11 2 mins 14 yrs

Did you see that a coalition of American Muslim groups is demanding that presumptive Republican nominee John McCain stop using the word "Islamic" to describe terrorists. The Washington Times reports Islamic Society of North America’s secretary general wants McCain to use something he calls "more acceptable to the Muslim community." You want to call them terrorist criminals, fine. But adding the word ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islamic’ certainly doesn’t help our cause as Americans… It paints an entire community of believers, 1.2 billion in total, in a very negative way."

But McCain strategist Steve Schmidt says there will be no changes.

"The reality is, the hateful ideology which underpins bin Ladenism is properly described as radical Islamic extremism. Senator McCain refers to it that way because that is what it is."

He’s so right. They ARE Islamic terrorists and they MUST be called for what they are. McCain gets this right, if nothing else. Here in the UK, the government has banned the use of the expression "Islamic terrorism" in a spectacularly craven act of dhimmitude – I hope the US will not follow. Pretending that Islamic terrorists aren’t Islamic terrorists is denying reality and those US Muslim groups that would seek to engineer this cover up must be questioned. Just WHAT is their agenda?

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

11 thoughts on “DON’T SAY ISLAM!

  1. Here in the UK, the government has banned the use of the expression "Islamic terrorism"

    How did they do that? The US government has no authority to do anything similar.

  2. I have to question the veracity of such reports at times. I mean, OK, dressing up and going out as Darth Vader, sure, we all do that from time to time, and there’s no greater thrill than to vaporize a few of those Jedi heretics.
    But… he drank most of a 10-litre box of cider?? I’ve never seen such an item on display in the supermarkets (perhaps because I’ve never actively searched such an item out?), but even if I had, surely (assuming that one could remain conscious after such a feat of ingestion) one would need to visit the portaloo so often as to render any anti-Jedi activities wholly ineffective?

  3. Alan

    The UK govt. haven’t banned the expression – they don’t have the power. A minister just said that the govt. wouldn;t use such expressions that’s all.

  4. I can understand why sane Muslims don’t like seeing Islam associated with terrorism, but I find it bizarre that they think that the cause of this is to do with people referring to "Islamic terrorism" rather than the fact that self proclaimed Muslims are all too often committing terrorism whilst invoking the name of Islam and are supported by several million other self identified Muslims throughout the world in doing so.

  5. Terrorism done in the name of Islam by Muslims is Islamic Terrrorism. Period. Nobody benefits by putting lipstick on the pig and calling it Sheila. Muslims are the people who are suffering the most from Islamic Terrorism, they are its disproportionate victims and should be outraged that their religion is being hijacked by terrorists. Calling it by another, nicer, name doesn’t change the facts and won’t make it go away.

  6. It was encouraging to read (IF one can believe it, and I have to admit that I was sceptical, and I wondered "is this just the Police and the MSM trying to deliberately and deceitfully downplay things?") that the guy who was arrested this week in England on terror suspicions, his arrest came about following a tip-off from within the Muslim "community" itself.
    Like I say, that is encouraging news, if one can believe it, and I want to…but…I wonder. I hope it’s true, and not just more Labour-instigated lies.

  7. The suicide bombers are doing it for Allah according to their pre-murder videos. They get it all from their holy book.

    If it walks like a duck and quacks…

  8. Don’t they have it backwards. They find it shaming that Islamic terrorists are giving them a bad name so they want people to stop mentioning the fact that the terrorists are Islamic?

    Wouldn’t it be far more effective if the community of believers condemned shunned and denounced the terrorists at every opportunity. A Muslim march against terrorism in London Paris or New York would be a good start.

  9. Great comment Daphne. Islamic terrorism will be defeated when Muslim peoples and govts. become more militant in wnating to stop it than those who want to pursue it.

  10. Muslims will give up terrorism when they find other ways to achieve their aim (as made clear by their ‘prophet’ and their moon-god) of world domination – Sorry, I meant ‘world peace’. How about out-breeding everybody else? It seems to be working in the UK.

Comments are closed.