
The question is, are they being pro-active, reactive, retrospective, introspective, or just plain silly?
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]
6 thoughts on “Another Trayvon query”
Comments are closed.
a dissenting review of contemporary British & American politics
The question is, are they being pro-active, reactive, retrospective, introspective, or just plain silly?
Comments are closed.
they’re being responsible, in the sense that now would not be a good time to release a film that makes fun of a situation that is being attacked by the racist industry cheer led by the president
Bad fortune for the people who made that film
As was the case ages ago when someone had an exceptionally unfortunate name for a Appetite Suppressing Candy
Though it had been a popular enough product, the name was radioactive for obvious reasons and it was soon withdrawn from the market.
I read that Zimmerman received medical attention at the scene and was cleaned up. The video was pretty grainy too so that proves exactly the square root of bugger all.
On a related note Obama too busy to say that if he had a son he’d be exactly like Shawn Tyson then?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9173820/Parents-of-murdered-British-students-criticise-Barack-Obama.html
Ya got 13 minutes to spend learning some important facts?
How about listening to one of the “brothers” dealing some common sense:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A–dNCkr8co
https://twitter.com/#%21/KillZimmerman
A ‘twitter’ page.
Yeah, it’s so obvious that the real victim in all this is the shooter Zimmermann. The coon (Zimmermann’s word) got just what he deserved.
And I know there are several of this parish who think just that. They know who they are.