41 2 mins 10 yrs

The wretched Home Secretary, Theresa May, has conspired with the Metropolitan Police to ban a planned English Defence League march through Tower Hamlets in London. And the doesn’t stop there:

The home secretary has agreed to a police request to ban the far-right English Defence League from staging a march through one of the UK’s biggest Muslim communities in east London.

Theresa May said she would outlaw any marches in Tower Hamlets and four neighbouring boroughs – whether by the EDL or any other groups – for the next 30 days, having “balanced rights to protest against the need to ensure local communities and property are protected”.

So that’s all marches, protests and demonstrations banned for a month in a great chunk of London by executive fiat. Here’s some advice to the EDL and all who are barred from being heard: do it, make your voices heard. There are 63 million of us, just a few of them.

The streets belong to we, the people. They do not belong to the useless and clearly frightened police, they do not belong to any interior minister, to the government or any state agent. If a free-born Englishman wants to demonstrate on his streets he is free to do so at any time.

Compliance with a state directive is only obligatory as long as you believe it to be obligatory. The order to stay away is unBritish and illegitimate. Ignore it, put your walking boots on and reclaim your streets from these authoritarian parasites.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

41 thoughts on “THERESA MAY: ALL YOUR STREETS BELONG TO ME

  1. I think the EDL should be allowed to march, though I am concerned about the damage to the roadway from their knuckle dragging.

  2. Brave talk Pete! – you are so inspiring! you have convinced me to make a stand – ‘Once more unto the breach dear friends, – once more!’ – and all that bullshit.

    Where shall I meet you? outside the aptly named Tower Hamlets Cemetary Park? – or are we starting from the Mile End Road, or is it Bow Street? Or perhaps you are otherwise engaged on that day?

  3. I must agree with Pete here. The right to a Peaceful assembly should not be infringed, as our written Constitution puts it.

  4. charles,

    In this case it would be a meaningless gesture, we are already too far ‘down the road’ for such gratuitous aggravation to be of any use.

    The politicians would just ignore it, and the media would use it to further stigmatise any useful debate on the subject, and to label any supporters as thugs etc. even as ‘knuckle draggers’, and with which remark we see the hypocrisy of so-called liberals and their rather narrow definition and support of universal ‘free speech’.

    All too little and too late….

  5. I see what you’re saying Ernest, but IMHO, supporting someone’s constitutional right is never a meaningless gesture. Our rights are enshrined not to protect the popular march, but the unpopular, where the majority might be able to suppress minority opinion. I ave no doubt that this group just wants to be shite stirrers, but sometimes I want to express unpopular views, and I don’t want to be dragged off by the police while I peacefully do it.

  6. She’s right though. Communities have a right to live in peace, same with orange marches in nationalist areas. The rights of those who live in tower hamlets to live in peace must be respected. This march is contentious deliberately so, londoners don’t need more violence in their city.

  7. But in a march, someone will always be offended. That person can not have a veto over someone’s elses constitutional right.

  8. Do you really think this march would pass off peacefully, Charles? Most lkely the EDL knew that. They couldn’t exercise their constitutional right in a non contentious area? This isn’t about offence but keeping the peace and a governments first duty is to keep citizens safe and streets peaceful, so May has acted rightfully and in line with the law.

  9. Kateyo, who is the violence going to come from, the marchers, or the bystanders? You can’t stop a march b/c someone might be offended and might act out and commit a crime! That’s exactly the theory that southern sherriffs tried to use to stop civil rights marches in the 1960s!!!

  10. kateyo. There are no Orange marches in nationalist areas. A moment’s thought would show the sheer idiocy of such a statement. Check the Ardoyne where an Orange march merely skirts an ira supporting area, where supporters of bombers and murderers are bussed in to be offended. Now to the EDL. Let’s check this out. Did our Home Secretary ban those who burned a giant poppy? Erm! don’t think so! Did she ban those who insulted our troops in Luton? Erm! don’t think so! Why not? Oh! they were Muslims and are therefore allowed to insult our troops and our culture. Just as supporters of murderers are allowed to do in Northern Ireland.

  11. Well said Charles. The EDL is despicable and deeply racist, but they have the right to be heard.

  12. There is a perfectly simple solution which preserves the freedom to march but also gives communities the right to protest against unwelcome intrusion. The police should announce that they will not be turning up to protect the march. That would separate the men from the boys. Bully groups like the EDL and the Orange Order would soon back off.

  13. when people are brought onto the streets violence can come from anywhere, and there are competing rights involved of both protestoes and marchers but what of the rights of all in tower hamlet and even greater London? After the recent violence the British nation doesn’t need more violence in it’s capital, as for the civil rights marches the American south has changed and N Ireland has too, the orange state has gone, therefore you are not comparing like with like.

    The EDL are the BNP in disguise, they picked tower hamlets deliberately. No one needs to be offended this EDL like some who will protest, have there fanatics that would deliberately start trouble, May is within her rights to bann this.

