57 4 mins 7 yrs

obama1-compressedI’m not sure what is worse, the Presidential Delusion that he is clothed in genius or those that admire the emperors clothes as he nakedly parades before us. If I were forced to choose I would have to say the latter.

Obama is a Marxist Academic with Tyrannical tendencies, Laws were written for others not him.  He is above such things. He must not be hindered by mere Laws and something as trivial as defined powers in bringing forth his vision of a Better America.  Not at home, and especially not on the Stage of the World.

No better example of those who admire the finery not adorning this naked wannabe king are those that praise his latest episode of idiocy with Iran.

He has brought us Peace….. the devotees gasp as they swoon before him.

I just don’t see it. I see a naked fool who will get millions killed due to his delusion. Looking at this issue alone, the view of reality is not the same as the one that the Administration nor those devotees are praising.

Lets look at the events. During this negotiation Obama on his own authority lifted Sanctions on Iran removing pressure and supplying the Iranians much needed funds. Funds that they have used. During these negotiations Iran has financed and arranged the occupation and control of four other Nations Capitals. In Yemen they threw us out to do it.

Two weeks ago the Ayatollah led a crowd in the Chant “Death to America”.  Two days before the “Deal” was struck a Top Iranian General stated the destruction of Israel is NON-NEGOTIABLE.  The day before the deadline the Iranians reneged on sending the Uranium to Russia to be refined into Fuel Rods. Saying it was unacceptable they will do it themselves. At this point Russia and the other Nations packed their bags and went home.

Not Kerry and his team though they had the Iranians on the ropes. What’s another lost redline where legacy is concerned. They stayed and what have they achieved? They achieved nothing.

They have a promise that ALL the points the American team wants they will get. That is what we are being told, is it not? Even though the Iranians say they got what they want. They keep their centrifuges, they get to MODERNIZE their Heavy Water Production and they get all their money.

Now you can view the Obama Administration allowing Iran to develop a Nuclear Bomb a success, but then you’d be a fool of a devotee. Is that what you are? I’m not, this man who would be King is just a fool that will guarantee the death of Millions in the name of Legacy. If we allow this we’re all screwed.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

57 thoughts on “One Mans View on Obama’s Delusions

  1. Troll

    So it’s war? Thought so.

    Out of interest, what would Iran have to do to satisfy the war-hungry neo-cons in USA and more importantly their puppet-meister in Israel?

  2. where did I say it had to be war Peter? Nowhere in this post.

    War is not the only alternative here. Yet that is the exact argument the administration is making. We make the deal or it means war. That’s bullshit.

    No the deal would cause war.

    Drop the deal that doesn’t even exist except in the delusional mind of Barack Obama anyway. The alternative to the deal is restore the original sanctions and then double them.

  3. Only the complete idiots within the American population would allow the Israel lobby and the surviving neo-cons drag their country into another unnecessary war.

    Obama has public support on this one; he should make that plain to the war faction in Congress.

  4. Troll – would you perhaps consider answering Peter’s question at 1.10am?

  5. Any of you Americans want to post about the treatment of Anthony Ray Hinton – 30 years on death row and the fact that it took 12 years for the powers that be to reopen the case despite clear evidence of a miscarriage of justice.

    God bless America!

  6. Yes Matt America is Evil. A poor black man that had bad lawyers at his first trial was able to get his case fought all the way to the supreme court and is a freeman today instead of being on death row.

  7. Noel what are basing your ridiculous claim that Obama has public backing on an Iran deal on?

    You just pull that out of the twilight zone that is your mind, or did you read that nonsense somewhere?

  8. // what are basing your ridiculous claim that Obama has public backing on an Iran deal on?//

    Do you actually believe the majority of Americans support your madness?

    You are totally out of touch with what Americans think.

  9. what are basing that on Noel?

    I know that is your opinion, but other than what you “feel” what do have to back that statement up?

    You say I am totally out of touch with what Americans think. Are you in America? What do you use to judge what Americans think?

    I’m not saying that an analysis of the moods in the US can’t be garnered, I am asking you…. What do you base your opinion on about what Americans are thinking?

  10. a quick search of the polls (if you believe in polls) shows the nation running 2 to 1 against an Iran deal and even the poll from the Washington post that supports the deal has 71% of Americans saying Iran can’t be trusted.

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=iran+deal+poll&pc=MOZI&form=MOZSBR

    If you are going to make statements like You are totally out of touch with what Americans think you might want to provide your reasoning behind it.

