39 1 min 3 yrs

Well that’s the implication of what she said.

Cherie Blair has been criticised for “usurping” the voice of African women and reinforcing stereotypes by telling school children during a talk that “most African ladies’ first sexual experience is rape”.

Funnily enough, that’s the experience of an increasing number of European girls. It seems that Blair is onto something. Nick Ferrari opened the lines on his LBC show this morning and a flood of African women called to say that she’s right.

What a shame she didn’t think to tell her husband and her EU chums all about it years ago. Thousands of European girls and women could have been saved from a similar fate.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]


  1. Hard to read past the headline when you follow it up with “Well that’s the implication of what she said”.

    Also, from your own link:

    Between the ages of 15 and 49, 43% of women have reported having experienced gender-based violence, including sexual violence or abuse. It’s not all or a majority but a large number … It’s not a unique phenomenon to Africa but it is widespread and that must be acknowledged.

    So the majority of women in Africa are not raped, and the inference would thus be that the majority (ie the most) of Africans are not rapists.

    Additionally there is no evidence to suggest that Africans in the UK have been responsible for the rapes of many, never mind thousands, of European girls and women.

  2. What a shame she didn’t think to tell her husband and her EU chums all about it years ago

    Like when Blair came to power in 1997?

    Funnily enough, a child born to African parents in 1998 would have been old enough to play football in the World Cup in 2018….

  3. Seamus –

    It’s the implication of what she said. Thousands of European girls and women have been raped by Africans. Please don’t argue with stone cold facts.

  4. “Thousands of European girls and women have been raped by Africans. “

    Show me where.

    “Please don’t argue with stone cold facts.”

    It it is a stone cold fact then it should be easy to show me examples.

  5. Pete doesn’t care that ‘thousands of European girls and women have been raped by Africans’ when they can get England to the quarter finals of the World Cup

  6. Seamus, on March 27th, 2019 at 6:48 PM Said:

    “Thousands of European girls and women have been raped by Africans. “

    Show me where.

    Let’s start with Sweden – it’s the perfect place……


    Then we can move on to Italy…….


    Police found the body of 18-year-old Pamela Mastropietro in two suitcases on January 31st, though the cause of her death has not yet been established by investigators.

    They seem to do these things with a certain absolutism which whitey just doesn’t have. Most whites didn’t seem too bothered, though one guy took action…..

    The woman’s family have denounced a drive-by shooting in which six foreign citizens were injured, which the suspect said was prompted by the news a Nigerian man had been arrested over Mastropietro’s murder.

    That statement is a lie. At the funeral of the unfortunate young woman, her mother carried the wreath sent by Luca Traini.

    The stats for rapes in the US reveal that groids rape about 40,000 white women annually, whilst the other way round is statistically insignificant.

  7. Actually both are statistically insignificant. When compiling the crime statistics the National Crime Victimization Survey uses extrapolation. They don’t survey every person.

    They survey 158,000 people, and extrapolated from them into the national averages. So it is one person representing about 1,750 people. If 1 person says they were attacked then 1,750 people were actually attacked.

    And broadly that is how statistics work. And it is useful. However it has its limitations, especially if the total number reporting are a small number. Of the 158,000 people surveyed in the NCVS 0 of them stated that they were a black woman raped by a white man. Of the 158,000 people surveyed in the NCVS less than 10 of them said there were a white woman raped by a black man. However because it was more than 0 it is extrapolated out, and potentially paints a picture of quite a large number, where in it is likely much smaller. Trusting such a small sample size (less than 10 people) to be representative of the wider public is silly.

  8. Seamus, on March 27th, 2019 at 7:45 PM Said:

    Wow. In your search for the thousands of rapes you found two.

    How many do you want?


