37 5 mins 10 yrs

What are High Crimes and Misdemeanors? Murder, accessory to murder, lying under oath, lying to congress, gun trafficking, incitement to riot, violations of international weapons treaties, violation of Rico, do these qualify?

President Obama by default is guilty of all these. The Obama DOJ with operation Fast and Furious has created a criminal conspiracy that has encompassed all the above. Today New Subpoenas have been drawn up by Congress asking for:

In the new subpoena, congressional investigators  will apparently demand information regarding the investigation into death of  U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry. Two guns found at Terry’s crime scene were  linked to the failed operation that allowed more than 2,000 weapons to  “walk.”

The subpoena is expected ask for correspondence that  Justice Department officials had with the White  House about the gun trafficking operation, as well as what information was  shared by Justice officials in Mexico.

We already KNOW that the above crimes have been committed with the full knowledge of the following Depts. as testified under oath.

What we know beyond a doubt about the operation is that William Newell, former ATF special agent in charge in the Phoenix area, was fully aware of it.  And he has admitted in sworn testimony that “the DHS, IRS, DEA, ATF, ICE and the Obama Justice Department were all involved” in the operation.  Speaking of the Justice Department, Issa and Grassley … have identified a dozen Justice Department officials who they say knew about the program, and following Holder’s May 2011 testimony in which he told the House Judiciary Committee that he only learned of both Gunwalker and Fast and Furious in “recent weeks,” Issa has pointedly stated his belief that Holder had provided “inaccurate testimony.”

Now we can add the White House to the mix, because during recent congressional hearings, the ATF’s Newell told Issa’s committee he “discussed the operation with the national security director for North America, Kevin O’Reilly.”  The means of communication seems to have been an e-mail that was designed both to be kept private and to keep O’Reilly updated.  But regardless of the method of communication, the fact is that a Fast and Furious update was sent to a White House official.

So all these agencies were involved in a criminal operation, that’s Rico. What we have not heard is also very important. You have heard put forth by me, as well as others in my country that this whole operation was setup as an attack on the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Obama has stated throughout his career that guns should be removed from the hands of American citizens. He stated falsely that 90% of Mexico’s Illegal guns came from U.S. Gun Dealers. After this being PROVEN TO BE FALSE Operation Fast and Furious kicked into high gear, placing over 2500 Illegally transferred guns into the hands of the Mexican Drug Cartels. As a result 2 American Law Enforcement Officers are dead, over 200 Mexicans are dead and over 2000 guns are missing.

Now the regime says Fast and Furious was designed to trace guns into Mexico and lead to the arrest of the Drug Kingpins. HOW? To this date no one from the Administration has explained how it would work. There were no tracking chips in the Guns, as there were in the Bush Administrations Operation Wide Receiver, There is NO extradition agreement with Mexico, There was no deal in place to arrest anyone across the Border in Mexico as there was in the Bush Operation.  The only way to find and recover guns in Fast and Furious is at crimes scenes. So how was it going to work? Or is it as I and others say just an attack on the Second Amendment, while Hillary simultaneously works over the last year to get the U.S. on the U.N. small arms ban which also removes our second amendment rights. Call me what you will, but if it walks like a Duck….

Oh and for all those dissing Hank Jr as a Crappy Artist on the post below, I give you one of my Favorites by him that explains why the Left will loose, and why we the MAJORITY of Americans will NEVER be DEFEATED

 

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

37 thoughts on “High Crimes and Misdemeanors

  1. The subpoena is expected ask for correspondence that Justice Department officials had with the White House about the gun trafficking operation, as well as what information was shared by Justice officials in Mexico.

    That’s nice and polite. Most people would be raided at dawn, held in custody and have their files and computers taken away and pulled apart. Government isn’t treated differently, is it?

