
I occasionally glance through an American-based and -centred blog which primarily deals with the impact of a Black criminal underclass on America, and came upon this strange and savage story of the short life and tragic death of a two year-old boy named John Swoveland Jr.
His parents committed the grave and unpardonable sin of allowing this toddler to play in the back garden of his home. Two gangs of upright Black citizens were engaged in some strange tribal ritual over either ‘turf’, which is coded talk for who is allowed to sell hard drugs on that particular street corner; or over a perceived lack of ‘Respect’, which is also coded talk for a slight on the recipient’s standing in his ‘community’, or ‘armed gang’. Both gangs were armed, and strangely enough, none had a ‘carry’ permit.
Numerous shots were fired, and one bullet travelled three blocks before striking the body of this small bystander, who hadn’t even reached the age when he would have learnt to take care.
The Reverend Brown said, “They came together in unity and they left in unity. But one thing I know in this community is that it’s going to take the whole community to cease this fire.”
Community? Cease fire? What planet is the man living in!
19 thoughts on “Equality? Respect? You must be joking!”
Comments are closed.
“….before striking the body of this small bystander”.
Can you please not write like some official ‘PC Plod’ report, Mike. It sounds ridiculously pompous.
Ii doesn’t surprise me that someone who lived in Apartheid South Africa for so long would ‘occasionally glance through’ such a non partisan, objective site.
Nothing makes me delight in Obama quite like realising how these people must be eating their hearts for two whole terms of a black president.
Poor kid and family…
In an interview with the New York Times, beleaguered open-range rancher Cliven Bundy said, on thye matter of the negro:
Wrong question as to whether blacks were better off as slaves. The question should have been – were whites better off when blacks were slaves? The answer is ‘yes’: less murder, less rape, less crime generally.
less murder less rape less crime generally… against whites of course. The mass murder rape and systematic criminal behaviour carried out against millions of black slaves doesn’t count at all I guess.
Colm – you’re right. They should have been returned to mother Africa. Seriously, they should have been returned to Africa.
Allan — You are vicious scum.
Predictable response from Tarasov, but it’s an intriguing idea from Allan@Aberdeen.
I wonder what others think his idea that blacks should have been repatriated to Africa to lessen racial strife.
Pete – Abraham Lincoln was intending to do exactly that.
Allan, you spoiled it for him.
Noel Cunningham –
Sorry, I have no idea what you’re talking about. What did Abraham Lincoln intend regarding blacks and repatriation?
Sorry Noel, just in case you’re not sure which Abraham Lincoln I meant: it’s the one everyone is supposed to think of as The Great Emancipator.
Hope that helps.
Who was it that signed that Emancipation Proclamation again?
Hey! Why is Allan getting the title of “vicious scum” when I was originally accorded that honour a week or so back?
I want to head the list, not be second fiddle.
Perhaps the freed black slaves should have deported the whites back to Europe !
by:
Abraham Lincoln
(1809-1865) 16th US President
Source:
Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858
(The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, pp. 145-146.)
Phantom – did your school and college tell you that?
And more:
http://www.etymonline.com/cw/lincoln.htm
The reality is that blacks are utterly dependent upon whitey, both as support and prey. They don’t want to go back to Africa and would flee it – the result of themselves – to get to where there is abundant support and prey in white countries.
Would Mike care if a black child was killed by gun violence? Like in Soweto back when thegovernment fired on children. of course not.
Correct, Mahons. Scum.