    Black people had the highest arrest rates per 1,000 people in every police force area for which there was data

    The Color of Crime, 2016 Revised Edition

    As we will see in greater detail below, blacks are arrested at much higher rates than any other racial group.2 It is common to argue that these high rates are the result of racial bias, and that bias continues through every stage of criminal processing: indictment, plea bargain, trial, sentencing, parole, etc. In 2008, then-senator Barack Obama asserted that blacks and whites “are arrested at very different rates, are convicted at very different rates, [and] receive very different sentences … for the same crime.” This view is echoed by the media but is not supported by either the scholarly literature or by government statistics.

    Police, in particular, are often accused of racial bias, but is it really plausible that they arrest blacks they know are innocent but ignore white criminals? A 2008 summary of earlier research compared the races of offenders as identified by victims to the races of perpetrators arrested by the police and found that “the odds of arrest for whites were 22 percent higher for robbery, 13 percent higher for aggravated assault, and 9 percent higher for simple assault than they were for blacks, whereas there were no differences for forcible rape.”

    A 2015 study of American men based on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health found that controlling for IQ and lifetime records of violence completely accounted for racial differences in arrest rates.

    NIBRS data come disproportionately from smaller police departments. In 2013, only 10 percent of the population covered by the system lived in cities of 250,000 and greater. What do arrest statistics show for large metropolitan areas?

    New York City, for example, does not participate in NIBRS but it records the races of arrested offenders, and consistently distinguishes between whites and Hispanics. In 2014, 374 people were arrested for murder. Their races were as follows:

    White: 2.9 percent

    Black: 61.8 percent

    Hispanic: 31.8 percent

    Asian: 2.7 percent

    Other: 0.8 percent

    Police take murder very seriously and investigate all cases carefully. Press and judicial system scrutiny are high. Arrest rates for murder therefore track actual crime rates more closely than for any other crime. Murder is probably the crime for which it would be most difficult for police to make “biased” arrests even if they wanted.

    Given a population (page B1 of report) that was 32.8 percent white, 22.6 percent black, 28.9 percent Hispanic, and 13.0 percent Asian, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely than a white, and an Asian was twice as likely. These multiples and those for other crimes appear as graphs on the next page. A “shooting” is discharge of a firearm in which a bullet strikes a person.

    There is another way to express these disparities. If New York City had been all white in 2014 — and the additional whites committed crimes at the same rates as the city’s actual white residents — there would have been 32 murder arrests instead of 374, 1,844 robbery arrests instead of 10,163, and 16 arrests for shootings rather than 503. These figures would reflect reductions in these crimes of no less than 91, 81, and 97 percent, respectively.

    Like New York, Chicago keeps detailed annual statistics on major crimes. Until 2010, it published the race of offenders, but after the election of Mayor Rahm Emanuel, it stopped releasing that information. The 2010 report (page 35) shows that, like New York City, there are stark racial differences. Arrests for murder were as follows: whites — 8, blacks — 190, Hispanics — 48, Asians — 1.

    The racial mix of Chicago’s population in 2010, as reported on page 25 of the police department report (whites — 31.7 percent, blacks — 32.4 percent, Hispanics — 28.9 percent, Asians — 5.4 percent) meant that a Chicago black was 24 times more likely than a Chicago white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 6.7 times more likely.

    Sweden did the same – stopped ethnic records of offenders, for some reason….

    The Department of Justice keeps national records on murder. In 2013, it reported 5,621 single-offender, single-victim cases in which the race of the murderer was known. Like most federal statistics, there is no clear distinction between whites and Hispanics, so the only meaningful racial categories are black and non-black. Blacks killed 2,698 people — 48 percent of the total — and non-blacks killed 2,923 or 52 percent. Since blacks were just 13.3 percent of the population, it meant a black was six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder. Although most murders are within the same race, blacks were 13.6 times more likely to kill non-blacks than non-blacks were to kill blacks.

    The figures for rape are as I stated at 7.42pm


    “The actual history of interracial rape – according to FBI statistics – is that, since the 70’s, approximately 15,000 to 36,000 white women have been raped by black men every year, while, on average, zero black women are raped by black men.” (The Department of Justice uses “0” to denote fewer than ten victims.”