    Now Troll, it’s a big mistake for Americans to talk about the 2nd Amendment the way they do. It’s as if the right to keep and bear arms flows from it when this is not so:

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    The 2nd clearly and only recognises a prior right. It is not the source of that right, however with the focus always on the 2nd Amendment it’s as if the right to keep and bear arms will be extinguished if the clause is extinguished.

    It’s important for it to be revognised that the 2nd is merely a recognition that the right to keep and bear arms is inalienable, untouchable by the state.

  2. Oh baloney

    There is no such right.

    You can make the ( weak ) argument for rootin’ tootin ‘ guns in every kintergarten, but there is no basic human right to bear firearms and there never will be.

  3. the right comes from GOD, but half these bastards don’t believe in god so you need the paper trail.

    God gave us the right to defend ourselves, the 2nd amendment spelled it out forever that NO government can take our weapons away from us, so the PEOPLE can use there OWN weapons to form militias to gurantee our FREEDOM

  4. so says the NY sheep, come on Phantom make your argument against an americans right to bear arms, I need a good laugh, and would love to expose to our world wide audience why your beliefs are those of a fool

  5. Troll

    I’ve picked your arguments apart a hundred times, so I will leave you be today.

    You need to devote all your resources on that Newt Gingrich campaign.

  6. Not even the most mouth-breathing lunatic in Congress would claim the laundry list of alleged crimes that is proclaimed here.

  7. no mahons but the facts do,

    A)the obama regime came into office with a gun control agenda

    B)the Obama administration has illegally sold guns to the mexican cartels, this has been testified to under oath, The only denials have been in who ordered it.

    C)over 200 mexicans have been killed by those guns, plus two US law enforcement officers. If you knowingly sell a gun illegally and it is used in a murder it makes you an accesery.

    D)The combining of different groups and organizations in criminal activity constitutes a rico case.

    E)Selling guns to criminal organizations accros international borders is a violation of several UN and US international law treaties.

    F)Eric Holder testified under oath he had never even heard of Fast and Furious until two weeks before his testimony yet released memos sent directly to him on over 5 occaisions gating back almost two years have been released.

    G)Obama being President is responsible for those beneath him. dig up Nixon and ask him.

    So tell me counsler where do I have it wrong? Prove to me why or admit your stupid.

  8. Phantom…. The 27 Words

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    A Militia as explained in the Federalist papers is a body of organized citizens.

    A Free State as explaned in the Federalist can apply to the nation, or to the individual state.

    The right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed was written as also explained in the federalist so that it could never be misunderstood that the individual citizen has the right to own and to bear which means carry his armaments, and shall not be infinged means NO GOVERNMENT LOCAL OR FEDERAL CAN CHANGE THIS RIGHT.

    The Federalist also went on to talk about this right as an explicit right so that if either a state or the federal government became oppresive to the people the citizens could remove that government by force if neccesary.

    You know nothing of your nations founding. and are fool to be subjegated under tyranny

  9. What tyranny? Who is being tyrannized on this issue?

    This isn’t 1776, and we’re not in the wilderness anymore. I note that you refer to the Federalist Papers but don’t give a direct quote, or refer to the specific section.

    Could this because you just copied some bullshit from an NRA talking points sheet? Don’t you dare try to tell us that you’ve read the Federalist Papers.

  10. Troll

    Apologies for the delay in posting this but had some issues retrieving my password – not I hasten to add from ATW but care of crappy MAC mail.

    Just wanted to stop by and extend my best wishes to Monica for a speedy and full recovery. One very brave lady. It must be a huge strain on you all, hope ytou are all coping ok. I fully sympathise in this regard having lived through the kind of trauma it is having the centre of your family, mum and wife, live through such an ordeal. My thoughts and prayers are with you. I have no doubt she will brave it all out. Please send her my love.

    Alison x

  11. Phantom FUCK YOU

    Don’t you dare call me a liar you know nothing you over paid trader, besides not knowing your own nations history, and the fact that you of all people live in a city that suffers under some of the most extreme soft tyranny (oh pass the salt please, oh sorry that’s right no salt in NY resturants is there) when you comment you reveal your lack of memmory as well as your lack of depth.

