7 2 mins 15 yrs

uda203.jpgWhat a surprise. The so-called "hard men of loyalism" (Quislings to anyone with a brain btw) will not "stand in the way" of an Ian Paisley-Martin McGuinness government. That was the message delivered by the UDA’s political wing – the Ulster Political Research Group – in an interview with the Belfast Telegraph. Ho Hum.Cue celebrations all round.

I need not remind readers as to how vile and disgusting a terror group the UDA is. That it remains active, murdering and wounding, stealing and intimidating, up to its neck in every form of criminality. That it’s political frontmen welcome the admission of IRA terror proxies to Government is entirely predictable and should give the more reasoned element of the DUP food for thought. Does Jim Allister, for example, welcome the goodwill from the UDA’s stooges for his Party entering Government with the Irish mafiosa? Green light spells danger, to paraphrase Bily Ocean.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

7 thoughts on “TERROR APOLOGISTS APPROVE SHARING POWER WITH TERRORISTS – FAUX SHOCK SENSATION!

  1. These people are indeed revolting. It is also revolting that they have been given the impression that anything that they have to say, bar that they recognise that they have been a pack of murdering bastards and that they are disbanding their organisation, handing over thoe weaponry and are giving fukkl confessions to the police including information on the activities of third parties..

  2. It looks like the UDA have finally wised up to being used as the strong arm of unionist politicians.
    As for full confessions I wonder how many unionist politicians would be implicated as third parties?.

  3. "It looks like the UDA have finally wised up to being used as the strong arm of unionist politicians. "

    Poor wee souls with no minds of their own.

  4. >>giving fukkl confessions to the police including information on the activities of third parties.<<

    The police usualy were the third parties.

  5. <Q>As for full confessions I wonder how many unionist politicians would be implicated as third parties?.</Q>

    Probably the same number as priests Davy 😉
    A few, and too many at that.

  6. <Q>The police usualy were the third parties.</Q>

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Comments are closed.