    ― Ann Coulter, Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America

  9. “The figures for rape are as I stated at 7.42pm”

    Which I pointed out are bollocks, no matter how much you and Ann Coulter shrill about them. It is based on extrapolating out where less than 10 people had said it happened.

  10. Immigrants committing sex crimes against women is the perfect storm for Allan as his disdain for immigration is only matched by his disdain for women.

    In fact, his crocodile tears for rape and murder victims are so sincere that he’s even mocked some of them.

  11. Which I pointed out are bollocks, no matter how much you and Ann Coulter shrill about them. It is based on extrapolating out where less than 10 people had said it happened.

    Seamus – fewer than 10 black women in the US were raped by white men whereas several thousands of white women were raped by black men. Let’s go with the worst case, and 10 black women were raped by white men and compare it with the thousands of white women raped by black men. 10 versus 20,000 is over 1000:1 and so the one disappears off the stats in percentages

    As for the women in Europe who have been raped and murdered by 3rd-world immigrants which Paul does not dispute, those who wanted their murderers in their own towns and cities knew what these beasts are like but figured that they could virtue-signal because the victim would almost certainly be somebody else. As is seen, sometimes it’s not ‘somebody else’:

    Let’s start with Sweden – it’s the perfect place, but Seamus seems to have missed this……


    And a classic……

    This is what happens when it isn’t ‘somebody else’.


    An Afghan man who claimed he was 17 years old to be granted asylum in Germany where he later raped and killed an EU official’s daughter is 33 years old, a court heard.

    Hussein Khavari ambushed 19-year-old medical student Maria Ladenburger in Freiberg in October last year before raping her and drowning her in a river.

    EU official, faciliating the admission into the EU of his daughter’s murderer. What about the victim?


    Maria Ladenburger arbeitete wie ihre Eltern in der “Flüchtlingshilfe”….

    Like her parents, Maria ladenburger worked in Refugee Aid…..

    In such instances, the same question: in the last moments of life, did the victim change his/her mind?

  12. “Seamus – fewer than 10 black women in the US were raped by white men whereas several thousands of white women were raped by black men.”

    Actually no. The survey found that less than 10 white women were raped by black men (and was then extrapolated out). It is the danger of extrapolating statistics based on a very small sample size.


    That is the data that racists like yourself (and Coulter, and David Duke etc) have been clinging to. 2008 is the most recent I can find. I imagine there are more recent.

    White victim, black perpetrator: 16.4*

    And what does the asterisk mean? “*Estimate is based on about 10 or fewer sample cases.”

    So the tens of thousands of what women being raped by black men is an estimate “based on about 10 or fewer sample cases”.

  13. And back home……


    Here almost 60,000 rapes are reported to the police each year – more than double the number in India, in a far smaller country.

    Experts believe the true figure is at least 10 times that – 600,000 attacks

    But, when they set foot on the 1st-world’s magic soil, their rapeyness evaporates: that is what realists are being asked to believe

  14. That’s right, because what goes on doesn’t get reported. This was unbelievable, though you won’t find it unbelievable…..because some whites are off my scale, but not yours


    In these “pet owner killed by jungle animal” situations, the pet owner is always to blame. If a man’s toddler is eaten by his pet 30-foot-snake, it’s the man’s fault for introducing a 30-foot-snake into his toddler’s environment.

    In this case, no innocent children or even real people were harmed by the accident, only baby boomers. Baby boomers are like human bodies which have lost brain function but which are kept alive by insulin injections and McDonalds.

    It’s when WTF is not enough

  15. Funnily enough, that’s the experience of an increasing number of European girls.

    And funnilly enough, measles is the experience of an increasing number of American children:

    “A county in New York state has declared a state of emergency following a severe outbreak of measles, but what’s behind the rise in the number of cases? The announcement in Rockland County follows other outbreaks of the disease in Washington, California, Texas and Illinois.