    Face it your only exposure to a view of what is going on in America on a daily basis is Phantom and Me, and we agree on about 70% of issues except our disagreement on the other 30% is almost irreconcilable.

  11. Troll – the question put by Peter is:

    Out of interest, what would Iran have to do to satisfy the war-hungry neo-cons in USA and more importantly their puppet-meister in Israel?

    and clearly you haven’t replied to that question, so I shall re-phrase it.

    What does Iran have to do to satisfy you?

  12. What worries me about countries like Iran getting Nukes, is that those countries that may themselves be targeted will want them too. Here I am thinking of Saudi Arabia. And all it takes for all this to kick-off, is for some hothead to press the button.

    The threat of nuclear deterrents works in the Western style nations, because they are Christian in nature and love life. The savages believe that only death is the answer. A bit like handing over a civilian aircraft to a manic depressive. You just know at some point its going to turn out bad.

  13. NetanYAHOO severely isolated here and exposed for the war hungry belligerent that he is.

  14. The people supported rapprochement with China, and arms treaties with the USSR, and they’ll clearly support a reasonable deal with Iran.

    Which will not mean that the Iranian government is good. It will mean that you find a way to live with them, knowing that you can’t control everything in the first place, and that a trust but verify peace is better than an endless war centered around the Persian Gulf.

  15. Spare a thought too for the Iranian public who have suffered greatly under sanctions.

  16. Noel I provided you a link to a search for polls. If you’re unable to grasp even that how can you expect to grasp what the mood in America is?

    As for the One in the Washington post poll that you cite as I said 71% people in that poll even say Iran can’t be trusted.

    Then you cite the one poll in two comments as if they were multiples.

    Noel your only proving my point. You have a view, you think “most” americans agree with your view. They don’t. Yet you believe you know what Americans are feeling better than an American living in America…. do how much of idiot that makes you look like?

    You are so blinded by your view that you refuse to even acknowledge proof that you are wrong when it is put in front of you.

    Let me ask you a simple question. Whose view is more valid on the attitudes of NI someone who lives there or someone in the US ?

    It really is just that simple. You have no clue what is going on in my country, and trying to get a clue by cherry picking select views out of the headlines will never give you an honest view.

  17. Yet you believe you know what Americans are feeling better than an American living in America…. do how much of idiot that makes you look like?

    Indeed. Like the last two US presidential elections which you called correctly, and we call got wrong… Oh,hang on!

  18. Petr Tarasov, on April 4th, 2015 at 1:37 PM Said: Edit Comment

    Spare a thought too for the Iranian public who have suffered greatly under sanctions.

    But screw the Jews who are under almost daily missile attack by Iranian supported terrorists right Petr?

    Fuck those Israelis… that a boy

  19. Spare a thought too for the Iranian public who have suffered greatly under sanctions.

    And a thought too for an Iranian public that has suffered at the hands of a wicked , undemocratic, government controlled by religious lunatics

    Who were brought to the table by sanctions

  20. Petr

    So you’re going to talk elections in the US as a Judge?

    Well the last election was a landslide for the Republicans, and their was another election 4yrs ago that was an even bigger landslide for the Republicans.

    So out of the last 4 elections 3 out of 4 of them Republicans gained and democrats lost. Oh but facts don’t count because they don’t fit your view.

  21. And a thought too for an Iranian public that has suffered at the hands of a wicked , undemocratic, government controlled by religious lunatics

    Agreed.

    Who were brought to the table by sanctions

    They were, no doubt about it. But a more interesting question, I think, is why they needed to be ‘brought to the table’ while other states like the aggressive expansionist state of Israel don’t even sign up to the NPT, much less face inspections or sanctions.

  22. Troll — Read my comment again. I referred only to the last two presidential elections. Many non-Americans here called them correctly, while you got them both comically wrong.

  23. The Iranians are an educated and sophisticated people and by all accounts many of them hate that government and are actually pro US and pro west. I’ve heard someone say that it has the most pro US population of any country in the Middle East.

    The hope is that an Iran that opens to the world will slowly evolve into a more decent place, where Iranians can speak freely in public and where it is a source of wealth for its people and the region

  24. Phantom — That has been my experience with Iranians. The average Iranian is an outward looking, open, reasonable person. What I admire about them, is that they refuse to be a client state. That is very admirable, is it not?