  14. rob2 didn’t see your comment as I am on a small mobile at the mo like I said competing rights. Skirting an area and banging drums deliberately to cause offence ended in bother hence the rules about music when passing , the example you give is not a banned march merely restricted so I guess the idiocy can be shared with you;)

  15. Ernest,
    “Where shall I meet you? outside the aptly named Tower Hamlets Cemetary Park? – or are we starting from the Mile End Road, or is it Bow Street? ”

    Hows about HamD’illah Boulevard, Tower Hamlets??

  16. Tough call. I can argue both sides of this one.

    But in the US we let Neo Nazis march through a Jewish neighborhood, and protected the little bastards when they did so, and the earth was still in one place when it was over.

    This is the same Maggie May or whatever she calls herself who tweaked the job requirements so that only British citizens could apply for the Met top cop gig, since it was obvious that Bratton had nothing to teach anyone and that she and the British police establishment knew everything there was to know and have had an impeccable record on the streets of London.

  17. “The EDL are the BNP in disguise, they picked tower hamlets deliberately. No one needs to be offended this EDL like some who will protest, have there fanatics that would deliberately start trouble, May is within her rights to bann this.”

    Can’t agree with you on this KateyO.
    If some believe our nation and culture is under threat from extremist Islamic groups,
    and they see that the State allows those groups to demonstrate and preach hatred against the British/Christian culture, and to state their intention to set up Shari’a compliant areas in our inner cities;
    but RULES AGAINST members of the White/British/Christian host culture from opposing the destruction of their culture..
    and you think they should do nothing????????

  18. “Well said Charles. The EDL is despicable and deeply racist, but they have the right to be heard.”
    Peter,
    WHY do you say they are “deeply racist”?

  19. Kateyo –

    The EDL are the BNP in disguise, they picked tower hamlets deliberately.

    Well, the EDL and the BNP aren’t really the same, at least not yet since the EDL hasn’t been operational long enough for spooks to take it over.

    And why should English patriots not demonstrate in the part of England called Tower Hamlets?

    Because lots of muslims live there and would take against against English patriots parading through?

    Then your point rather justifies the existence of the EDL.

  20. WHY do you say they are “deeply racist”?

    Eh? They are the National Front / British National Party/ English Defense League. Most of them are jew-haters, and black haters.

    But they exist because of mass uncontrolled immigration and the disastrous impact of that on the native working class, so they have a point. And they will be increasingly joined by middle class workers whose jobs are being out-sourced to India. So they have a future.

  21. Disgraceful a Home secretary banning a march, what you need is some sort of commission to approve or ban parades, that would solve the problem overnight.

  22. Thank you Peter. As Phantom said, we let Nazis march here and provide them police escort. If letting those little turds goosestep down the high street is the price of protecting civil rights here, so be it.

  23. I cannot believe that there are some on this website who do NOT fully endorse this protest march. Please, people, the English Defence League are blue-blooded English men and women who are appalled by the ongoing dismantling of our society. It is time to wrest our country back from the barbarous hordes who have been allowed to settle here courtesy of invertebrate Labour politicians.

    I notice the usual IRA sympathisers amongst those who dislike the idea of indigenous British people staging this protest. This does not surprise me in the slightest.

    My prayers are with those gallant protesters. May Tower Hamlets be the start of a righteous backlash, one that in my opinion is long overdue. Tower Hamlets ceased to be British a very long time ago. It is high time that we reclaim it and many more areas from the enemy in our midst. And be assured that the Muslim population ARE the enemy within.

    We must act now. As Pete Moore stated: ‘The streets belong to we’!

  24. Peter,
    “Eh? They are the National Front / British National Party/ English Defense League. Most of them are jew-haters, and black haters.”

    From reading the EDL website, I haven’t got the impression that they are deeply racist; they simply want to “keep Britain British”. They are afraid that our country’s rulers are complacently watching the destruction of our own cultural history and practices.

    For a British government to deny loyal English and British citizens the right to demonstrate in their own country: whilst happily sending them to fight in countries with the same religious and cultural values as our disaffected immigrants, verges on total HYPOCRISY!

    And let’s get this straight Peter;
    unless YOU are a “fluffy, middle class,self hating, bleeding heart, support the rights of minorities over the heritage of the majority, NICE, non confrontational person…
    WHY WOULD you want to stand by as your country is taken over by immigrant groups who actually despise you and your culture??
    It’s not Racism, it’s called “standing up for your people and your nation”.

    After all, the people who are causing us the most problems either CHOSE to make their home here, or have the freedom to depart to a country more compatible with their religious or cultural beliefs.
    WHY should the host nation CHANGE to suit them?

  25. I’m evolving somewhat and I’m getting close to the position of Jack Straw who onsiders that the English are not worth saving.

    The reason why the English are not worth saving is because, even after all the mass immigration of the detritus which is the 3rd-world, there has been no resistance, none whatsoever apart from a few comments to the Daily Mail. The English would rather die out completely (and it is now irreversible) than vote for a party which would retain England for the English. After all, to do so would be ‘racist’ and no English person wants to be called racist – that just would not do, would it?