    Vaccination rates have dropped steadily in the US with many parents objecting for philosophical or religious reasons, or because they believe discredited information that vaccines cause autism in children…”

    Needless to add that you-know-who has given support to the anti-vaxxer cause.


  16. “If there is one thing pro-vaccine campaigners and their opponents probably agree on, it is that Donald Trump has provided a major boost to the anti-vaccine cause. On more than 20 occasions, Mr Trump has tweeted about there being a link between vaccines and autism, something experts at the government’s leading public health institute say is not true. He also repeated the claim during a Republican primary debate, a remark that was immediately dismissed as false by the Autistic Self Advocacy Network.

    Prior the election, Mr Trump met with four prominent anti-vaccine campaigners at a fundraiser in Florida – disbarred British doctor Andrew Wakefield, Mark Blaxill, editor-at-large of the Age of Autism website, Gary Kompothecras, a chiropractor and Trump donor from Sarasota, and Jennifer Larson, an entrepreneur who has campaigned against the use of vaccines in her home state of Minnesota.”


  17. Anti Vaxers include granolahead liberal trendies from the coasts and right wing conspiracy nuts

    They are an anti science danger to the public health

  18. So what was Blair, the one with trousers 😉 trying to say ? What did she hope to achieve? And what action is she likely to support ?

    I have become very cynical when these women who have political ambitions of their own suddenly find themselves a cause to stand on. And I do mean stand on as in to elevate themselves.

  19. What ? A woman with political ambitions of her own ! absolutely disgraceful.

    I agree with you Mark, the world’s gone mad 😉

  20. Women with political ambitions of their own you say???

    Damn fillies, next they’ll be wanting to drive.

  21. Phantom, on March 28th, 2019 at 1:53 AM Said:

    Anti Vaxers include granolahead liberal trendies from the coasts and right wing conspiracy nuts

    They are an anti science danger to the public health

    How many vaccines are ‘required’ and how do the rates of autism match?

    What happens when there are no vaccines…….


    I’m about at that point when it comes to the Amish and their amazingly good health.

    There’s been story after story reporting the relative absence of Alzheimer’s, allergies, asthma – you know, the big chronic disorders that plague the people who live around them, namely the rest of us. Not to mention — not ever — the lack of autism.

    Autism aside, the medical and media establishments still manage to evade the logical implications – something is protecting the overall health of this insular community whose rejection of many contemporary norms is legendary. You would think they would want to find out what that something is and try to clone it, stat, especially as the same disorders and diseases hit epidemic rates outside the Amish world and these same “experts” express complete bafflement about what’s going on.

  22. Your Baby’s Best Shot: Why Vaccines are Safe and Save Lives

    By Stacy Mintzer Herlihy, E. Allison Hagood


    Yes, they do, and yes, they do.

    Many Amish vaccinate, and many of them get autism. According to a report by the online magazine Autism News Beat, the Lancaster Amish community is home to the Clinic for Special Children (CSC). A reporter from the magazine made a call to the clinic and learned the following: “The idea that the Amish do not vaccinate their children is untrue,” says Dr. Kevin Strauss, MD, a pediatrician at the CSC. “We run a weekly vaccination clinic and it’s very busy.” He says Amish vaccination rates are lower than the general population’s, but younger Amish are more likely to be vaccinated than older generations.
    Strauss also sees plenty of Amish children showing symptoms of autism.

  23. http://www.vaccinews.net/2014/04/anecdotal-amish-dont-vaccinate-claims-disproved-by-fact-based-study/

    Yesterday, Reuters Health reported on a recent study in Pediatrics titled “Underimmunization in Ohio’s Amish: Parental Fears Are a Greater Obstacle Than Access to Care.” The study found that majority of Amish parents do, in fact, vaccinate their children…and among the minority that don’t, the most common reasons cited were the same anti-vaccine fueled fears that have infected people around the country.

