Another Trayvon queryHome by Mike Cunningham March 30, 2012 6 1 min 9 yrs Tweet The question is, are they being pro-active, reactive, retrospective, introspective, or just plain silly? Click to rate this post![Total: 0 Average: 0] Current Affairs Post navigation Previous postNext post 6 thoughts on “Another Trayvon query” they’re being responsible, in the sense that now would not be a good time to release a film that makes fun of a situation that is being attacked by the racist industry cheer led by the president Bad fortune for the people who made that film As was the case ages ago when someone had an exceptionally unfortunate name for a Appetite Suppressing Candy Though it had been a popular enough product, the name was radioactive for obvious reasons and it was soon withdrawn from the market. I read that Zimmerman received medical attention at the scene and was cleaned up. The video was pretty grainy too so that proves exactly the square root of bugger all. On a related note Obama too busy to say that if he had a son he’d be exactly like Shawn Tyson then? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9173820/Parents-of-murdered-British-students-criticise-Barack-Obama.html Ya got 13 minutes to spend learning some important facts? How about listening to one of the “brothers” dealing some common sense: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A–dNCkr8co https://twitter.com/#%21/KillZimmerman A ‘twitter’ page. Yeah, it’s so obvious that the real victim in all this is the shooter Zimmermann. The coon (Zimmermann’s word) got just what he deserved. And I know there are several of this parish who think just that. They know who they are. Comments are closed.