57 2 mins 9 yrs

As expected, Jacqueline Woodhouse has been imprisoned for being white, for effectively committing sedition against Marxist throught laws in once-free Britain.

Yes, she was rude to other commuters on a tube train, but we used to be free to be rude. This on the day that Michael Gove told Leveson that free speech is the freedom to be rude to and about others. Don’t make me laugh!

While I wouldn’t have put it in the way that Woodhouse did, I absolutely agree with her and wish my compatriot all the very best. But she stood no chance from the off, because she’s white and wants her country back. People like us are supposed to be intimidated into silence by illegitimate “laws”.

Instead, if she had been a coloniser she could batter two white women to a pulp and then escape jail. And if she had been a coloniser she could have kicked a white woman almost to death while screaming “Kill the white slag”, and still escape jail. But she’s a white Briton, and we’re denied justice in our own land.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

57 thoughts on “JACQUELINE WOODHOUSE JAILED FOR BEING WHITE

  1. Anyone with open eyes can see that the UK is being forcibly colonised by the 3rd-world, the ‘force’ being imposed by the Establishment on the indigenous Britons. It’s a given that most Britons are lobotomised by TV (football for the guys, X-factor and soaps for the gals) and nutrition-free food yet here is imposition of custodial sentences on the merest flicker of dissent (and Emma West is next). What is the purpose of it all? Are all members of the Establishment so idiotic as to believe that they shall escape the consequences of the ruination of England – 70 million stuffed into the tiny country wghich can only feed 30 million?

  2. She wasn’t jailed for being white. She was jailed for subjecting passengers to seven minutes of vile racist abuse. It’s also not the first time she has done it. Goodness knows traveling on the London underground is stressful enough without having to deal with cretins like this.

    That said, I agree with Phantom, the sentence is excessive. We send far too many people to prison in this country. Community service would have been more appropriate.

  3. I don’t think she was jailed for being white. She was jailed for having a rant in a public place. It is against the law. And yes Pete, you are right to point out the inconsistencies, but she still broke the law.
    Just as I believe that the Christian owners of the B&B were wrong to turn away the two gay men. They have to either obey the law of the land, or else make it clear that they do not accept some members of our society.

    The people Jacqueline Woodhouse was ranting about were probably here legitimately, so they should not have been targetted for taking advantage of opportunities offered by successive British governments.
    If her and our anger should be directed at anyone, it should be our politicians.
    So how many of you are going to make your views known to your Constituency MP??

  4. Agit8ed –

    “So how many of you are going to make your views known to your Constituency MP??”

    Not that it will do much good, but he’s quite aware of my opinions on liberty, immigration, his treasonous (Tory) faction and what I hope happens to them.

  5. If the law is not applied equally, there’s no justice in it.

    I think that she’s a foul creature, but that’s not the point.

  6. The sentence was excessive. It wasn’t for being white as much as stupid and unruly. I say “as much” because certainly with these types of laws agaisnt “racist” speech I do think you will find that the race of the speaker and the race of the target tends to be a factor.

    Penalize her for disorderly conduct, but not for speech itself.

  7. Yes, she broke the law as did the miscreants in the other cases where somebody really did get hurt. Jacqueline Woodhouse was then given a custodial sentence whilst the savages in the other cases did not. She was jailed because she is white.

  8. Pete,
    fair enough, but there are others who would rather moan about the things that matter than actually make their views known to those whose duty it is to represent them.
    As my neighbour says, “the problem is that things have gone too far”. Leicester will soon be the first city in Britain where indigenous white English people will be in the minority.
    So what to do? One can only insist that traditional British laws and values are the SOLE source of law and order. That’s one thing that could be done to ensure we retain our national identity. Another thing would be to pour more resources into guarding our borders, withdrawing from Human Rights legislation and EU diktats relating to freedom of migration, then start deporting foreign criminals and terrorists without taxpayer funded legal aid to appeal.

