Well, this should really help boost the prospects of those who wish to do the jobs that Brits just won’t do.

Citizens from nine new EU member states, most in Eastern Europe, will be able to travel without a passport to most other countries in the bloc after ministers endorsed plans to lift border checks. Wolfgang Schäuble, the German Interior Minister, said that the decision fulfilled the dream of establishing a united Europe after the 1989 fall of the Iron Curtain. The opening of the borders with the nine countries – Slovakia, Slovenia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic and Malta – will be marked with ceremonies at former border crossings a minute after midnight on December 21.

No borders = No Nations. Eurabia moves closer. Welcome to the future. 

I’ve never been to the Balkans but I have every confidence that the Balkans will soon be coming to me, and YOU too, dear reader. I say this in the light of the EU statement that it expects all western Balkan countries by the end of 2008 to have signed initial deals paving the way for eventual entry into the bloc. The announcement affects Serbia, Bosnia-Hercegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Macedonia and Albania.

Great news! Can you guess which EU nation they will be happily eyeing up as their desired place of welfare residence? It’s amazing to watch the EU continue to grow like one great big malignant tumour, constantly absorbing nation states – whilst our political class pretend that this “project” is all destined  for a happy outcome when it clearly won’t. My advice is to brush up on some elementary Albanian as in a few years time, they are going to be the folks who do the jobs that other Eastern Europeans  just won’t do, in Britain.

The media have been having fun closing down any prospect of any real debate over the fact that Britain cannot/will not  control immigration. The Independent reports that Conservative Leader David Cameron faces further "embarrassment" today after Tory activists produced leaflets making "lurid predictions" about the scale of immigration and claiming that newcomers jumped hospital waiting lists.

The leaflets were distributed in the West Midlands borough where the Tory parliamentary candidate Nigel Hastilow was forced to resign after insisting that Enoch Powell was right on immigration. Labour said the language proved that grassroots members were continuing to whip up hostility to immigrants in defiance of Mr Cameron’s promises to root out racism.

Just one cotton-pickin’ second! Why is it that any criticism of uncontrolled immigration is "lurid", exactly? Is it factually incorrect and if so where is the evidence to support this? Why is that the years of this socialistt Government LYING to us about the numbers coming into our country was not "lurid"? And on what basis can anyone defend the scale of immigration, precisely?

The reality is that Labour is profoundly committed to the principle of continued uncontrolled immigration. It’s nihilistic multiculti zeal knows no limits. This constant screaming of "racism" whenever anyone asserts the dangers posed by a Nation without borders (it’s not a Nation any longer, more of a large Welfare waiting reception room) is designed to silence all debate. I also think that the immigration debate itself is a faux debate – since even the Conservatives only refer to seeking to limit immigration from OUTSIDE the EU. However as the EU itself morphs into Eurabia, and as there is no barrier to the huge numbers of EU "nationals" coming here, (EU immigration accounts for around 70% of those coming into the UK) it is clear that there really is only one credible solution; The UK must remove itself from the EU whilst seeking to remain a good neighbour. The longer we stay in the EU, the deeper we sink into the mire. The closing down of debate on this issue, and the total dishonesty of the political intelligentsia, proves that the EU and democratic debate cannot co-exist.

We have covered several stories in recent times on ATW which basically repeat the same theme, namely that the UK Government cannot remove foreign criminals since this will infringe their "human rights."  One instance of this was the decision to allow Learco Chindamo to stay in the UK, even though he had murdered Phillip Lawrence. It was claimed that that Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, which protects individuals’ right to a family life, meant he could not be sent to Italy as he had left that country aged six and his family were in Britain.

So, how interesting to read that  Italy’s government has toughened its stance with a decree allowing police to expel fellow European Union citizens who are believed to be dangerous to society. The decree by Prime Minister Romano Prodi came into force for the first full day today and followed a spate of violent crimes in Italy, many blamed on immigrants from Romania, which joined the EU this year. Mayor of Rome, Walter Veltroni, has claimed that Romanians made up 75% of the arrests for crimes including rape, theft, murder in the first seven months of the year.

So, even Italy can find the cajones to get rid of violent foreigners whilst the eunuchs in our Government just haplessly trot out excuses why they cannot take any action. It’s not that can’t – it’s because they do not wish to.

The EU really does dislike the idea of the serfs people of the Nation States having their say, doesn’t it?

We see the cowardly UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown refusing to allow the British people a chance to speak on the European Constitition Treaty but he ‘s not the only Eurocrat determined to shut the people up. The Dutch Parliament is doing exactly the same – as Klein Verzet exposes here.

The fact that this government is willing to completely bypass parliamentarian accountability in such a brazen manner on this issue should give anyone pause. Evidently the ….(Treaty) is not only in need of the big lie to be acceptable. It also needs strong-arming the supposedly democratic process which is now recruited to sign away the sovereignty of the Netherlands. Who’d have thought this would be the state of affairs in contemporary Netherlands even as little as two years ago?

That’s the way with the EU – It is an imposition, a tyranny, a nail in the coffin of democracy. The elite are scared of the people, and are circumventing the common will. It will all end in euro-tears but not until there is a mass uprising by those who are being ignored.

My thanks to the ATW reader for the link.

A couple of days late due to me being away.

Christopher Booker’s Notebook, essential reading for a clear persepctive on the true nature of the EU, related the following tale in the Sunday Telegrah at the weekend. In 2003, when he was 19, Joe Mendy was on holiday with two friends in the Canaries. One evening, several Spanish policemen arrived, asking to be taken to their room. After a search the three young black Englishmen were taken to a police station and charged with counterfeiting four 50 Euro notes.

