24 2 mins 7 yrs

This is just the beginning, the demography is happening across the country, it is simply more obvious in those areas where it first started.

Two seats will be contested at the UK General Election where the majority of voters were born overseas. A record four million people born abroad will be able to vote in May after a decade of mass immigration, a study predicted yesterday. The figure – up 500,000 since the last election – represents one-tenth of the electorate. In a historic development, more than half of those eligible to vote in London’s East Ham and Brent North seats were born overseas.

This is what Labour was hoping for when they opened the floodgates in 1997. They imported MILLIONS of people who realise that if the current bloated dysfunctional system is to stay in place, they should really vote for a Party dedicated to ensuring that (In the name of “social fairness)

The entire multicultural agenda is predicated on changing the face of Britain forever. In East Ham and Brent North, that has now happened. Give it five years and see where it has spread.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

24 thoughts on “DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN THE NASCENT PERIOD…

  1. Give it five years and see where it has spread

    And in 10, 15 or 20 years?

    We are going back to the stone age.

  2. And to query the wisdom of the ‘open door’ policy was to invite cries of racism or even of ‘vile racism’, when the narrow and small minded bigots failed to understand that the argument wasn’t against immigration per se, but in the sheer numbers involved.

    Overcrowding of services and infrastructure have always been of concern, but conveniently ignored by politicians, with the consequence that many areas now resemble the 21st century version of a third world society.

    Another example of the inevitable ‘unintended consequence’ of ego inspired political thinking rather than that of an intelligent leadership.

    It is easy to reach the conclusion that Blair et co have done far more damage to our society than Hitler ever did.

  3. The entire multicultural agenda is predicated on changing the face of Britain forever. In East Ham and Brent North, that has now happened. Give it five years and see where it has spread.

    Maybe so, but don’t even think about protesting about any of your concerns on the streets,or you will automatically get screamed and wailed at for being a ‘Nazi’.

  4. This is what Labour was hoping for when they opened the floodgates in 1997

    And it was opposed by the Con-servatives….? Yeah, right. The LibLabCon is united in its drive to destroy the indigenous population – and they all have Friends of Israel sub-groups. Any Friends of the British in amongst them?

  5. I doubt very much that the multi-culti agenda had anything to do some ulterior agenda fostered by any ‘friends of Israel’ group in any of our political parties. The motive, as proven time and again, is primarily one of ‘vote catching’, and nothing else.

    If I am wrong please explain why anyone of the Jewish persuasion, who, being in their ‘right mind,’ would wish to flood the UK, or even Europe with Muslims of any description? – especially with their first hand experience of the barbarities practised by extremists among its followers.

    Also, with your frantic, almost vehement denial of the Holocaust, I am thinking that you are all but calling myself and folk of my generation liars. Unlike yourself, I have had relatives and conversations with people who were there when it happened, not months or years later or from exaggerated news reports produced with perhaps a more political purpose at some later date.

    It happened, and was far from the worst incident of its kind, but it happened close enough to home to have an impact of scary relevance.

    If those who were at that time, among some of the most civilised humans on the planet could behave thus, just what might the future hold for us in the future when things will eventually deteriorate sufficiently to inspire, once again, an ‘anything goes’ attitude to their ‘fellow man’? And that is a question that barely bears thinking about.

  6. Ernest Young, on January 30th, 2015 at 4:25 PM Said:

    I doubt very much that the multi-culti agenda had anything to do some ulterior agenda fostered by any ‘friends of Israel’ group in any of our political parties. The motive, as proven time and again, is primarily one of ‘vote catching’, and nothing else.

    Right, that’s probably why it’s happening all over Europe then, vote catching.

    Okay, got it now, nothing to worry about then.

  7. Ernest

    The rest was not worth commenting on to be honest, it was the usual ‘Denier’ blah, blah, blah, have an opinion by all means on the Holocaust, just don’t ask any questions stuff.

    No offence.

  8. Ernest

    Immigration is such a wonderful thing across every Western Country, and is so successful, I can see why you think it is such a vote winner 😉

    Or, it’s just one huge and amazing coincindence.

    None so blind as those that can not won’t see.

  9. There is no vote-catching conspiracy. There is certainly no protocols of the elders of zion conspiracy – such conspiracies are unworkable and, as Ernest says, belief in them stems from Allan and Harri’s own inherent prejudices.

    In the globalised world there is a much greater ability for goods, services and money to move across borders to meet business requirements and for people to do the same to pursue the resulting opportunities. Only foolish governments would limit this completely but, understandably, people are often uneasy at the unprecedented level of change this brings.

  10. There is no vote-catching conspiracy.

    Clearly there is, and has been for many decades. Tory and Labour governments have done everything possible to fill up our land with as many Third World primitives as they can shovel in. This is deliberate action against the British people, and neer was it discussed openly or put to a vote. It is therefore a conspiracy.

  11. people are often uneasy at the unprecedented level of change this brings.

    Agree, but if anyone dares to protest about it, peacefully or otherwise, they automatically get screamed at and labelled as ‘Nazis’ by the wilfully ignorant and ill-informed.