  9. Allan,
    it is still up to us to challenge the inconsistencies. We are not dumb, we are not powerless, we ARE lazy and apathetic. And to keep saying that nothing will be change is the best way to ensure that it won’t.

  10. I’ve never heard of such a lengthy sentence where no one was physically harmed, and where there was no attempt to steal anything.

    The British must be delicate flowers indeed. There will be many others who follow this unfortunate woman through those prison doors.

    As I mentioned before, I’ve seen demonstrations by Neo Nazia, and by their brothers a group of Black Racists who said that the ” White Man ” was the creation of the Devil. Nobody arrested anyone from either group. The black racists were actually pretty funny.

  11. Actually, for the first time in ages, I must agree with Allan – she probably did receive the sentence she did because she was white.

    I can’t imagine a Muslim or Black Supremicist ranter receiving such a term if they did the same thing. It would be impossible. Your Justice System would give them a medal.

  12. Agit8ed –

    “As my neighbour says, “the problem is that things have gone too far”.

    But that’s to suggest that cancer, or the Black Death or the Ebola virus might go a bit too far. I’d suggest that supposedly free-born Britons ensure that they remain free-born Britons.

    “Leicester will soon be the first city in Britain where indigenous white English people will be in the minority. So what to do?”

    If you don’t want to avoid losing your liberty, you’re supposed to shut up and not mention things like that. However, the very first and minimal action is to ignore the media, ignore the ruling class and always – without exception – vote for a patriot who will act by, for and on behalf of the indigenous people of our islands.

  13. She wasn’t jailed becuase she is white, otherwise explain how Allan, Pete, Colm, and David remain at large despite being white.

    However, as I noted above, it would appear that her race was a factor in her sentence, and that shouldn’t be a factor.

  14. Pete linked to two cases which set the precedent that non-whites who assault whites will be released i.e. not given custodial sentences. In this case, and another is pending, a white who makes an alcohol-affected rant where nobody is hurt (OK, the Sikh says he was ‘hurt’, feelings etc) gets jailed. She was jailed because she is white although what she said might have been a bit beyond permitted dissent – “I want my country back” etc. We can’t have British people saying that.

  15. Yes Allan. Two cases. Which ignores cases of non-whites who assualt whites being jailed.

  16. Of course she received that absurd, racist sentence for being white while ranting in public.

    If she’d had the temerity to spew that impolite stuff on any American public transport, she would have been beaten to a bloody pulp by her fellow non-white passengers.

    Off topic… but the woman’s really quite trashy, behaving that way with a young child sitting on her lap. If that’s representative of White Britain, you have more serious social problems than too many coloured folks in your midst.

  17. Mahons, I’ve never once seen any of those men speak as that woman did. She was a low class piece of white trash and doesn’t do any favors to sensible British people seeking sane immigration and welfare policies.

  18. Daphne- My joke as to why our ATW British contingent are “at large” was aimed at pointing out that white people are not be randomly arrested by the State and imprisoned for merely being white.

  19. Welcome to Britain 2012, where if you’re a white indigenous Briton, you can get jailed for 21 weeks for saying some naughty-woughty words. Yet if you’re an illegal alien plotting and abetting murderous attacks, you won’t be deported for love nor money, even if you beg the courts to deport you.
    I’m really glad I don’t have children, because at this stage, there’s a certain part of me which says “screw it all, I just don’t care about this wretched country any more, I’ve got 30 or 40 years left before I choke it, so I’ll just shut up, and try and live the remainder of my years in peace, and leave all the coming chaos to the next generation.”
    It’s really hard to find the strength to fight back sometimes, it’s so tempting to just take stock and decide to leave all this shit for the younger generations to fight over.
    But all the same, I’m still glad I don’t have children. Because Britain in 2012 is bad enough. To imagine Britain in 20 years’ time? 50 years’ time? The mind just boggles. It’s going to be carnage.