  24. Many Amish vaccinate, and many of them get autism

    There it is – vaccines cause autism.

    Vaccines are a huge earner for big-pharma and the idea that big-pharma is interested in people’s health is nonsense: big-pharma is interested in money, and long-term chronic illness of cash-cows is a fantastic earner for them.


    The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on
    Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?

    Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD
    Neural Dynamics Research Group, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8,

    Vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants are involved, full consent with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.
    Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct.

    Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.

    Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained.

    Oh dear – withholding results of adverse reactions (I assume that death is an adverse reaction?) skews the risk assessment outcome, and the fact of doing so is conspiracy.

    But who are the conspirators and do they have ‘skin in the game’?

    The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake.

    Seamus – you can believe whatever it is that makes you comfortable, but the reality of the conduct of the big pharmaceuticals is that they are mired in corruption and will use any product to be pushed by any dupe doctor in anybody stupid enough to allow a mix of toxins to be injected into them. There is a revolving door between the pharmaceutical companies and the governmental bodies which decide policy. This is an analogue of the banking/regulator revolving door – no conspiracies of course.

  25. “There it is – vaccines cause autism.”

    Nope. Just proof that on both of your assertions (that Amish people don’t get autism and that Amish people don’t get vaccinations) you were incorrect. That is all the evidence we have. Is that you are a moron.

    “you can believe whatever it is that makes you comfortable”

    Well you clearly do, no matter how moronic it is.

  26. Just proof that on both of your assertions (that Amish people don’t get autism and that Amish people don’t get vaccinations) you were incorrect.

    Not so…..


    So the allergies rate amongst Amish is very low – but what about autism? That doesn’t seem to be mentioned.


    Researchers studied Penn State Children’s Hospital’s medical records for children under 18 who were diagnosed with a VPD from 2005-’15. Children were classified as Plain (Amish and Mennonite) or non-Plain, although when looking at rates, researchers did not have enough data to include the Mennonite population.

    Roughly 92% of the Plain children in the study were unvaccinated compared to 17% of the non-Plain children.



    Although more VPDs occurred in non-Amish children, Amish children had an increased risk of a VPD requiring hospitalization compared with non-Amish children. Except for pneumococcus, all VPDs were more common in children who were either unvaccinated or immunocompromised. Ninety-two percent of Plain children were unvaccinated, suggesting that interventions to increase vaccination among these communities could decrease the number of VPDs admitted at our center.

    VPDs – so-called ‘vaccine preventable disease’ noting that children who had been vaccinated got the disease that the vaccine was supposed to prevent

  27. Amish people tend to be more rural, less urban etc… Most studies have concluded that the growth in things like allergies, hayfever etc.. has come from an increasingly urban population.

    And yes, Amish children are less likely to be vaccinated than other children but it is simply false to say the majority of Amish children are not vaccinated.

    There is also no link between vaccinations and autism.

  28. Still on vaccines and autism……..


    A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.


    The reason for the rapid rise of autism in the United States that began in the 1990s is a mystery. Although individuals probably have a genetic predisposition to develop autism, researchers suspect that one or more environmental triggers are also needed. One of those triggers might be the battery of vaccinations that young children receive. Using regression analysis and controlling for family income and ethnicity, the relationship between the proportion of children who received the recommended vaccines by age 2 years and the prevalence of autism (AUT) or speech or language impairment (SLI) in each U.S. state from 2001 and 2007 was determined. A positive and statistically significant relationship was found: The higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher was the prevalence of AUT or SLI.

    Further study into the relationship between vaccines and autism is warranted.

    As if that’s going to happen?? Too much money would be lost to big-pharma’s revenue stream not to mention law suits etc

    See page 2 of 45

    2 Assertions
    In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:
    1)Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;
    2)Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;
    3)On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in conflict with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;
    4)Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;
    5)Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;
    6)Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine paediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;
    7)Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;
    8)Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage; Notably, all of these actions appear to violate the JCVI’s own Code of Practice (http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@ab/documents/digitalasset/dh_115363.pdf).

