
It does tend to give the game away slightly when the plot is divulged before the film is shown on the screen.
As with Hollywood, so with our mealy-mouthed friends in the Labour movement. Because of our slightly twisted voting system, Labour seats get the title ‘Safe’ because it takes on average ten thousand fewer votes to get a Labour person elected than a Tory, mainly because the Labour seats are ‘urban’ and the Tory seats are ‘rural’; thus giving the title of a ‘Safe Seat’ to a constituency which has usually returned a Labour vote for many elections.
So the Labour bloke states that the Muslims get looked after by Labour better than the others, and also have more muslim candidates in ‘SAFE SEATS’, does this mean that they are subverting the will of the people? No, they are playing the numbers game with our Democracy, and it is all perfectly legal, except with all those suspiciously high numbers of Postal Votes!
2 thoughts on “Ahhh…yes, the Muslim Vote!”
Comments are closed.
it takes on average ten thousand fewer votes to get a Labour person elected than a Tory
Yes, and about 20,000 votes less to elect a Tory than a Lib Dem.
Let’s reform the voting system so that all votes count equally, and end the absurd lottery of FPTP.
Found this over at John Jay ray’s blog. It seem pertenent to th upcoming elections:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1270230/Pensioners-red-white-blue-election-protest-poster-branded-racist-police.html