  20. The police and prosecution here have acted as kapos, gutless or worse. It is not too much to say that.

    And some are conspicuous by their silence on this thread.

  21. I speak of all who enabled this miscarriage of justice.

    They’re much worse than liberals, they are of a kind we’ve not seen in the US.

    Not quite yet. But this is where hate crimes law will lead us. Fighting injustice with more injustice.

  22. Unfortunately, those types are well and alive in the US. Have you not been following the Treyvon Martin case?

  23. At least in that case – someone was harmed, and possible wrongful use of a gun vs someone who supposedly did no wrong

    This other case involved someone speaking on a train, and noone harmed.

  24. Phantom,

    “The police and prosecution here have acted as kapos, gutless or worse. It is not too much to say that.”

    Yes it is. It is ludicrous hyperbole. The sentence is excessive and certainly inconsistent – but the woman was given a 21 week sentence, she wasn’t sent to a death camp.

  25. She was jailed because the video went viral. Absent the hype around the video she gets a much reduced sentence or a non custodial punishment.

    And it is fun watching Brits complaining about colonization.

  26. The sentence is excessive and certainly inconsistent – but the woman was given a 21 week sentence, she wasn’t sent to a death camp.

    I reckon she should be grateful for the 5-month sentence. She could do an Open University module, start learning a new language, and she gets a break from nagging relatives. In fact, for anyone who wants a get-away-from-it-all break at taxpayers expense, just go mouth off some stuff about wanting your country back. But – it’s only an offer open to white Britons.

  27. Frank

    I know that she was not sent to the Ovens.

    But your police and prosecutors here have acted against human rights here, not as defenders of them. The best you can say is that they are unjust careerists. Utterly lacking in judgment and morals the capos of tomorrow, who are cutting their teeth with things like this.

  28. We Brits are as free as the chains allow us to be. I note that you Yanks are feeling the length of your chains too these days.

    Welcome to 1984 which most thought was a novel not an instruction book for regimes.

    Interesting law that allows one drunk chavette (telling it like it is – a crime in Britain these days) to be banged up yet allows Anjem Choudhary to spread his poison under police protection whilst our Benefits pay for him to do so. Truly thats insane.

  29. if she had been a coloniser..

    Many of her ancestors were, which is why you have so many of those bloody browns and blacks you detest so much about the place.

    These people are not colonisers, principally because unlike the real thing they didn’t come to steal land and resources, slaughter, murder, and rape. They came to get a job and hopefully a better future.

    That said, if they were actual colonisers; the feeling of schadenfreude would be almost overwhelming!

    Delighted to see this nasty bint ba

  30. Petr Tarasov –

    You shouldn’t believe noted liars. In any case, everyone in Kenya was warmer than anyone in a Soviet gulag, and better fed than anyone in Mao’s China.

  31. Churchill:

    … we are not a young people with AN INNOCENT RECORD AND a scanty inheritance. We have engrossed to ourselves … AN ALTOGETHER DISPROPORTIONATE share of the wealth and traffic of the world. We have got all we want in territory, and our claim to be left in the unmolested enjoyment of vast and splendid possessions, MAINLY ACQUIRED BY VIOLENCE, LARGELY MAINTAINED BY FORCE, often seems less reasonable to others than to us.

    Indeed. What goes around comes around old chap.

  32. It would not have came around if you’d maintained your borders.

    Or if the Brits did.

    God knows what land Petr is from.

  33. You shouldn’t believe noted liars

    You what? Elkins? She won the Pulitzer Prize for that book and her CV is a hell of a lot more impressive than the crackpots you cite.

    But then, the Pulitzer is all a big conspiracy by the same people who brought down building by controlled demolition, isn’t it?

  34. Phantom,

    It didn’t come around. I was being facetious. Pete’s claim that Britain is being colonised by the filthy browns and blacks is pure crackpotery.