    Not only have I read the Federalist, I have also read the anti-federalist, plus Franklins hand written notes on the conventions and the drafting. If you weren’t so blinded by ignorance with your hate for Guns you might remember Pinky and I had a long argument on this site because I called myself a constitutional scholar.

    We disagreed on what a scholar was, my writing my final thesis on the bastardization of the Constitutions original intent vs The political and Judicial interpretations of the constitution today, she said did not qualify me and I say it did.

    Phantom on some subjects your comments are quite good and informed. On guns they are obsesivly bigoted and illinformed, on our founding documents they are just nieve and uneducated.

    Don’t you ever call me a liar, You can call me a bastard, a prick, a rightwing kook, an asshole or what ever fits your temperment is fine. call me liar and I’ll ban you from my posts and torture you on everyone elses.

    You may have no code of honor but some in this world still do.

  12. c’mon Mahons explain to the rest of us with your vast legal knowledge as a man educated in the law why those actions testified to under Oath aren’t crimes.

    were waiting

  13. You mean I would be able to claim more expertise if I wrote a college paper? I wrote a report in 4th grade entitled “Our Friend The Dolphin”, but I wouldn’t claim to be a marine biologist.

    Frankly I don’t think one needs to have any particular expertise to know that the crimes you suggest against the President (including murder) are charges that have any actual support. Certainly the Fast and Furious operation was a misguided screw up, but as I’ve written before it won’t be the first or last time a government agency makes a complete blunder or exhibits gross negligence. If there was a sliver of hope that such charges as murder could be reasonable charged agaisnt the President surely someone in Congress would be making that charge.

    If you are honest with yourself you would note that you are predisposed to accepting the worst take (and promoting the worst take) on any event that involves the Administration. Add to that predisposition a push button topic like guns and I’d suggest you are incapable of not going overboard on your denunciations. Do you think you are viewing the matter in an unbiased way?

    It is fine to disagree with the President or his policies, and to argue with passion those things which one might be passionate about. But passion without reason and balance is ineffective and counterproductive.

  14. Tough Guy

    Then we both agree that you’re a a rightwing kook

    I won’t call you the other things that you’ve admitted to.

    You have a long record of wild overstatement, at playing fast and loose with the truth on any number of subjects, and especially anything to do with the guns that give you such pleasure.

    If you wish to be taken seriously when making major assertions, provide a specific reference. Or put some qualifier on it ” I think that … ”

    Otherwise, it will be assumed that you’re up to the usual rage-fueled stumbling and roaring. And don’t come crying to me when you’re called on it.

  15. Mahons Here is your accusation from Congress please pay attention to the news

    Republican Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona told The Daily Caller on Wednesday that Obama administration officials responsible for Operation Fast and Furious might be accessories to murder.

    “We’re talking about consequences of criminal activity, where we actually allowed guns to walk into the hands of criminals, where our livelihoods are at risk,” Gosar said in a phone interview. “When you facilitate that and a murder or a felony occurs, you’re called an accessory. That means that there’s criminal activity.”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/05/congressman-obama-admin-may-be-accessory-to-murder-with-fast-and-furious/#ixzz1aaT3zLFb

  16. Phantom please put up ANY example of where I have ever LIED on this site.

    The ONLY time I ever LIED was a misquote.

    You have not read the Founding Documents I have.

  17. Mahons here are 9 sherifs 4 democrats and 5 republicans calling for accesary to murder charges, watch the video, than admit you know nothing

    9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to Call for Holder’s Resignation (Video)

  18. I’ve never called you a liar. That’s a loaded word, that there is no going back from.
    Kind of like saying You may have no code of honor

    I accused you of doing what 99% of right or left partisans do – cherrypicking from the work product produced by those who think the same, Sean Hannity style.