    Noteworthy is how a leftist (Seamus) is stating that big-pharma really does care for the people and that it’s not about money. This shows how the corporate-left is just as much the property of corporatism as the corporate-right

  29. Gayle DeLong is not a doctor. She is a quack Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at Zicklin School of Business.

    “Noteworthy is how a leftist (Seamus) is stating that big-pharma really does care for the people and that it’s not about money. This shows how the corporate-left is just as much the property of corporatism as the corporate-right”

    I don’t believe that big-pharma cares for the people. They want to make money. However, study, after study, after study, after study, shows there is no link between autism and vaccinations, carried out people with no link to big-pharma.

    So stop peddling bollocks.

  30. Let’s take a closer look at how much Seamus’s corporate-pharma cares for ‘the people’……

    Here’s a beauty. An MMR vaccine branded in Canada as Trivirix was withdrawn in 1988 because of the unacceptably high numbers of adverse reactions, so the UK bought it and labelled it Pluserix. It’s just tremendous – I’m so proud of our medical establishment.


    page 9 of 45

    What is rather astonishing is that the four-year old Canadian concerns over the safety profile of the MMR vaccine (which had been confirmed in 1989), were apparently ignored by the JCVI or at least, not given much credence. While the Canadian Health Authorities suspended the use of the Urabe-9 MMR in 1988, the UK introduced it along with a vigorous promotional campaign. In a confidential meeting of the JCVI Working Party on the introduction of measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)vaccine on 11thFebruary 1988 (http://www.dh.gov.uk/ab/JCVI/DH_095297):

    As for the alleged “slender” Canadian data on safety hazards of the SKF (Smith Kline and French) Urabe MMR vaccine, in a confidential JCVI CSM/DH Joint Sub-committee on Adverse Reactions meeting on 7thMarch 1990 (http://www.dh.gov.uk/ab/JCVI/DH_095294) the following was
    disclosed:(6. Adverse reactions to MMR vaccine)
    “In Canada, the MSD vaccine had been used exclusively [Jeryl Lynn strain-containing MMR]. Following the introduction of SKF product, the cases of meningoencephalitis had been reported. When distribution of the SKF vaccine was halted, no further cases of meningoencephalitis were reported.”
    Yet, from this clear evidence, the JCVI derived a conclusion that somewhat seems to defy logic:
    “It was suggested that, due to different reaction criteria and methods of data collection, reporting in different countries should not be compared.”
    In summary, the JCVI endorsed and promoted a policy of vaccinating every child in the UK with the Urabe-9 MMR vaccine, in spite of the evidence that this would have caused a greater risk of encephalitis in children, when compared to the alternative Jeryl Lynn version of the MMR. It was only under pressure from a potential legal action that the JCVI and DH decided that it was due time “to act quickly” and withdraw the Urabe MMR from use in routine vaccinations.

    Be absolutely clear that the only thing that stopped a dangerous vaccine being injected into British children was the threat (at the time) of a lawsuit. The government then granted blanket immunity to the pharmas on that matter…….

    And the excoriation of Andrew Wakefield is particularly telling because the can of worms that Wakefield opened would end the entire casino if it weren’t clamped by corporate media etc….

    page 21 of 45

    Finally, far from being “discredited” and “flawed” as suggested in latest editorials published in the BMJ [7], the “Wakefield’s hypothesis”, which indicates that there is “a pattern of colitis and ileal-lymphoidnodular hyperplasia in children with developmental disorders” [3], is now supported by more independent research [8-12]. Notably, several respectable publications suggest that the principal findings of the Wakefield’s 1998 Lancet study should not be discarded nor ignored. For example:
    Quigley and Hurley [13]:
    “Wakefield et al. are to be congratulated on opening yet another window onto the ever-broadening spectrum of gut/brain interactions. Their findings raise many challenging questions that should provoke further much-needed research in this area, research that may provide true grounds for optimism for affected patients and their families.”