  25. Allan@Aberdeen, on April 4th, 2015 at 1:59 PM Said: Edit Comment

    Troll – What does Iran have to do to satisfy you?

    do you want a serious answer Allan or do you want the answer you expect?

  26. Israel will happily make peace with every ME nation

    They used to have friendly relations with a Iran and they did reach out to the Islamic republic only to be spurned

  27. Petr Tarasov, on April 4th, 2015 at 2:03 PM Said: Edit Comment

    They make no offensive war.

    AH FFS Troll.

    Well Petr than you should have no trouble putting up examples. I look forward to laughing at them and you.

  28. //As for the One in the Washington post poll that you cite as I said 71% people in that poll//

    Where does it say that?

    If you can’t even read, it’s no wonder you always get it wrong about the mood of the American people, even though you have Phantom here to put you right.

    You haven’t got a single US Presidential election right since I’ve been coming here. Each time you have been gloriously wrong because you don’t understand the real people of America.

    And even if it did say a majority think Iran can’t been trusted, that would simply undermine your point with the – yes – Fox survey, which again is about trust and not about support for a deal.
    But you probably can’t understand that either.

    You haven’t put up a single source supporting your delusion that Americans don’t support a deal with Iran.

    //It really is just that simple. //

    No, it isn’t. You are actually too brainless even to understand your own question.
    If you ask people in NI to judge the mood, you will get totally different answers depending on where you ask the question.

    //So out of the last 4 elections 3 out of 4 of them Republicans gained and democrats lost.//

    LOL, now you’re tripping yourself up. Whether the Reps won or not was not the question. But rather whether non-Americans read the mood of the American people over the past eight years more correctly than our Pennsylvanian dunce.

    And they did, because you are familiar only with the arse-end of your own country.

  29. do you want a serious answer Allan or do you want the answer you expect?

    Troll – would you be good enough to answer. Exactly what does Iran have to do to satisfy you to the extent that sanctions can be lifted? Bear in mind that I want a secure and safe jewish state even more than you.

  30. This is pure convoluted idiocy.

    Petr Tarasov, on April 4th, 2015 at 2:03 PM Said: Edit Comment

    Phantom — That has been my experience with Iranians. The average Iranian is an outward looking, open, reasonable person. What I admire about them, is that they refuse to be a client state. That is very admirable, is it not?

    The Iranian people don’t control their country. They are subjects of it.

    As for the nation refusing to be a “client” state right there proves how backward your thinking is. Iran isn’t a client state because it is a sponsoring state. The number one Sponsor state of Terror. Just this year their surrogates have seized control of the capitals of four other countries.

  31. And the US is a sponsoring state too: sponsoring terrorists from South and Central America, to the Middle East, Africa, and South East Asia. Why do you guys get to do it but not Iran?

  32. You just want a place to put all the jews so you can find them easily to be marched into the ovens Allan.

    Iran has to cease all funding of terror, and dismantle ALL of it’s nuclear development. Verification of those two items must be done by Americans.

    It’s as simple as that Allan.

  33. First off Petr

    We don’t sponsor terror anywhere.

    Second we get to do it because we can 🙂 and that just galls the hell out of you doesn’t it?

  34. // we get to do it because we can 🙂 and that just galls the hell out of you doesn’t it?//

    Well, you’re the very one who has just said that Iran can do it too, and that certainly “galls the hell” out of YOU.

  35. No Noel it doesn’t gall me. It Identifies a threat. A threat that will be eliminated.

    That’s the difference really. Most of you refuse to see the threat. I see it and I advocate removing it, by any and all means.

  36. If Iran is a threat, it makes no sense to still support the Iraq war.

    Because we removed the single greatest check to Iranian ambitions from the chessboard.

    Iraq has gone from Iranian enemy to Friend of Iran and its the US that made this happen.

  37. //Just this year their surrogates have seized control of the capitals//

    Troll, it must also gall the hell out of you to see the Iranian-backed militia not only make great strides in Iraq this week, capturing Tikrit from IS, but also do so in the interests of the United States.

    I believe Iran’s elite Quds force helped their militia take Tikrit. Quds means Jerusalem in Arabic and Persian, and the Quds force is responsible for actions outside Iran.

    All this was made possible by Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the great “regime change” that made space for, inter alia, Iranian forces in the country.
    Regime change – Whoopee!!

