15 1 min 9 yrs

Just this...concerning what happened in that Mall in Nairobi.

Soldiers told of the horrific torture meted out by terrorists in the Nairobi mall massacre yesterday with claims hostages were dismembered, had their eyes gouged out and were left hanging from hooks in the ceiling. 

Men were said to have been castrated and had fingers removed with pliers before being blinded and hanged.

Children were found dead in the food court fridges with knives still embedded in their bodies, it was claimed.

And the guilty?

Most of the defeated terrorists, meanwhile, were reportedly discovered ‘burnt to ashes’, set alight by the last extremist standing to try to protect their identities.  The horrifying details came yesterday as the first pictures emerged from within the wreckage of the building, showing piles of bodies left strewn across the floor.

 

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

15 thoughts on “BEYOND COMMENT…

  1. …..eyes gouged out and were left hanging from hooks in the ceiling.

    Men were said to have been castrated and had fingers removed with pliers before being blinded and hanged.

    Children were found dead in the food court fridges with knives still embedded in their bodies, it was claimed.

    How did the ‘terrorists’ manage to do this whilst they were fending off counter-attackes from security forces, dramatic photographs of whom have been shown in the same newspaper?

    And

    Most of the defeated terrorists, meanwhile, were reportedly discovered ‘burnt to ashes’, set alight by the last extremist standing to try to protect their identities.

    How convenient!

  2. We’ll see the truth or otherwise of the claims. The photos show that the car park was destroyed, and I don’t recall seeing any smoke from the shopping centre itself. I don’t think the hostages would have been held in the car park, so how the attackers were incinerated is a mystery for now.

    As always, the media does a great job of flinging out info and disinfo. It’s so confusing as to be useless.

    We were told for days that Samantha Lewthwaite (aka ‘The White Widow’ – ohhhh scary) led the attack. Eye witnesses were reported to have seen a white woman barking out the orders and shooting her weapon.

    All of a sudden, Interpol issues a worldwide warrant for her arrest. Well is she in the shopping centre or not?

    Other reports talk of the South African ‘lair’ she had, which is a house. Other reports talk of her as the world’s most wanted woman, the mastermind of the attack.

    Frankly, she looks a bit too thick to mastermind anything. The Daily Mail also, bizarrely, tells us what’s in her knicker draw.

    We’re being led up a certain path in all of this, wherever that leads to. As always, we’re being led to believe some pretty daft and contradictory stuff. The media never just reports news. It’s always within an overarching narrative.

  3. Lads,

    The reason for the contradictions is that journalists are competitive and fall over each other to get the scoop – often leading to them jumping the gun with speculation and hearsay. It’s pretty easy to understand.

    It isn’t a big conspiracy. Govts and their agencies are just not that clever or organized – Pete, you should know that.

  4. Journalist aren’t getting any ‘scoop’ – they are simply printing what has been passed to them from the news agencies which control news flow to the corporate outlets. Two days ago were were told by corporate media that al-Shababadabadoodah had released the names of the perpetrators on twitter and there were the names listed – now we’re told that they burnt themselves to ashes to prevent identification.

    One point of note: throughout the entire duration of al-qaeda’s ‘war’ against the west, not one neo-con or pillar of Establishment power has been attacked, never mind killed, and there are usually convenient dental appointments or meetings missed etc by which they esacpe ‘fortunately’. When the IRA was active against the British authorities, the government and judiciary were targeted and several members of the Establishment were killed. To me, that shows it was real – the attack on the The Queen’s Parade, the Brighton bombing, the mortar attack on the Major Cabinet etc. – those are real. I doubt that the neo-cons’ security is so perfect that they can’t be targetted, especially given America’s open borders. No – the neo-cons are immune because they run the show.

  5. Allan,

    Unsubstantiated bollocks.

    Personally, I think the so-called “white widow” is just yet another alter-ego of arch-illumimati puppet master – Willie “Abu Hamza” Frazer. Has anyone here ever seen them in the same room? No? I rest my case.

  6. // not one neo-con or pillar of Establishment power has been attacked, never mind killed, …and there are usually convenient dental appointments or meetings missed etc by which they esacpe ‘fortunately’.//

    But when the very top man, the president, is in fact murdered, boy, that’s when the real conspiracy theorising starts.

    //Did you see that picture?//

    It’s a beaut. Does anyone know what point Willie Frazer/Abu Hamza/The White Widow was trying to make? Did he want to be extradited somewhere?

  7. MourneReg –

    That journalists are competitive and want the scoop is true, but only part of the picture. There’s always an overarching narrative within which key stories are placed.

    Noel Cunningham –

    Well, that a president was bumped off is proof that someone wanted to do him in, but the alternative theories only came out after the Establishment tried to get away with the nonsensical claim that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated him and that he acted alone.

  8. // not one neo-con or pillar of Establishment power has been attacked, never mind killed, …and there are usually convenient dental appointments or meetings missed etc by which they esacpe ‘fortunately’.//

    But when the very top man, the president, is in fact murdered, boy, that’s when the real conspiracy theorising starts.

    Brilliant Noel, just brilliant – JFK was a neo-con decades before the term and the aggressive ideology came into existence!? He really was ahead of his time! Stupidity aside, do you really believe that JFK would have backed the ideology of these ‘neo-cons’?

    Reg – that ‘reporters’ take script from news agencies is a fact: it’s a fact, fact, fact and you could substantiate it yourself by typing something of interest into your search engine and up will pop a whole load of links to various media outlets – to exactly the same original report. Now show me where any Establishment figure has been the subject of an actual life-threatening attack? Blair, Clinton, Major, Wolfowitz et al – all pefectly safe, no security concerns because nobody is out to get them. Whoever these ‘terrorists’ are, they are out to attack the public.

  9. What a stroke of luck an armed SAS trooper was ambling about the shopping centre doing some window shopping the same day as a boogeyman terrorist attack.

    So, now we have dissapearing self-combustible Islamic terrorists … give me strength.

  10. So, now we have dissapearing self-combustible Islamic terrorists

    It’s true – it’s in the Daily Mail. Ask Noel and Reg – they believe.

Comments are closed.