of the fate of Nazi Generals at Nuremburg.

Back come the old Generals – Guthrie, Jackson and Dannat – and others with military connections, with more accusations against the BNP.

It all reminds me of the Queen’s 2004 Christmas Message, which we are assured she drafted herself, in which she effectively told the British people to shut up and accept the multicultural world that had been imposed on them. Even after this drivel we’re still told the Queen is “above politics”, just like the military is supposedly “above politics”. Well of course she isn’t and we see also that the military isn’t either, not when Generals are rolled out to make political attacks on a lawful British political party.

In the forty eight hours ahead of Griffin’s appearance on BBC Question Time, this British politician is being attacked by the British military establishment. I wonder, on whose behalf?

MI5 And A Sense Of Priorities

By ATWadmin On October 3rd, 2009 at 2:11 pm

How heartening to see not all of our tax money is wasted:

MI5 held a secret file on Harold Wilson throughout the time he was Labour Prime Minister, The Times can reveal ….. Wilson’s MI5 file was opened in 1945 when he became an MP and remained one of the Security Service’s most closely kept secrets throughout his premierships, 1964-1970 and 1974-1976.

Good. A suspected communist like Harold Wilson should be under the eye of MI5. Most Labour MPs are Fabians and former (and not-so-former) commies.

I hope the spooks have a file on all of them. 

Just Popping Out

By ATWadmin On August 27th, 2009 at 8:18 pm

THERE be dragons here. A Bank Holiday weekend has been made a touch longer by me; tomorrow capitalism will have to save itself while I go for a stroll in the country. So it’s way out west I go, past even Offa’s Dyke (memo to self: pack more ammo) and onto The Unpronounceables.

Have fun, whatever you’re doing.

Now There’s A Question …

By ATWadmin On August 8th, 2009 at 9:57 am

Guy Herbert asks –

What does one call a state partially ruled by a club for police chiefs and ‘law enforcement’ bureaucrats who do not wish to obey the law?

The club in question being (of course) the Association of Chief Police Officers, a private limited company that’s doing rather well.

Here’s Your Welfare State

By ATWadmin On July 21st, 2009 at 5:03 pm

IF THE graph below showed average global temperatures in the 20th Century, we can guess at the reaction of the ruling Establishment. We know it would be drastic, terrifying, would claim our wealth and proscribe our liberties. We know this because, on the basis of wholly equivocal evidence on the course of the planet’s climate, humanity’s influence on it and what we ought to do about it, the reaction of the ruling Establishment has been drastic, terrifying, has (but of course) claimed our wealth and proscribed our liberties.

source (pdf)

But as you can see, the graph – resembling something of a ‘hockey stick’, one might say – shows instead the course of crime in England and Wales during the 20th Century. From the lowest crime to the most heinous, in the words of the House of Commons report from which the graph is taken, it “records offences that are reported to the police and recorded by them.”

In other words, dear reader, we see in graphic form the inexorable rise of crime that has taken place under the growth of the British welfare state and an increasingly intrusive and fascistic style of government.

We see a marginal rise of crime in the 25 years to 1955. This may be partly explained by the welfare state being broadly in place by the mid-1930s. But look again at the from 1955 onwards. There are those who will tell you that “there has always been crime”, as if a society that was once famed for its gentility and civilisation has always been as violent as it now is. (We can dismiss the miraculous dip at the end, coinciding as it does with a New Labour administration that has rendered crime statistics meaningless). 

We can see now it simply isn’t true that crime levels have always been as great as they now are. What we can see is that, within memory for many of our compatriots, our country was once remarkably free of crime. The line from 1955 – in my opinion – represents the catastrophic effects of the growth of government and the welfare state, the war against our Christian morality, the destruction of marriage and the family, the effective banishment of any meaningful punishment for criminal behaviour and thousands more undoubtedly catastrophic social policies inflicted on the British people by an Establishment which protects itself with wealth and men with guns. 

That line represents millions of crimes and incalculable misery, all avoidable but made and fostered and sustained by the welfare state and the social policies of successive British governments. But then I would say that.

What is undeniable is that something went very terribly wrong in our nation in the last century, didn’t it? Shouldn’t we wonder, therefore, at the complacency of an Establishment that has presided over this breakdown in civilisation while waging apparent total war in the name of tweaking temperatures decades into the future?

To put it another way, instead of reversing our economy back into the 17th Century, shouldn’t we instead undo decades of ruinous social policy?

Who Am I, And What Year Is It?

By ATWadmin On June 30th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

THE SUN is out, the sky is blue and “a burglar who broke into a house and threatened a pensioner with a knife got more than he bargained for when the victim turned out to be a retired boxer who left him bruised and bleeding“.

Frank Corti, 72, who served with the Royal Engineers in North Africa from 1956-58, dodged the knife and punched Gregory McCalium, 23, twice in the face, giving him a black eye and a swollen lip. He then restrained the attacker until police arrived.

So he did (permission to guffaw granted) –

It gets better –

McCalium, a barman, was given a four-and-a-half year prison sentence at Oxford Crown Court on Monday for aggravated burglary and was told by the judge he had “got what he deserved”.

And all of a sudden, it’s Life on Mars and I’m disoriented.