  38. Troll – it is often very difficult for somebody of my intelligence to engage in discussion with somebody of your intelligence, as is seen on this thread and many others. Jews want Israel, they have it so I want every zio-jew to live in Israel, safely and securely with all protection from their neighbours and their neighbours protected from them.

    As for Iran, it should close down any military applications of nuclear development and this should be verified by an international body on which Americans are present. Unfortunately, the biggest funder of terrorism is the US whether it be directly or by proxy. The US even uses military forces to support terrorism directly:

    http://rt.com/usa/245877-afghanistan-pentagon-blackwater-opium/

    Since the US toppled the Taliban in 2002, opium production in the country has tripled. Afghanistan accounted for over 90 percent of the world’s heroin market in 2014.

    A UNAIDS report from 2014 said that there is a 7-percent increase in land being cultivated despite the US spending over $7 billion on counternarcotics programs.

    The Taliban ended opium production in 2001 so the US took control of Afghanistan and used US military and sub-contractors to grow, process and distribute the crop.

  39. This is why I believe you suffer from Obama derangement syndrome

    Phantom, on April 4th, 2015 at 2:46 PM Said: Edit Comment

    If Iran is a threat, it makes no sense to still support the Iraq war.

    Because we removed the single greatest check to Iranian ambitions from the chessboard.

    Iraq has gone from Iranian enemy to Friend of Iran and its the US that made this happen.

    We removed Iraq and replaced it with the American Army ya git. Your emperor not only removed the pieces from the chess board he folded the friggin game. Now we are going to have to go back and pay for the same realestate twice.

  40. Allan you’re not going to get a rise out of me. Your certifiable and you’re a proud nazi. I only even look at anything you’ve said when I’m bored.

    My hope is someday the home that you escaped from will come and claim it’s damaged baggage.

  41. Now we are going to have to go back and pay for the same realestate twice.

    “We” – who exactly is ‘we’?

    And as for the ‘real estate’, those are the lands of peoples who want nothing to do with the US and its real government.

  42. The people supported rapprochement with China, and arms treaties with the USSR, and they’ll clearly support a reasonable deal with Iran.

    That’s true, and with the passage of time (and notwithstanding my opinion of politicians), those days seem remarkably mature compared to today. I freely admit that it influences my view of NATO now.

    Presidents and prime ministers supped with Stalin, who murdered many more than anyone in Tehran ever could.

    Presidents supped with Khrushchev, who openly promised to “bury” the US, and while a sea of nuclear warheads were aimed at the US and Europe.

    Nixon, who has admirers in here, toasted Mao in Peking. Say no more.

    Reagan supped with many Societ leaders and did deals with them, while even more nuclear warheads were aimed this way.

    To say then that deals with Tehran (which is much less gruesome than Stalin’s Moscow and Mao’s Peking, and a million miles from being the danger that the Societ Union was) is nonsense.

    Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan wouldn’t have thought twice about it.

  43. Troll

    The majority of Iraq is Shia. Iran is Shia.

    We toppled a Sunni dictatorship in Iraq which allowed for the Shia to take control there.

    The centuries old ties of Shia Islam have re asserted themselves across that border.

    US troops were never going to occupy Iraq long term. That was never the plan of Bush.

    What GWB failed to see was that toppling Saddam placed Iraq solidly in the Iranian Shia sphere of influence. That’s pretty much what the majority of Iraqis want.

    And we did it. How could ending Sunni rule have given any different result?

  44. Iran has to cease all funding of terror, and dismantle ALL of it’s nuclear development. Verification of those two items must be done by Americans.

    So Iran is to be banned from having nuclear power stations?

  45. Phantom, on April 4th, 2015 at 8:20 PM Said:
    Troll
    The majority of Iraq is Shia. Iran is Shia.
    We toppled a Sunni dictatorship in Iraq which allowed for the Shia to take control there.

    No you didn’t, you toppled a Baathist secular dictator that allowed the Shia to take control

  46. “Yes Matt America is Evil. A poor black man that had bad lawyers at his first trial was able to get his case fought all the way to the supreme court and is a freeman today instead of being on death row.”

    Yes, if you had your way he would have been “fried” many years ago. Your legal system is a complete joke. You got the money, you got the verdict. You can’t defend it, unless you are a redneck fool!

  47. EP

    The Iraqi Baath was a Sunni Show.

    When Saddam fell, the Sunni, esp those around Saddam’s home town of Tikrit lost all their privileges

    They went from first place citizens to tenth rate – and they are very well aware of what they have lost.

Comments are closed.