    I am racist and I would put my own people before all others in my own country (that’s what ‘racism’ really is) – but my own people don’t so I’ll be looking after no. 1 and family. My ‘fellow countrymen’ can go to their own special X-factored hell.

  26. From reading the EDL website, I haven’t got the impression that they are deeply racist

    Well naturally they are not going to come out openly as nigger-haters.

    Like I said, I support their right to march, but I reserve the right to call them racist scumbags. Free speech cuts both ways.

  27. Allan

    I forget the exact figures, but DNA tells us something like this: We are a species that evolved in Africa a few hundred thousand years ago. When we arrived in Europe we exterminated the Neanderthals who had been there for tens of thousands of years.

    We share a common ancestor with badgers (about 30 million years ago) and with oak trees (about 300 million years ago). So hating other members of our species because of their skin colour seems a tad stupid.

    Of course I get the point about mass immigration. It should not have been allowed to happen. But it cannot be reversed.

  28. Peter,
    Quite right. That’s your prerogative. I don’t hate anybody, but I don’t like lots of people from other countries setting up shop in my country with absolutely no sense of obligation to it.
    Those who want to be part of my country, respect its laws and accept its traditions are fine, but I still preferred it when it was a more homogenous society.
    Does that make me a racist?

  29. Peter – you seem to forget that neither oak trees, nor badgers, nor blacks (I’m taking that as sub-Saharan Africans and their off-shoots) made any contribution to the development of technology although, strictly speaking, oak trees were used for ships. Note that no sub-Saharan African had even conceived of ships, not in Roman times nor in the 2,000 years since when we encountered them in their native lands. They had made absolutely no progress at all so I don’t see why they should be in this country. However, this most useless sub-species of humanity is breeding away in this country and dumbing-down the native population. There has been no resistance from the indigenous of this country so, from a presence in these islands of over 10,000 years to minority status in two genrations. Such a race deserves to be wiped out.

  30. from a presence in these islands of over 10,000 years to minority status in two genrations.

    Where is your evidence for that claim?

  31. Allan,
    “Such a race deserves to be wiped out.”
    You really go too far.
    No race deserves to be wiped out.
    That is an evil thing to say.
    Many might say as I do, that multiculturalism has not been a success. That the reason our country is so attractive to others is its ridiculous perception that we have an obligation to accept anybody and everybody. We back that up with a benefits and welfare system which puts the needs of newcomers before those of British residents.
    So for that reason I support the right of the EDL to peaceful protest, and who knows one day I might even join them.
    If I found they were indeed as racist as your lot, I would withdraw. But the fact remains that somebody has to protest, because our own UK government seems content to give our culture and history away..

  32. Agit – yes, I went too far. But take the case where an organism is threatened by something, like a change of environment or a new predator. If that organism doesn’t adapt to its new envirnoment nor resist the new predator, it will become extinct. The tipping point for the English in England has been passed, and births of indigenous English in England are now a minority of total live births. In order for the English to retain control of their own land (and Scotland is going the same way), they must become racist i.e. put themselves first in their won land. Your last paragraph shows that it will not happen so your doom is sealed.

    Dr. Noel Ignatiev is a Jewish American history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art. He’s also a Communist and a Marxist. He wrote:

    “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”

    So it seems that if you oppose this genocide in any way you will be labelled a ‘white supremacist.’ Dr. Ignatiev also made the incredibly racist and wholly inaccurate statement:

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”

    He then gets even worse when he adds:

    “Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed, not deconstructed, but destroyed.”

    Peter –

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgene.html

    – Despite invasions by Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Normans, and others, the genetic makeup of today’s white Britons is much the same as it was 12,000 ago, a new book claims.

    In The Tribes of Britain, archaeologist David Miles says around 80 percent of the genetic characteristics of most white Britons have been passed down from a few thousand Ice Age hunters. –

  33. Mahons – when I am shown to be in the wrong, I will acknowldege it. You, being profoundly ignorant, would never do that so you will always be wrong. As usual, no effort to engage in the discussion: it’s simply above you.

  34. Allan – Why wuld I engage with a raving lunatic? Your offerings here are vile. They are dismissed out of hand.

  35. Mahons – if my offerings are vile, why not show why they are vile? If they are “vile”, it doesn’t make them wrong so why don’t you show them to be wrong too?

  36. Such a race deserves to wiped out

    Allan

    You called for genocide just today. That qualifies as a vile statement

  37. In The Tribes of Britain, archaeologist David Miles says around 80 percent of the genetic characteristics of most white Britons have been passed down from a few thousand Ice Age hunters.

    Of course. I have had my DNA checked and my most remote paternal ancestor can be traced to 8,000 years ago. His genes are liberally scattered around what is now Wales, Scotland and Ireland. So he must have got about quite a bit, and with, ahem, more than one partner. I can imagine theer were quite a few single mothers.

    My question was what evidence do you have that we will become a minority “within two generations”, given that the non-native population of Britain is around 10% at present?

Comments are closed.