    Which do you think is worse though: the carnage and theft the Brits carried out all over the world, or some brown and black people coming to Britain to live?

  35. Petr Tarasov –

    I know it won a Pulitzer. Big deal. A number of disreputable people and works have done so. Woodward and Bernstein won a Pulitzer for their account of Watergate, and that was a fairy tale. Elkins’ book has been criticised for being loose with facts and stats.

    Did I say something about Building 7? And who do I cite?

    If we’re going to talk about crackpots, then step right up and claim your prize. Tens of millions were murdered in the name of your evil creed, the most monstrous crime in history, which you dismiss as “bourgeois lies”, and you have the cheek to call other people crackpots. That is some front.

    So yeah, let’s talk about real gulags, commie gulags and the millions who were murdered in them for your political creed.

  36. I’m not a Stalinist. Try again.

    Pete, Tens of millions were murdered in the name of your evil creed: colonialism.

    Now you – in your utter nuttiness and racism – believe you’re being colonised in Britain. It’s a lunatic’s thesis but as I said, I’m so glad you feel that way!

  37. Your boy Mao nearly destroyed China and its economy and culture until some semblance of sanity, and some capitalist methods were introduced, allowing for the recent decades of prosperity

  38. Mao had some great ideas…

    But back on topic, and Pete’s idea that Britain is being colonised by the filthy browns and blacks.

    Phantom,

    Which do you think is worse: the carnage and theft the Brits carried out all over the world, or some brown and black people coming to Britain to live?

  39. You frame the question in a way that does not facilitate serious discussion.

    Mass immigration from incompatible cultures to Britain has been a mistake ( at best ) of epic proportions.

    The British colonialists were in most of their domain for a time, and now they’re gone. It wasn’t all ” theft and carnage ” either. Many areas of the former empire gained mightily from their presence.

    If you want to tell a story, tell the whole story and not just the bad stuff.

  40. Petr Tarasov –

    Mention them all you like, but have a point and stop being so boring.

  41. //Many areas of the former empire gained mightily from their presence//

    But Britain – and other countries – gains to a much greater and suffers to a much less extent from immigration.

    Yet immigration is all you complain about, which all really shows what a sound point Petr has been making.

  42. Phantom:
    “Or if the Brits did.

    God knows what land Petr is from.”

    Petr:

    “Building 7”

    He likes the cryptic stuff our Petr doesn’t he?

    He probably lives in a cardboard box in some exclusive neighbourhood in Ireland..

  43. But Britain – and other countries – gains to a much greater and suffers to a much less extent from immigration.

    Economically?

    Culturally?

    Are you entirely sure about that?

  44. Phantom, the economies of many European countries – incl. the UK – would collapse if their immigrants were to disappear.

  45. The Korean economy has not collapsed, and they don’t really have any immigrants.

  46. “Phantom, the economies of many European countries – incl. the UK – would collapse if their immigrants were to disappear.”

    Only because the indigenous population of the host nations have become fat, lazy and hooked on tv/junk food/drugs and the welfare state.
    If you are intimating that the only way a successful economy can stay afloat is by importing cheap labour, I would dispute that. I would also say that importing people means you also import cultural beliefs and practices which will destabilise and weaken the host nation.
    Nothing happens overnight. It happens in stages, and once people realise what has happened, they either choose to go with it, or you end up with varying degrees of strife or civil war.

  47. It is absurd what you see even in the powerhouse of London

    You rarely see an English person working in a hotel or restaurant

    Yet there is high unemployment

    And a chunk of that unemployment is from ” immigrants ” or children of immigrants

    **DOES NOT COMPUTE**

  48. Noel Cunningham –

    “Phantom, the economies of many European countries – incl. the UK – would collapse if their immigrants were to disappear.”

    Eh? How does that work?

    On balance, immigration has been a drain on the productive class. Besides economic affairs, our liberties have been severely curtailed in the name of race relations. We’ll have those back as well.

Comments are closed.