15 1 min 1 yr

The New York Times ran an in-depth story Monday on Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s adoptions from Haiti. The story, which is the result of more than three weeks’ investigation by the Times, turns up nothing in the way of bombshell revelations. It does, however, fly in the face of pleas by adoption experts not to make children’s lives the center of a politically motivated investigation.  The Times uses quotes from Barrett and her family in prior speeches and interviews to insert their voices into the story. But it’s inescapably clear that reporters went on a fishing expedition, combing through the records of the Barretts’ adoption agency, interviewing families who adopted from Haiti contemporaneously, and seeking out information on the orphanage from which the children were adopted.

While at the sametime they Praise Louie Farrakhan.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

15 thoughts on “NYTs attack Judge Barret’s Children

  1. How does it attack her children? Even your racist far-right conspiracy theory site says:

    Whether from restraint or lack of content, the Times article avoids being an overt hit piece. On first blush it reads almost like a personal profile

  2. ” Investigation of Amy Comey Barrett’s Children “

    You may wish to read the article. It’s nothing of the sort.

  3. “Where in the article is there an attack on the children”

    It doesn’t. Even his racist far-right conspiracy theory friends admit that.

  4. Half the stuff on the internet, including on very many right wing junk sites, is like this – complete bullshit, at best

  5. Eric and Trump Jnr , the beavis and butthead of 2020 are going after Joe Biden’s Son night and day, like 2 high school kids on crack and you have the front to post this .

  6. Half the stuff on the internet, including on very many right wing junk sites, is like this – complete bullshit, at best

    Absolutely correct, and they will be propagated across the internet with increasing regularity the closer the election comes.

    There was no ‘attack’ on Coney Barrett’s children but it’ll be good to see the same faux moral indignation the next time Biden’s children are attacked.

  7. Biden’s son is an adult, who has done a long series of bad and questionable things.

    Not the same as the judge’s young kids at all. Patrick should not use the judge’s young kids as pawns in a fake argument.

  8. “Biden’s son is an adult, who has done a long series of bad and questionable things.”

    Which are not relevant to any discussion on his father’s fitness to be the President of the United States. They attack Hunter Biden to attack Joe Biden. So if playing the kids is now acceptable then playing the kids is now acceptable.

  9. I think that Hunter Biden’s fake jobs in corrupt nations are a legitimate issue.

    It looks like hell. All these political crime families – the Biden, Clinton, Trump mobs, are subject to sharp criticism.

    My only comment here is that the three laptops being repaired in Delaware by a Trump supporting blind man for a California customer a sounds a tiny bit suspicious.

  10. “I think that Hunter Biden’s fake jobs in corrupt nations are a legitimate issue.”

    If there is evidence tying it back to his father, or that it had an impact on his father.

    What is certainly not an issue that has any relevancy is Hunter Biden’s drug use, for example. But that didn’t stop Patrick masturbating so much over the story that he could have got a job at the New Yorker.

  11. Biden’s son is an adult, who has done a long series of bad and questionable things.

    Speaking as a father, that’s an irrelevance. Hunter Biden’s employment record has sweet FA to do with his father, which it’s being used to attempt to attack.

    There was no ‘attack’ on Coney Barrett’s children. Biden Jr’s weakness of character has been used to continuously attack his father is the most dispicable ways.

  12. The commie media are so transparent.

    They refuse to look at Hunter Biden’s own (highly incriminatory) emails but when it comes to ACB’s family matters and hunting down Brett Kavanaugh’s school friends in the hope of a juicy quote they are super sleuths.

  13. The Hunter Biden e mails may be fake. Caution is just due diligence. ACB is about to join for life the Supreme Court, arguably after the office of President a position that has the greatest ongoing influence on public life. The public being given a detailed profile of her life which includes how her family came to be is perfectly appropriate business for the media to report.

Comments are closed.