7 3 mins 10 yrs

Some interesting thoughts from Dr David Starkey writing in the Telegraph this morning;

One of the most striking things about the England riots is where they did not happen: Yorkshire, the North East, Wales and Scotland. These areas contain some of the worst pockets of unemployment in the country. But they are also characterised by a powerful sense of regional or national identity and difference that cuts across all classes and binds them together. And it is this, I am sure, which has inoculated them against the disease of “gangsta” culture and its attendant, indiscriminate violence.

Scotland, Alex Salmond says smugly, is a “different culture”. It is indeed, since the Scots are allowed – and even encouraged – to be as racist as they please and hate the English with glad abandon.

I do not want a similar licensed xenophobia here. But an English nationalism we must have. And it must be one that includes all our people: white and black and mixed race alike.

I think he is right. England is not allowed to be nationalistic, unlike the Celtic fringe. Why? Is it because the metropolitan elite consider nationalism below them? Or is it perhaps too dangerous a genie to be allowed out of the bottle? I have often speculated upon why the English people allow the Celtic fringe to rip them off so much? Why do they work so hard – and here I am talking about the South-East of England in particular – so that government can take their taxes and redistribute to the welfare class elsewhere who deign work beneath their dignity? Why, for that matter, should they accept that Scottish MP’s can interfere in their affairs at Westminster whilst they cannot influence what happens at Hollyrood?

I have no problems with English Nationalism given the generous nature of the English people. I don’t always agree with them but I do believe they should be allowed to speak on how their wealth is spent, on what their priorities are, and how this is best politically expressed.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

7 thoughts on “ENGLISH NATIONALISM NOW?

  1. English nationalism will lead to an independent England which will break up the UK, be careful what you wish for

  2. I do not want a similar licensed xenophobia here. But an English nationalism we must have. And it must be one that includes all our people: white and black and mixed race alike

    The above will lead to the elimination of indigenous English people because Africans are not English and can never be English.

    Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi is credited with being the founder of the first popular movement for a United Europe. In the early 1920s he joined a Masonic lodge in Vienna. Later, in 1925, he wrote a book called ‘Practical Idealism’ in which he clearly described the genocidal roots of the European Union. In it he said:

    “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

    References to ‘vanishing prejudice’ give the illusion that there was some sort of altruistic element to their desire for a united Europe. Make no mistake, the idea of encouraging mass immigration from Asia and Africa has long been part of the European Union ‘project’. The intention wasn’t only to destroy the indigenous populations of Europe but also to create a new, more easily controlled, dumbed-down mulattos capable of serving the ‘blue-blood’ royalty and aristocracy who still, to this day, really control things.

    But this ‘mongrelising’ of the masses is but one part of the enslavement agenda. Bertrand Russell, in his book ‘The Impact of Science on Society’ (1953) p49-50, gave a clear indication of the long term goals of this Satanic ‘elite’:

    “Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”

    That those at the top of our society are driven by something approaching pure evil can now be demonstrated. Here are the closing scene sfrom the Olympics of 2008 in which the murder of 13 people on a London bus of 7/7 is ‘celebrated’.

    http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/61906/London_2012_7_7_Olympics_Sacrifice_Ritual/

    Bryan Sykes is a Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of Wolfson College. His research into this area led him to the conclusion that:

    “In spite of all these later contributions, the genetic makeup of Britain and Ireland is overwhelmingly what it has been since the Neolithic period and to a very considerable extent since the Mesolithic period”.

    He summed this up in a quote from his book ‘The Blood of the Isles’, published in 2006:

    “We are an ancient people, and though the Isles have been the target of invasion and opposed settlement from abroad ever since Julius Caesar first stepped on to the shingle shores of Kent, these have barely scratched the topsoil of our deep-rooted ancestry. However we may feel about ourselves and about each other, we are genetically rooted in a Celtic past. The Irish, the Welsh and the Scots know this, but the English sometimes think otherwise. But, just a little way beneath the surface, the strands of ancestry weave us all together as the children of a common past”.

    Dr. Noel Ignatiev is a Jewish American history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art. He’s also a Communist and a Marxist. He wrote:

    “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”

    So it seems that if you oppose this genocide in any way you will be labelled a ‘white supremacist.’ Dr. Ignatiev also made the incredibly racist and wholly inaccurate statement:

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”

    He then gets even worse when he adds:

    “Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed, not deconstructed, but destroyed.”

    As one commenter asked, what ‘social construct’ will remain? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?” I suspect ‘the social construct that will be left’ will reflect what William Guy Carr said was the Luciferian aim. That is to ‘reduce mankind to one indistinguishable chaotic mess’ and therefore all the more easily enslaved ‘mind body and soul’.

    Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish which led another commenter to ask the following question. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race? It’s clear that Dr. Ignatiev believes it is self-evident that whites (English, French, German etc) in their homelands should be abolished. So too it appears does David Starkey.

  3. Allan,

    Yet more racist idiocy.

    David,

    I’ve always found the English lack of nationalism a bit odd…maybe something to do with a historic emphasis on the whole “British” project? It has allowed the EDL hooligan element to usurp it which is unfair and innacurate and it was good to see the real English patriotism around London for St George’s Day this year.

    Reclaim your flag!

  4. If you think about it English Nationalism really is a more diverse thing than that found in Wales and Scotland. Yorkshire has a nationalism related to the county of Yorkshire whilst Lancashire is similar in expression. The Northeast also has its own culture and a vocal identity which sets it apart whilst Cornwall, surrounded on three sides by water, also has an identity of its own. Could it be, therefore, that English Nationalism per se, does not exist but is really an amalgum of former loyalties?

  5. Mourne – you really debunked me there 🙂 If it is “racist idiocy” why not explain why it is racist idiocy.

  6. I like Dr David Starkey. He was great in Jamie Oliver’s “Dream School” recently, and Like our very own Troll he is a man who speaks his mind (which goes down well with me 😉 )
    He also knows his subject, has had to fight to get where he is and he is seriously handicapped: He comes from the North West of England…. 🙂
    Tough times like these often see seismic shifts in cultural values and attitudes. If like ne you are a devotee of Radio 4 and 5Live (I can’t get the Northern Ireland stations) you will realise that the old underlying values of common sense and appropriate retribution are re-surfacing. People are becoming fed up with the” namby pamby, benefits for all, no blame” culture.
    And damn right too. The English are being forced to wake up to what is happening, and I think there will be a resurgence not so much of English nationalism, but a return to the more traditional values that have shaped us. An absence of war is not always a good thing..
    Go David! (Starkey). You know it makes sense, Rodney 🙂

Comments are closed.