  12. Harri,

    I am far from being ‘a denier’- (or was that just your bad writing?) – and it happened, and far from being just ‘an opinion’ I know that much of it was fact. Yes, of course there are bound to be some exaggerations, but to suggest it was ‘Jewish inspired’ as Allan suggests is pure lunacy, for the very reason I suggested in my comment.

    Of course some immigration can be beneficial, but the active encouragement by some European governments has proven to be anything but beneficial e.g. Spain, Italy et al, and not forgetting Greece.

    As said in an earlier comment the harm done by ‘open borders’ is the usual ‘unexpected consequence’ of the also usual pathetic level of political thinking of anything beyond the politicians own interests i.e ‘vote catching’ under the guise of ‘liberalism’.

    How we have such ‘freedom of movement’, and yet have to endure the most ridiculous restrictions on our ‘freedom of speech’, surely gives some clue as to the original intent.

    Reg’s comment that globalisation has benefitted from the freedom of movement is also quite fanciful, most of our migrant inflow are of the ‘lower orders’, as is obvious when visiting any of the fast rising ghettoes in our cities. With the collapse of our large post war industrial base we have ample numbers of ‘workers’, we do not need to import more of the same. That ‘workers’ tend to ‘the left’ gives added credence to my thoughts on the multi-culti scenario.

  13. Harri,

    I am far from being ‘a denier’- (or was that just your bad writing?)

    It was just my bad writing.

    Still, nothing to faint about.

  14. Ernest

    Just for the record, as far as I can work out, unlimited immigration has been an unmitigated disaster.

  15. We all seem to agree, – even if arriving at our destination by differing means and reasoning…

    The debate on globalisation, and its consequences seems to be one with widening potential for future vigorous discussion, and it even comes complete with its own ‘unintended consequence,’ The ultimate superfluousness of national governments to that of what we used to call ‘parish councils’… 🙂

  16. Ernest’s comment at 4.25pm requires response:

    I doubt very much that the multi-culti agenda had anything to do some ulterior agenda fostered by any ‘friends of Israel’ group in any of our political parties. The motive, as proven time and again, is primarily one of ‘vote catching’, and nothing else.

    Vote-catching? Why did none of the main parties attempt to catch the votes of the British people first and foremost? The fact is that all major politicians and their parties are beholden to the jewish/Israeli lobby. All jewish organisations in the UK and in every country in the white world are pro-mass-immigration to demographically destructive levels, although there are certainly individual jews who disagree with the policy but allocate no blame to organised jewry.

    http://balder.org/judea/Hate-Speech-Laws-Immigration-Jewish-Influence-Britain.php

  17. Also, with your frantic, almost vehement denial of the Holocaust, I am thinking that you are all but calling myself and folk of my generation liars. Unlike yourself, I have had relatives and conversations with people who were there when it happened, not months or years later or from exaggerated news reports produced with perhaps a more political purpose at some later date.

    “who were there when it happened” – when what happened? I put links to film showing Treblinka to be a fraud, a lie – and here is the lie of Auschwitz. From 09.00 for a few minutes will suffice:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWCOjOj4RAU

  18. There is no specific nefarious and deliberate policy reason for large scale immigration. It was not done at the behest of ‘The Jews’ regardless of what Allan claims, and I very much doubt it was done for ‘vote grabbing’purposes. Like most social phenomenon’s it was a mixture of economic laxitude, ill thought political weakness, a genuine desire not to appear racist and a structural unwillingness to prevent or remove the large numbers of people who freely chose to come. I don’t think anything was deliberate at all.

  19. I don’t think anything was deliberate at all.

    Yeah – it just happened at the same time in every white country, pure cohencidence

  20. The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

    No, nothing deliberate at all.

    He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.

    It just kind of happened, like the weather.

  21. Allan

    It happened because non-white people wanted to come to richer succesfull white countries. Individuals chose to come, they weren’t dragooned here.

  22. Colm – didn’t Peter Mandelson “send out search parties” to get immigrants, just anybody, to come to the UK? Why yes, he did:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10055613/Labour-sent-out-search-parties-for-immigrants-Lord-Mandelson-admits.html

    Between 1997 and 2010, more than 2.2 million immigrants came to the country – more than twice the population of Birmingham – with the annual net figure quadrupling during their time in office.

    Mandelson has jewish heritage. His wish to destroy this country by swamping it in the 3rd-world means that he is biologically jewish.

  23. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1429114/Fury-as-Dalyell-attacks-Blairs-Jewish-cabal.html

    Tam Dalyell, the Father of the House, sparked outrage last night by accusing the Prime Minister of “being unduly influenced by a cabal of Jewish advisers”.

    In an interview with Vanity Fair, the Left-wing Labour MP named Lord Levy, Tony Blair’s personal envoy on the Middle East, Peter Mandelson, whose father was Jewish, and Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, who has Jewish ancestry, as three of the leading figures who had influenced Mr Blair’s policies on the Middle East.

    Lord Janner, a Labour peer and the chairman of the Holocaust Education Trust, said….

    That holoco$t thing is a useful tool to use whenever somebody lifts the rock. Any criticism of jewry and……. the holoco$t etc.

Comments are closed.