2 2 mins 9 yrs

 

Art, as a definite physical object, is usually easy to define. Whether a painting, a sculpture, a musical score, an opera, a song or a film; the end result is hopefully to delight, to entertain, to hush to a reverent silence, to amaze, to arouse silent or dormant feelings. Art is produced also so that the artist may live and prosper, so that they might produce more of their works for our enjoyment.

But there are also forms of art which are produced which state, quite openly, that the artist is so close to genius that they don’t have to worry about ordinary folks’ approbation or approval, because we couldn’t possibly understand their work, mainly because the ‘artist’ is ‘above’ all normal criticism. I myself published a fairly mild criticism of an exhibition at a gallery near where I live, and the thunderous reproof received by return was amazing.

So what are we to make of the three minutes of idle chatter broadcast each morning this week just after the BBC Today programme; three minutes of garbled voices, saying absolutely nothing of interest or value; all produced by ‘artists’ who presumably, will be paid, and paid well, for their ‘services’.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

2 thoughts on “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

  1. This seems to have been copied from Channel 4’s funny five minutes after their news programme.

  2. Yes Mike, I heard that too. It was followed by Wimmin’s Hour.

    If you want another belly-full of BBC bullshit then tune in to the World Service after 3am. It’s then that they let the REAL lunatics out of the asylum.
    Appalling, dismally low standards.

Comments are closed.