    The report linked above is a review of the transcripts of meetings of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and the conclusion is…..

    In conclusion, by apparently prioritizing vaccination policy over vaccine safety, the JCVI, the DH and the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) may have shown a disregard for the safety of children. Through selective data reporting, the JCVI in conjunction with the DH, has promulgated information relating to vaccine safety that may be inaccurate and potentially misleading, thereby making it impossible for the parents to make a fully informed consent regarding vaccination. Furthermore, by 1) apparently misleading patients about the true risks of adverse reactions as to gain their consent for the administration of the treatment and 2) seemingly siding with vaccine manufacturers rather than public health interests, the JCVI and the CSM appear to have signally failed their fiduciary duty to protect individuals from vaccines of questionable safety. If these provisional conclusions are indeed correct, then the information presented here may help us in understanding the UK government’s and the JCVI’s official position on vaccine damage, that is, one of persistent denial.

    ……that it’s a conspiracy to make money for corporates by harming the health of our children

  31. http://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/gsk-hit-with-380m-corruption-fine-in-china-1.1935191

    A Chinese court has fined British pharmaceuticals firm GlaxoSmithKline three billion yuan (€380 million) for paying bribes, the biggest fine ever imposed in China and evidence of a tougher business climate for foreign firms.

    The record penalty follows allegations the drug giant ordered staff to bribe doctors and hospital officials to use GSK products, using up to three billion yuan channelled through travel agencies.

    WHOA!!! I thought that the benefits of vaccines were so beyond-dispute that no bribery is needed?

    Seamus, on March 28th, 2019 at 10:53 PM Said:

    Gayle DeLong is not a doctor. She is a quack Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at Zicklin School of Business.

    here’s another bunch of quacks………


    5.d. Comments on Professor Stewart’s letter)
    “Professor Gilliatt observed that in the Meade Panel Study one-third of children with brain damage were not admitted to hospital. In both the Meade and Dudgeon studies there were examples of children who had a fit soon after vaccination which was followed by a fit at a later time and then followed by cessation of development. It was very difficult to assess this as a random event.”

    Surely fits and seizures following vaccination is a bad thing, a very bad thing indeed? The rate of vaccination and the scale of adverse reaction (death is an adverse reaction) increase in tandem: there can be no denying the link.

  32. I see that there’s a high-profile rape-murder of a student in South Carolina – and you’ll never guess who was arrested……


    Fox News:

    A South Carolina man was charged Saturday with the kidnapping and murder of University of South Carolina student Samantha Josephson; police say they believe he picked her up in a vehicle, killed her and dumped her body in a wooded area.

    Chief William H. Holbrook, with the Columbia Police Department, said at a news conference on Saturday night that authorities had charged 24-year-old Nathaniel Rowland with killing Josephson, 21. A traffic stop reportedly found the victim’s blood in his car.

    And cohencidentally, in London…….



    The Metropolitan Police are hunting a 6’3″ black male suspect after four people were approached from the back and stabbed, seemingly at random, in the Edmonton area of London.

    The first of the four victims was a 45-year-old woman, approached from behind on Saturday, March 30th on Aberdeen Road, shortly after 7 p.m., and stabbed in the back. She remains in “critical condition”, according to an official police statement.

    The second, male victim was targetted shortly after midnight in Park Avenue, although his injuries are not believed to be life-threatening.

    A third victim, another male, aged 23, was attended at the Seven Sisters tube station at 3:55 a.m., having been stabbed possibly in Silver Street. His condition is described as “critical”.

    The fourth and, so far, final victim, was stabbed in the back at 09:43 hours in Brettenham Road. His injuries are described as “not life-threatening but potentially life-changing” — which generally indicates that a serious disabling or disfiguring injury has been inflicted.

    It’s something about needing the pavement-apes to pay for our pensions……?

Comments are closed.