  19. no you called me a liar

    Could this because you just copied some bullshit from an NRA talking points sheet? Don’t you dare try to tell us that you’ve read the Federalist Papers.

    that is calling me a liar, I have read the federalist papers, and have discussed it several times on this site. You to dumb to even know what you wright

  20. Mahons you asked for accusations from members of congress There is just one of them, the 9 Sherifs are another.

    Read the list of Subpounas I posted and tell me what they are working on proving. Tell me what you call a person that sells a gun to someone and he then uses that gun to commit murder.

    No this isn’t speculation, these are actions admitted to under oath, you are in denial

  21. I didn’t call you a liar, Troll.

    Read the above comments. You hadn’t said that you read these papers.

  22. Troll – the committe is entitled to investigate what they believe may be wrongdoing. They (and you) are not entitled to proclaim the President murdered someone, that is silly.

  23. your right to expect you to have any type of recall on a subject is to much to ask from someone so limited, yet so fast to accuse like you did

  24. Don’t get cute

    You are slipshod with the facts and logic all the time

    But you are forgiven for this unnecessary eruption

  25. Troll – aside from your customary animosity (which doesn’t serve you or your cause well), why not try to be so predictible in your writings.

  26. fist off Phantom I can’t help but be cute, good genetics, second please provide examples of your accusation on my slipshod reporting.

    Mahons so far you have blown a lot of hot air but not once explained why the accusations are faulty or not based in the way the law works.

    so what all you have is rhetoric

  27. please provide examples of your accusation on my slipshod reporting.

    Are you kidding me? Give me a hundred dollars for every howler I find from you and I’ll be richer than Warren Buffett the day the check clears.

    And I don’t intend to play a sustained game of hide and go seek with someone who doesn’t play by the rules of logic, but I will riddle you this nasty bit of work. Forget the over the top opinions – who cares.

    You here quote John McCain as saying ” I would gladly do away with the First Amendment if I thought it would help end corruption in Government “

    You intentionally quote him completely out of context. Allow me to educate you once again by playing the exact quote.

    McCain here is clearly giving a sarcastic reference to the argument made by the Koch Brothers and other rich gangsters who like to buy elections that fat campaign contributions by the rich ( which you support ) are ” speech ” and is in any way a ” First Amendment issue ” which it is not. Big money in politics is not a First Amendment or Free Speech issue, which is McCain’s entire point. You pretend that he is against the First Amendment, as if you were to fool somebody, which you did not.

    You left out all the context, and accepted the simplistic arguments of your Republican masters without thinking them through. That is as slipshod as it gets.

  28. That’s the best you can come up with…lol

    And watch your own clip moron he says exactly what I said he said and he may have been laughing about it, but he was being serious NOT sarcastic.

    Face it Phantom your a fool, you accuse me of being a liar then as your only example the clip you post of the traitor John McCain proves me right.

    Did you ride the short bus to school? and your “this” link doesn’t even work.

    Phantom you can’t find a single lie EVER posted by me, it took you two hours to try and twist something that was true into a lie, your pathetic.

    I guess telling the truth to you is a game

  29. Troll

    This is a highly dishonest post that you wrote. You and Patty are charter members of the Hall of Shame.

    Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it.

  30. what’s dishonest about it Phantom, you know your becoming a little whiner.

    Point out one thing in my post that is dishonest.

    you know you and mahons are getting really pathetic. If you call something a lie you should atleast have the balls to point out what it is that’s dishonest and why.

    Both of you with your this is just bullshit, or this is just dishonest and nothing to back up what you say makes you EXACTLY THE SAME as that guy shitting on the police car. Thats your people

  31. Shush

    I said the truth. If you can’t handle it, well that’s fine.

    Frankly, you’re just not worth the time.

    Cheers.

  32. your right Phantom your not worth the time, what truth did you say?

    while you have your ass pressed against that police car you might want to pull your head out of it.

Comments are closed.