Two fake notes had allegedly been passed off in the town, one was found in the possession of one of the friends and a fourth was found in the room. The three men were held in custody for two days, subjected to racial abuse and given hardly anything to eat. When a court then told them to report back next morning, they returned to their room to find most of their belongings had been stolen.

Next day the court allowed them to return to England but told them they would be hearing from the Spanish authorities again. No more was heard until March this year. Officers of the Serious Organised Crime Agency arrived at Mr Mendy’s family home in Camden. His mother told them he was living in Liverpool, waiting to go to university. The officers gave her a number for him to call, which he did. When they didn’t call back, he rang them again and was told he would be hearing from Liverpool police.

The Liverpool police served him with a European Arrest Warrant. He was held in the cells overnight and driven to London. When he said he wished to appeal against the warrant, he was released on bail but in July his appeal was refused (he had been told such appeals are hardly ever upheld). He went to Heathrow, where he was arrested by Spanish police. On arriving in Madrid he learned that the Spanish courts were on holiday and was kept in jail for two months.

In September his Spanish lawyer told him that if he pleaded guilty he would only be given a small fine and a suspended sentence. But if he chose to maintain his innocence (there was not a shred of evidence against him), he could expect to remain in prison for a year until his case was heard. Reluctantly he paid 600 Euros and returned to England, having had to postpone for a year his entry to university.

To an almost empty House of Commons, when confonted with the case, a junior Home Office minister, Meg Hillier, said she could not discuss the case in detail. But she insisted the EU’s warrant was necessary to fight serious cross-border crime, and said "we must have faith in our European partners" that the system would work fairly.

Here is a classic example of the Queen and her government entirely ignoring constitutional constraint. Clearly the Queen and her government do not recognise the absolute supremacy of our Constitution. If they did, a Briton would not be treated in such a dreadful and arbitrary manner on the orders of foreign state agents while in his own country. The Serious Organised Crime Agency was created by the Blair government and, uniquely for any British police force, is not required to swear the Oath of Allegiance to the Crown. We can see now why its staff are not required to do so; plainly, its allegiance is to foreign law and foreign powers.

So if that supremacy of the British Constitution no longer exists, then the supremacy of the Crown no longer exists, and if this be so, then Parliament, which draws its legitimacy from the Crown is now an unlawful assembly, and our courts are acting out a charade. The English Law they exercise now being in the nature of local by-law, subordinate to foreign law as agreed upon by Elizabeth the Useless, the woman who swore to govern the British people "in accordance with their laws and traditions" and who then betrayed us. 

I laughed at this story over on Shortnews.com concerning a man who saved the life of a lady who had gotten caught in train doors, and was subsequently fined!

A Belgian man has been fined €60 for delaying a commuter train after he helped a woman from being crushed that was stuck between the doors. "I apparently could have caused a delay and that is not permitted," said Daniël Dewulf.

 

He added, "The train arrived right on time in Bruges in any event. The conductor did not see my point that I may have saved the woman’s life as a mitigating circumstance. Result: 60-euro fine."

Railway officials have since nixed the charge, saying that Dewulf did nothing wrong and did help avert a worse outcome, adding "We also offer our apologies. We should have in fact fined the woman in question for boarding the train after the whistle."

I see that the "right-wing" Swiss People’s Party has won the most votes ever recorded in a general election in Switzerland. Naturally they are portrayed as bigots and extremists. The SVP, led by the controversial billionaire and Swiss Justice Minister Christoph Blocher won 29 per cent of the vote in Sunday’s general election and seven extra seats in the national parliament. The final result published yesterday by Switzerland’s Federal Statistics Office firmly secured the controversial SVP’s position as the largest party in the Swiss parliament.

"We have reached the highest score in the history of Switzerland’s present day electoral system," said Ueli Maurer, the SVP party president after the result. His party’s election posters featured three white sheep standing on a red and white Swiss national flag kicking a black sheep out of the country. Alongside ran the slogan "More Security!" Is this racist? If so, then the majority of Swiss voters must be racist. Is this possible? Or might it be that even the mild mannered Swiss can see that borders must be protected?

Say what you want about the Nazis but at least they made the trains run on time. It appears that one in four Germans believe some aspects of the Nazi era were positive, according to a poll published after a dispute about the Nazis and their attitude towards the family. Asked whether National Socialism was wholly negative or had some good points, 25% of respondents to the Forsa institute poll said yes, while 70% said no. The poll was published in Stern magazine to accompany an essay on "Why every fourth German still believes National Socialism had its good sides". It comes after a debate sparked last month by a television presenter who said the Nazis’ attitude towards the family had been positive.

Mmm..not for Jewish families. Not for families of those nations they invaded. Not for families of anyone who opposed their tyranny. It seems that older Germans have a lot of respect for one of the most wicked political regimes that has ever been. Shame on them. Mind you, quite a few in the former USSR republics look back on the Stalin era with deep fondness – I mean tractor production has never been as good as it was back then.

Well now, I see that Zimbabwean thug-in-chief Robert Mugabe is entitled to attend a Europe-Africa summit in December, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said this weekend. Her pronouncement puts her at odds with Gordon Brown, who has threatened to boycott the talks if Mugabe goes. So, what’s it to be Gordon, will we witness ANOTHER bottling-out or will you stick by your word? And doesn’t it speak volumes about EU values that it extends a welcome to genocidal racist tyrant Mugabe?